Product review based on sales data - How much should we link out?
-
Hello,
We're doing a product review series based on sales data.
How much should we link out? Consumersearch is the number one position with full sources for "best X product"
Consumersearch has flaws it looks like. The data reads correct but the products they are promoting are not the best based on our own customer service informal interviews.
Was wondering if we should include all data in the field including competitors and display our sources, or if we should just list in-house data.
Any other advice for this is appreciated too.
Thanks.
-
"Maybe we could say that we pull from a variety of sources off the web through this consumer reports article combined with interviews."
I would probably go that direction. Or, you could mention a list of the locations you pulled information from, but not link to them. I might word it as something like:
"Our review data comes from primary sources including our own internal recorded data, interviews, [whatever else] as well as secondary sources including consumer reports, and the following other sites: [list competing sites you pulled data from but don't link].
Fact is, if you are pulling data from competitors mentioning them and letting people know where your data is coming from is the right thing to do (as you've been saying). However, I probably would withhold the link and just list the site name in this situation.
If there is a way to generate more reviews from other sources that you wouldn't mind linking to (like bloggers, other consumerreports type sites, perhaps look at niche forums/communities for users reviews, etc.) I would certainly pursue that route as well.
Good luck!
-
It looks like I wasn't clear about the question but you still helped.
We are doing like a 10-part "Best 5 Products" (Best Red Shoes Blog Post, Best Blue Shoes Blog Post, etc) that includes the best products in different categories (each different blog posts) along with a buying guide like consumer reports. There will be a beautiful 10-button menu at the top that organizes the whole review. Goal is to do such a nice job it's not scalable. We'd like to draw off of external sources as well as our own interviews.
Except for consumer reports pretty much all the reviews are done by competition.
Maybe we could say that we pull from a variety of sources off the web through this consumer reports article combined with interviews.
How do we do this and word this? We don't have much in the way we can do with external bloggers this industry.
Thanks!
-
Hi BobGW,
I'm assuming when you say "we're doing a product review based on sales data" you mean that you're reviewing a product that has been a good seller for you? Or, perhaps you're reviewing a few products in a category and and writing up your review based on which ones sell the best and have the best reviews?
For me, linking out depends a little on what type of site you have, and more on what is going to provide the best experience for a user.
It sounds to me like you have one product that fits in this product grouping and you'd like to do a review of competing products along side yours.
In this situation, I probably wouldn't link directly to the competitors (but I would certainly site any appropriate research with links), but I likely would include links to other third party sites that discuss your product as well as the competitors products. This information combined with your own should help users feel like your being as objective as you possibly can.
Bottom line is though, consumers are suspicious if you have a dog in the fight. Perhaps you could give your product or a trial of it away to a few bloggers or members of the press in your industry in hopes that they'll provide some feedback on their own sites. If it's favorable, you could then mash-up this content in a variety of ways which might include a side-by-side comparison of your product (along with this new third-party information) stacked against competitors, or perhaps quotes from the third party services that reviewed your product along with your own internal sales data.
I can't be certain that's answering you question, but the bottom line for me is link as it makes sense for users, and use the rel=nofollow attribute if you aren't 100% sure that where you are linking is credible. If you can avoid linking to a competitor and still have a useful set of content, I'd do it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Inbound link analysis
Hi all! we are doing some back link analysis on a clients competitors site. The competitor has roughly 300,000 links generated from an estimated 1,500 domain names. Is there an easy way to determine how many of the 300,000 links come from which of the 1,500 domain names? Essentially we want to see which of these domain names are generating the majority links? Is there a tool we can use to determine this? Or is it good old fashioned leg work? Ideas...? Thanks in advance 🙂 Phil.
Link Building | | Globalgraphics0 -
Do affiliate links to Amazon product pages boost those pages in the SERPs?
From casual observation, I believe that affiliate links to Amazon product pages, move those Amazon pages up in the SERPs. Does anyone else have an opinion on this? Philosophically, I think that affiliate links should not be counted in the rankings, even if they have not been nofollowed. I think that Google and other search engines should be filtering these links because they are compensated. Thanks for your thoughts.
Link Building | | EGOL2 -
Gathering links
There are numerous "Ultimate Guides" to linkbuilding, outreach, etc., and they are all written to teach you the art of linkbuilding. The only thing these guides don't tell you is that following them takes a massive amount of time and doesn't guarantee to get good links at all. We're all in online marketing, and maybe we online marketeers are familiar with linking to other websites, posts that we like, etc. and maybe that's why we can write these guides but in other niches it really doesn't work that way 🙂 I'm wondering what techniques/tactics/strategies you guys are using in less straightforward niches to get quality links to your blogposts. To give you an idea, we launched an article a couple of weeks ago targeting a very competitive keyword. The article got shared over 100 times on LinkedIn/Twitter/etc. and already ranking pretty good, but REAL backlinks are still missing. How to get people to link to that article?
Link Building | | jorisbrabants0 -
Spammy links
Hi I was reviewing a clients link profile and found a lot of the links they have pointed at their domain have the anchor text "Buy Viagra" or "buy viagra online" and similar. Now the website has absolutely nothing to do with this kind of business so no doubt these links are spammy. To my knowledge the website has not been penalised by Google so far. Is it best to disavow or just leave alone? Kind Regards
Link Building | | TheZenAgency0 -
Link pipeline software
Has anyone used the link building software - www.linkpipeline.com ? Any feedback would be much appreciated
Link Building | | gtdesign0 -
Are the following considered bad links for Link Building.
I've been doing a lot of research lately on link building & I've read a lot about having a diverse amount of links. Social links, Blog links, comment links, footer links, No follow links, Directory links as well as links with Anchor text URL match, brand match, partial brand match, non-descriptive, and with keywords. But there is a lot of talk of removing those links that look like a site that's built just for link building purposes.... but Directories are basically built for link building are they not? I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if they feel links from the following directories would be bad links. (Non-Paid) http://www.yoganza.com http://www.wkool.com http://www.wee-directory.com http://www.voicelet.com www.hotfrog.ca http://www.webdirectorieslist.com http://multiplelistingboard.com http://mozdirectory.net http://freedirectorypr.info Industry specific below: http://bestautolinks .com http://automotivedome.com http://automobilebuzz.com http://craigsautolinks.com Thanks so much for the help!
Link Building | | DCochrane0 -
Linking from Blogs
Hi I like to link from blogs on similar keywords on a regular basis but I am thinking about changing tactics as it can appear monotonous and un natural. What are peoples experiences in linking from blogs ?
Link Building | | onlinemediadirect0