Tuesday July 12th = We suddenly lost all our top Google rankings. Traffic cut in half. Ideas?
-
The attached screenshot shows all.
Panda update hit us hard = we lost half our traffic.
Three months later, Panda tweak gave us traffic back.
Now, this past Tuesday we lost half our traffic again and ALL our top ranking Keywords/phrases on Google (all other search engines keywords holding rank fine).
Did they tweak their algorithm again? What are we doing wrong??
-
couldn't they edit out the links back to your site?
-
something to throw into the mix from a guy I know who was also hit hard by the panda update was the incoming links cname. Do the incoming links you have all come from one particular source or host ?
-
It's a possibility. There have been ongoing discussions on internal linking on most of the major SEO forums for quite some time.
My personal feeling is that most websites can effectively reduce the number of internal links by auditing their link flow, determining their "ideal" real estate and ensuring that they are not necessarily duplicating unnecessary links, which would steal some of the juice that might otherwise go to some of the bigger pages.
Only <5% of people ever see the footer in the average website, so my opinion has always been that the footer should contain supporting links to areas to help the user in "context". Contact, About, Sitemap and Investors, for examples, are classic links one might find there.
Big real estate - or important pages in the website - should be linked to from your main nav or areas above the fold with lots of user exposure.
Keep in mind when changing and removing links - it is a process. Do not go in and remove all or a significant part of your links in one week.
Make one or two good changes, then wait for a period of a week or so, then make others small changes over time
Hope this helps.
Todd
www.seovisions.com -
OK. Well, my suggested strategy would be:
- Go through the list Todd gave to make sure that there is nothing wrong on your site. If not, you can probably assume it was a Google algorithm tweak, so proceed to...
- Work on improving your site, starting with any areas you know of that might be an issue. I would say any content that is not unique would be a good place to start.
-
If you think people are scraping your content, you might want to look into making sure you link back to your pages within your content so that you always get links back in those cases.
I noticed that when scraper site pick up SEOmoz content, tehy dont pick up the footer with the author links back. So make sure to keep links in the actual body text
I also saw a number of site that pull seomoz content into an iframe on their site. Places like twitter and Flickr detect when their pages are opened in an iframe and give a error message -> tabs.to/POL-Lp
-
Thanks - reading up on rel=author now. Looks kinda complicated from the Google instructions..
-
Great advice - I especially like the suspicious inbound links idea.. never thought of that.
We have had experts say that we have too many links per page on average on our site, and that we should consolidate the links in the sitewide footer as they add so many links per page.
Is this a good idea? Are we being hurt by having so many outbound links and such a link heavy footer?
Thanks
-
Place links within your content too if people are talking your content, also add the rel=author attribute.
I would also look at the link profile for your site, have you added any dodgy links recently.
Regards.
-
Drops such as the one you have experienced can be difficult to assess. I would advise the following procedures to rule out other issues first. As Egol correctly stated it is important to not jump to fixes right away, for two reasons. First of all, the situation could be temporary and could revert. Second of all, changes you make will obscure the potential issues, making it more difficult to find problem spots.
1. Check robots.txt to ensure there are no issues with file additions that could be blocking major pages
2. Check link canonical tag, if you use it, to ensure there are no issues there with incorrect urls
3. Check inbound links both using inbound link tools and Webmaster tools for any suspicious bursts of links or links that look dodgy you might not account for
4. Run a sitewide meta check on all titles and meta descriptions and ensure everything is correct. There are software companies that offer fairly inexpensive options that will spider the entire website relatively quickly. Do this late at night post-swell
4. Use Xenu to check all broken links and fix. Even if there are only a few.
5. Run the google bot indexing tool in GWT and check for any instances of funny code or potential problems
6. Analyze your analytics to determine which keyword clusters lots the most positioning. This can often give you clues as to what might have happened.Hope this helps.
Todd
www.seovisions.com -
Study this... implement carefully....
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1229920
-
So at the footer of any article we publish by another author have a link to that author's original article with rel="author" in it?
-
Hold your fire. Your traffic might come back tomorrow.
However, it looks like you are on the edge of whatever Google does not like because you are flashing in and out.
Hang in there, keep working to improve and iron out any problems that you think might be causing this.
-
One thing that I would do is implement the rel="author" attribute in a link to your author pages if you have not already done that.
-
That page has been around for 10 years on our site, and as you can see, many many people are ripping it off, along with all other pages on our site.
Would you recommend an aggressive campaign of "cease and desist" emails to these plagiarizers, coupled with more addition of unique content??
-
All of our top ranked articles are unique, although many people rip them off and it's hard as heck for us to track them all down and get them to remove our content.
I recently did this for our "Raised Garden Bed" Page, which contributes a huge amount of our traffic. It was very labour intensive.
Our blog has a lot of articles that other authors have written and are republished elsewhere.
-
Adam is asking the right question. On http://eartheasy.com/live_water_saving.htm, I grabbed some text "Many beautiful shrubs and plants thrive with far less watering than other species. Replace herbaceous perennial borders with native plants. Native plants will use less water and be more resistant to local plant diseases." That text appears on a bunch of sites. I tried this with several other phrases from different pages on your site, and almost every time several other sites shared identical text to yours.
