Analytics tagging parameters effect on site SEO
-
One of the effective tools used in analytics tagging is the use of analytics parameters that starts with '?' or '#'.
Example on site tagging:
- Main link: www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/
- www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=topnav
- www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=sidenav
All three links link to the same landing page, with an extra parameter.
Using email or campaign tagging:
- www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/
- www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?utm_source=launch&utm_medium=email&utm_term=html&utm_content=getscoop&utm_campaign=hwdyrwm2012
With that we create many tagged links based on the campaign internal strategy. How do these effect indexing, and link juice? How do thy effect SEO in general?
-
I do lots of tagging with the Google Analytics URL parameters. It's hard to get around using them for tracking. To get around the duplicate content issues, I:
- Set all pages with the parameters to rel=canonical to the appropriate pages.
- Let Google know those parameters don't change the page content within Google Webmaster Tools. The canonical should take care of this, but it shouldn't hurt to do both.
- Let Bing know those parameters don't change the page content in Bing Webmaster Tools. Again, the canonical should be on top of this, but just in case.
-
From what I've seen on sites I've managed, these types of URLs create lots of duplicate content issues. All the sudden Google and Bing see that there are many different links pointing to the exact same content. For example, Google and Bing will look at it and say "hey, www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/ is the same thing as www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=whatever...they have duplicate content on this site". Trust me, you don't want this to happen to you...it can be no big deal or it can be a very messy situation.
Back to your question, using a query string on your URL isn't too big a deal if the URLs are inside ads or inside an email campaign because those links aren't likely to be found or used by the search engines. (Somebody could share that URL in a way that this URL could be found...but that is rare.)
However, if you are using the parameters in your link building efforts you are communicating to Google/Bing/the world at large that you are linking to different pages (for example, they'll see links to www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/, www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=whatever, www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?utm_source=something, etc.) and could treat those as different URLs which would dilute your link juice to a given page (I've seen some instances where they treated the URL as the same thing despite the query string - still though, why take the risk with your links?).
Additionally, if you have those links on your website all the sudden you are indicating to Google/Bing that these are distinct and different URLs that they should index (you are telling them that you have a page on your site called www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=topnav and another page called www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=sidenav). Most often I see Google or Bing pick one of these URLs and index that, ignoring the other URL(s) to a similar page. Alternatively though they could not index either URL because you are linking to duplicate content. If this is a key page, you don't want to chance it not getting indexed!
To get around this and accomplish the same tracking, I usually don't use utm tracking except in emails, ads and similar types of campaigns. To keep track of the traffic from link building efforts I watch the referrals in Google Analytics. To keep track of traffic from social, I rely on bit.ly. It isn't always as clean, but it avoids other issues with duplicate content.
For tracking on site, I use event tracking in Google. This type of link has no impact on SEO at all (it is a JavaScript onclick event). Event tracking has the added advantage that nobody can skew your data. For example, if you are using ?lid=link-location on your site and somebody copies that exact URL with that query string, puts that exact URL somewhere else AND then clicks on that link (still with the query string) all the sudden you have an ?lid source from a location that didn't come from that location. With event tracking, you can know exactly what location it came from (and a lot of other cool things in Google - for instance, did people who clicked on the product link from the top nav or the side nav convert more?).
Here is the link to Google's event tracking. http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html
One other thing I'll throw out here is that if you are using these kinds of parameters (even if you aren't) you should make sure that domain.com/category/sub-category/ has a canonical element that tells Google/Bing which version of that page you'd prefer they index. That way even if you have a link out there somewhere with a query string, Google/Bing can lump that query string version into the canonical version. That said, Google and Bing have both said canonical tags are suggestions - meaning they have the right to ignore it. So, while I have canonical elements on all the sites I manage, I'm not relying on the canonical element as my only line of defense when it comes to duplicate content.
