Site in top 3 with a 1-day old domain and no backlinks
-
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to understand some searchresults, when searching in the netherlands for 'online casino':
http://www.google.nl/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=online+casino&pws=0You'll see as position 3 result this website: http://bit.ly/qhRsUT, it's obviously that this site is there because of blackhat. But how did it come there such high for a keyword with high competition? I don't see anything wrong in the website? It's not like Google did something wrong, because it happened already a few times for this keyword with different domains from that owner.
Regards,
Yannick
-
In this instance the html code is added to a blog comment which seems to be legitimate.
The site adds the nofollow tag to links in comments, but the way the html has been added in this instance allows the link to appear normally without the nofollow tag.
The css for the div class being used is part of the site's code. Based on everything I am seeing it appears most likely the person who added that link has access to the site's code. It could be an employee, or someone who otherwise has access to the server files, or someone who has hacked into the server.
The level of effort involved for this relatively low value link (the PA of the page is 1) is not reasonable for a person to put forth any serious level of effort. If the link's creator is not affiliated with the site, he would have had to study the site's code, found the proper CSS class to reference, and then found a way to inject the HTML into the comment. It's certainly possible, but not at all reasonable.
-
Hi,
I found his blackhat technique, here is an example of his backlink
http://www.thereporterethiopia.com/News/us-admits-prior-knowledge-of-famine.html
The link is not visible to anyone.But if you look in the source code.
<div class="t3-logo-sm ja-video-thumb"><div><p> p><h2>casinoh2><p><span>Poker and blackjack is my favorite at an online <a href ="[http://www.casinostimp.com](view-source:http://www.casinostimp.com/)">casinoa> and I love the casino cash that comes along with it as I am playing. span>p>div>div> He is using hiddentext. -
In the example you offered from Matt Cutts, the context was buying expired domains solely for their backlink value. In this case iwebdevnl shared the website owner has operated other casino sites. The site's footer has a copyright from 2003. I didn't read anything in this Q&A that suggested this site purchased other sites for their backlink value.
If you buy an expired domain because you notice it has good backlinks, then redirect the domain to yours in an effort to boost your backlinks, then yes that is a blackhat activity. Clearly those actions do not benefit users and are being performed for the express goal of manipulating search engine ranking.
Almost any legitimate activity can be transformed into a black hat method.
I am not disputing that this casino site may be involved in black hat techniques. I would share there are not any obvious black hat activities visible on the site, and the act of redirecting another domain to this site is not black hat in and of itself.
A suspicion exists without any solid evidence. If the suspicion is valid and you were willing to dedicate enough time investigating the matter, you could probably find evidence. The question is are you willing to dedicate the hours required to thoroughly research this site? If you are one of the other top sites on the page then it may be profitable to do such.
-
I agree it ain't kosher, but why would a webmaster like the guy i'm talking about care about that? He earn's like hell now in top 3 for such a keyword. if i had such a domain i would have done the same i think.
-
Well Matt Cutts said buying another established domain to 301 redirect to another is against their guidelines. If its domain you own or created i'm sure its legit but if your just buying expired domains and using a 301 I don't think that is kosher.
-
It is not necessarily "getting away" with anything. It is a legitimate SEO tactic.
If SEOmoz.org decided tomorrow their brand would better be served by moving the site to SEOmoz.com, the site would move and all pages would be 301'd to their respective pages on the new site.
In this case SEOmoz already owns the .com domain but let's assume for a moment they just bought it. The .com site would be 1 day old and retain all the rankings (minus a possible small drop based on the loss of link power from the 301) on the new .com site.
This method is designed to allow businesses the flexibility to change and grow over time. There is nothing wrong or blackhat with this approach.
-
Yep, funny Rand was just talking about this in the last webinar. It's surprising Google lets people get away with that still.
-
There is a big difference between a backlink and a 301.
If you receive a backlink that is one link. That link may be highly valued, but it is still one link and can only do so much. A single redirect can forward a page with thousands or even millions of links.
