Why would backlinks trump content and keywords / DA?
-
While analyzing competition, I frequently see backlinks being the biggest factor at deciding rank for keywords, while content and keyword page grading can say great things, it always comes down to backlinks it seems. Even our DA is better or equal, Why would this be?
-
Hi,
I often see the same myself and the recent Moz ranking factors survey (and all previous ones) show that general opinion is that links are still the strongest signal when it comes to organic rankings.
As others in the thread have mentioned, your content can be great but if no one ever sees it, then it's a bit wasted. One of the ways people can see / discover your content is via links and Google see links as vote of confidence in your website or content.
The one thing that hasn't been mentioned is that it's often the high quality links that can differentiate websites in the long-term. Lower quality links can boost a site for a short period but will often not work long-term anymore. So you're right in that things often come down to backlinks, but it's usually high quality backlinks that make the difference.
Having said all of that, I wouldn't bet against Google bringing in more signals that could become as strong as links. Social signals may become stronger for example, as may user signals or brand / offline signals. Machine learning also plays a huge part in rankings which are largely driven by user behaviour.
I hope that helps!
Paddy
-
I frequently see backlinks being the biggest factor at deciding rank for keywords, while content and keyword page grading can say great things, it always comes down to backlinks it seems
I believe that it is important to consider the age of the document and the on-site traffic that might flow into it. New pages with great content might have very little popularity on other sites. If you see them ranking high then it is the authority of the domain on which they were published that is lifting them to high rankings. Young product pages on amazon, new pages on wikipedia are examples.
Great content that has not been marketed to other websites but that is seen by lots of people who visit the domain where it is published can climb the rankings to top positions but that takes more time.
Great content on less visited domains can still rank high over time but the climb up the SERPs can take years to happen.
-
Hello,
The old saying that content is king still remains the same, but there should be an asterisk (*) next to it. Good content is not good if you cannot market it to a wide audience and build interaction and feedback with it. A website that is simply optimized for given keywords will only get you so far. Most people in the SEO industry (myself included) would argue that links represent a hefty percentage of all ranking potential. The split is roughly 50%:25% in favour of link profile over on-site optimization and content from a technical perspective.
These numbers are impacted by interaction metrics (CTR, BR, etc.) which is where content can really be a deal maker. Links represent votes of confidence in your website from other sources. If these sources are authoritative and relevant, you are in good shape from a rankings perspective. Another way to look at it is:
Links are how you get discovered, content is how you generate revenue/interest.
Remember that rankings do not necessarily generate revenue. You need properly-created, relevant and useful content for your user base to make the difference between digital success and failure. The way this content gets discovered is through your link profile and social avenues, among others.
In other words, you are not wrong. Links are still a huge factor when it comes to rankings, but this is not the only aspect of SEO that requires attention. A 1st place ranking will not last if users are not finding what they are looking for once they click through.
Hope these insights help,
Rob
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to get rid of bad backlinks
So I noticed my rankings going down and spam score going up. So under my spam score there are over 100 links for different websites but ALL redirect to semalt.com I researched it and it says they hijacked a bunched of backlinks but don't know much more. How can I get rid of all those backlinks? I was told I could use the disavow tool but apparently that can hurt my ranking as well. The semalt.com site has no backlink to me - it looks like the pages that have/had my backlinks, they've redirected to them. For instance this is one of the links http://www.oxvideos.xyz/indianantyphotoxxx 422005fb-9240-40a4-8b65-f5b1f5079dea-image.png
Link Building | | landlwoof40 -
Video Backlinks
This looks like an interesting idea from Wistia. Anyone have comments or experience with this? http://wistia.com/blog/video-backlinks Best,
Link Building | | ChristopherGlaeser
Christopher1 -
Duplicate Content Link Juice
Hello SEO Community, So sometimes I will pitch one guest post to multiple outlets and if multiple reply positively, I will tell all but the single most authoritative site that the article is being published elsewhere and it won't be unique for their site. But some don't mind and still post anyway. I definitely don't mind because it just means that more people will read my article and more sites will be linking back to me. What are the implications on the link juice from the most authoritative site? What about the other ones (which are still authoritative, just not as much)? Is there any reason I should explicitly tell them not to post if I know it will appear somewhere else? Thanks much,
Link Building | | CleanEdisonInc0 -
What is keyword rich anchor text?
So, I have searched around the internet but, I still can't find the answer.What is Keyword Rich Anchor Text? Is it basically just exact matching to the page. For example if my page was www.randonmpage.com would a keyword rich anchor text be randompage? Thanks. Peter
Link Building | | PeterRota0 -
BackLinks Less than other software
Why Domains BackLinks to my sites are less than link in google webmaster tools or in the other software? In google web master tools i find 323 domains backlink, in other online software the number of domain links is similar. There are great problem when i must download the backlink to upload in other seo software for different analysis, example buzzstream Thank You.
Link Building | | agasystem0 -
Backlinks on Facebook
Has anyone seen the benefits of adding backlinks back to their main site on their facebook page? Also, what about uploading a bunch of pictures of your products onto facebook, and on each picture putting the link directly to that specific product? Anyone know if there is any benefit in doing this? Thanks...
Link Building | | Prime850 -
Wikipedia Backlinks
Does wikipedia nofollow backinks help your site to rank higher in google? I got a niche related backlink from wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_(film) The page has pr 5... does this backlink count? (My backlink is in the bottom of the page anchored "Movies 2012")
Link Building | | prunarevic0 -
Links and keywords
A rather simple question, If i have a paragraph and have the words cat, dog and bird would it be a good idea to have them all linking to the same url? or is better to have them all going to different urls?
Link Building | | Vetshopgroup0