Which is best for SEO: Dedicated landing pages for contests or templated page URL?
-
A colleague and I were having a discussion about this and wanted to get insight from the community about this. Most often we run contests on social channels, but for some we place them on our e-commerce web site - particularly those which have a universal appeal to customers since these also tend to be included in our e-mails.
So our question is with regard to any links built to those contest pages, is it better to:
- have them point to a unique page, Example: domain.com/customer-appreciation-contest
OR
- A reusable page/URL that can continuously be repurposed and updated for new contests. Example: domain.com/contests
We discussed pros/cons of each but am curious if anyone here has insight or source that definitively advises which method is best. Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
-
Thanks Jared for your thoughts/insight! I was leaning toward the dedicated/unique landing page for each contest as well.
-
Hi Vanessa,
First off, really awesome question, I definitely had to give this one some thought! I would do both...
You're right about there being pros and cons, but if it were me I would create a dedicated landing page for each contest then 301 them to the main /contest page after it was over.
The reason for my preference is because you may be more likely to earn certain links from certain places if you have a very specific landing URL vs. a generic one. I know you mentioned changing the "catch all" page each time, but you lose the ability to change the URL in that scenario. If it's always going to remain /contest, this might be a turnoff (albeit very slight) to someone that might have otherwise linked to you if it was /unique-content-title instead. Not to mention, if there are any semi-shady domains that end up linking to this unique page, the URL specifically is another signal that might reinforce the idea of "Don't-penalize-me-because-their-spammy-site-is-linking-to-me-I'm-just-running-a-contest" to the engines because of its onpage relevance (this also assumes it's a relevant spammy site linking to you in the first place).
All that being said, you would lose about 10% of link equity anyway by 301ing the unique link every time, and the scenario of getting one bad link that ends up hurting you is unlikely, so it really could go either way. This decision might also be swayed by how hard it is to get something redirected in the first place. If you're in a "typical" corporate environment, it may be an act of congress to get a 301 pushed through instead of just changing the body content of an existing page.
Hopefully that helped Vanessa and didn't just generate more questions...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Facebook got rid of "Invite" from page likes?
Hi guys. Just found out "awesome" update from facebook - no way to invite people who liked page post. Anyone else seeing this? Anymore info? https://www.facebook.com/regexseo/posts/993562270758881 https://www.reddit.com/r/socialmedia/comments/4nopz5/did_facebook_just_end_the_ability_to_invite_page/
Social Media | | DmitriiK0 -
Google+ Best Practice
I have a client company looking to make use of G+ The company has a high quality, decent traffic blog with articles written by 4 in-house team members. The company has a G+ company page and each of the 4 blog authors has their own G+ profile. None of the G+ authors have any interest in using their G+ profile for general social reasons - simply as a means for sharing content (and consuming content from others) within the scope of the business sector they are in. In order to take advantage of G+ authorship, we have now linked each user to their own G+ profile page (using Yoast WP plugin) and linked the website to the G+ company page. Rel=publisher also added for the company. In terms of best practice would you recommend sharing new blog posts to the individual's G+ profile page AND to the G+ company page or just do one or the other? As a final twist the company also has a G+ Local page which is primarily used for local search/map entry (the company is online but has a physical office address). Should articles also be posted to the G+ Local page?
Social Media | | bjalc20110 -
Facebook Fan Page Name Question
I know this is a silly question. But i cant find good advice on the topic anywhere. I have a company fan page with 3,500 fans. However, there were some serious changes to the company name, and i dont want to start a new fan page, because of the current fans. Any ideas on this topic? Regards!
Social Media | | JesusD0 -
Is it possible to get high page ranking with no social media activity?
I'm curious to know how much social media effects the chances of being more highly ranked on Google. I appreciate it's important to 'be seen' by Google, but if articles/newsletters are being written, does it really matter if a business isn't using Twitter or Facebook, etc?
Social Media | | lindsayjhopkins0 -
Should I have Facebook Likes on my webpage point to a Facebook page or just the domain?
We have a Like button on our site which currently Like's our domain. I'm wondering if it would be better if it Liked a Facebook page for our company. The benefit of liking the domain as I can see it is that when it appears on timelines a click will take you directly to our site.
Social Media | | whatupdave0 -
Has anybody else noticed that Google has made a significant change to their SERP? There is a lot of social data reported from LinkedIn, Youtube and Facebook (includes page likes and activity) when you search by company name. Thoughts anybody?
Has anybody else noticed that Google has made a significant change to their SERP? There is a lot of social data reported from LinkedIn, Youtube and Facebook (includes page likes and activity) when you search by company name. Thoughts anybody?
Social Media | | rrad0 -
Facebook Account Architectures (Pages, Groups, etc)
I'm looking for help with how to setup/manage a community on Facebook. Here is the scenario: You have a bike store owner. Out of the store he also organizes different biking training groups, for people who want to be able to meet certain personal goals. These groups like to interact with the other members inside their groups, but not across groups. Does the following architecture make sense? The business would have 1 Company Page. Then for for various different training groups, the company admin would create Facebook 'Groups' which allow for interaction amongst members that way. Does that make sense? Or is there a smarter way to do this? It seems like this isn't very unified, because there could be a bunch of different groups. Is there a way to set this up inside the business' page itself? Any other thoughts?
Social Media | | brianspatterson0 -
Do links in Paper.li twitter round-ups help my SEO?
My twitter feed is picked up in the daily roundups like Paper.li. Do these links count towards my SEO effort or are they just empty. Clearly they spread my content so that great, just wondered if the links pass juice to the site.
Social Media | | GlobalLingo0