2 sites using 1 CMS... issues?
-
Hi,
We are working with a client that has 2 sites in the same sector. They are currently on separate servers, with separate blogs, images galleries etc.
Both sites rank combined for over 200 terms.
IF we were to "combine" the sites on one CMS, with one IP, two separate front ends, one blog stream, one image gallery what do you think the SEO impact would be from this?
We had an issue with another client whose sites were too close and we had to separate in order to get them both to rank.
Further to this we want both sites to now have their own https certificate however this wouldn't be possible if combined.
Interested to hear thoughts on this. Thanks
-
I know lots of people who have two domains in same sector on the same server. If there content is unique and very different and they are not heavily interlinked then I would be comfortable with that.
-
Correct, I have thought the same as you. However it has been a case of business logistics that this request was put in.
Say we say, ok we will put both sites on separate CMS, blog etc ... what about having these two sites, separate URLs on the same server? They are both in the same sector?
-
When I read your question I was on the assumption that they were on separate servers and that you were going to merge them into a SINGLE DOMAIN.
Now I am thinking that you are going to run both of them from a single CMS install. That just sounds strange to me. I wouldn't do it.
-
One more point on this, would it be better for the sites to be on separate servers? Or would it impact if they were on the same server?
-
Thanks for that. Just to expand on this slightly. The idea is that both the front end sites remain. But their assets are still managed from one CMS. So the only merging would be on the server and assets, both ideally want to keep their own brand and rank for their own terms.
One site ranks very well, the other is still strong - but not as strong.
There is a lot of content overlap .. the difference is one is slightly more high end but target a lot of the same keywords.
Further to this I'm conscious about streamlining the blog, as then there is only one blog content stream for essentially 2 sites.
-
Great answer.
Couldn't have put it any better myself!
-
Merging two sites in the same sector or launching a second site in the same sector should always be given careful consideration.
My thoughts on this are.....
-
If you own the dominant site in a sector then you are in excellent position to launch a second site in that sector.
-
If you don't own the dominant site in a sector then you are better off putting all of your work into your best site (or your only site) to build it into the dominant site.
To me, those two situations are very clear.
About merging sites....
To me, if Site A and Site B have very little content overlap then a merger makes good sense. The strength of the sites will be merged and the rankings might go up for lots of keywords.
However, if Site A and Site B have a LOT of content overlap then merging them requires more careful thought. If one site is strong and the other puny, then the merger of the puny site into the strong site will not accomplish much. I would rather put work into the strong site. If both sites are moderate in strength then the merger will likely give a nice boost to the site that remains.
Before doing any merger I would be sure that both sites are clean of any Panda, Penguin or other problems. Because you don't want to merge poison into a good site.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do I use /es/, /mx/ or /es-mx/ for my Spanish site for Mexico only
I currently have the Spanish version of my site under myurl.com/es/ When I was at Pubcon in Vegas last year a panel reviewed my site and said the Spanish version should be in /mx/ rather than /es/ since es is for Spain only and my site is for Mexico only. Today while trying to find information on the web I found /es-mx/ as a possibility. I am changing my site and was planning to change to /mx/ but want confirmation on the correct way to do this. Does anyone have a link to Google documentation that will tell me for sure what to use here? The documentation I read led me to the /es/ but I cannot find that now.
Technical SEO | | RoxBrock0 -
Site Navigation
Hello, I have some questions about best practices with site navigation & internal linking. I'm currently assisting aplossoftware.com with its navigation. The site has about 200 pages total. They currently have a very sparse header with a lot of links in the footer. The three most important keywords they want to rank for are nonprofit accounting software, church accounting software and file 990 online. 1. What are your thoughts about including a drop down menu in the header for the different products? (they have 3 main products). This would allow us to include a few more links in the header and give more real estate to include full keywords in anchor text. 2. They have a good blog with content that gets regularly updated. Currently it's linked in the footer and gets a tiny amount of visits. What are your thoughts about including it as a link in the header instead? 3. What are best practices with using (or not using) no follow with site navigation and footer links? How about with links to social media pages like Facebook/Twitter? Any other thoughts/ideas about the site navigation for this site (www.aplossoftware.com) would be much appreciated. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | stageagent0 -
Site not loading on Firefox
Hello guys, I can't get my website to be loaded on Firefox, why's that?
Technical SEO | | PremioOscar0 -
Cache Not Working on Our Site
We redesigned our site (www.motivators.com) back in April. Ever since then, we can't view the cache. It loads as a blank, white page but the cache text is at the top saying: "This is Google's cache of http://www.motivators.com/. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jul 22, 2013 15:50:40 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more. Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar." Has anyone else ever seen this happen? Any ideas as to why it's happening? Could it be hurting us? Advice, tips, suggestions would be very much appreciated!
Technical SEO | | Motivators0 -
What should the combined domain rank of 2 sites?
We have just combined 2 sites by redirecting a site with a domain ranking of 35 to a site with a domain ranking of 27 (this is because the we want to use the address with a ranking of 27) After a week I now have 1 domain with a ranking of 26?? So my questions are; Should the ranking have increased already? What should I expect the ranking to increase to if at all? Is there something I could have done wrong when transferring? Thanks
Technical SEO | | benj450 -
Has anyone used paid services to help improve their site
Hi, i am getting lots of spam in my mail box about how companies can help you get more traffic and i see on lots of sites about tools that can bring you more traffic and help improve your site, and i am just wondering if anyone has tried any of these services or products to help promote their site. For example, i keep getting sent about submitting my site to over 200 directories or search engines and just wondering if these are a waste of time.
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
Will using https across our entire site hurt our external backlinks?
Our site is secured throughout, so it loads sitewide as https. It is canonicalized properly - any attempt to load an existing page as http will force to https. My concern is with backlinks. We've put a lot of effort into social media, so we're getting some nice blog linkage. The problem is that the links are generally to http rather than https (understandable, since that's the default for most web users). The site still loads with no problem, but my concern is that since a redirect doesn't transfer all the link juice across, we're leaking some perfectly good link credit. From the standpoint of backlinkage, are we harming ourselves by making the whole site secure by default? The site presently isn't very big, but I'm looking at adding hundreds of new pages to the site, so if we're going to make the change, now is the time to do so. Let me know what you think!
Technical SEO | | ufmedia0