Community Discussion: Can 10x content be short-form content?
-
In his (intentionally very short) post on Tuesday, Rand makes the case that long-form content isn't necessarily great content:
"Rather than applying a tactic like long-form content universally or setting length as the bar (or even a metric) for greatness, we instead match our content to our audience's needs and our business/personal goals. 700 more words will not help you reach your goals any more than 7 more words. Create content that helps people. Do it efficiently. Never write an ultimate guide where a single image could more powerfully convey the same value. Trust me; your audience and your bottom line will thank you."
I think this is something we all struggle with as online marketers, in one way or another. As someone who casually consumes online content on a regular basis, this also resonates with me on a personal level.
I'm curious, what are your hesitations with focusing on shorter-form content that packs a wallop, and what excites you about it? Can you think of any examples of content you've come across that you consider 10x short-form content?
-
If one is creating content that is addressing to the target audience and answer their questions, clearing their confusing it’s a good content, and we have several great examples of it. Let’s say if someone is new to the SEO, Moz’s beginners guide to SEO will answer all their questions and clearing all the possible confusions that a person will have in his head with regards to SEO.
To me, 10X content is something that not only answers the questions or clearing the confusions but also nurtures the reader to go a step further. For instance, if someone is looking for live chat software… the content that shows you the list of tools to choose from (with pros and cons of each tool) is a good content… it’s answering the question.
But, 10X content is when you move further and tell them wherever software you use, this is how you should be using it to get the maximum out of it. This way you are not only answering the question but you are also educating them further…this according to me is a 10X content.
Ideally, I think 10X content has nothing to do with the length of content. I don’t really have to give the examples of “ultimate guides” that offer nothing new to the audience. On the other hand, Rand’s post is kinda example of 10X content that actually motivate people to get out of the long-form short-form content formula…
In my opinion, length of the content has nothing to do with 10X content. As far as you are answering your audience’s question, clearing their confusions and nurturing them to think and act further you are creating 10X content and you should be proud of it.
I may be wrong but this is what I think about 10X content.
-
I have been a "long form" and "beat their content" kinda guy for a long time. I am sure that my competitors and my visitors expect that out of me. It's what I expect out of myself. Attitude is really important in most competitive endeavors.
Before I start working on content, I look at what's out there and make a judgement on my abilities to beat it. If I don't have the resources and abilities to compete, I don't compete. Don't step into the ring with the heavyweights and expect things will turn out pretty. AI lot of people are not honest with themselves or are fooled that 10X length is 10X quality.
I am not going to say that my site is full of 10x content. If I can produce 2x, I think that I have killer stuff. 1.5X is fantastic. There is some stiff competition out there. Honestly, 10x against the rest of the world is going to be waayyyy too expensive, extremely rare, honestly, impossible for me to produce. I'd rather spend the same money on five 2x articles or nine 1.1X articles. Most of them will be at or near the top of Google a year or so later.
Some sites are defined by their long form content. These sites are often built around encyclopedia-type articles. If your goal is to beat Wikipeidia for a one-word query, you better have good stuff and a lot of it. I have not seen any brilliant stubs up there for a long time - not even on wikipedia.org.
One of the major values of long form content is its word diversity which qualifies it to rank for lots of long tail keywords. You start making money from the long tail before the head brings in anything. The long tail funds the sustained attack and might make you a profit even if the head attack fails.
I will admit that I don't read to the end of most articles that I click into. I start reading at the top and then scan when I've got the gist. The solution was described by Dan Petrovic, who presented on inverted pyramid writing in a recent Whiteboard Friday. Begin with a defining paragraph and then add deeper content and surprises below. II believe in what he said about hypotext and subheadings, but I wouldn't use any "click to view" formatting. I would put all of the text out into the open because I believe that "click to view" content does poorly in longtail.
I think that your audience is really important. If you run a popular news site and your audience comes straight to you daily then you can really kick ass with short form content that is big on panache. That kind of content will also be shared like crazy. Here 10X content can be short.
(ADDED: If you read today's post on the Moz Blog by Eric Eng, you will see how much traffic The Atlantic and other sites can immediately receive from Facebook. If you have an audience that will share your content socially a short viral article can be kickass. So, this is a way that a site without much SERP presence or a direct audience can win with 10X short form. However, it is really hard for most authors - even professional viral writers - to produce that type of article - even if they are intentionally trying to produce it.)
However, if yours is a site that has an audience that arrives from search, from one word queries or multi-word queries, then you better have a strategy to please Google first or you will get no traffic. From my experience, Google likes long form content with a diversity of keywords, written with precision and accuracy. I have been betting my money on that for a long time. I enjoy panache but I don't think it will work when the reader wants deep nitty gritty or are looking for specific facts that are not in the quick presentation.