Anyway, I hope I added a few thoughts that help answer your question.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Using Site Maps Correctly
Hello I'm looking to submit a sitemap for a post driven site with over 5000 pages. The site hasn't got a sitemap but it is indexed by google - will submitting a sitemap make a difference at this stage? Also, most free sitemap tools only go up to 5000 pages, and I'm thinking I would try a sitemap using a free version of the tool before I buy one - If my site is 5500 pages but I only submit a sitemap for 5000 (I have no control of which pages get included in the sitemap) would this have a negative effect for the pages that didn't get included? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | wearehappymedia0 -
Identifying Bots in Google Analytics
Hi there, While you can now filter out bots and spiders in Google Analytics, I'm interested in how you identify a bots and spiders in the first place. For example, it used to be thought that Googlebot wouldn't appear in GA as it 'couldn't process Javascript' but now Google has announced new developments for its crawler with regards to interpreting javascript and CSS, this argument isn't as cut and dry. I'm not suggesting Googlebot appears in Google Analytics, but I am saying that you can't make the case that it won't appear only because it can't interpret JavaScript. So, I'm interested to see what metrics you use to identify a bot? For me, the mix of Users > Browser, Users > Operating System Version is still quite handy, but is it possible to identify individual bots and spiders within Google Analytics? And would Googlebot appear?
Reporting & Analytics | | ecommercebc0 -
Will benchmarking only be available in universal analytics or all analytics?
With the announcement of benchmarking in Google Analytics I was wondering if I would have to upgrade to universal analytics or will it be available to everyone?
Reporting & Analytics | | EcommerceSite0 -
Wordpress SEO vs Regular Site SEO
Hey Mozzers I'm building a Wordpress-powered site (self hosted on different domain). I know there are different plug-ins and whatnot for Wordpress SEO, but what exactly am I getting myself into? Am I required to use these plug-ins even if I already know how to do regular SEO on-page coding, or are they mainly dumbed-down tools for mom-bloggers to use? Am I still able to use Google Analytics as I am with a regular site?
Reporting & Analytics | | Travis-W
What else is there to think about? Thanks!0 -
Google Analytics Myth?
Dear Moz-members, I have read several discussions regarding not to implement Google analytics on your website. Reason: Google is tracking your website behavior, for example you have a high bounce rate it will affect your rankings negative. See it as we are opening the doors too much to Google so it can have a negative impact on your online business, especially when your site is new and you are still building your credit. Because of this i have not chosen to install GA. What is your experience with this? Most of the time if i read analytics posts at Seomoz, people do have GA installed. I am also in doubt whether to switch over at GA, but then again mine site is relative new and i am still working on the negative bounce rate/daily visitors. Would like to hear from you pro's whether this is a myth or not 🙂 Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | mcweb0 -
Google Analytics & Omniture Discrepancies
I am seeing a significant difference between my traffic numbers in Google Analytics and Omniture (Omniture has significantly more). I do not expect them to report exactly the same numbers but these are just too far off. Any idea why that is, or which one I should trust more? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | emediaSEO0 -
Email campaigns. Should I link to my blog or to my site?
I have a client for who we write and post a daily blog article. The articles are optimized and linked to particular targeted content on his top level site. Now we are going to start e-marketing to his 3000+ website users to announce inventory changes and specials. My question is (from a SE standpoint) are we better off linking the e-mail content to the blog and introducing people to the blog (but adding an additional step for getting to the new inventory. Or are we better off putting a link in the HTML E-mail letter that we send out to both the blog and separately to the inventory section? Just to clarify, we wonder if the search engines would provide some additional authority for the extra blog traffic and thereby build the overall score of the blog & site. We are looking at the e-mail campaigns as a potential opportunity to impact SE scores not just awareness of new inventory. Thanks everyone!
Reporting & Analytics | | webindustry0 -
Best Practices For Google Analytics
Does anyone have any recommendations or resources for best practices in using Google Analytics. Specifically, as they relate to SEO and managing and monitoring several websites (i.e. registering/managing multiple accounts vs. master account, etc).
Reporting & Analytics | | Gyi0