Modified broad match vs phrase match strategy - Google Adwords
-
Hi All,
I am looking through a client account that is very mature (10+ years running) on Google AdWords. As soon as it became available, this client adopted a modified broad match (MBM) strategy and has removed all phrase match and exact match keyword types. The account has hundreds of thousands of active keywords. Over the past few years, the CPCs have been rising. While I know that market values of keywords in general have risen consistently year after year, I speculate that this client is actually causing their own prices to go up faster than they should. I have a couple of questions regarding strategy that I am considering that I want to know if anyone else has any experience with...
- by having many MBM versions of the same keyword, is it possible for cannibalization to occur for most of the variations?
Example query: new red running shoes
variations Ad group 1: +red running shoes, +red +running shoes, red +running +shoes, red running +shoes
variations ad group 2: +blue running shoes, +blue +running shoes, blue +running +shoes, blue running +shoesbased on the logic of MBM, the possible matches to this query from the available variations are +red running shoes, +red +running shoes, red +running +shoes, red running +shoes, blue +running +shoes, blue running +shoes. So, if the performance of those blue variations trump the more closely related red variations, this searcher may actually see an ad about blue running shoes, even though they have indicated they are more interested in red.
- in terms of cost, I would anticipate that MBM keywords are more expensive than their phrase match counterparts. can anyone confirm or deny this?
My thoughts are that with several years of actual search terms being collected, this client should be able to do a great job of covering almost every variation of keyword that customers have used and create a strong list of phrase match keywords to satisfy all relevant queries. MBM keywords seem like they are a lazy way of getting traffic at a higher cost that can actually cannibalize close variations that exist in the account, causing the wrong ad to be shown based on matching/relevancy and a higher price CPC in the long run.
Thoughts?
-
Your answers are inaccurate.
-
A higher bid does NOT always win. It's the QS X the bid. If a keyword with a high QS X low bid is greater than a keyword with a low QS x high bid, then the lower bidding keyword can still trigger the ad.
-
There is NO pattern to MBM keywords being more expensive than phrase keywords. The opposite can often be true for high intent keywords where it has been discovered to result in more conversions or lower CPA.
-
-
This is an interesting strategy question. Here are some answers + my thoughts.
- Cannibalization. (Cannibalization is sort of the wrong word, because you do go on to talk about the blue ad group "trumping" the red ad group.) Assuming both keywords have equal bids, Google will always trigger the ad of the associated keyword with the better quality score. (If there are different bids, then simply multiply the bid x QS to determine which would ad would trigger.) The overlap/trumping can still have an adverse effect, whereby the ads are not always relevant to the search intent, thereby reducing CTR and then adversely affecting the Quality Score, and the cycle continues. The reduced Quality Score is the likely reason for the increased average Cost Per Click.
- **Actual cost of different match types. **Is MBM or broad match always more expensive than phrase and exact. No. Sometimes exact and phrase are more expensive than their broad counterparts because high intent keywords come at a premium. Also, MBM covers the phrase match keywords, and one needs to remember that the CPC column you see is just an average of all the keyword clicks combined. You can see the true CPC by looking at the Detailed Search Query report.
Hope that helps!
-
Hey DJ!
- Yes.
(i have to say, I really hope that your client/company isn't focusing on a MBM with something as broad as : +red blah blah, because that's nearly as bad as just broad on the term Red, ok, moving on to answer your question)
Google has gotten significantly better at making the decision to show a Red ad v a Blue ad when the searcher really wants Red, however if the bids are higher on Blue then yes, blue will win out. The best way to protect yourself against bid wars is to build up your negative keyword army (yes, all of them. yes, this is time consuming and it blows a little).
Also, these three different types of MBM should NOT be in the same adgroup. +Red running shoes & red +running +shoes are two completely different types of requests. For instance, think of MBM as phrase match. I wouldn't put "red" and "running shoes" and "shoes" in the same adgroup (at least, that's my opinion). But see the above point, you'll need an ever growing & large list of negative keywords to keep this under wraps, which is a second full time job.
- I haven't looked at it recently, but MBM should definitely get a bit more costly than phrase. Exact being least expensive, or at least on par with Phrase in my experience.
But the bids & strategy are really the major contributing factors. I typically stack my bids highest for exact, then phase, then MBM & broad at the lowest. So I refuse to let them get high. But also stacking bids helps to prevent that cannibalization that you might be seeing.
Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
About how much time should I budget for an adwords audit?
Hi, I'm considering devoting either my time to or jobbing out an adwords audit. The account has about a dozen campaigns and in total about 60 ad groups, 15 landing pages. About 6000 clicks and about 450 lead gen conversions. Conversions are phone and thank you page. The account involves search, display and retargeting. Client is looking for actionable insights about both the account and the landing pages, prioritized, in order to lower cost per lead. Here are my questions: How many hours of work? How extensive of a deliverable is the result? What might this cost if I hired a knowledgeable individual (not a big firm)? Thanks!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | 945010 -
Tracking Adwords users who sumbit a contact form after clicking through my Landing page.
