The importance of url's - are they that important?
-
Hi Guys
I'm reading some very contrasting and confusing reviews regarding urls and the impact they have on a sites ability to rank.
My client has a number of flooring products, 71 to be exact - categorised under three sub categories 1. Gallery Wood - 2. Prefinshed Wood - 3. Parquet & Reclaimed. All of the 71 products are branded products (names that are completely unrelated to specific keyword search terms. This is having a major impact regarding how we optimise the site.
FOR EXAMPLE: A product of the floor called "White Grain" - the "Key Word" we would like to rank this page for is Brown Engineered Flooring. I'm interested to know, should the name of the branded product match the url?
What would you change to help this page rank better for the keyword - Brown Engineered Flooring.
Title page: White Grain
Url: thecompanyname.com/gallery-wood/white-grain (white grain is the name of the product)
Key Word: Brown Engineered Flooring
**Seo Title: **White Grain, Brown Engineered Flooring by X
Meta Description: BLAH BLAH Brown Engineered Flooring BLAH BLAH
Any feedback to help get my head around this would be really appreciated. Thank you.
-
David/MaxOnce again, thank you very much for such detailed information. This has been really helpful and I'm truly grateful. I do have one more question if I may. The main primary domain name contains the word "wood" - is it really essential to contain the word "wood" into "sub categories" also (as seen below)? You can see how we're planning to structure the site.Many of our key words have the word wood, so for obvious reasons this term is essential. Thank youwww.thebestwoodcompany.comParquet & Reclaimed - 1./parquet-reclaimed/lights-greys/PROUCT 2. /beiges/PRODUCT 3. /browns/PRODUCT 4. /darks-blacks/PRODUCT Engineered Wood - 1. /engineered-wood/lights-greys/PRODUCT 2./beiges/PRODUCT 3. /browns/PRODUCT 4. /darks-blacks/PRODUCT Prefinished Wood - 1. /prefinished-wood/lights-greys/PROUCT 2. /beiges/PRODUCT 3. /browns/PRODUCT 4. /darks-blacks/PRODUCT
-
Honestly, all being said, I would choose the URL structure which makes more sense disregarding the SEO effect. I mean, secure the keyword you want to rank for are there in the url, but do not move them leftward just for the purpose of SEO. As far as I can tell from my little experience is not a factor which weight so much to justify a weird URL structure just for the purpose of putting the most relevant keyword on the far left.
Said that, all the keywords you want to put in the URL must be in the url part processed server side. Crawlers do not process javascript, any framework, like angularjs I mentioned earlier, will make it possible to show different url in the browser through url routing, client side. Which means javascript dynamically change the content of the page without a roundtrip to the server. It's the javascript which detect the URL change, not the server. So the crawler will never navigate it, google will never know it exist.
Yes, there are ways to have google crawler index those javascript generated pages, you can find instructions here https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/ but I strongly suggest you to do not go that way.
Instead, have your CMS generate an html page with all the content you want to index, and dynamically show and hide portions of the content using a javascript framework like angular, if it helps (for bookmarking purpose or UX) use client side url routing to change the url when you show the different portion of the content. That way google will crawl the page with all the content, it's white hat as long as you don't cloak.
So, what you have to do is design your pages, deciding which content goes there keeping in mind SEO target, keyword diversity and semantic; a part of course from the most important... UX.
Now, getting back to the original question, should you put the keywords you want to rank in the url, yes, put those you want to rank in the url processed server-side, the others if useful for UX, bookmarking, etc... process client side with a javascript framework using client side url routing.
Hope it helps. Good luck.
-
In my opinion, as of the current state of client side technology, the way to go is angularjs.
When you talk about shorten the url you are probably referring to url routing which is one of the capability of angularjs, but other frameworks are doing a good job in that area as well.
-
"jQuery is a fast, small, and feature-rich JavaScript library. It makes things like HTML document traversal and manipulation, event handling, animation, and Ajax much simpler with an easy-to-use API that works across a multitude of browsers."
