What's wrong with this robots.txt
-
Hi. really struggling with the robots.txt file
this is it:User-agent: *
Disallow: /product/#old sitemap
Disallow: /media/name.xmlWhen testing in w3c.org everything looks good, testing is okay, but when uploading it to the server, Google webmaster tools gives 3 errors. Checked it with my collegue we both don't know what's wrong.
Can someone take a look at this and give me the solution.
Thanx in advance!Leonie
-
I think thats a great Idea .net is not my thing.
All the best!
Tom
-
Ah thanks, it's an Azure platform, so no SFTP, SSH or .htaccess. but i'll give the stack link to the technical guys then they have to translate it to our environment ( .net)
-
Believe me it took me plenty of time to realize how to do this but if you're handy with SFTP or SSH you can change the
And for the ultimate in ease if you're using WordPress there is actually a plug-in for 410s so it wasn't something anyone found easy to do.
https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-410/
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
Hi Leonie,
That's very kind of you I am very happy that you got it working correctly.
All the best,
Thomas
-
Hi ,
i got it working with a proper sitemap. Special thanks to Thomas for the great effort in his answers!
-
Hi, Thanx for your reply, i'm not sure i understand you by "please note you are disallowing more than just media"
the thing with this is the xml file is an old file but somewhere in the google archive. i tried do remove it with the wmt, but returns. It's not on the server anymore. the directory "media" doesn't exist anymore, also from an old website.
Because the file still returns in wmt i thought let's try it with the robots.txt
new robots.txt not tested waiting for deployment
Oh call me stupid, but how do i make a 410?
Grtz, Leonie
-
By the way here is an outdated site map that has when it looks like errors that really is telling me the protocol for putting a site map inside a robots.txt file is not endorsed by Google or Bing however I truly feel it is helpful so I do it. I've also added extra video site maps from an external host which is what's throwing out the errors the red color of the disallows is not a error it is just letting you know they are being blocked. Hopefully this will be of help
bigger photo is right here as well please give me a look at what errors are getting
http://i.imgur.com/Xg7EXwO.png
http status: 200
Syntax check robots.txt on http://www.blueprintmarketing.com/robots.txt (359 bytes)
| Line | Severity | Code |
| 6 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |
| 7 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |
| 8 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |
| 9 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |
| 10 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |Warnings Detected: 5
Errors Detected: 0
robots.txt source code for http://
| Line | Code |
| <a name="line-1"></a>1 | User-agent: * |
| <a name="line-2"></a>2 | Disallow: /wp-content/plugins/ |
| <a name="line-3"></a>3 | Disallow: /wp-admin/ |
| <a name="line-4"></a>4 | Disallow: /wp-includes/ |
| <a name="line-5"></a>5 | |
| <a name="line-6"></a>6 | Sitemap: http://www.blueprintmarketing.com/sitemap_index.xml |
| <a name="line-7"></a>7 | Sitemap: http://app.wistia.com/sitemaps/11323.xml |
| <a name="line-8"></a>8 | Sitemap: http://app.wistia.com/sitemaps/4339.xml |
| <a name="line-9"></a>9 | Sitemap: http://app.wistia.com/sitemaps/14213.xml |
| <a name="line-10"></a>10 | Sitemap: http://app.wistia.com/sitemaps/23283.xml | -
Hi Leonie,
I believe that you should create a robots.txt file that allows for a user agent disallow a folder /media/ and /.xml file. make the Unwanted xml file a 410 it will be dead to Google. however I think I have come up with a solution below please try pasting that in if it does not work.
A another tool for building robots.txt files and comparing them to the existing file from the same company believe it or not is right here.
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/seo-tools/robots-txt-generator/
please note you are disallowing more than just media you are disallowing something that should be more like this is for the xml sitemap why not just set it to a 410 killing the link in Google's eyes then you will not have to Disallow.
User-agent: *
Disallow: /product/
Disallow: /media/
Disallow: /bcc.xmlSitemap: http://example.com/sitemap_index.xml
putting your new site map in where I have placed a site map or where the rule above will give you the spot to put it will help you tell Google where your new site map resides along with of course submitting it to Google Webmaster tools and fetching it as a Google bot.
I would like to look at the architecture of your site if you're getting errors with what you showed me you can send me a private message and I promise I will respond if you are not comfortable showing the URL on Q&A.
I hope this is of help,
Thomas
-
Hi Dean happy to be of help!
-
Thanx for the url: it gives a warning on
Disallow: /product/
and
Disallow: /media/bcc.xmli wonder why?
-
Thomas,
That's an awesome tool, thank you for sharing.
-
if you want to find out anything that could possibly be wrong with that this tool is the holy grail of finding out what's wrong with robots.txt issues in my opinion just expect a lot more info than a simple response from it.
http://tools.seochat.com/tools/robots-txt-validator/
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
if i test the blocked url's they are blocked so it looks like the file is doing what's supposed to do. but still is strange i got these errors.
@Dean Andrews, thanx i will test it without empty lines, though have to wait for another deployment
-
Okay i got these errors in webmaster tools, very strange it is
-
Sounds more like a bug in the tool that you're as I tested the syntax just now in Google Webmaster Tools and it's not causing any issues there.
