Analytics tagging parameters effect on site SEO
-
One of the effective tools used in analytics tagging is the use of analytics parameters that starts with '?' or '#'.
Example on site tagging:
- Main link: www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/
- www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=topnav
- www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=sidenav
All three links link to the same landing page, with an extra parameter.
Using email or campaign tagging:
- www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/
- www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?utm_source=launch&utm_medium=email&utm_term=html&utm_content=getscoop&utm_campaign=hwdyrwm2012
With that we create many tagged links based on the campaign internal strategy. How do these effect indexing, and link juice? How do thy effect SEO in general?
-
I do lots of tagging with the Google Analytics URL parameters. It's hard to get around using them for tracking. To get around the duplicate content issues, I:
- Set all pages with the parameters to rel=canonical to the appropriate pages.
- Let Google know those parameters don't change the page content within Google Webmaster Tools. The canonical should take care of this, but it shouldn't hurt to do both.
- Let Bing know those parameters don't change the page content in Bing Webmaster Tools. Again, the canonical should be on top of this, but just in case.
-
From what I've seen on sites I've managed, these types of URLs create lots of duplicate content issues. All the sudden Google and Bing see that there are many different links pointing to the exact same content. For example, Google and Bing will look at it and say "hey, www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/ is the same thing as www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=whatever...they have duplicate content on this site". Trust me, you don't want this to happen to you...it can be no big deal or it can be a very messy situation.
Back to your question, using a query string on your URL isn't too big a deal if the URLs are inside ads or inside an email campaign because those links aren't likely to be found or used by the search engines. (Somebody could share that URL in a way that this URL could be found...but that is rare.)
However, if you are using the parameters in your link building efforts you are communicating to Google/Bing/the world at large that you are linking to different pages (for example, they'll see links to www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/, www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=whatever, www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?utm_source=something, etc.) and could treat those as different URLs which would dilute your link juice to a given page (I've seen some instances where they treated the URL as the same thing despite the query string - still though, why take the risk with your links?).
Additionally, if you have those links on your website all the sudden you are indicating to Google/Bing that these are distinct and different URLs that they should index (you are telling them that you have a page on your site called www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=topnav and another page called www.domainname.com./category/sub-category/?lid=sidenav). Most often I see Google or Bing pick one of these URLs and index that, ignoring the other URL(s) to a similar page. Alternatively though they could not index either URL because you are linking to duplicate content. If this is a key page, you don't want to chance it not getting indexed!
To get around this and accomplish the same tracking, I usually don't use utm tracking except in emails, ads and similar types of campaigns. To keep track of the traffic from link building efforts I watch the referrals in Google Analytics. To keep track of traffic from social, I rely on bit.ly. It isn't always as clean, but it avoids other issues with duplicate content.
For tracking on site, I use event tracking in Google. This type of link has no impact on SEO at all (it is a JavaScript onclick event). Event tracking has the added advantage that nobody can skew your data. For example, if you are using ?lid=link-location on your site and somebody copies that exact URL with that query string, puts that exact URL somewhere else AND then clicks on that link (still with the query string) all the sudden you have an ?lid source from a location that didn't come from that location. With event tracking, you can know exactly what location it came from (and a lot of other cool things in Google - for instance, did people who clicked on the product link from the top nav or the side nav convert more?).
Here is the link to Google's event tracking. http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/eventTrackerGuide.html
One other thing I'll throw out here is that if you are using these kinds of parameters (even if you aren't) you should make sure that domain.com/category/sub-category/ has a canonical element that tells Google/Bing which version of that page you'd prefer they index. That way even if you have a link out there somewhere with a query string, Google/Bing can lump that query string version into the canonical version. That said, Google and Bing have both said canonical tags are suggestions - meaning they have the right to ignore it. So, while I have canonical elements on all the sites I manage, I'm not relying on the canonical element as my only line of defense when it comes to duplicate content.
Anyway, I hope I added a few thoughts that help answer your question.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How is Google Analytics defining page depth?
