Site in top 3 with a 1-day old domain and no backlinks
-
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to understand some searchresults, when searching in the netherlands for 'online casino':
http://www.google.nl/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=online+casino&pws=0You'll see as position 3 result this website: http://bit.ly/qhRsUT, it's obviously that this site is there because of blackhat. But how did it come there such high for a keyword with high competition? I don't see anything wrong in the website? It's not like Google did something wrong, because it happened already a few times for this keyword with different domains from that owner.
Regards,
Yannick
-
In this instance the html code is added to a blog comment which seems to be legitimate.
The site adds the nofollow tag to links in comments, but the way the html has been added in this instance allows the link to appear normally without the nofollow tag.
The css for the div class being used is part of the site's code. Based on everything I am seeing it appears most likely the person who added that link has access to the site's code. It could be an employee, or someone who otherwise has access to the server files, or someone who has hacked into the server.
The level of effort involved for this relatively low value link (the PA of the page is 1) is not reasonable for a person to put forth any serious level of effort. If the link's creator is not affiliated with the site, he would have had to study the site's code, found the proper CSS class to reference, and then found a way to inject the HTML into the comment. It's certainly possible, but not at all reasonable.
-
Hi,
I found his blackhat technique, here is an example of his backlink
http://www.thereporterethiopia.com/News/us-admits-prior-knowledge-of-famine.html
The link is not visible to anyone.But if you look in the source code.
<div class="t3-logo-sm ja-video-thumb"><div><p> p><h2>casinoh2><p><span>Poker and blackjack is my favorite at an online <a href ="[http://www.casinostimp.com](view-source:http://www.casinostimp.com/)">casinoa> and I love the casino cash that comes along with it as I am playing. span>p>div>div> He is using hiddentext. -
In the example you offered from Matt Cutts, the context was buying expired domains solely for their backlink value. In this case iwebdevnl shared the website owner has operated other casino sites. The site's footer has a copyright from 2003. I didn't read anything in this Q&A that suggested this site purchased other sites for their backlink value.
If you buy an expired domain because you notice it has good backlinks, then redirect the domain to yours in an effort to boost your backlinks, then yes that is a blackhat activity. Clearly those actions do not benefit users and are being performed for the express goal of manipulating search engine ranking.
Almost any legitimate activity can be transformed into a black hat method.
I am not disputing that this casino site may be involved in black hat techniques. I would share there are not any obvious black hat activities visible on the site, and the act of redirecting another domain to this site is not black hat in and of itself.
A suspicion exists without any solid evidence. If the suspicion is valid and you were willing to dedicate enough time investigating the matter, you could probably find evidence. The question is are you willing to dedicate the hours required to thoroughly research this site? If you are one of the other top sites on the page then it may be profitable to do such.
-
I agree it ain't kosher, but why would a webmaster like the guy i'm talking about care about that? He earn's like hell now in top 3 for such a keyword. if i had such a domain i would have done the same i think.
-
Well Matt Cutts said buying another established domain to 301 redirect to another is against their guidelines. If its domain you own or created i'm sure its legit but if your just buying expired domains and using a 301 I don't think that is kosher.
-
It is not necessarily "getting away" with anything. It is a legitimate SEO tactic.
If SEOmoz.org decided tomorrow their brand would better be served by moving the site to SEOmoz.com, the site would move and all pages would be 301'd to their respective pages on the new site.
In this case SEOmoz already owns the .com domain but let's assume for a moment they just bought it. The .com site would be 1 day old and retain all the rankings (minus a possible small drop based on the loss of link power from the 301) on the new .com site.
This method is designed to allow businesses the flexibility to change and grow over time. There is nothing wrong or blackhat with this approach.
-
Yep, funny Rand was just talking about this in the last webinar. It's surprising Google lets people get away with that still.
-
There is a big difference between a backlink and a 301.
If you receive a backlink that is one link. That link may be highly valued, but it is still one link and can only do so much. A single redirect can forward a page with thousands or even millions of links.