-
Good points Erica. "We should be building content (and our sites) around what people want to know."
I think that statement is 10x content. If you are answering the query and providing the info you have nailed it. You do not need a ton of words or interactivity, etc. I do think that terms like this (10X content) become overused and then misunderstood as the result. Frankly, if I hear of one more firm that does "content management" as a sub specialty or specialty I will hurl.
If you look at what I wrote, "Who is the audience, what do they want to know, how are we going to surprise them or move them, etc.," it doesn't require more than one person to pull that off. But, even if you are a one-person shop, you can't just write a bunch of stuff and assume you are giving the reader what they wanted unless, IMO, it is in a fairly narrow band vertical of some sort.
Good points, though.
-
I'm pretty tired of the term "10x" whether it's applied to content, marketers, or hell engineers. There's a huge toxic idea that in order to have 10x content, you must have the team and other resources to pull this off. In fact, in many cases and many of Rand's examples, there are big teams with lots of resources putting it together, and this actively discourages those who struggle to get the basics implemented due to bandwidth and other resources. (Which I think the examples misalign with the quote, which I generally agree with that sentiment.)
To me, 10x content is just getting your community/customers/visitors to the information they actually want to know about. Think about how many badly put together sites rank in the Google Knowledge Box. Google isn't (necessarily) putting big value on how gorgeous the execution is, but how useful it is for what people actually want to know. We should be building content (and our sites) around what people want to know. The crap content out there serves no actual person, and it never has.
-
Christy,
First thank you as you made me go look at Rand's examples of 10X content and there are some good ones there. (Though I loved #4).
The most important question you raise to me is: "what are your hesitations with focusing on shorter-form content that packs a wallop, and what excites you about it?" The hesitations are that for us as an agency with copywriters and others responsible for content that we will not do the creative work to truly create 10X content. Then, there is no length to go with no POW! ZAP!! BOOM!!! Even though I know length works for little or nothing, something about not creating something quality when you have no true length requirements bugs me more.What excites me about 10X content are two things: First, as a reader or consumer of content I know how annoyed I get when I read a catchy title or a title about something that interests me and I start to read but when I am two paragraphs in I realize there is nothing yet that inspires or provides information that is relevant or new. Second, I know that clients are time starved business people and if you create something for them that is quality they are blown away by it. I love being in a client meeting when the client says to the strategist something like: "I have had three different people comment on this; it was great!"
The key IMO is in the planning. Who is the audience, what do they want to know, how are we going to surprise them or move them, etc. As they used to say in the print world long ago and far away... "What's the hook?" etc.
Really good discussion point to get all thinking about whether or not we are contributing to web spam or web renaissance.
Thanks
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can Anyone Recommend a Web Page Automated Tagging Solution for Large Sites?
We're looking for a way to automate content tagging on our site with a pre-existing solution/software/tool. This is mainly for content organization and to better establish internal linking connections for a large site. We work with Adobe Creative Suite.
Content Development | | ari_seo0 -
What's brewing on YouMoz? (And how you can Help)
In the last year, we've searched for ways to make YouMoz more interesting, more exciting and more inviting for the Moz community. The blog really does belong to the community, for it's the place where many novel ideas are shared, discussed, and further developed. Aside from being a great place to share ideas, though, YouMoz is also the primary vehicle by which many now-household names in online marketing were discovered. (Many of the top posts on YouMoz eventually find their way onto the main Moz Blog.) YouMoz belongs to the community. The blog was created as a place for the community to share and engage around bright ideas, in addition to being a vehicle for provoking thought around new concepts, strategies and tactics. For both aspiring and established authors, YouMoz has become a popular destination in the online marketing space. In the quest to make YouMoz even better, we’ve come with a few ideas to ensure that everyone continues to feel as though they can contribute to the blog. Beginning today, we’re introducing what we hope becomes four common formats for YouMoz: My Story, Headsmacking Tips, Problem Solved and Here’s How: My Story: The name pretty much says it all. Share with the community an interesting story related to online marketing. The story could be funny, personal or informational. As long as it’s interesting, well-written, and a benefit to the community, we’d love to hear it. A great example of the type of post we’re looking for is Mike Ramsey’s From Zero to a Million: 20 Lessons for Starting an Internet Marketing Agency. Headsmacking Tip: We’re bringing this format, first shared by Rand years ago on the main blog, out of the mothballs. Simply share with the audience an awesome online marketing-related tip that could make their jobs easier. (Example:Headsmacking Tip #21: Write Better Headlines Than Anyone Else.) Problem Solved: Tell the audience how you solved a significant marketing problem, making it easier for you to do your job. Share the nitty-gritty details, and include any graphics or tips needed for the community to solve the problem for themselves. (Example: A Simple Guide to Overcoming Ad Blindness for Publishers.) Here’s How: This style of post is meant to be a little more wide-ranging, allowing you to share with the audience ways they can successfully deploy a technique, tactic, strategy, tool or anything else you’ve gleaned that might be of value to marketers. (Examples: How to Write Emails That Get Opened Every Time and The 10 Tools I Use to Monitor Social Media More Effectively. A big shout out to Katy Katz for the inaugural post in this category: Here’s How to Write an Email That Throws off a Whole Room’s Productivity.) Sounds easy enough, doesn’t it? Don’t overthink it. Read our guidelines, then dive in and get started. Also, we’d love to hear what you think about these new formats. Plus, we welcome your comments or questions. Feel free to share your thoughts below
Content Development | | ronell-smith7 -
Duplicate Content
Hi Does anyone know a site where i can paste text to test for duplication? We've used some outstanding freelancer copywriters in the past but need to check the authenticity of the article created before publishing, Thanks Gary
Content Development | | GaryVictory0 -
Short Meme/Image Posts on Blog - Will this hurt me?