Using JQuery can allow you to load in galleries or product options/variations into a page, without actually having to have a unique URL for each item. This would be done through coding, and display on one of the category pages to help your users see available flooring options. I'm not outright claiming that this would be great for SEO, as the items often are not "crawlable", but merely suggesting a few different options that may help your users navigate a larger site.
Sorry if you thought I was mentioning PHP or dynamically changing URLs
-
Thanks David
These are all areas I'm currently researching. My client is ambitious enough to really expand their product range, so I'm interested to find out more about JQuery and how it really works? If I'm correct, this helps shorten the url by replacing key words with specific code?
-
I would think of it this way:
1. What URL format would give you the most amount of beneficial (unique) URL's?
2. By using this structure, do you have the time/resources to optimize all newly created URL's?
3. Looking at the BIG GUYS in the flooring industry (Lowe's, Home Depot, ETC) what URL format do they use? Can this format be downscaled to work for your needs? Would that format make sense to use on your site?
4. What does the Google keyword planner suggest for being the most heavily searched for terms? Is there a way to include these terms in your navigation and still have it make sense?
5. Judging by your goals, does it make sense to have all the URL's be unique to each product, or would it work better for your gallery or product options to be loaded in a JQuery or "outside of content" format on a second level category page?That should help you narrow it down a bit
-
David/Max/Sheena
I cannot thank you guys enough. And Sheena, thanks so much for your help. Max sorry if I confused you - I probably confused myself more.
My thought process now consists of the site "architecture", "keywords" as well as considering other client needs. It would certainly help if each product was a generic name. However keeping the url for this is also challenging.
By manufacturer - gallery-wood/engineered-floors/grey-sabe - Keyword, Grey Engineered Wood
By manufacturer - gallery-wood/oak-flooring/grey-stone - keyword, Oak Wood or Grey Wood etc
By colour - gallery-wood/beiges/blonde-oak - keyword, Beige Oak or Oak Wood
By colour - gallery-wood/blacks-brown/engineered-ember - keyword, Brown Engineered Wood or Black
Maybe we could title "Gallery Wood" into "gallery-wooden-floors" to expand our keyword range?
Thanks so much again!
-
Unless the brand name is more popular than the style or type, I would only use the brand name where it makes sense. For the URL structure, personally I would use the style or color rather than the brand. If you do a few searches in Google, I'm betting you see a lot more results coming up for styles and colors.
I like the way that Sheena has described how to do the URL's, as it makes sense to flow from first major category, and go down from there gallery-flooring/manufactured-flooring/PRODUCT
With the way Google has been changing up their results, I'm betting if you had a lot of really nice optimized pages for "manufactured flooring", you would not need to really go into very specific details
EDIT* I thought I would add why I think this way. We do a lot of ecommerce seo for clients, and optimize every page on the site. Even with the individual product pages being highly optimized for one given thing, we often see the main level category pages ranking higher, even if your query is for a specific type or style.
-
Maybe it's a language thing, but I may still be misunderstanding you.
If I understand correctly, the product name is "White Grain", the category that product falls in is "Gallery Wood", what is "Brown Engineered Flooring"? What is the relation with the product name and the category name?
- Is it a sub-category as Sheena was suggesting? If so the url structure she suggested make perfect sense. Of course from a pure seo prospective you want to put the keyword to the leftmost possible place in the url, but it may do more harm than good if it doesn't make sense sematically.
- Is it a synonym of the category? If so I would replace the category name in the url.
- Is it something else?
-
Hi Sheena
Your comments certainly help. It's really about architecture and what keyword to rank for. The sub category "gallery-wood" has a number of different products such as - Stone, Ember, Sabe, Shell, Oyster etc. I've already considered these urls
www.companyname.com/gallery-wood/whites-greys/stone - keyword?
www.companyname.com/gallery-wood/mid-drowns/shell - keyword?
All products currently are easily selectable on the same page. By using these url types we can build up their selection of products and later easily move them into sections "mid-browns", "whites-grey" etc - we're not planning this now as the "mid-browns" section for example would be to empty. With a structure like this, the headache now would be what keyword to use which matches the url?
Really appreciate your feedback.
-
Hi Max
Thanks for getting back to me.
