Getting links on old blog posts
-
There's 100 of blogs with posts that link to my competitors, but don't link to my site.They are mostly lists. Eg: "The best Sites to get blue widgets"
I was thinking about getting in touch with these blogs, and asking them to take a look at my site, to see if perhaps they would add it to the list. In fact, I started doing it and I got some links already.
Now I am starting to worry that Google could consider these links as unnatural, because, you know, the algos are not exactly perfect. Anyway, the links are important for the exposure anyway.
I've two questions:
1. Is there any chance I'll be penalized?
2. May I get a SEO benefit from this links?
-
I agree with you, Alan. That's how most people do it.
I've found through a few small retail sites and a couple of information sites, that publishing useful or interesting content can be enough that other people will share it for you. There are still niches out there where one or two people, working as a team, can produce, in two or three years, more content and better content than all of the competitors in the niche combined. Once you have that, then some of the people who find your site and see the depth of content, will share it for you. And, there are some topics where people will search deeply for the right information.
If you have a hardware store or a toy store or a jewelry store, you don't have to attack the entire industry. Instead, focus on a very small niche of products that are typically not represented well in local stores, and that do not have an online champion.
The niche must be chosen carefully.
I don't have any interest in social media, or making personal connections, or in soliciting others. But, I do have an interest in learning the deep technical details of things and enjoy writing about them. Through that, I provide the community service similar to what you provide. Then a steady stream of visitor questions coming in and being answered, first by email and then published to the content library that provides a service to a consumer community - these are coming from people who may have first purchased at amazon or or some other vendor who places 100% of their effort in making the sale but places zero effort in helping the customer after the sale.
These people are out searching deeply. They feel like they have been abandoned. This is today's internet - Walmart, Amazon, Jet, and others are all focused on the aggressive price competition. Service after the sale and deep information for the consumer has been abandoned at the very time when you think it should be abundant. Nobody wants to write it. How many times have you purchased something and could not understand directions that were written on another continent and then translated into English by someone who knows the language poorly.
That leads to a problem in that you become the default service department for amazon! They don't do it. But if you step into that role you quickly obtain a knowledge of what information people need and when you answer an email, you also place another brick in your relevant content library. So, although I am not making any direct outreach at all to advocate a brand, engaging a community, or soliciting on my own behalf in any way, the questions keep coming in, the content mass continues to grow, and it attracts more and more traffic year over year.
Most business owners are not going to do this because they don't like to write content and they don't have a situation that allows them to invest a lot of time now and not be paid back until years down the road. No SEO will do this because the upfront labor is very high and the return isn't fast enough to satisfy a client. These opportunities are perfect for the person who enjoys working from the cloister.
-
EGOL,
As always, you infuse wisdom into this discussion. I have always been an advocate of "content first, content last". Yet in 2015, search engines are only one piece of the puzzle, and until and unless other efforts for brand visibility / authority / trust are made, the overwhelming majority of sites on the web will leave way too much money on the table.
I happen to believe links need to be generated through our own efforts yet it's not the "traditional" link building. Instead, it's more about advocacy of brand, community service, and participation in the community in which our prospective/existing clients/customers live.
If we are not active in those ways, we build a house on sand.
Just my take on it.
-
just "produce great content" and sit on our asses.
That's what I do.
'Cept, I don't do much ass sittin'. I am right back onto the next piece of content.
If you don't spend any time link buildin' you can make twice as much content and then even if it attracts half as many natural links you have broken even on the links because you have double the amount of content.
The problem with link buildin' is that you can only put 20 hours per week into it. With content makin' at the end of the first year I have 100 articles out there pullin' links and at the end of the fifth year I have 500 articles out there pullin' links, but you are still only able to work 20 hours per week. Rand would say that content makin' is a flywheel activity because it scales while link buildin' isn't.
The biggest risk that you take content makin' is that you are not honest with yourself, or unable to distinguish, "great content" that will become popular from "pedestrian content" that nobody will link to and most people bounce off of.
-
The reason for the skepticism is the scale of spam out there, and the volume of ways spam efforts attempt to trick search algorithms. Google, even now, all these years into it, still does a very poor job of trapping some of that noise, and so the index remains polluted.
