How does CTR relate to SERPS Position?
-
I'd always though that CTR would increase with SERPS position but my data doesn't really seem to show that.
I used google analytics/acquisition/SEO/Queries and looked at the top 1800 queries. Then I filtered those with a CTR of 0 and for branded keywords.
The result was as shown - a big glob with no real pattern other than a long tail of keywords with a 100% CTR
Does this tell me anything useful or am I just wasting my time?
Its probably worth stating that only 12 of my keywords had over 1000 impressions and none over 10,000 (all in top 10 though) - but thats a function of my industry sector
-
Hi Zippy-Bungle,
If your rankings improve then your CTR is likely to improve too. To affect CTR you can use the meta description and title tags - the more compelling your meta des the more likely it'll get clicks. I sometimes use high performing ad text for this if it's relevant.
As to whether an increase in CTR would relate to an increase in rankings - I don't really know. However, I did notice that our CTR dropped slightly and then our listings dropped a little too - whether this is a coincidence or not I couldn't tell you.
I think it would be very difficult for Google to use CTR, time on site and bounce as ranking signals. For example, if someone just wants my company's phone number, they may do a brand name search, find the number at the top of our pages and call us but analytics/google would count this as a bounce! So, we've been 'useful' but we've not encouraged the visitor to click into deeper pages (they found what they were looking for on the first page they visited) - so how does google know when a page has been 'useful' or not? (obviously I know links play a role here, I'm just speaking from a data perspective).
So, I suspect google doesn't use these signals, because it seems pretty darn difficult to determine what is a real bounce and what isn't (as in a real bounce would be where the site you click on is useless for the query). As for time on site... well, if you follow google's instructions and make your site faster (we halved our site speed in April) then time on site will inevitably reduce (ours did!) so, again I don't know how google would use this (unless it was in conjunction with site speed). As for CTR - that only tells one half of the story, so again, not sure how google could use it. I know they use it for adwords, but it's in their best interests for the most likely to be clicked ad to be highly prominent and any reduction in cpc as a result is easily mitigated by the fact that it gets more clicks (stack 'em high, sell 'em cheap)
However, I do think google probably uses a metric similar to bounce, when users use the back button to immediately leave a page they've just landed on and end up back on the same serp as they started from. This is just my theory, and the reason I think they use something like this is because if I was them I would. I will probably get shouted down here by everyone else, and this is just my opinion so do with it what you will!
-
Hi Tom, yes that's what I meant,. Never thought about it the other way round so I'm glad for the confusion as I learned something that I hadn't expected to learn.
Ive ve still got the issue with the data blob though not seeming to correspond with what other sources show. Is it a function of low search volumes or something else?
-
Beg your pardon, I think I misinterpreted your initial question. My answer addressed "Would an increase in CTR result in an increase in rankings" (No), but I think you meant "Would an increase in rankings result in an increase in CTR" (Usually yes)
Sorry about that, was that what you meant?
-
Thanks. That's good to know. I thought there was a case a few years ago where some Yahoo data got into the open and it showed that there was a correlation.
Checking on that I discovered this Moz article (which is more recent) which seems to imply that there is a relation - or have I misunderstood your answer, the article or both?
-
Your data shows you what is generally accepted - there is no relation between CTR and organic search.
Certainly with what Google tells us it has no baring at all - although we should always take what they say with a pinch of salt, my own tests and most other people I know agree with this. Some people think the time on site/bounce rate may have an affect, but again I don't think this is the case either.
The only time where CTR comes into play is for PPC, where it can affect your cost-per-lick and quality score.
For SEO, it's widely agreed that there is no relation.
Hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does anyone have a good resource for seeing SERP feature/presentation change Year-Over-Year?
Moz only tracks general SERP feature changes for the last 30 days.
Reporting & Analytics | | homedepot0 -
Lower Impression higher clicks and CTR Compared to Previous Month?
I'm looking at our monthly traffic report and noticed that impressions were down in October compared to September but Clicks and CTR increased. I'm thinking it's because certain keyword increased in rank thus increase chances of a click through? Anyone else have any idea? Thank you in advance. Here is the data below: September:
Reporting & Analytics | | davidwang
Total clicks: 5071
Total impressions: 83429
Avg. CTR: 6.08%
Avg. Position: 28.4 October:
Total clicks: 5695
Total impressions: 79366
Avg. CTR: 7.18%
Avg. Position: 28.90 -
Google Analytics Average Position
I'm looking at Google Analytics -> Acquisition -> Search Engine Optimization -> Queries reports. I'm looking at keywords and the average position. What Google reports and what I see in a Google incognito search is different (usually my search is much lower). For example, for one search term, Google reports 5.8 average position and every time I search it is 8. My local result is 4. Anyone know why this is? I'm wondering if Google is averaging the Local results into number?
Reporting & Analytics | | CalicoKitty20000 -
What are some good SERP visibility tools?
With keyword data from Google on its way out, we're losing our ability to discover what keywords a website is ranking for (you can do ranking checks, but only if you already know what keywords the site is ranking for). What are some good SERP visibility tools? (i.e. you enter the domain name, and the tool lists which keywords the site ranks for organically, etc.) I know SpyFu offers this, but they seem to be PPC focused and perhaps not very accurate. I know other companies offer it, but I'm blanking on which ones.
Reporting & Analytics | | AdamThompson0 -
Why Webmaster tools shows different avg. positions?
Hi everyone, I am new to Seomoz, I loved this amazing SEO school 🙂 My questions is about webmaster tool. Webmaster tool shows that my site's avg. positions is 34 and its getting better every week. I even see some new queries, new avg. positions for that queries. That's great ! But when I search the avg position it is between 54 -60 and I don't see any new queries . Shouldnt we rely on what webmaster tells us about avg. positions? Thanks a lot
Reporting & Analytics | | EzgiGunyel-InfinPixels0 -
SERPS different based on location of search even with non-personalization
Hello Mozzers, Our agency's website, www.kenta.ro - ranked for a long time at #1 for "ann arbor seo" and similar keywords. For the past several (4-5) months we've been sitting around #5. My guess was that this was Google playing around with the results but I'm not sure why we have been at this position for such a long time. I have a vpn that I use for checking rankings overseas and if I connect to a server in Chicago, LA, Ontario, etc we show up as #1 - only when you search for "ann arbr seo" in our area do we get a lower ranking. All rank checking programs including seomoz show us at the #1 position because of this. What this means for us is that all of the traffic we target with this keyword sees the poor result, while the rest of the world sees the great result (should they search for it). How can we ensure that our target market finds us at #1 like the rest of the world does? Thank you in advance. weabi.png
Reporting & Analytics | | kentaro-2569290 -
Why is this website with worse metrics performing better on serps?
Hi! I would like to ask if anyone has any ideas on why the second website in this analysis is getting position 2 on google and website 1 is getting position 5: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/comparisons?site=bonobetfair.info&comparisons[0]=www.bonobetfair.com&=Compare The metrics indicate that the first website is clearly superior in (almost) all metrics. Why could this be?
Reporting & Analytics | | inmonova0 -
Google vs Bing/Yahoo SERP results?
I see large differences in Google and Bing/Yahoo SERP results for many keywords. Google shows many of our primary keywords in their top ten, while Bing/Yahoo rank the same one 40-50 or above. Do you have any insight on their differences that might account for this variation? We are legitimate, long time, white hatters at a small manufacturer that is one of the leaders in our industry. The only thing I can think of that might describe this issue is PPC advertising. Their algorithms wouldn't be that inconsistent would they? (We do much more paid advertising on Google) But generally this should have no affect, right? Thanks, George...
Reporting & Analytics | | rhawk0