Something does not add up with WMTs search analytics data
-
we recently replatformed our main site and switched to https. For the first 2-3 weeks after we moved organic traffic was great, we did not lose any ( increased a little), but then it dropped off significantly. Attached is a screenshot from one of our main keywords that dropped off.
You can see click (blue) and impressions (red) dropped off, and the position became unstable, but in the last week it has stabilised to about the same position it was before, but the clicking and impressions are still very low.
The keyword is generic (for our industry) and there would not be any major seasonal changes in the search volume. I can't make sense of this data, could be be wrong?
-
Hard to match up with analytics since the landing page is the home page. Over all there has been an drop in organic traffic, but it looks like most of it is long tail and some smaller drops on some keywords, but that keyword was the standout loss.
Yes I track on Moz, it show no major drops at any stage ( just from 2-4, but that should not have effected impressions I would have thought)
attached is an update of WMTs, which is started to show impressions and clicks starting to come back, not to what it was, but its something
I thinking John might have been on to something and that maybe that a local results or something like that had been pushing the result down
-
Thanks! Does the "click" data and trends match up with your visits from Google Organic search in Analytics?
Also - do you track rankings separately (in Moz or another rank tracker) - have those changed?
-
Paddy
Is there a "new" news feed on the SERP?
I have a site where we were in position 6 - trading ok and have now been pushed to page 2 - in position 6. Impressions plummeted as well...
-
I understand why you might come to that conclusion, but its very generic keyword for our industry, and the number of searches have constant for years. For example its like saying users are not searching for "cars" anymore.
-
yes the graph is from the https version, but I have attached a picture of the last 90 days for the http version
-
Did you register a "new" site in webmaster tools for the https version? The old account for http won't work anymore, and you should have all your new impression data in the new https version. Google calls these different "site variants".
-
Ok, nope cannot assist. There are some discrepancies between SA beta and old SA I thought that may explain it.
It maybe people are just searching less for that keyword... really only conclusion I can think of at the moment.
-
search analytics beta, but I also checked with the old version as its showing the same thing
-
Paddy
I think I know the answer. Are you now using the new "search analytics beta"? or the old search analytics.
-
Hi John
My main point is that the WMTs is reporting the same position but the impression have dropped off which does not make any sense to me.
"but I am starting to get concerning on backlink issue" what do you mean, I have done 1000s of redirects linking the correct old pages to the new pages. Also I have been keeping an eye on the crawl errors, and most errors are for pages that have been removed off the site years ago (wmts doesn't ever give a link to where the source of the links are from)
But even if there was an issue with back links it does not explain why wmts is reporting no drop in position, but a drop in impressions
-
Paddy
Hard to work out from the data we have - but I am starting to get concerning on backlink issue. Two weeks after the site went live and time for the google bots to do a clean sweep.
I note impressions should be similar in position 2 as to 4 - it should be your CTR that changes.
Good luck not sure I can assist.
-
There are other oddities like this with other keywords, but nothing as extreme as this
-
yeah, unfortunately, its the home page, which gets a traffic from a few keywords. But it has had a drop in traffic. Other metrics, bounce rate sightly higher, less page views, longer sessions, but no huge spikes/drops
-
Yes, the search engine optimization part is taken from WMT--I was asking about the actual Google Analytics piece. The keyword in question is associated with a particular web page, yes? If you look at the Google Analytics stats on that page, what do you see? Presumably a big drop in sessions. Has anything else changed about the behavior associated with the sessions?
-
Ah ok, get you. But yeah yeah about the same data, High impressions for the first week of so , then a drop, but yeah more impressions I got I was in position 2-4
-
Are you talking about "Search Engine Optimisation"? its that not use pulled from WMTs?
But yeah its showing the same type of thing
-
I think that what John is referring to is the two ways you can look at search analytics in WMT. You can toggle back and forth between the way it used to be reported and the beta view that was more recently rolled out.
-
Oh, and one other question, is it just this keyword, or are there others like this?
-
The chart is from WMTs not analytics
The average impression is now 12, but before the drop it was over 100
-
Do your Google Analytics numbers for the webpage associated with this keyword line up? They wouldn't be the same of course, but does it show the same drop?
-
-
not sure what you are asking
-
yes I used an exhaustive list of redirects ( over 10k of redirect rules
3) Not sure what you mean
Still its not really the drop in traffic I'm questioning, ( could be related to issue with TTFB we has and with has been addressed 2 weeks ago), but more why is wmts saying we are ranking about the same for that keyword, but the impressions (and clicks) have crashed
-
-
I used $pws=0 and we are 4th
but when I used a proxy, we are not on the first page . But moz's tracking is showing us in about 4th place too.
But no, there is now note about the certificate
-
Nothing obvious.
I noticed a possible similar problem on impressions - a few weeks ago, I looked into it - I changed from old search analytic's to the search analytic's (beta). I found out if you have not ticked page, then impressions for keywords often dropped considerably to the old search analytic's.
