Google Search Console issue: "This is how Googlebot saw the page" showing part of page being covered up
-
Hi everyone!
Kind of a weird question here but I'll ask and see if anyone else has seen this:
In Google Search Console when I do a fetch and render request for a specific site, the fetch and blocked resources all look A-OK.
However, in the render, there's a large grey box (background of navigation) that covers up a significant amount of what is on the page.
Attaching a screenshot.
You can see the text start peeking out below (had to trim for confidentiality reasons). But behind that block of grey IS text. And text that apparently in the fetch part Googlebot does see and can crawl.
My question: is this an issue? Should I be concerned about this visual look? Or no?
Never have experienced an issue like that.
I will say - trying to make a play at a featured snippet and can't seem to have Google display this page's information, despite it being the first result and the query showing a featured snippet of a result #4. I know that it isn't guaranteed for the #1 result but wonder if this has anything to do with why it isn't showing one.
-
Good to hear no performance issue. Obviously that is priority number one. Definitely don't sweat the render. You might want to refetch and see how it looks. also give it shot with mobile fetch to see if you get anything different.
A lot of us are chasing the position zero snippet. I didn't look at your site closely but i would start by making sure that every single item (as appropriate) is marked up with schema.org. That will put you closer to your goal
-
No performance issues, other than not capturing the featured snippet despite my best efforts
Really, I'm mostly concerned about the render, as I hadn't seen that in the 10ish years I've been doing SEO.
Seems like, with your great help (thanks so much again!), that it probably isn't actually an issue of any kind that is hindering performance or the ability to capture the featured snippet.
-
Hi Christian, my apologies, i should have noted that. The CSS does not render in the text cache version. The value though is that you can see if something is crawlable/displaying properly. So for instance, if you looked at that cached version and didnt see any of the content on your page, you know you have something stopping the search engines from properly crawaling and indexing the page.
edit. noticing when looking at the link that the full version doesn't show the CSS either. That's a bit weird. I wouldn't worry about it too much as it seems other pages on your site are rendering properly in the full version.
are you seeing any performance issues with the page or is the concern originally due to just the fact that grey box was displaying in the search/render feature of console?
-
Totally hear you.
Here's a link to the page: https://goo.gl/kZVqE9
Will also say: the cached version of it in Google is also very strange. Almost like CSS not really working.
-
Without knowing the URL its really difficult to audit this situation. My first thought is to ask if you have a pop up that loads when a user comes to your page. Google could be rendering the popup without its content. To your point the content on the page is still shown but only behind the popup.
When you look at the actual text cache of the page are you seeing the actual text of the page? If this is the case I would rely on this more than the rendered version. Honestly, it could be multiple things but without the URL it really is nearly impossible to tell you why.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate 'meta title' issue (AMP & NON-AMP Pages)
how to fix duplicate meta title issue in amp and non-amp pages? example.com
On-Page Optimization | | 21centuryweb
example.com/amp We have set the 'meta title' in desktop version & we don't want to change the title for AMP page as we have more than 10K pages on the website. ----As per SEMRUSH Tool---- ABOUT THIS ISSUE It is a bad idea to duplicate your title tag content in your first-level header. If your page’s <title>and <h1> tags match, the latter may appear over-optimized to search engines. Also, using the same content in titles and headers means a lost opportunity to incorporate other relevant keywords for your page.</p> <p><strong>HOW TO FIX IT</strong></p> <p>Try to create different content for your <title> and <h1> tags.<br /><br />this is what they are recommending, for the above issue we have asked our team to create unique meta and post title for desktop version but what about AMP page?<br /><br />Please help!</p></title>0 -
Should we rename and update a page or create a new page entirely?
Hi Moz Peoples! We have a small site with a simple site navigation, with only a few links on the nav bar. We have been doing some work to create a new page, which will eventually replace one of the links on the nav bar. The question we are having is, is it better to rename the existing page and replace its content and then wait for the great indexer to do its thing, or perm delete the page and replace it with the new page and content? Or is this a case where it really makes no difference as long as the redirects are set up correctly?
On-Page Optimization | | Parker8180 -
"translation" of code in htaccess file
Hi everyone! I am a newbie to the whole SEO and html thing and I am trying to get a better understanding of the "behind the scenes" part of my website. I hope I can find someone here who can translate a piece of code for me that I have in my htaccess file: Options -Multiviews
On-Page Optimization | | momof4
Options +FollowSymLinks
rewritecond $1 !^(index.php|public|tmp|robots.txt|template.html|favicon.ico|images|css|uploads)
rewritecond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
rewritecond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
rewriterule ^(.*)$ index.php?link=$1 [NC,L,QSA] I know that something is getting redirected to the index file, but what (or when) exactly? Does the word "robots"mean that search engine crawlers are getting redirected here? And is this good or bad (in terms of SEO)? Or is this redirecting people who try to get to my robots/ template or image files?? Thanks in advance for any answers!0 -
Google Map Marker not showing up when using HTML Embed Code
Hi community, For several clients, when embedding the Google Maps, the Marker DOES NOT appear. I am copying straight from Google Maps, it appears fine in Google Maps. Is there HTML I can add or is there something wrong with the map marker to begin with? These are verified listings. Help! Thank you! Priscilla
On-Page Optimization | | FullMedia900 -
Does the title tag on the home page affect sub-pages?
Hello. I am thinking of changing our home page title tag to include our two most valuable keywords from two of our sub-pages. Would this help the rankings of those two sub-pages? Thank you!
On-Page Optimization | | nyc-seo0 -
How do I get other pages to show in SERPs
Why is it that when you google a domain like yahoo.com you sometimes get a main SERP and 6 sub SERPs below it. This concerns the 1st position.
On-Page Optimization | | ribandhull0 -
Should I use a Page Name variable after the ? for a dynamic web page
I'm converting for static to dynamic web pages. It appears that the page name is used for page ranking in the search engines. Will adding a Page Name variable help to increase our SEO. For example aspecialgift.com/subcat.php?PageName=GiftPage&ProductID=ABCDE. Does the page name variable make a difference?
On-Page Optimization | | NCBob0