Site in top 3 with a 1-day old domain and no backlinks
-
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to understand some searchresults, when searching in the netherlands for 'online casino':
http://www.google.nl/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=online+casino&pws=0You'll see as position 3 result this website: http://bit.ly/qhRsUT, it's obviously that this site is there because of blackhat. But how did it come there such high for a keyword with high competition? I don't see anything wrong in the website? It's not like Google did something wrong, because it happened already a few times for this keyword with different domains from that owner.
Regards,
Yannick
-
In this instance the html code is added to a blog comment which seems to be legitimate.
The site adds the nofollow tag to links in comments, but the way the html has been added in this instance allows the link to appear normally without the nofollow tag.
The css for the div class being used is part of the site's code. Based on everything I am seeing it appears most likely the person who added that link has access to the site's code. It could be an employee, or someone who otherwise has access to the server files, or someone who has hacked into the server.
The level of effort involved for this relatively low value link (the PA of the page is 1) is not reasonable for a person to put forth any serious level of effort. If the link's creator is not affiliated with the site, he would have had to study the site's code, found the proper CSS class to reference, and then found a way to inject the HTML into the comment. It's certainly possible, but not at all reasonable.
-
Hi,
I found his blackhat technique, here is an example of his backlink
http://www.thereporterethiopia.com/News/us-admits-prior-knowledge-of-famine.html
The link is not visible to anyone.But if you look in the source code.
<div class="t3-logo-sm ja-video-thumb"><div><p> p><h2>casinoh2><p><span>Poker and blackjack is my favorite at an online <a href ="[http://www.casinostimp.com](view-source:http://www.casinostimp.com/)">casinoa> and I love the casino cash that comes along with it as I am playing. span>p>div>div> He is using hiddentext. -
In the example you offered from Matt Cutts, the context was buying expired domains solely for their backlink value. In this case iwebdevnl shared the website owner has operated other casino sites. The site's footer has a copyright from 2003. I didn't read anything in this Q&A that suggested this site purchased other sites for their backlink value.
If you buy an expired domain because you notice it has good backlinks, then redirect the domain to yours in an effort to boost your backlinks, then yes that is a blackhat activity. Clearly those actions do not benefit users and are being performed for the express goal of manipulating search engine ranking.
Almost any legitimate activity can be transformed into a black hat method.
I am not disputing that this casino site may be involved in black hat techniques. I would share there are not any obvious black hat activities visible on the site, and the act of redirecting another domain to this site is not black hat in and of itself.
A suspicion exists without any solid evidence. If the suspicion is valid and you were willing to dedicate enough time investigating the matter, you could probably find evidence. The question is are you willing to dedicate the hours required to thoroughly research this site? If you are one of the other top sites on the page then it may be profitable to do such.
-
I agree it ain't kosher, but why would a webmaster like the guy i'm talking about care about that? He earn's like hell now in top 3 for such a keyword. if i had such a domain i would have done the same i think.
-
Well Matt Cutts said buying another established domain to 301 redirect to another is against their guidelines. If its domain you own or created i'm sure its legit but if your just buying expired domains and using a 301 I don't think that is kosher.
-
It is not necessarily "getting away" with anything. It is a legitimate SEO tactic.
If SEOmoz.org decided tomorrow their brand would better be served by moving the site to SEOmoz.com, the site would move and all pages would be 301'd to their respective pages on the new site.
In this case SEOmoz already owns the .com domain but let's assume for a moment they just bought it. The .com site would be 1 day old and retain all the rankings (minus a possible small drop based on the loss of link power from the 301) on the new .com site.
This method is designed to allow businesses the flexibility to change and grow over time. There is nothing wrong or blackhat with this approach.
-
Yep, funny Rand was just talking about this in the last webinar. It's surprising Google lets people get away with that still.
-
There is a big difference between a backlink and a 301.
If you receive a backlink that is one link. That link may be highly valued, but it is still one link and can only do so much. A single redirect can forward a page with thousands or even millions of links.
If you take the current #3 site for any search term and move the content to a new site and redirect your traffic to the new site, that "new" site may rank #3 in one day. Maybe it might lose a spot or two due to the redirect, but it still can land on the 1st page of SERPs for a competitive key term immediately. It is not really a "new" site but an old site which has been redirected.
-
Even a new site doesn't appear in top 3 for a high competive keyword like online casino, so i don't believe it's because of the new site-thing. Further i added some new information in my other comment about the only backlink it has.
-
In the netherlands they are quite devoted to anti spamming as well, i just think he's really good with blackhat.
He doesn't dissapear fast, with sites he owned before he staid there for more then 3 weeks, another site which is in top 10 as well for the same keyword: http://bit.ly/oCrLcl uses blackhat as well. This is a domain which he bought from a previous site owner i assume and then put this overlay at this page, but it still doesn't represent which such an overlay make such a page appear in top 10 for such a competive keyword.
-
I just found out with help from another webmaster that this completely new domain got 1 301 redirect from an old-domain he used with blackhat techniques so it appeared in the top 10 for 'online casino' as keyword. That only redirect was enough for appearing with a new website back in the top 3 directly..
-
it's obviously that this site is there because of blackhat.
Can you point out any black hat techniques used? I don't see anything obvious.
Why do you believe there are no backlinks?
New sites get a boost. This is a "new" site but since the copyright is from 2003-2010 and there is plenty of content it seems this is an old site on a new URL. It has a keyword in the domain name and would benefit from the new site boost. Unless the site makes changes I would expect it to drop down in rankings in a month. The site is not optimized for SEO.