We have a very good inbound strategy in place that includes content creation, social media, influencer outreach, the list goes on to help build authority.
However my question is how to optimise a page that is focussed on the brand name itself - the name of the product is "White Grain", meaning the "title" of the page should be named the same (branded product). If the name of the product was called “Brown Engineered Flooring”, this would be a piece of cake http://www.companyname.com/dark-engineered-flooring, as the url suggests.
BUT - How does a product name like "white grain", "stone" or "Ember" become fully optimised for a keyword? Currently we have http://www.companyname.com/gallery-wood/white-grain
-
First off, I do think URLs help theme pages, which can indirectly help with SEO, but that shouldn't be your main goal. Aim to create a consistent structure for how all category, subcat, product detail pages are organized. This will not only make your life a whole lot easier, but it will also make more sense to users, help keep linking consistent, and (indirectly) help rankings.
I would have 3 category pages that lists all relevant products: /gallery-wood, /prefinished-wood, /parquet-reclaimed-wood. I would probably then have subcategory pages that drill-down to more specific product listings (i.e. /gallery-wood/brown-engineered-flooring). *This is the page level you'll want to target "brown engineered flooring."
From there, you have to decide if you want the product detail page URL to follow the folder structure (i.e. /gallery-wood/brown-engineered-flooring/[product-name]) or if you want it to only have the product name (.com/[brand-product-name/number]) which is usually better for complex ecommerce sites where products fall under multiple categories.
You could also drop the parent category from the URL structure, which is probably what I'd do. Something like:
- Category: /gallery-wood *optimize for "gallery wood" & related terms
- Subcategory: /brown-engineered-flooring *optimize for "brown engineered flooring" & related terms
- Product Detail: /brown-engineered-flooring/brand-product-name *optimize for brand, product name & related terms
Depending on search volume, there may even be an opportunity to create brand categories or landing pages.
I hope this helps!
-
Don't laugh, but personally my advice is to gain some backlinks to that page if you want to improve ranking.
All the on-page optimization suggestion you can easily find in the page grader tool here on moz.
If you want to rank well for “Brown Engineered Flooring”, you know what you have to do, put it in the url path, put it in the title, in the h1, in the body, don't stuff the page with it and remember the usual recommendation: before the fold is better than under the fold, at beginning of the title is better than in the middle, etc...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Our homepage url has been 301'd to the new https version - as our MD wanted us to have the secure protocol
Hello Mozers I'm just checking whether it is good practice to 301 the main homepage url to its https version. Will this have any detrimental effect on ranking and DA?
Technical SEO | | Catherine_Selectaglaze0 -
Are backlinks the reason for my site's much lower SERP ranking, despite similar content?
Hi all, I'm trying to determine why my site (surfaceoptics.com) ranks so much lower than my competitor's sites. I do not believe the site / page content explains this differential in ranking, and I've done on-site / on-page SEO work without much or any improvement. In fact I believe my site is very similar in quality to competitor sites that rank much higher for my target keyword of: hyperspectral imaging. This leads me to believe there is a technical problem with the site that I'm not seeing, or that the answer lies in our backlink profile. The problem is that I've compared our site with 4 of our competitors in the Open Site Explorer and I'm not seeing a strong trend when it comes to backlinks either. Some competitors have more links / better backlink profiles but then other sites have no external links to their pages and lower PA and DA and still outrank us by 30+ positions. How should I go about determining if the problem is backlinks or some technical issue with the site?
Technical SEO | | erin_soc0 -
Just read Travis Loncar's YouMoz post and I have a question about Pagination
This was a brilliant post. I have a question about Pagination on sites that are opting to use Google Custom Search. Here is an example of a search results page from one of the sites I work on: http://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/category/search-return?q=countryman I notice in the source code of sequential pages that the rel="next" and rel="prev" tags are not used. I also noticed that the URL does not change when clicking on the numbers for the subsequent pages of the search results. Also, the canonical tag of every subsequent page looks like this: Are you thinking what I'm thinking? All of our Google Custom Search pages have the same canonical tag....Something's telling me this just can't be good. Questions: 1. Is this creating a duplicate content issue? 2. If we need to include rel="prev" and rel="next" on Google Custom Search pages as well as make the canonical tag accurate, what is the best way to implement this? Given that searchers type in such a huge range of search terms, it seems that the canonical tags would have to be somehow dynamically generated. Or, (best case scenario!) am I completely over-thinking this and it just doesn't matter on dynamically driven search results pages? Thanks in advance for any comments, help, etc.