If you take the current #3 site for any search term and move the content to a new site and redirect your traffic to the new site, that "new" site may rank #3 in one day. Maybe it might lose a spot or two due to the redirect, but it still can land on the 1st page of SERPs for a competitive key term immediately. It is not really a "new" site but an old site which has been redirected.
-
Even a new site doesn't appear in top 3 for a high competive keyword like online casino, so i don't believe it's because of the new site-thing. Further i added some new information in my other comment about the only backlink it has.
-
In the netherlands they are quite devoted to anti spamming as well, i just think he's really good with blackhat.
He doesn't dissapear fast, with sites he owned before he staid there for more then 3 weeks, another site which is in top 10 as well for the same keyword: http://bit.ly/oCrLcl uses blackhat as well. This is a domain which he bought from a previous site owner i assume and then put this overlay at this page, but it still doesn't represent which such an overlay make such a page appear in top 10 for such a competive keyword.
-
I just found out with help from another webmaster that this completely new domain got 1 301 redirect from an old-domain he used with blackhat techniques so it appeared in the top 10 for 'online casino' as keyword. That only redirect was enough for appearing with a new website back in the top 3 directly..
-
it's obviously that this site is there because of blackhat.
Can you point out any black hat techniques used? I don't see anything obvious.
Why do you believe there are no backlinks?
New sites get a boost. This is a "new" site but since the copyright is from 2003-2010 and there is plenty of content it seems this is an old site on a new URL. It has a keyword in the domain name and would benefit from the new site boost. Unless the site makes changes I would expect it to drop down in rankings in a month. The site is not optimized for SEO.
-
Amazing, well its possible he has some crazy link scheme going and of course it won't show up in the yahoo index or anywhere a day after it was launched. I'm not sure how strict is with the NL search results, I don't know if there's as much resources devoted to anti spamming as there is in other places.
You said he's done this before, does he usually disappear fast?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How important is a keyword rich domain name for ranking?
I've read that Google has lowered the relevancy of a keyword rich domain name in recent years, but I have a scenario with a client that makes me think otherwise. My client has a particular phrase that they're trying to get rank for and are currently in position 3 of Google. Their primary competitor has position1. Using the Keyword Analysis in Moz Pro, my client has a competitor beat out in Page Authority (45 vs 36), # Root Domains Linking to Page (98 vs 9), Domain Authority (35 vs 24), and # Root Domains Linking to Domain (122 vs 15). The main difference is that the competitor has the exact phrase as part of their domain. Other than that, the phrase (on my client's site) is used in title tags, heading tags, and throughout page content. I can provide additional information if necessary, but does anybody have any general advice about this scenario?
Competitive Research | | robotninja0 -
What's the difference between 'external links' and 'linking domains to this domain' in my report?
I'm looking at a competitor analysis report. The number provided for 'external links' is 150. The number for 'external links to this domain' is 4860 and 'linking domains to this domain' is 232. What are the differences between these numbers?
Competitive Research | | lthompsonon0 -
Local Real Estate Site vs Larger National Sites
Hello all, I am a local realtor that created my website with an idx feed. I am on page one but at the bottom. Question is how can a local real estate website rank better in the SERPS than the larger national brands? Any tips out there from those who have worked with real estate websites and seo? I'm trying to out rank the larger sites for my main keywords. Thanks all.
Competitive Research | | bronxpad0 -
Keywords and Getting Started with them to the top of the Search Engines
We are an online Saas Based startup. Strongly 70% of our daily users come directly to us since they know us by the url . Now there these 30% who scout for software's like ours online. Get to us by some hook or crook and then maybe end up giving the trial a shot. Our Main site is only of say 5-6 pages. These pages have basic info about our product , pricing and contact etc. What I wish to understand is that when one says" getting those keywords to the top of the engines rankings" who do you mean by these - I presume one means that get the keywords you want to compete for and then push in "Adwords" or better content pages? So If I want to rank well - then my websites should have good content pages you mean? Is that correct-? That means now I have to write good content on those keywords or around those keywords- without that there is no hope to come on good on engines right? Correct me here if I sway away from the actual meaning. Next I wish to have campaigns setup in google adwords keeping in mind those competitive keywords - here again does content on my website play a role? If I have no content and then have google adwords setup does that help? Please advice How long before I add good content pages and expect them to show up in my analytics etc? Thanks
Competitive Research | | shanky10 -
How hard could it be to outrank a huffington post article with PA:1 ?