If you take the current #3 site for any search term and move the content to a new site and redirect your traffic to the new site, that "new" site may rank #3 in one day. Maybe it might lose a spot or two due to the redirect, but it still can land on the 1st page of SERPs for a competitive key term immediately. It is not really a "new" site but an old site which has been redirected.
-
Even a new site doesn't appear in top 3 for a high competive keyword like online casino, so i don't believe it's because of the new site-thing. Further i added some new information in my other comment about the only backlink it has.
-
In the netherlands they are quite devoted to anti spamming as well, i just think he's really good with blackhat.
He doesn't dissapear fast, with sites he owned before he staid there for more then 3 weeks, another site which is in top 10 as well for the same keyword: http://bit.ly/oCrLcl uses blackhat as well. This is a domain which he bought from a previous site owner i assume and then put this overlay at this page, but it still doesn't represent which such an overlay make such a page appear in top 10 for such a competive keyword.
-
I just found out with help from another webmaster that this completely new domain got 1 301 redirect from an old-domain he used with blackhat techniques so it appeared in the top 10 for 'online casino' as keyword. That only redirect was enough for appearing with a new website back in the top 3 directly..
-
it's obviously that this site is there because of blackhat.
Can you point out any black hat techniques used? I don't see anything obvious.
Why do you believe there are no backlinks?
New sites get a boost. This is a "new" site but since the copyright is from 2003-2010 and there is plenty of content it seems this is an old site on a new URL. It has a keyword in the domain name and would benefit from the new site boost. Unless the site makes changes I would expect it to drop down in rankings in a month. The site is not optimized for SEO.
-
Amazing, well its possible he has some crazy link scheme going and of course it won't show up in the yahoo index or anywhere a day after it was launched. I'm not sure how strict is with the NL search results, I don't know if there's as much resources devoted to anti spamming as there is in other places.
You said he's done this before, does he usually disappear fast?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can deceptive ads help sites to rank? Pogosticking effect involved...
Hello,
Competitive Research | | fablau
I have a question for you. I have noticed that many music sites that appear in the first top results for keywords our users search for, include all the same ads that deceive people by inviting them to "Download" or get the "Full Album" of what people may be search for. Look at the following websites that are often displayed at the first spots for keywords like "Christmas Sheet Music" (just an example): [....] They all have, most of the times, the same ads. Look at the following screenshots taken from the sites above (the ads are at the top of the page): http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/storage/google/Shot1.jpg
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/storage/google/Shot2.jpg Those deceptive ads could engage users more than legitimate websites not showing those ads or not showing ads at all, making Google think that people are more engaged on those website showing those deceptive ads. If it is quality that Google is looking for, shouldn't they do something to avoid having sites ranking well just because of some deceptive ads that take users into action, but without any useful result? I am eager to know your ideas on this issue. Thanks! Fab.0 -
What's the value of Exact Match Keyword Domains vs. Company Name Domains?
Hey Mozers, I was in a discussion this morning about the value of Exact Match Keyword domains vs. a company name domain and wanted to get a little more clarification. Let's say we are doing a site for a company called Favored Dental, and they have had the domain favoredental.com for quite a while and have their authority built up in it. Is it better to have favored-dental.com or favoreddental.co or keep its current form? The reasoning behind the alternate domains would be they have the exact match keyterm, in this case lets say "Favored Dental" is the keyterm we were going after. To my knowledge EMDs aren't as relevant as they'd use to be as Google would rather branding of companies instead of keyterm domains? Is this correct, or do EMDs of keywords you're going after hold higher authority? Thanks for the clarification!