Technical SEO | | danatanseo1 -
On-Page Report Says 'F', and I'm Confoozled As to Why
I'm primarily interested in how we failed in our "Broad Keyword Usage in Title" category. The Keyword Pair we're gunnin' for is: "Mac Windows" Our current page title is: "CrossOver: Windows on Mac and Linux with the easiest and most affordable emulator - CodeWeavers" This is, I grant, ugly. However, bear with me. SEOMoz Report Card says "Easy Fix!" and suggests: "Employ the keyword in the page title, preferrably as the first words in the element." I humbly submit that "Mac" and "Windows" IS in the page title. So what am I missing? Is it the placement of the words relative to each other, or relative to the start of the sentence? Or is the phrase "CrossOver:" somehow blocking the rest of the sentence from being read? Are colons evil? I'm genuinely mystified as to why (from a structural standpoint) our existing title tag is failing this test, and I'd be delighted for answers and/or feedback. Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | CodeWeavers0 -
404's and duplicate content.
I have real estate based websites that add new pages when new listings are added to the market and then deletes pages when the property is sold. My concern is that there are a significant amount of 404's created and the listing pages that are added are going to be the same as others in my market who use the same IDX provider. I can go with a different IDX provider that uses IFrame which doesn't create new pages but I used a IFrame before and my time on site was 3min w/ 2.5 pgs per visit and now it's 7.5 pg/visit with 6+min on the site. The new pages create new content daily so is fresh content and better on site metrics (with the 404's) better or less 404's, no dup content and shorter onsite metrics better? Any thoughts on this issue? Any advice would be appreciated
Technical SEO | | AnthonyLasVegas0 -
Old URL redirect to New URL
Alright I did something dumb a year a go and I'm still paying for it. I changed my hyphenated URL to the non-hyphenated version when I redesigned my website. I say it was dumb because I lost most of my link juice even though I did 301 redirects (via the htaccess file) for almost all of the pages I could find in Google's index. Here's my problem. My new site took a huge hit in traffic (down 60%) when I made the change and even though I've done thousands of redirects my old site is still showing up in the SERPS and send much if not most of my traffic. I don't want to take the old site down in fear it will kill all of my traffic. What should I do? Is there a better method I should explore then 301 redirects? Could the other site be affecting my current rank since it's still there? (FYI...both sites are built on the WP platform). Any help or ideas are greatly appreciated. Thank you! Joe
Technical SEO | | kaje0 -
If I redirect my WordPress blog to my main site, will it help my main site's SEO?
I have separate sites for my blog and main website. I'd like to link them in a way that enables the blog to boost my main site's SEO. Is there an easy way to do this? Thanks in advance for any advice...
Technical SEO | | matt-145670 -
Switching ecommerce CMS's - Best Way to write URL 301's and sub pages?
Hey guys, What a headache i've been going through the last few days trying to make sure my upcoming move is near-perfect. Right now all my urls are written like this /page-name (all lowercase, exact, no forward slash at end). In the new CMS they will be written like this: /Page-Name/ (with the forward slash at the end). When I generate an XML sitemap in the new ecomm CMS internally it lists the category pages with a forward slash at the end, just like they show up through out the CMS. This seems sloppy to me, but I have no control over it. Is this OK for SEO? I'm worried my PR 4, well built ecommerce website is going to lose value to small (but potentially large) errors like this. If this is indeed not good practice, is there a resource about not using the forward slash at the end of URLS in sitemaps i can present to the community at the platform? They are usually real quick to make fixes if something is not up to standards. Thanks in advance, -First Time Ecommerce Platform Transition Guy
Technical SEO | | Hyrule0