Of course, just building great content is never enough and won't ever be enough. So we just need to check the boxes regarding the potential for Google to think "this isn't legitimate".
-
They are real, quality, relevant, etc, etc. Is there any good reason for such skepticism? It seems like every link building idea is met with a negative attitude, as if we should just "produce great content" and sit on our asses.
-
Are they legitimate placement? Meaning - are the posts you seek links from real, quality, and relevant posts, and not on sites that are created for spam purposes?
Are you asking for a link and NOT specific anchor text, and NOT the wording they would use?
If the above scenario is what's happening, it's valid to reach out this way. As long as you leave it up to them to decide whether to include your content or not, and decide what they write, and what anchor text to use, and there is no reciprocal exchange, and no paid aspect, you "should" be fine.
Of course, it's impossible to know what some poorly trained manual reviewer might think about them, however that's the only scenario where I'd be concerned in this situation.
And if all of the above criteria are met, then those links would be helpful to readers of those sites, and thus have a chance of bringing actual human users to your site. Which makes them valuable for many reasons, one of which is SEO.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Where would we get the most bang for the buck? Fresh Content, Internal Links, or Schemas & Metatags
We cannot change the content on our website.And we have a lot of it. Where would we get the most bang for our buck: Adding lots of fresh content; Linking Content Internally in ways that make the relationship between the content more clear; Creating schemas and metatags for the content. Or something else that we haven't thought of. Our content is not really conducive to social. It is legal information. We have a Domain Authority of 61 / 100 Your help and experience is appreciated.
Link Building | | SamD12340 -
Subdomain links vs root domain links? Are the less valuable?
I am determining the value of links we get. Is a link on a subdomain less valuable vs one on the root domain? How less valuable would you consider a subdomain link? For example blog.site.com vs site.com/blog What other metrics would you take into consideration for the value of a subdomain link?
Link Building | | calf0 -
Using sitewide links to improve link profile?
Hi Guys... When I look at my competitor's link profile, they often have thousands of backlinks. For example, one of our main competitor, he got 3,400 backlinks in total but only 80 referring domains. When I look at my link profile, I have around 50-60 referring domains, but hardly 80 backlinks. My question is, is it okay to get a few sitewide links (no-follow of course!) to get to the thousands backlinks? Or I will be able to achieve top rankings with my current link profile? Thanks!!
Link Building | | TheSEOGuy10 -
How can I find the best sites to guest post on while linking back to my article?
Whats the best way to find sites to guest blog on. There are just so many and I don't want to make bad choices so my current rankings don't get hurt
Link Building | | aronwp0 -
Best Blog Post Length to get Links
Okay, kind of silly question but i am looking for some help interpreting an analysis done by John Doherty almost a year ago: http://moz.com/blog/what-kind-of-content-gets-links-in-2012 In the document he mentions the correlation that longer posts on average receive more links but the graphs were really hard to interpret (for me). Based on the data what is the correct size we should shoot for (most graphs were missing labels). Any one have any insight? Should i shoot for 300 words per post, higher, etc? Thanks! Kyle
Link Building | | kchandler0 -
Old Non Relevant Links
I'm currently working on a project where most of the links are from irrelevant sources referring to the site of the past domain owner. My question is should I remove as many of these as possible or let them be for now. My gut tells me for every new link I build that I should attempt to remove some of the old ones but I'm not exactly sure on how to proceed with this situation. Thanks in advance for any input.
Link Building | | brandonschultz0 -
Link Location: In main page or inner "Link" page?
My question is what´s best of Link Building: have it in main page or in internal Link Pages. I have the problem that have to reduce the number of outgoing links in my mainpage to rank better, but do not want to miss any linkjuice. How Linking in Main Page or Internal Pages affects SERP for your website? And should they be Follow or not Follow? Thanks in advance Maria Jesus
Link Building | | goperformancelabs0 -
Do links from a Tumblr blog count as inbound links?
That's it. I'm thinking of making a Tumblre blog (s) for inbound links. Is it worthwhile?
Link Building | | Spreader73760