I have a user, Jane, who comes to my landing page through an AdWords campaign. She click off my landing page, browses the website, then submits a contact form on one of the other pages on the site. My problem is when I receive the email from the contact form, there is no identification that this user came through adwords. If she had submitted the contact form on my landing page this wouldn't be a problem, but she submitted the form from elsewhere on the site. I know that I can see a NUMBER of how many goal conversions were achieved this way in Analytics. This is not what I want. I need something to identify it on the CONTACT FORM so that the intake staff in my office can credit that lead to the correct campaign. Any idea on how to achieve this. Technically, I am using the latest version of Wordpress and the Contact Form 7 plug-in. I can change plug-ins if needed.
Conversion Rate Optimization | | McShaneFirm0 -
Browser-based redirect vs. dynamic content
Hey everyone, We have a free browser extension for Chrome and a paid web product for all other browsers. Given the differences in product and pricing (free vs. paid) I'd like visitors to see a different landing page based on their browser. Visitors using Chrome should see a landing page with content about the free browser extension, while visitors from every other browser should see a landing page with content about the paid, premium web product. I'm trying to decide between these two options: a) 302 redirect visitors from one static HTML landing page to another if their user agent suggests they're using Chrome b) Use javascript to make parts of the landing page dynamic and show a different CTA and different copy for visits from Chrome Does anyone have any experience with having to make this choice? What are some things I should take into consideration for optimal "crawlability" and page-load-speed? Thanks in advance!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | ipancake0 -
Google Remarketing Conversions - Possible Issue
Hi All, When it comes to Google Adwords, when considering conversions, Google assigns each conversion back to the click that originally drove that visitor on the day they clicked. so, even if someone converts today, Google would show that conversion as occurring two weeks ago when the visitor originally clicked on a paid search ad and came to my site. fine...whatever. My question now is if we use a remarketing campaign through the Display Network, and someone converts, will that conversion be shown under their new visit or back on their original click where they did not originally convert, causing them to be included in our remarketing audience? Cant seem to find a straight answer anywhere and hoping someone out there has some guidance.
Conversion Rate Optimization | | dsinger0 -
How can I find the redirect that removes special parameter from Adwords?
My main problem is Google Analytics doesn't show data from Google Adwords because a redirect in my site removes the special parameter(gclid) supplied by Adwords. Here's an email from one of Google Adwords representative: "When I reviewed your website, I found that a redirect set up on your site is removing auto-tagging information from your URLs. Auto-tagging automatically adds a parameter to the end of each of your AdWords destination URLs in order to identify visitors as AdWords referrals. The tag captures keyword, campaign, ad content information, and your ad's position when a user clicked it. The parameter used in auto-tagging is called "gclid." However, due to your website's redirect, the "gclid" parameter is being removed from the URL. As a result, Google Analytics is unable to properly track visitors reaching your site through AdWords. We suggest contacting your webmaster to append the "gclid" parameter to the redirected URL. If this isn't possible, you may want to consider removing the use of the redirect." Thanks in advance!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | esiow20130 -
Does Anyone have tips or resources for Adwords Re-targeting Campaigns?
Hey everyone, I have a retargetting campaign with a 0.09% CTR, a 1.04% conversion rate, and a fairly high Cost per conversion. I was wondering if anyone has any tips, resources, ideas, etc. as to how to improve our campaign? Links to external resources would be great. Thank you!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | jhinchcliffe0 -
How do I get Google to rank the right page?
My site ranks #1 for Arabic Interpreting on Google UK. This great, but it's ranking my home page rather than the my specific Arabic Interpreting page. The home page shouldn't really rank for this term as it has very little connection with this exact term. This means that while the site ranks great, the conversion is pretty much zero. How can I get Google to rank the page I've optimised for this term? I know the ranking will no doubt slip but may the conversions will be better. Can you help please?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | GlobalLingo0 -
Google adsense to make money banner ads or text ads for revenue
Hi i am trying to increase my revenue on my site, and i am working with google adsense at the moment and would like some much needed advice. I am not sure what are better, text ads or image ads I have put some links below to show you different sections of my site so people can help me work out for those sections what is better image ads or text ads. also i would really love to know where i am going wrong with the google adsene and would like to know if i am displaying them in the right places. I have good traffic, but low google adsense returns. here are the different sections. the below is travel articles and i am using text ads. http://www.in2town.co.uk/benidorm/benidorm-news/cheap-flights-airline-flybe-drop-credit-card-charges the below is a showbiz gossip article and i have used text ads http://www.in2town.co.uk/news/one-direction/simon-cowell-upsets-one-direction the following is another celebrity gossip article http://www.in2town.co.uk/news/gossip-celebrity/has-david-gest-put-liza-minnelli-off-marriage the below is a health article http://www.in2town.co.uk/news/health-for-women/beauty-expert-says-you-can-avoid-common-spring-skin-scares-for-sensitive-skin-sufferers I would really value your help with the above.
Conversion Rate Optimization | | ClaireH-1848860