Old Search analytic's counted impressions differently and would double up if the URLs was listed twice in the SERP etc. Have you crossed checked your data with old search analytic's?
Also perhaps consider changing your title and meta description to something more clickable. 12 impressions is not much.. data, but maybe worth considering down the track.
-
Transitioning a site is a very sensitive build out.
-
Do you have the old URL structure and the new - I will look into a bit.
-
Did you use 301 redirects ?
-
Did you take down the old site of the server?
There are plenty more questions but this should get the ball rolling.
Web therapist,
Chenzo
-
-
Have you done an anonymized search for the keyword and looked at the result? Is there anything funny there, like a note about your certificate?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Phantom search results showing up in analytics
Hi, I'm getting these weird phantom search results showing up in my analytics account which is skewing my results. I have a wordpress site, and I do have some custom search results pages, but analytics is telling me these hits are coming from google- which I doubt. The end of the query string (&cat=plus-5-results) is not coming from a link created within my site. Anyone have any ideas? Failing that, would somebody be kind enough to explain how I can ignore these hits, but retain other, valid search result requests? Thanks reading! Will Screenshot%202019-05-16%20at%2022.32.10.jpg
Reporting & Analytics | | madegood0 -
Google search console
Checking our links to our site on GSC and we've dropped from 515 to 324 over night - is this normal?
Reporting & Analytics | | RayflexGroup0 -
Google Analytics Organic Accuracy?
Hi, On a cool summers day, I was quenching my thirst for SEO Knowledge in the depths of Google analytics, When I stumbled upon a most troublesome sight. I was Browsing the data inside Acquisition->Keywords->Organic and comparing them to Acquisition->Search Engine Optimization->Landing Pages, to find the results quite questionable.. Since Keywords->Organic measure the visits from the organic results, and Search Engine Optimization->Landing Pages measures the clicks onto one of my landing pages from Google, I assumed they should be the same or very close, (besides Keywords->Organic having visits from other search engines) but they were not the same, as a matter of fact it was telling me that Keywords->Organic visits = 1,474, 27.19% of total(5,422) and Search Engine Optimization->Landing Pages, clicks = 1,548 154.80% of total (1000). Even worst the Search Engine Optimization -> Queries clicks = 1,123, 160.43% of total(700). I have been searching, and come up empty handed in the answer so does anyone know why Google is showing me different results and strange numbers that don't make sense? Any information is greatly appreciated?
Reporting & Analytics | | KBB_Digital0 -
Has anyone seen their GWT Search Queries data resolve?
My GWT data seems to be have resolved through 9/28, but still looking low for the week starting 9/29 through present.
Reporting & Analytics | | EmpireToday0 -
Google Analytics shows wrong traffic source
I was reviewing out traffic sources on GA for this past week's traffic history, and noticed a couple of visits & conversions that GA cited as coming from campaigns from emails that were sent out in 2012 and early 2013. it seems odd that we would have traffic & conversions from these older campaigns - on a regular basis. it's not even from one campaign, but from multiple campaigns. is it possible that it is a cookie issue? - i wonder if these visits were really from the email campaigns - or if they were from organic searches or other sources. Thoughts? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | S.S.N0 -
Re-branding with Google Analytics
GM Mozzers, I apologize in advance if my description of this issue is confusing, but I'm doing my best here. Anyway, due to legal reasons, one of the publications I manage was forced to change their name. We set-up a 301 redirect from the previous domain and have also set-up an analytics profile for the new domain, however, as it stands, visits to the old domain outnumber those to the new domain 12:1. Is there anyway to set-up my analytics profile to the new URL so that this traffic is being attributed to the new domain and the new site, since, after all, it is a redirect. I hope that I explained this sufficiently. Any and all insight will be very much appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Reporting & Analytics | | NiallSmith0 -
Advanced segements Google Analytics
Hi guys, I was to hasty last time marking the given question as answered. So i would like to ask another question on the subject. My original question was how to get a pdf report of 10 specific keywords with information about visits,pages per view. avg, visit time, new visitors and bounce rate. The answer was to create an advanced segment with "or operators" and adding all keywords on an exact match basis. I did this but it still gives me a list of more then 500 keywords in traffic sources organic view. Next to that i get different visitor numbers for some keywords where it says 40 at the normal segments (all visits) but gives me 0 when i turn on the advanced segment. I've been clicking and changing things for a long time until i got almost dizzy. Could someone plz help?
Reporting & Analytics | | 5MMedia0 -
Analytics tagging parameters effect on site SEO
One of the effective tools used in analytics tagging is the use of analytics parameters that starts with '?' or '#'. Example on site tagging: Main link: www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/ www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=topnav www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=sidenav All three links link to the same landing page, with an extra parameter. Using email or campaign tagging: www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/ www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?utm_source=launch&utm_medium=email&utm_term=html&utm_content=getscoop&utm_campaign=hwdyrwm2012 With that we create many tagged links based on the campaign internal strategy. How do these effect indexing, and link juice? How do thy effect SEO in general?
Reporting & Analytics | | RAPPLA0