Is content really king?
-
I have a good sized website with lots of pages. Many pages are designed around specific keywords and for the most part, they rank well. I have many pages packed with good content that don't rank well, but the keywords are related to those pages that score well. Are the under performing pages contributing to the good performing pages and/or to the overall benefit of the website because of the additional content? In short, if i remove under performing pages, will it affect good performing pages and the overall performance of the website?
-
Hi Kristian,
Without looking at your analytics, it's a little difficult to say for sure, but there are a few things for you to consider.
First, content isn't king unless it is related to the subject and doesn't just waffle about a product. A page that is well structured and allows people to fulfill a function quickly and easily, is likely to trump one that makes the visitor experience a miserable one. Yes, create amazing and unique content, but you don't need to go overboard in all cases.
Secondly, are any of your pages similar to each other? Are you at risk of some pages competing with others in Google? If so, then you might be falling foul of duplication / keyword cannibalisation issues. In these cases, make sure that you have pages setup with rel=canonical correctly. This is very common with e-commerce sites.
Finally, do a bit of a page sanity check. Are the keywords that are underperfoming doing so because you aren't using the correct group of related words and phrases that Google would expect to see on those pages? This is one of the more common issues that sites fall foul of and with a little research, one of the easiest to correct.
I hope this helps
-Andy
-
Hi
First of all, i would check traffic of those pages and engagement of visitors on those pages. If these pages have reasonable traffic and engagement then i would deal with them in the following way would not remove them though i would prefer to make changes to improve those pages.
If those pages has less traffic and but with anchor links on them, i would focus to improve by adding info-graphic or some other mode of media. Which can have potential to engage with visitors? Removing or using canonical tags would be the least option for me.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does Exact Match Domain really works?
Hey!
Keyword Research | | ayofztk
I heard that exact match domain is helpful in ranking over popular keywords. I have two websites Tech Crunch SmallSEOTools My question is, will it be helpful to rank over Tech Crunch and SmallSEOTools, respectively?0 -
Same content but written for different audiences
Hi Mozers, The site that I work on has two pages with very similar content but written with a different sophistication of language. One page is written in a simple, easy-to-understand voice and the second is written at a high level for researchers. My question is: does the Google algorithm really understand the difference in sophistication and then pivot results such that the more sophisticated page shows up for researchers and the simplistic page shows up for non-researchers (thereby eliminating or greatly reducing competition between these two pages)? Thank you!
Keyword Research | | yaelslater0 -
Is there ever a time when we shouldn't care about content showing in search?
I often get push back from our content team about optimizing blogs for organic search. They'll say things like "but this isn't relevant for search" or "well, this is intended for people who come directly to our blog, I don't think it'll matter if it shows up in search." This is especially true when we publish product announcements and customer case studies. As an SEO, my opinion is definitely biased, but I 100% disagree and believe that search is relevant for every piece of content -- it's just that we might approach SEO differently for a product announcement (i.e. looking at branded search queries) vs. a more general "how to create an editorial calendar" type post. Would like to hear thoughts from the Moz community, though: what do you think? Is there ever a time when search isn't relevant for a blog post? Ever a time when we should skip the keyword/phrase research and tracking? Why or why not?
Keyword Research | | AsanaOps0 -
What came first the content or the keyword research?
So I've been searching high and low to try and answer this. I just cant seem to get this part down and i know its the most important part. I always run into the issue where i am building a e commerce or some other site and i have it all set up but no content. So i start doing keyword research. In which the market niche that i am working on now is really broad, so its really hard to research. I then end up getting frustrated because the competition for the words are really high. But back on track, i get frustrated and then kaboom! i don't get the results i want and i am back to square one and no content is made or nothing. So my webpage gets nothing. So i took a step back and wondered, should i make all the content first and then the keyword research and then go back and "revise" my website content with all my keywords that i a trying to target? Sounds like a dumb question but i just wanted feedback and input on how people do this and go forth with everything.
Keyword Research | | Dante130 -
Is 15 keywords enough to properly optimize content for an entire domain?
I have recently moved in charge of a 95 page web portal that has around 8 categories of content. The SEO agency I am touch with has sent me a proposal that says they will do on-page optimization for this domain for 15 keywords. Should that be enough? What should be my expected outcome? My promise to the client is that core pages from his website will show up early on the SERPs. If they can do this, I am fine with it. Do you think I am getting the right deal? Should I be asking for more?
Keyword Research | | amit20760 -
Hit by Panda, what's the quickest way to remove content
One of our client's sites got hit by panda/penguin. after careful investigation we found that the site had 6,900 pages indexed out of which about 300 are actual pages (pages with quality content and add value to the user). Needless to say we had to remove all those pages. Most of the thin pages were on the blog section of the site so we removed the WP which was on www.mysite.com/blog/. My question is how can i speed up the process for Google to realize that i have taken all those this pages down. i have fetched the homepage and all linked pages via "Fetch as Google Bot" on WMT. is there anything else i can do to speed this up???
Keyword Research | | 858-SEO0 -
Is there really "keyword strategy" for sites with User Generated content? Any experiences?
I am starting website focused on consumer complaints/reviews with purely User Generated content. Is there really "keyword strategy" for such sites? I can only think of analyzing competition's keywords and understanding long tail http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-big-is-your-long-tail-whiteboard-friday. Any experiences? Or ideas?
Keyword Research | | ShoutOut0 -
Article rewrite tools: do they really do the job to meet google's requirements?
Dear all, I need to produce around 100 articles. I came across several tools which replace some of the words with synonyms. 1- How many words does it need to replace out of 100 words? 2- Which tools do you recommend? 3- Human re writers seems to use the same tools. Which human re writer company do you suggest? 4- Is there any content writing company you suggest? Thanks in advance
Keyword Research | | sarenausa0