News Errors In Google Search Console
-
Years ago a site I'm working on was publishing news as one form of content on the site.
Since then, has stopped publishing news, but still has a q&a forum, blogs, articles... all kinds of stuff.
Now, it triggers "News Errors" in GWT under crawl errors. These errors are
"Article disproportionately short"
"Article fragmented" on some q&a forum pages
"Article too long" on some longer q&a forum pages
"No sentences found"
Since there are thousands of these forum pages and it's problem seems to be a news critique, I'm wondering what I should do about it. It seems to be holding these non-news pages to a news standard:
https://support.google.com/news/publisher/answer/40787?hl=en
For instance, is there a way and would it be a good idea to get the hell out of Google News, since we don't publish news anymore? Would there be possible negatives worth considering?
What's baffling is, these are not designated news urls. The ones we used to have were /news/title-of-the-story per...
https://support.google.com/news/publisher/answer/2481373?hl=en&ref_topic=2481296
Or, does this really not matter and I should just blow it off as a problem.
The weird thing is that we recently went from http to https and The Google News interface still has us as http and gives the option to add https, which I am reluctant to do sine we aren't really in the news business anymore.
What do you think I should do?
Thanks!
-
Update: 5 months later, the problem has long since gone away.
-
Thanks for the answers Matthew & Martijn. So, I'm going to go with what I have in place... 301s to the main forums page to pick up/recycle the incoming links to that section and removing the /news category from where Google News looks for news, but not leave the Google News program altogether right now.
Thanks, again!
-
I'd opt for 301s if there is any link equity on those pages worth pushing to the forum pages. If not, I'd robots.txt them out to save on wasted crawl.
-
HI Matthew,
Thanks for the insight. On your, "I think the important part is that Google doesn't suddenly crawl a bunch of 404s that they think are news pages of some importance" would you robots.txt out the old category they looked at (/news) or leave it and figure out via the mass of 301s and the removal from the url structure we told them to crawl, so that Google figures it out on it's own?
-
Hi there,
It wouldn't be a problem to get out of Google News, but by the same logic, it wouldn't hurt just to leave it alone and let them figure out you're not publishing news anymore. It won't affect your web search rankings, since you're not targeting traffic from the news onebox or news.google.com.
These old pages redirect to forum pages? I think the important part is that Google doesn't suddenly crawl a bunch of 404s that they think are news pages of some importance.
-
Possible, hard to guess what your current set-up looks like. What you could do alternatively is set up a robots.txt with Disallow statement that are only targeting the Google News bot instead of just the general Google Bot.
-
Hi Martijn,
We still have the old /news url still in Google News. I don't think we've ever submitted a news site map.
Is there any downside to deleting the url structure they're currently looking at, which does forward to our forum? Or, would it be better to just get out of Google News altogether, since we don't really have or publish news anymore? Is there a downside to that?
To summarize... delete the url they look to as news or get out of Google News altogether... what do you think?
Thanks!
-
Are you still submitting a Google News Sitemap to Google Search Console? Because usually that's the biggest reason where these errors are coming from because Google is picking up these kind of 'new' pages/articles as news content and then seeing it doesn't match with their guidelines.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Recent changes to Google organic search?
We have a client's website that was on page 1 for 2 years, and then in September fell off while a new website with virtually no visitors and never showing in organic search before shot to #1. Never seen anything like it. Today, my client is back where they were two weeks ago and the #1 listing I mentioned is not even on page 1 at all. In fact it's at the bottom of page 2! It seems to us, having read about Google organic changes made around July 3rd, 2018, that even more emphasis is now on the domain name (all the results on page 1 have my client's keyword in their domain name) and the importance of H1 tags and Title tags has risen to trump many other factors. Can anyone shed some light on changes you may have seen in the past few months? Along with huge changes to Adwords and AdGrants, Google seems all over the place (at least to us) and it is more challenging then ever. Thanks!!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Teamzig0 -
Google does not want to index my page
I have a site that is hundreds of page indexed on Google. But there is a page that I put in the footer section that Google seems does not like and are not indexing that page. I've tried submitting it to their index through google webmaster and it will appear on Google index but then after a few days it's gone again. Before that page had canonical meta to another page, but it is removed now.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | odihost0 -
How do we preserve images in google search after CMS migration?
