Our SEO suggests thinning our homepage - is this a good idea?
-
We provide a single medical service in London. Our domain is "service"london.co.uk. Our home page consists of:
- Welcome message (40 words)
- Reasons why customers choose us (720 words) - as bullet points
- Benefits of the service (380 words - as 6 subheadings)
- Then a small sample of testimonials
It currently looks word doc boring so that's definitely an area we are talking to our designer about. We currently rank second or third for our most popular keywords which are mostly variations of "service london" - these go straight to our home page. Our competitors do the same.
The only other pages that rank are /pricing (for "service london price") and /reviews (for a tiny proportion of rarer keywords)
The main variations in the services we provide is adult and children. We have /adults and /children pages for this where we describe the actual procedures (these are relatively new pages so perhaps they will rank for "adult/children service london" in the future, but right now, they still go to the home page).
Now our SEO agency suggests we spread the content into more pages: Why us page, Benefits of service page etc., (also suggested we add more high quality content pages). Our home page will be similar to what moz suggested on whiteboard Friday - a few key points then directing them towards the sub-pages to read more.
However I am unsure if this is suitable for us where the great majority of our organic traffic comes from "service london". These visitors should ideally still come to our home page and I'm not sure if Google will be thrilled that my home page is now poorer in terms of content despite the fact that the home page still links to these high quality pages on my site.
Would really appreciate this beautiful community's insights on this. Thank you.
-
One of the things I would start with is getting proof that your home page performance sucks. I am assuming you have analytics for your site, so go ouut and download the Google page analytics tool: http://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/page-analytics-by-google/fnbdnhhicmebfgdgglcdacdapkcihcoh?hl=en
This will let you see a live view of how users interact with your site. As it has already been stated, if you describe your homepage as a word document you probably have some issues. Even if you get good traffic, I would bet your conversion rates are taking a hit.
For the content, as long as other souces backlinking to you can support a content reduction I would go for it. (meaning if you have a good backlink profile, reducing your page content will most likely not cause any problems) Do some searches and see what shows up when you rank. Where is Google (and others) pulling content from? The page? The meta data? Once you see what they like, you can begin to weed out what they don't without as many risks.
-
-
remember that your homepage has to tell the visitor in under five seconds exactly what you do.
see this https://usabilityhub.com/tests/new/FiveSecondTest
your site currently is something I would really have to need to read in order to keep going and I'm not saying that to be mean at all I'm saying it to be honest it's not clear what you do immediately and it does resemble a Word document.
Now let's take this homepage and not forget about CTA You have a unique service you could get very creative like some of the examples below from the security world sorry
but they all will you the same thing in five seconds what they do then allow you to find the information you need how cool you could make your site if you used graphics along calls to action with words to tell the story
https://www.digitalocean.com/ tells you what they do
https://www.digitalocean.com/features/technology/ tells you a lot more shows you what they offer.
http://www.distilnetworks.com/
https://sucuri.net/website-firewall/ 2
If you want to see what I would say is a very good-looking homepage that happens to have a fair amount of text
see gordonjamesrealty.com it incorporates the testimonials and gives a lot of information. I think your home page should tell people what you do then give them the ability to find what they're looking for via a very well thought out.
if the company you've hired is up to par they should be able to do this without you losing your traffic regardless of what page it ends up going to I would listen to what they have to say and definitely make your home page something that invites people to learn about what you do after they know they've landed in the right place from your homepage.
then http://99designs.com/ save $99 with http://moz.com/perks
I think you should have an idea of what you want and I'll allow the designer to impress you. Never stray from the showing people exactly what you do in under five seconds.
Sorry phone calls I will reply more I promise
-
Sure the domain is ***
Thanks and looking forward to hearing what you think.
-
I think that your description of your page being a "word doc" is a strong sign it is not user-friendly.
Use the MozBar http://moz.com/tools/seo-toolbar & look at the websites with non-personalized search on.
I think a good example of a site that contains a lot of text but is still compact and functional is http://websynthesis.com/ now there current company copy blogger does not have as much text on its homepage however I would suggest you look at the way they format text it is, big, with the right amount of spacing scannable if you know what I mean making it easy to read and the letters are big enough so it is comfortable http://www.copyblogger.com/
Look at they have been able to keep the text on the homepage and do it in a method that makes it very easy to read. You want people the will to scan your site.
I have tried to go to the domain I have tried to follow the hints to get your domain you are going to have to write it out and give a very clear for people to find it. You can use (service London co.uk) keep it inside of some system that I can find your site using. Because I have gone to a lot of domains that are for sale.
I will respond promptly once you post that or simply send me a private message with it.