Google is penalizing you because your content is identical to a bunch of other sites. The more unique, original content you have, the more you should see your rankings rise.
-
Are your articles unique or are they syndicated?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
PDFs With No Index Contribute To Page Ranks?
I have a question I'm hoping you can help me with. If I upload a PDF and add a no index under the meta robots index so that the PDF doesn't appear in search results when I send people the link to this PDF, does it still contribute to my site traffic/ranking etc? Basically we are deciding whether to put some PDFs with pricing options etc onto our website or on a google drive. We will be sending the links to potential clients. If visitors clicking on the link would still help with increasing traffic and increasing our google rank (without that PDF showing in results) we thought this might be the best solution.
Algorithm Updates | | whiterabbitnz0 -
Does Google considers the direct traffic on the pages with rel canonical tags?
Hi community, Let's say there is a duplicate page (A) pointing to original page (B) using rel canonical tag. Pagerank will be passed from Page A to B as the content is very similar and Google honours it hopefully. I wonder how Google treats the direct traffic on the duplicate Page A. We know that direct traffic is also an important ranking factor (correct me if I'm wrong). If the direct traffic is high on the duplicate page A, then how Google considers it? Will there be any score given to original page B? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Page Rank Metrics Disapearing
Hi Everyone. I keep hearing from different people that googles PAGE RANK , Will soon be eliminated. Has anyone heard anything more about this ? Or is this a myth? This would make it more complex for the average person to rely on DA and TF etc.. Would love to hear from you guys. I actually like the PR rating system. Also have websites more then a year old which are still not showing actual PR yet .Maybe delayed or maybe not. Robert
Algorithm Updates | | Yellow20000 -
301 Redirect has removed search rankings
As per instructions from a SEO , we did a 301 redirect on our url to a new url (www.domain.com to subdomain xxxx.domain.com). But the problem is we lost all the google rankings that the previous url had gained. How can we rollback this situation. Can we retrieve the rankings of the previous url if we remove 301 permenant move redirection ? The new url does not figure in the google search for the keyword that use to fetch the previous url at no 3 in the results Please help ...
Algorithm Updates | | BizSparkSEO0 -
What do you think of Google SERP encryption?
Really interesting post by Search Engine Land about this "issue" for tracking conversion, especially for long tail keyword research. I suppose this change will be also applied on all google search pages (.ca, .fr etc.). I Really don't think Webmaster tools is a serious compensation in Analytics for this.
Algorithm Updates | | Olivier_Lambert0 -
Does the browers type affect rankings?
This may be a rooky question so apologies in advance if it is! A client of mine has asked why his site's rank is different when he searches for it from his iPhone or computer (where he uses IE) and also on Bing. Obviously I know that there will be differences between Bing and Google so I can explain that to him. But he seems to be implying that the different browsers are affecting the results on his iPhone and computer. I've tried this myself using Firefox and IE and on Firefox the site ranks page 1 but on IE it ranks page 3 (both using Google). Is this likely to do with the browser having information about my past search habits or is it actually the browser affecting the SERP? Again, sorry if this is a stupid question! Thanks in advance.
Algorithm Updates | | WillCreate0 -
Decrease in Organic Traffic Due to Google Places
Hello there, we are national junk removal company and have franchises in most major cities in the US. We wanted to check to see if anyone else has seen a drop in organic traffic with the changes that Google has done with the amalgamation of Google Places with the organic rankings. All our places pages are ranking quite well and we are ranking higher organically but it appears that people go to the Google Places page and then either leaving or picking up the phone and calling our 1800 number to book a job instead of going to our website to make the booking. The interesting thing is that although Google started these changes back in October 2010 we have seen the drop in organic traffic mostly starting in April, even though we have seen a steady increase in organic ranking across the board. Has any other franchise based company seen this happen as well? Your feedback is greatly appreciated!
Algorithm Updates | | imspecialistgotjunk0 -
Site Usage Statistics and organic ranking
I'm not sure if anyone has tested this properly but i'm begining to suspect that google is using site usage statistics as a site quality guide and ultimately as a ranking variable. The this what i've seen so far on one of my sites (site A) Week 1= bounce rate (83.88%), Avg time on site (0:0:57), Pages/visit (1.28) no changes made to the site apart from the usual link building. Week 2: Traffic drops by 30%, Keywords generating traffic drops by 39%. Bounce rate (87.25%), Avg time on site (0:0:43), pages/visit (1.21). I replaced all affiliate links on my homepage to internal pages where the chunk of the content is and did a reconsideration request. Week 3: Traffic goes up by 30%, keywords generating traffic goes up by 65%, Bounce rate (30.41%), Avg time on site (0:3:02), Pages/visit (3.74). This is not the most scientific test but surely google must be using these variables and a ranking factor? Anyone seen something along these lines or have thoughts on it?
Algorithm Updates | | clickangel0