Supplement/Nutritional Facts

[unikey]

This may be a hard one for most to answer. I am wondering if supplement facts should be listed as html on a website or as an image? I see the benefit of both.

Having a master image that can be saved into a lower res version and posted to the website eliminates issues with misspellings, etc. It also displays the information the same regardless of user and would be much easier to manage in terms of setup. Our formulations change from time to time, so it is important that our labels are consistent across all platforms.

That being said, having the facts in html, would add potentially useful search content to the page and I imagine it would be helpful for disabled persons who use text readers.

Any thoughts on this? I haven't discovered any recommendations or specs on this but I've seen it done both ways on many different sites.

[unikey]

Thanks, I figured that was the case. I am glad I asked.

[Ray-pp]

There is a very straight forward answer - make it HTML.

An image will give you an SEO disadvantage

An image is not user friendly (accessibility)

You want the info in the image crawled and indexed

An image bloats your page load size

[trung.ngo]

I would strongly recommend having it available in HTML so you can have the potential to gain knowledge graph visibility on results like this: https://www.google.com/search?q=avocado-nutrition

-Trung