Why would backlinks trump content and keywords / DA?
-
While analyzing competition, I frequently see backlinks being the biggest factor at deciding rank for keywords, while content and keyword page grading can say great things, it always comes down to backlinks it seems. Even our DA is better or equal, Why would this be?
-
Hi,
I often see the same myself and the recent Moz ranking factors survey (and all previous ones) show that general opinion is that links are still the strongest signal when it comes to organic rankings.
As others in the thread have mentioned, your content can be great but if no one ever sees it, then it's a bit wasted. One of the ways people can see / discover your content is via links and Google see links as vote of confidence in your website or content.
The one thing that hasn't been mentioned is that it's often the high quality links that can differentiate websites in the long-term. Lower quality links can boost a site for a short period but will often not work long-term anymore. So you're right in that things often come down to backlinks, but it's usually high quality backlinks that make the difference.
Having said all of that, I wouldn't bet against Google bringing in more signals that could become as strong as links. Social signals may become stronger for example, as may user signals or brand / offline signals. Machine learning also plays a huge part in rankings which are largely driven by user behaviour.
I hope that helps!
Paddy
-
I frequently see backlinks being the biggest factor at deciding rank for keywords, while content and keyword page grading can say great things, it always comes down to backlinks it seems
I believe that it is important to consider the age of the document and the on-site traffic that might flow into it. New pages with great content might have very little popularity on other sites. If you see them ranking high then it is the authority of the domain on which they were published that is lifting them to high rankings. Young product pages on amazon, new pages on wikipedia are examples.
Great content that has not been marketed to other websites but that is seen by lots of people who visit the domain where it is published can climb the rankings to top positions but that takes more time.
Great content on less visited domains can still rank high over time but the climb up the SERPs can take years to happen.
-
Hello,
The old saying that content is king still remains the same, but there should be an asterisk (*) next to it. Good content is not good if you cannot market it to a wide audience and build interaction and feedback with it. A website that is simply optimized for given keywords will only get you so far. Most people in the SEO industry (myself included) would argue that links represent a hefty percentage of all ranking potential. The split is roughly 50%:25% in favour of link profile over on-site optimization and content from a technical perspective.
These numbers are impacted by interaction metrics (CTR, BR, etc.) which is where content can really be a deal maker. Links represent votes of confidence in your website from other sources. If these sources are authoritative and relevant, you are in good shape from a rankings perspective. Another way to look at it is:
Links are how you get discovered, content is how you generate revenue/interest.
Remember that rankings do not necessarily generate revenue. You need properly-created, relevant and useful content for your user base to make the difference between digital success and failure. The way this content gets discovered is through your link profile and social avenues, among others.
In other words, you are not wrong. Links are still a huge factor when it comes to rankings, but this is not the only aspect of SEO that requires attention. A 1st place ranking will not last if users are not finding what they are looking for once they click through.
Hope these insights help,
Rob
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Backlinking and Redirect links
Can anyone please explain the real difference between backlinks, 301 links, and redirect links?which one is better to rank a website? i am looking for the help for one of my website lottery
Link Building | | murataft0 -
External Backlinks - Should I remove/disavow external blog posts done by SEO company?
Last year my company hired an SEO company to build backlinks for targeted achor text keywords. It turns out that they wrote average to below average blog posts that had content related to my business, but that were placed on odd websites, not related to my business. They did this for about one year before I fired them. Should I try to get each of those blog posts removed and then disavow them? If the external links back to my site are nofollow then it is my understanding that I don't really need to worry about them...is that accurate? Is it too risky to keep any external backlinked content alive when it is on a site that is unrelated to my business?
Link Building | | ajgrossman0 -
Backlink Audit
Hello, I have a quick question for the MOZ readers about my companies current backlink audit. We've noticed many of the backlinks that the Google Webmaster Tool has found come from websites that are no longer in existence or have error messages. Are these websites counting negatively against us or should we ignore them? Thanks! Alex Rubin
Link Building | | PlanetDISH0 -
How do I find what backlinks have disappeared?
I have seen a decrease in backlinks, how do I figure out which ones are no longer there?
Link Building | | EcommerceSite0 -
How much important is the connection between content and backlink relevancy?
My question is about the connection between web page content and backlink relevancy, how much it is important? Let’s have an example: If I publish a guest post about “cell phone model review” and get a link back to my website which is on the subject of “cell phone monitoring”. Now my question is: Is this a relevant and good quality backlink? As content is about “cell phone Model Review” while the backlink is about “cell phone Monitoring”, How Google would take this as if; 1- Anchor text is “cell phone monitoring” 2- Anchor text is URL based
Link Building | | shaz_lhr0 -
Bulk BackLink Chcecker
Does anyone know of a good bulk backlink checker? I want to input a list of URL's (1,000's) at a time and check to see if their are any external backlinks.
Link Building | | WEB-IRS0 -
Which backlink will be more useful?
Which bacllink will be most useful and gives me most juice? -link from all pages on the website (in footer), such as menu
Link Building | | ATCnik
-link from all pages on the website (in footer, display:none;), such as menu
-link from home page (footer)
-link from the page which have highest PR (PA) (footer)
-contextual-link from most relevant page on the site0 -
Why isnt google picking up my backlinks?
Over the last 2 months, my company has had almost 10 articles placed on very established websites. When I search for my company's backlinks on Google Advance Search, its not picking them up. Why?
Link Building | | BYSM0