Competitive Research | | MonsterWeb280 -
Site Architecture for a Services Company
Hey everyone, I'm doing the keyword research for a new virtual assistant services website that I am building. Being that there's almost a limitless number of services that a customer can outsource to a virtual assistant, I have a lot of service keyword options. Here's the problem: I don't know how to layout my services in a scalable fashion so that I can continue to add onto the services list (each with their own unique and helpful page) after the website is published. I have two options: 1. Create a service page with categories, each with links to the individual services. Like on my competitor: http://www.virtualemployee.com/services but with links to pages focused on the individual service keyword (ex. virtual receptionist services). 2. Don't have a services page, but include the services as blog posts like on my competitor's website: http://www.virtualstafffinder.com/blog. Obviously, the blog would be much more "scalable" in the terms of adding more services. It also reduces a lot of clutter on my website. However, it's not categorized like the average service or e-commerce website. Not sure if this is necessarily a bad thing. What do you think? Your help would be greatly appreciated!
Competitive Research | | Stryde0 -
Why is the Site indexed?
Hi, I'm trying to test a few things for which I've registered and set up new domains. For the set up I used Wordpress. Each Site has about three articles in it but no links pointing to them. Also I didn't take any measures to get my site indexed. However, one week later all my sites were indexed. Why is that and how can it be? I'm thankful for any answer since the problem is really ruining my test environment. The only clue I have, as to why this could be happening, is that I didn't remove the ping sites.Is that the reason? Or are there also other reasons? Thanks
Competitive Research | | Windex0 -
Why my site doesn't come on top even though search terms are very similar or exact?
For example, when I search in google for "Kookaburra Pro 600 wheelie kit bag", my site comes 9th on 1st page but 3rd link doesn't even match the exact key word rather it has few of the words. Can one of you expert please explain how it works? Thanks, CricMax
Competitive Research | | cricmax0 -
Is there a tool that will tell me how many visitors per day a website receives?
Hey guys, I am new to SEOMoz and have setup my first campaign, so far very impressed with what is possible. However I am trying to find out how much traffic a website is getting, as I know that people can be high up on certain keywords but are not actually generating any traffic from them. Can anyone help? Also I have a potential client who is ranking really high on alexa because of its american traffic, yet when I asked them they get very few bookings from americans. How can I view the UK ranking of the site? Thanks Andy
Competitive Research | | iprosoftware0 -
Isn't unfair that Keyword domain Exactly Match just overpowers every domain and page authority?
Im currently doing a research for a low-medium competitive keyword (SEO Moz Keyword difficult Tool it showed 36% competition, its a one word keyword) in my country. That keyword had a Google AdWords Broad Match of 368.000 searchs and a Google AdWords Exact Match of 33.100 searchs in April. The currently number one site for that keyword have an exactly match for that keyword, www.KEYWORD.com and nothing else. Then I ran and advanced report to that keyword and heres the initial result: This number one site has a domain authority of only 11 and a page authority of 25. The second site have the following domain name -> www.companynameKEYWORD.com.br (its in Brasil, so theorically and .br should worth more than a .com domain right?) Anyway the second site have a domain authority of 37 and a page rank authority of 45. So after this link all the others are like that, www.companynameKEYWORD.com and the domain and page authority is according to how it suposed to be (higher domain and page are ranked better). The exactly same thing happen when I search for a more long tail of this keyword (wich are 2 words) happen. The exactly match are ranked 1st with a very low page and domian authority while the others come first. Some more info about that number 1 ranked site- The layout is terrible and not user friendly. The site took more than 10 seconds to load Have not a single inpage SEO optimization. According to alexa the bounce rate is around 50% Now follows the data from Linkscape data between the 1st and 2nd ranked pages Overal Score - 19% x 38% Page mozRank - 2.04 x 3.95 Page mozTrust - 4.92 x 5.45 External mozRank - 2.04 x 3.95 Subdomain mozRank - 1.81 x 3.45 Domains Linkin - 4 x 163 External Links - 8 x 265 So, looks like that only two things should be 90% of the focus from a SEO perspective. Have an old exactly keyword match domain and youre good to go 😄 Edited 1: About the linkbacks to each page The 1st page in rank biggest page authority linking back (dofollow) have an authority of 36 from a domain authority of 49 The 2nd in the rank the highest dofollow linkback have a page authority of 40 and domain of 85 Edit 2: 1st in rank were created in 2000 2nd in rank were created in 2007
Competitive Research | | bemcapaz1