We run two websites and as part of our KPIs we are treating those who visit 3 or more pages of our website as a client served. As a digital team we are not convinced that this is the best metric to use as the improvements we are making to the sites mean that people are able to find the information quicker. Additionally other organisations including forums etc link to us so those users will get the info they need in one click. What I would like to know is how Google calculates page depth in GA. Are they treating the landing page as ground zero and then when users clicks a link they go one page deep? Or is the landing page, page depth 1 . Is page depth a measure of how many clicks a user needs to find their information?
Reporting & Analytics | | MATOnlineServices0 -
Is there a problem with using same gmail account for multiple site analytics and GWMT?
Hi, Is there a problem or a general recommendation about using the same gmail account for two different sites (both in Google Analytics and Webmaster tools)? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | BeytzNet0 -
Cross domain tracking setup in Google Analytics
I really need help on this, I can't figure it out. I need to track a few subdomains and and couple of seperate domains in one profile in Google Analytics. So I have: www.maindomain.co.uk sub1.maindomain.co.uk sub2.maindomain.co.uk www.anotherdomain.co.uk So the code I have placed on all of these domains is as following: I have then set up seperate profiles which filter out the data by domain. E.g. for sub1.maindomain.co.uk, I have user the fitler: Custom filter > Include > Filter Field = Hostname > Filter Pattern = sub1.maindomain.co.uk For the www.anotherdomain.co.uk, I have used the same filter. Now this all seems to be tracking visits and unique visitors okay, but I always have a very low pageview count, less than visits and sometimes zero. Could anyone shed any light on what I am doing wrong? Thanks in advance mozzers.
Reporting & Analytics | | MirandaP0 -
Google Analytics and backlinking
Let say I have my main site and my secondary site that is optimized for a slightly different set of keywords (nonetheless still relevant to my main site). I have several links from a secondary site to my main site. Secondary site is on a different C-block. Do you ladies and gentlemen think that if I put both websites under the same google analytics account, Google is going to penalize me or remove some of the juice that is flowing from secondary site to the main site because it would detect through GA that both sites belong to the same entity?
Reporting & Analytics | | SirMax0 -
Setting Up Google Analytic with Sub Folder Sites
What is the best way of setting up Google Analytic for a website that has many sub folders? The main site is example.com and it has 40 sub folder sites like example.com/uk example.com/France etc etc Would it be advised to track a single domain in Google Analytic then create filters for the sub folder sites. Filters > Include traffic from > Sub directories Also with this method is it possible to view overall incoming website stats for everything? Previous experience would be great with this thanks 🙂
Reporting & Analytics | | daracreative0 -
Why is Webmaster Tools not Linking Correctly Google Analytics?
I have a global site with .com as the US site and then /country for all other markets i.e. .com/uk .com/de etc. Each site has it's own WMT profile. Each site has it's own GA profile. Since Google added Search Engine Optimization to the GA interface, I can't track these sites separately under this new feature. It seems to me that it can only be associated with a single WMT profile at a time or rather that WMT can only be associated with a single GA profile at a time. The numbers for the UK and US site are identical, but when I try and link the UK WMT account with GA it removes it from the US profile and vice versa.
Reporting & Analytics | | Red_Mud_Rookie0 -
Google +1 and ranking effect .
Anyone have any experience as to what effect google +1 has on ranking? Trying to figure out what impact it might have. Ecommerce site in norway selling childrens clothing. Atm we are ranking 25th for main targetted word childrens clothing (barneklær in norwegian). on google.no this has a difficulty of 34. None of main competitors have any amount of google +1's on their site. Lets say if I in some way could manage to get 100 ppl to push +1 button. Would this affect our ranking at all ? Might be impossible to answer but if anyone has thoughts about it I am interested. Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | danlae0 -
New Google Analytics Site Speed tool and excel
Hello, I was wondering if there is a good tool or method to pull the new Google Analytics Site Speed data into excel and use this document to track site speeds on a weekly basis for multiple clients? Any good articles or how-to's would be awesome!
Reporting & Analytics | | Hakkasan0