Hey guys, I use Hootsuite to cross-post to twitter/facebook/google+/wordpress. It's mostly short one-sentence posts (http://minecraftserverfinder.wordpress.com/). But it's updated about 5-6 times a day and the images are relevant and interesting to my followers. Currently the wordpress page is not hosted on my main site minecraftserverfinder.com, it just links to it. I do have another blog on minecraftserverfinder.com/blog that has a couple of lengthy articles. My questions are thus: Should I keep going with these posts? Should I consolidate the blogs and host them on my main site? Thanks in advance.
Content Development | | HamburgerHelper0 -
Can having similar content on my company's two sites hurt our rankings?
We have a very successful website that has been up for a number of years (www.comellaortho.com). We rank high in the natural rankings for that site. A few months ago, we started seeing patients in another nearby city. I purchased a new domain name, www.dansvilleortho.com, and had our web company duplicate the website under the new domain name. The reality is that the content on these two sites are nearly identical. Some of the pages are different; for example, there are fewer pages on the new site. But the pages that do exist are nearly identical. My question is: Can having similar content on my company's two sites hurt our rankings? Based on what I've read thus far, I believe the answer is "Yes". However, I'm curious how bad this may hurt us. I'm not as worried about the new site (dansvilleortho.com) because our competition in that city is slim to none. But I AM worried about harming the original site/business (comellaortho.com). Which site(s) rankings may be affected by this, and if so, how bad? Thank you.
Content Development | | comellortho0 -
Matt Cutts and Curated Content -- something is confusing here...
Okay, I read an interview somewhere this week where Matt Cutts said he didn't care much for curated content. Today I searched on that subject and came up with the following video of his: http://youtu.be/zZU7O1BHfyo So, in the video he is going along and saying not to just grab content and repost it. And then at around minute 3:15 he says that, on the other hand, you can have a blog like DaringFireball.net and that's a good thing, because the blogger takes the time to pick and choose what he is posting. I went to Daring Fireball to take a look, and I saw that he writes maybe one line of commentary, and then pastes in a big chunk of the curated content along with a link to the source. This shocked me. How could Matt like that blog -- he keeps telling that he likes original not duplicate, curated content. So, the difference is that a blog can get away with this if they exercise discretion in what they choose to copy and paste? How the hell would the Google algorithm know what the intention of the blogger is? And here I've been wasting my time writing up paragraphs and paragraphs to precede any excerpts I paste in, in fear of getting hit by Google. I'd like to hear your comments on this.
Content Development | | bizzer0 -
Short blog post or Long Blog post, Which works better?
I was thinking, that SEOmoz or other technical SEO blog writes long blog post which cracks my interest when i start reading few lines of the blog post. My mind speak, Wooo! so boring.In SEO what will be best post long or Short? Thanks
Content Development | | tapankumar0 -
Can un-unique content damage my rankings?
Hi there, I run a blog @ http://ablemagazine.co.uk We produce our own editorial content for our print magazine. Which means I have a great bank of uniquely written content. I can usually afford to post 1-2 completely 100% unique articles a day. I've also been copy/pasting 2-3 articles from the BBC or The Guardian a day to keep up activity. Should I continue doing what I'm doing? Should I post exclusively unique articles? Thanks
Content Development | | craven220