All the best,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO, 301s & backslashes at end of URL
Wordpess started adding "/" (slashes) at the end of my urls and I've left them up for some time. Will removing them hurt search rankings or do I need to do a 301 redirect? For example - www.site.com/page1/ changed to www.site.com/page1 Are there any other ramifications I may not be thinking about besides just search rankings.
On-Page Optimization | | MSpencer1 -
Bullet points good or bad for seo?
Hi Everyone, After a body of unique content of say 50 words, will Google then penalise you for adding bullet points which will then be duplicated across all those products (say 100 products)? http://www.polesandblinds.com/acacia-teal-roller-blind/? Look forward to your comments, good or bad, Thanks Jonathan
On-Page Optimization | | JonnytheB0 -
Canoncial tag for homepage?
I have a site that gets most of it's traffic from one keyword combination, but I've noticed lately that instead of sending people to the homepage, it's sending people to an internal page. This isn't a problem, except for the fact that all the best link juice and domain authority has been directed at the homepage. There's not a lot of content on the homepage, so is it worth setting up a canonical tag on the homepage for this internal page to ensure that the page authority/link juice helps to boost this page that is already being indexed for the keyword?
On-Page Optimization | | Bigheadigital0 -
Is creating lots of sub product pages with some variation a good idea?
I have a service for quote comparison for web design, graphic design etc. My main sales page is http://www.designquotes.com.au/compare-quotes I am thinking of creating 20 or so product specific pages such as this: http://www.designquotes.com.au/business-card-design-stationary-quotes Additional pages such as CMS Wbe Design eCommerce Web Design Logo Desing etc Some of the content is repeat, the main content that changes is in the content slider at the bottom. Is this a good idea, or should I be creating more high quality content like the one below? Will the page be considered low quality or get duplicate content penalties? http://www.designquotes.com.au/web-design-buyers-guide
On-Page Optimization | | designquotes0 -
Is On Page SEO Dead?
Hey Guys, Search Engine Roundtable has published a short post about this a few days ago, quoting senior member at WebmasterWorld forums who said: "The way I see it, on-page text today is for the "relevance" part of the total algorithm. The whole algorithm is, in broad strokes, "relevance + connectedness + quality". After you've clearly stated the relevance of the page, then the rest of your ranking power comes from elsewhere. I've added on-page bold tags with no effect. I've added or changed h1 elements with no effect. Not too long ago, those might well have done something, but that's not the game anymore. And moving from a table layout to a CSS-P layout today might get you nowhere, too. It all depends how deeply complicated the table layout was, I think." http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4408395.htm Is it true? Is on-page SEO really dead? What do you think?
On-Page Optimization | | ShivaS0 -
WordPress (.com) and SEO
I am in my 30 day trial and very interested in my results. I think I am probably in a small minority in having the same web site up and running for approaching 17 years (registered in January 1995 :)) but only now am I looking at SEO seriously (to the extent that I want to learn more myself, as opposed to having others promise great fortune!)). Anyway, before committing to SEOMoz on an ongoing basis I want to understand just how actionable the information on my dashboard is. With that in mind, here's the first of what is (hopefully) a series questions that about low-hanging fruit I might be able to check off quickly. I recently brought up a new blog on WordPress.com (note - hosted by WordPress, not a self-hosted implementation). I have had this blog running for less than a month and have just 18 posts. And I am being overwhelmed with thoudands of errors/warnings from SEOMoz. These fall into a few categories: Duplicate content: As I understand it, each TAG I associate with a single blog post creates a unique URL. For example, if I have a single post with tags for "flowers", "wine" and "cakes", I get URLs generated such as <blog url="">/flowers, <blog url="">/wines and <blog url="">/cakes. Obviously, tagging posts is a common scenario. Must I just accept these duplicate content warnings?</blog></blog></blog> Title element too long: These are self generated by WordPress.com and the default format includes the date the post was submitted (which takes a bunch of characters followed by the title used). Many of the posts are well over 70 and this seems really easy to do. Missing meta-description: As far as I can tell, Wordpress.com doesn't give me an option to specify these. So, must I just accept these issues if I use WordPress.com (which, again, seems like a very common scenario) and how negative is this to me? Thanks. Mark
On-Page Optimization | | MarkWill0 -
Generic domain for SEO versus Brand name
I am currently building a retail e-commerce site in a highly competitive area. We have a generic brand name; e.g. kitchen-knives.com and we also have another brand name, e.g. 'slycers.com' We have 3 options that I can see and I would like to know which is better for SEO. Build generic.com as a blog site. Link to brand.com 301 redirect from generic.com to brand.com. Use generic.com as anchor text in all links 301 redirect from brand.com to generic.com . Use generic.com as anchor text in all links Also, if there are other better options, then I would appreciate the input! thanks
On-Page Optimization | | cestor0