-
Hi, Lines containing only a comment are discarded completely, and therefore do not indicate a record boundary however you may need to remove the line break (not 100% sure but worth testing): User-agent: * Disallow: /product/ Disallow: /media/bcc.xml -
Hi, sorry forgot to mention that
syntax error @ User-agent: *
no user agent @ Disallow: /product/
no user agent @ Disallow: /media/name.xml
Thanx, Leonie
-
Hi Leonie, what are the 3 errors as it seems that the robots.txt file syntax is correct.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Search console says 'sitemap is blocked by robots?
Google Search console is telling me "Sitemap contains URLs which are blocked by robots.txt." I don't understand why my sitemap is being blocked? My robots.txt look like this: User-Agent: *
Technical SEO | | Extima-Christian
Disallow: Sitemap: http://www.website.com/sitemap_index.xml It's a WordPress site, with Yoast SEO installed. Is anyone else having this issue with Google Search console? Does anyone know how I can fix this issue?1 -
Robots.txt Syntax for Dynamic URLs
I want to Disallow certain dynamic pages in robots.txt and am unsure of the proper syntax. The pages I want to disallow all include the string ?Page= Which is the proper syntax?
Technical SEO | | btreloar
Disallow: ?Page=
Disallow: ?Page=*
Disallow: ?Page=
Or something else?0 -
One robots.txt file for multiple sites?
I have 2 sites hosted with Blue Host and was told to put the robots.txt in the root folder and just use the one robots.txt for both sites. Is this right? It seems wrong. I want to block certain things on one site. Thanks for the help, Rena
Technical SEO | | renalynd270 -
Robots.txt | any SEO advantage to having one vs not having one?
Neither of my sites has a robots.txt file. I guess I have never been bothered by any particular bot enough to exclude it. Is there any SEO advantage to having one anyways?
Technical SEO | | GregB1230 -
Confirming Robots.txt code deep Directories
Just want to make sure I understand exactly what I am doing If I place this in my Robots.txt Disallow: /root/this/that By doing this I want to make sure that I am ONLY blocking the directory /that/ and anything in front of that. I want to make sure that /root/this/ still stays in the index, its just the that directory I want gone. Am I correct in understanding this?
Technical SEO | | cbielich0 -
What's the best format for a e-commerce URL product page
We have over 2000 non branded experiences and activities sold through our website. The website is having a face lift with the a new look and a stronger focus on SEO. As part of this, I am keen to establish what the best practice is for product based URLs. I've researched the market and come up with a few alternatives that are used: domain/category/subcategory/activity_name domain/activity_name/category/subcategory/activity_reference domain/generic_term/activity_reference/activity_name domain/category/activity_location/activity_name Activities are location based but the location can change (say once every 2 years). Activity names, category, subcategory and activity_reference rarely change. Are there any thoughts/ research on the best method? (If there is one) Many thanks in advance for your insights.
Technical SEO | | philwill0 -
Can JavaScrip affect Google's index/ranking?
We have changed our website template about a month ago and since then we experienced a huge drop in rankings, especially with our home page. We kept the same url structure on entire website, pretty much the same content and the same on-page seo. We kind of knew we will have a rank drop but not that huge. We used to rank with the homepage on the top of the second page, and now we lost about 20-25 positions. What we changed is that we made a new homepage structure, more user-friendly and with much more organized information, we also have a slider presenting our main services. 80% of our content on the homepage is included inside the slideshow and 3 tabs, but all these elements are JavaScript. The content is unique and is seo optimized but when I am disabling the JavaScript, it becomes completely unavailable. Could this be the reason for the huge rank drop? I used the Webmaster Tolls' Fetch as Googlebot tool and it looks like Google reads perfectly what's inside the JavaScrip slideshow so I did not worried until now when I found this on SEOMoz: "Try to avoid ... using javascript ... since the search engines will ... not indexed them ... " One more weird thing is that although we have no duplicate content and the entire website has been cached, for a few pages (including the homepage), the picture snipet is from the old website. All main urls are the same, we removed some old ones that we don't need anymore, so we kept all the inbound links. The 301 redirects are properly set. But still, we have a huge rank drop. Also, (not sure if this important or not), the robots.txt file is disallowing some folders like: images, modules, templates... (Joomla components). We still have some html errors and warnings but way less than we had with the old website. Any advice would be much appreciated, thank you!
Technical SEO | | echo10 -
Should we use Google's crawl delay setting?
We’ve been noticing a huge uptick in Google’s spidering lately, and along with it a notable worsening of render times. Yesterday, for example, Google spidered our site at a rate of 30:1 (google spider vs. organic traffic.) So in other words, for every organic page request, Google hits the site 30 times. Our render times have lengthened to an avg. of 2 seconds (and up to 2.5 seconds). Before this renewed interest Google has taken in us we were seeing closer to one second average render times, and often half of that. A year ago, the ratio of Spider to Organic was between 6:1 and 10:1. Is requesting a crawl-delay from Googlebot a viable option? Our goal would be only to reduce Googlebot traffic, and hopefully improve render times and organic traffic. Thanks, Trisha
Technical SEO | | lzhao0