or what would be the quick way to find out? Page Authority 1 mozRank 0.00 mozTrust 0.00 Total Links 0 Internal Links 0 External Links 0 Followed Links 0 Nofollowed Links 0 Linking Root Domains 0 On-Page Analysis Grade A Broad Keyword Usage in Title Yes Broad Keyword Usage in Document Yes Keyword Used in URL Yes KW in Domain No KW Exact Match No Exact Anchor Text Links 0 Linking Root Domains w/ Exact Anchor Text 0 Partial Anchor Text Links 0 Partial Anchor Text Root Doms. 0 Domain Authority 100 Domain mozRank 7.6 Domain mozTrust 7.9 DmT/DmR 1.0 External Links to this domain 40443657 Linking Root Domains to this domain 223797 Linking C-Blocks Domains to this domain 40697 Tweets 6 FB Shares 20 Google Plus One Shares 0
Competitive Research | | antoniorigo0 -
How hard could it be to outrank a huffington post article with PA:1 ?
or what would be the quick way to find out? Page Authority 1 mozRank 0.00 mozTrust 0.00 Total Links 0 Internal Links 0 External Links 0 Followed Links 0 Nofollowed Links 0 Linking Root Domains 0 On-Page Analysis Grade A Broad Keyword Usage in Title Yes Broad Keyword Usage in Document Yes Keyword Used in URL Yes KW in Domain No KW Exact Match No Exact Anchor Text Links 0 Linking Root Domains w/ Exact Anchor Text 0 Partial Anchor Text Links 0 Partial Anchor Text Root Doms. 0 Domain Authority 100 Domain mozRank 7.6 Domain mozTrust 7.9 DmT/DmR 1.0 External Links to this domain 40443657 Linking Root Domains to this domain 223797 Linking C-Blocks Domains to this domain 40697 Tweets 6 FB Shares 20 Google Plus One Shares 0
Competitive Research | | antoniorigo0 -
What sould I focus on to get over the top of my competors ?
Ok, I've been on this site for approximately one week now. There is a lot of good information but quite honestly, I don't know where to shoot at first in getting a better ranking against my competitors I have done pretty much everything on my web site to optimize, but I don't get at all the ranking close to my competition. They don't have as much content as we have other than they have been doing SEO for much longer time. I have worked a lot on the content optimization of our site, I get pretty much good result on some of the keywords, registered my site to google, bing , yahoo, I'm using the site map, configured the robot.txt, on-page metatag, URL canonical, clean-ur, H1 H2 tags, etc etc. Ho, And I just got today the approval of Yahoo Directory Listing. It's not sill showing up, but I guess it will come. You will find attached the output of 2 of my competitors and Us. They both rank very well on the keyword we are interested. Where should I start ? I know the Links Juice i important, but how can I workout my strategy to defeat them. Any help would be appreciated. Best regards, h837v
Competitive Research | | processia0 -
How much weight does Google give to Exact Match Domains?
I'm building a site on a virtual host and now it's ready to go online, but i still have to choose a domain name. One of the main keywords i want to rank for is a 3-word keyword phrase with 9000+ exact match searches per month. Here's an example to better understand my question: 'Guitar training lessons' My main competitor's domain is only 5 months old but it does have the full keyword phrase in it with '4u' added at the end: www.guitartraininglessons4u.com I wanted to go with www.guitartrainingcenter.com (notice that 'lessons' is left out of the domain name) but i'm wondering if my main competitor would have a big advantage by having the full keyword phrase in his domain. How much weight does google give to sites that have the exact search query in their domain name? Does a domain still qualify as 'exact match' if a word (info) is added to it? How much harder would it be to outrank this domain as apposed to a site that doesn't have the keywords in its domain name? Thanks in advance Freek
Competitive Research | | ZeroGrav1