Hi Folks we are about to migrate to a new CMS (bigcommerce/volusion type of thing) are are advised that we will preserve our google love for our old URLS with 301 re-directs. OK but what about images that show in search (we have a lot of our images show up high in relevant google image search) will this method work the same or should we do something else to keep the image benefits? many thanks Tom
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tomnivore0 -
Does Google still don't index Hashtag Links ? No chance to get a Search Result that leads directly to a section of a page? or to one of numeras Hashtag Pages in a single HTML page?
Does Google still don't index Hashtag Links ? No chance to get a Search Result that leads directly to a section of a page? or to one of numeras Hashtag Pages in a single HTML page? If I have 4 or 5 different hashtag link section pages , consolidated into one HTML Page, no chance to get one of the Hashtag Pages to appear as a search result? like, if under one Single Page Travel Guide I have two essential sections: #Attractions #Visa no chance to direct search queries for Visa directly to the Hashtag Link Section of #Visa? Thanks for any help
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Muhammad_Jabali0 -
Do Local Search Efforts (Citations, NAP, Reviews) have an impact on traditional organic search listings (without the A, B, C mapping icons), but rather the traditional listings?
Are citations, NAP, Reviews, and other local search efforts impact traditional SEO listings? Can one elaborate?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JQC0 -
How does google recognize original content?
Well, we wrote our own product descriptions for 99% of the products we have. They are all descriptive, has at least 4 bullet points to show best features of the product without reading the all description. So instead using a manufacturer description, we spent $$$$ and worked with a copywriter and still doing the same thing whenever we add a new product to the website. However since we are using a product datafeed and send it to amazon and google, they use our product descriptions too. I always wait couple of days until google crawl our product pages before i send recently added products to amazon or google. I believe if google crawls our product page first, we will be the owner of the content? Am i right? If not i believe amazon is taking advantage of my original content. I am asking it because we are a relatively new ecommerce store (online since feb 1st) while we didn't have a lot of organic traffic in the past, i see that our organic traffic dropped like 50% in April, seems like it was effected latest google update. Since we never bought a link or did black hat link building. Actually we didn't do any link building activity until last month. So google thought that we have a shallow or duplicated content and dropped our rankings? I see that our organic traffic is improving very very slowly since then but basically it is like between 5%-10% of our current daily traffic. What do you guys think? You think all our original content effort is going to trash?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | serkie1 -
Should We Link To Our News?
We just started an "In the News" section on our webpage. We are not sure what would be the best for SEO purposes. Should we link to the news websites that have the stories about our company, even if they have no link bank? Or should we just take screenshots of the news article and only link to articles that link back to us (this is what we a currently doing)? Here is our news page, http://www.buyautoparts.com/News/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | joebuilder0 -
Google bot vs google mobile bot
Hi everyone 🙂 I seriously hope you can come up with an idea to a solution for the problem below, cause I am kinda stuck 😕 Situation: A client of mine has a webshop located on a hosted server. The shop is made in a closed CMS, meaning that I have very limited options for changing the code. Limited access to pagehead and can within the CMS only use JavaScript and HTML. The only place I have access to a server-side language is in the root where a Defualt.asp file redirects the visitor to a specific folder where the webshop is located. The webshop have 2 "languages"/store views. One for normal browsers and google-bot and one for mobile browsers and google-mobile-bot.In the default.asp (asp classic). I do a test for user agent and redirect the user to one domain or the mobile, sub-domain. All good right? unfortunately not. Now we arrive at the core of the problem. Since the mobile shop was added on a later date, Google already had most of the pages from the shop in it's index. and apparently uses them as entrance pages to crawl the site with the mobile bot. Hence it never sees the default.asp (or outright ignores it).. and this causes as you might have guessed a huge pile of "Dub-content" Normally you would just place some user-agent detection in the page head and either throw Google a 301 or a rel-canon. But since I only have access to JavaScript and html in the page head, this cannot be done. I'm kinda running out of options quickly, so if anyone has an idea as to how the BEEP! I get Google to index the right domains for the right devices, please feel free to comment. 🙂 Any and all ideas are more then welcome.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ReneReinholdt0