-
Amazing, well its possible he has some crazy link scheme going and of course it won't show up in the yahoo index or anywhere a day after it was launched. I'm not sure how strict is with the NL search results, I don't know if there's as much resources devoted to anti spamming as there is in other places.
You said he's done this before, does he usually disappear fast?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Possible google sandbox issue? Organically ranking page 1 for our number 1 keyword, but page 5 sometimes 6 on google?
What are some things I can look into to figure out why google is ranking us on page 5 sometimes page 6, with some slight rank boosts to rank 36 from 48 but then falls right back. While Yahoo and Bing rank us page 1 consistently, without these big drops back. I use google search ( webmaster tools ) daily, fix 404s and make sure to fetch new content I create. Our site is within the Sandbox issue time frame, google 1st indexed the site about a year and a half ago, the site has been through various SEO service checks, and has had those issues fixed ( some bigcommerce won't allow, such as full sitewide ssl and a few other small factors ) but all the big stuff was handled or will be 100% handled after this redesign is complete. But just still seems we're stuck in the google hole again. We do use adwords, but no clear signs as to why we'd suffer such hardships with google ranking, only thing we don't have optimized in terms of on page optimization from moz is keyword in url, of which will be changing within the next month or two, as we're rolling our a new redesign with SEO 100% at the forefront, nice url paths, with keywords in their url, much more responsive site that uses less resources. But before we release this redesign, I'd like to find out what toe we stubbed of google's to give us such a ranking blackeye... We don't have that many backlinks, and I know these are a huge factor, however, building quality backlinks it's harder than walking on water at time and on the same level as spinning hay into gold. Any ideas community...
Competitive Research | | Deacyde0 -
Domain Name Keyword Change
Hello. I have a question. I currently have a client who is exploring the option of changing his domain name to one which includes a key word and his company name. Currently he is using a domain name which does not include a keyword and does not include his company name. I understand that with proper redirects we can keep a significant amount of the juice behind it and we aren't so concerned about the domain name change. However my clients only concern is this. His company and new domain have the words Best Buy in it. He is concerned about the words best buy being in the domain name as it would be directly competing with the electronics giants. Should this even be a concern? He isn't in the electronics business and the remaining of the domain would include a keyword which directly relates to his business. Any input would be appreciated.
Competitive Research | | Imagination0 -
Any Tool for Tracking Domain / Page Authority Growth?
Is there any tool available in the market where there is a ranking list of fastest growth in Domain and Page Authority? I launched a job site 8 months ago and I am curious to see what % of websites (not just job specific) have experienced faster growth in a similar time frame in Domain and Page Authority to get a sense of what may have been accomplished. thank you very much,
Competitive Research | | knielsen0 -
One client - 2 domains / same business - good or bad idea?
This is a follow up to a previous question actually: My client has one domain that has 'hardwood flooring' in it and one that has 'concrete polishing' in it - both services they offer. **Would it be wise (for seo purposes) to have them both point to ONE domain (more general of course) ** **- They only have a few local competitors that aren't doing anything to rank well. ** **- They aren't trying to rank nationally. ** If the smart thing to do is to have them point to one (more general) domain using a 301 direct will there traffic drop significantly? (at least for a short time) Does it matter if they continue to keep the existing domains they are using now on their literature, business cards, etc. and let them continue pointing to the new domain or should they really start promoting the new domain name? (They do NOT want to do this). My only concern is saving them time and money by not having to build links, submit articles, social media, on and on for two different sites OK, that's like 3 questions Thank you VERY much for any thoughts or opinions on the matter! 🙂 Have a great week everybody! Matthew
Competitive Research | | Mrupp440 -
What is the best tool to monitor your competitor's backlinks?
I am looking for a tool that not only accurately tells me how many links are being built by a competitor, I want to know the specific URLs for specific periods. If I can filter/search by time periods, i.e which links were added for the month of August, 2012, that would be great. Thanks for the help.
Competitive Research | | inhouseseo0 -
Reached No. 1 for my Keyword, what next?
Hi, After months of targeting, promoting etc... I have now reached Google.co.uk rank position 1 for my phrase "creative recreation trainers" and I stand at rank 3 on Google.com. I am happy with these results as this is the phrase I targeted and this is the brand I wanted to rank first for. But were do I go from here? I am thinking I change brand and try work some magic on that, but still continuing to add backlinks etc... to the Creative keyword phrase? What would people advise? Also can anyone do an analysis of any sort on that keyword phrase and/or the url http://www.designerboutique-online.com/all-clothing/creative-recreation/ and tell me some good points, bad points, what to do next and so on? Any help would be great. Thanks
Competitive Research | | YNWA0 -
How to find all the backlinks of a website?
Hello, I would like to know if there is a tool or a way to find all the backlinks of a website in order to understand how this site does get traffic? Thanks, JD
Competitive Research | | sarenausa0 -
In Open Site Explorer, what does it mean when a linking page does not contain any reference to the URl entered?
When running Open Site Explorer on a particular URL, I get a list of linking pages. Many of these pages have a high Page Authority. I am assuming that this is a list of pages that presumably link to the URL I entered. First, is this correct? Next, when I click on an entry in the list I don't see any reference to the URL on the page, even viewing the page source. What does this mean and why is the link in the list?
Competitive Research | | jkenyon1