Advertising and negative impact on SEO
-
On one of my sites, I've been trying to get the word out by contacting blogs and asking them to share my site with their readers. This has resulted in some free publicity for my site, as well as quite a few paid reviews/sponsored posts. Note, however, that I've never paid for links, just reviews of my site...
When I started this about 2 months ago, my site was a PR3 and getting fairly lowsy organic search traffic (i.e. 30-40 visits a day from Google). Then a few days ago, my PR dropped to 1. I didn't worry too much though, because my organic traffic was still around 30-40 visits a day.
Now today, I checked and I only had 1 visitor the entire day from Google. Obviously I've been penalized.
My most important question is, what can I do? Do I have an recourse, or do I need to just shut the domain down and move elsewhere?
Second, wtf is Google penalizing this? I understand the argument against paid links, but should I not be allowed to advertise my site? Apparently I can buy links all day long through Google and they'll happily take my money, but the minute I pay some poor blogger to write an article about my site to their audience, I get penalized?
Please help, I can't believe I just destroyed one of my sites like this!
-
I agree with the thin content assessment. Below is what I wrote before I read your comment a second time.
I'm looking at interior pages on the site, and my question is "if I were Google, what benefit do I get from including this site in the index?". What does this site offer that's not already on the web? I visited a few random pages. Several of the offers were expired, some as much as a couple of years ago. The product information is taken from another site, and is duplicated all across the web. The blog hasn't had a new post since January. There is very little to this site that is not from a data feed, from what I can tell. Why should Google include this site in their results, when other sites can offer more information?
On the technical side, don't include "all" in the robots meta tag, it's not an option (see http://www.robotstxt.org/meta.html). I don't know if it's causing any problems, but it doesn't need to be there.
-
FYI, to add some more to the discussion, I had a long talk with an SEO buddy of mine, and he has a theory on why my google traffic might have dropped. Before, my site was a PR3, had been around for several years, but not getting much traffic, much publicity, etc.
Then I started this advertising campaign in early June. Immediately we started getting a lot of links, so from Google's perspective, it looked like there was suddenly interest in the site. Obviously, some of those links were sponsored posts, which Google possibly took note of.
However, if I look at webmastertools in Google, I noticed that Google is crawling a lot more pages. This was probably because Google said "woah, something is going on here, this site is showing up on a lot of blogs all of the sudden" so it crawled like crazy.
However, on this particular site, I basically aggregate deals on women's products. A lot of the content on each product page is pretty generic, like product titles and descriptions that are duplicate content from other sites.
Therefore, my buddy's theory is that Google took an interest in the site because of the sudden influx of links. As a result, Google crawled deeper into the site (keep in mind we have 50-75k products, each product with its own landing page). As it went deeper, it didn't like what it saw, because the content was "thin" i.e. lots of duplicate content with other sites, etc.
As a result, his theory is that Google decided to penalize the site. So in other words, he doesn't think it's the sponsored posts and the lack of nofollow links, he thinks it's the increased attention on the site that caused Google to look closer.
Any thoughts from anyone else here on this?
-
I haven't made any code changes or robots.txt changes, at least not yet. The URL is:
This is a site that historically has gotten poor SEO, I just started focusing on it in the last month by asking for links/articles/reviews from other sites.
-
Hi Dustin,
Do you know if any code changes have been made? Maybe accidentally something modified the robots.txt and excluded most of your site? Has your organic traffic from Bing and Yahoo had a similar drop? Before getting the tin foil hat on too tight, check the robots.txt file and the code on your page and make sure something didn't go astray there.
Can you share your URL with us?
-
That's what I heard from everyone too, don't rely on page rank when it dropped from 3 to 1. That happened over a week ago, but my organic search results were still healthy. Then last night I noticed the big drop down to only 1 organic search result from the standard 40-50 results I was getting from Google.
If I went back through all of the sponsored posts I've received and asked those site owners to add rel="nofollow" to all of the links to us--or at least the ones that disclosed that the post was sponsored/paid--do you think google would remove the penalty? Do I need to do anything proactive with Google to make them reconsider?
-
The site still shows up in google, but I've lost positioning for the few keywords I spot-checked, which coincides with the results I'm seeing from Google Analytics.
What should I do? One idea I had was to go back to all of the sites that wrote paid reviews for us and disclosed it, and ask them to add rel="nofollow" to all of their links. Assuming this is what penalized us, would Google re-evaluate and eventually remove the penalty if it saw that all of our sponsored posts had rel="nofollow" even if originally they didn't have nofollow attributes?
-
Hi
I would wait another few days before confirming that you have been penalised, as this is unlikely. First check that nothing else has changed, especially your analytics tool? What are your actual organic results positions for your keywords? Do you have an adwords campaign, has that changed? Also, I wouldn't rely on page rank as a metric. Instead, use Seomoz DA and PA.
-
Paid reviews are pretty much the same as paid links, becuase you are paying for the content to be placed on a block with links.
The worst thing is if the person you purchased the paid review is listing the stuff on a public forum or public site. Then Google can easily just see the content and hit it hard.
In regards to making content that is not paid I advise to use Guest posts where you make content for free for a site.
You can try and make sections of the site on sub domains and see if they have any ranking, I would also advise to make sure then content is natural and unique.
Maby it is worth while also too type in site:yoursite.com into google to see if it is also still in the index, worst case senario is if Google has removed the site from the index.
My advice is to try a reconsideration request if that is the case.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Personalization software and SEO
Hi guys, I'm just testing a personalization software in our website, basically changing the "location" text depending on the user's IP. I can see in my software that when the Google bot comes to our site the personalization software triggers an action changing the location based text to "California". Can this make Google understand that our website targets only users in California and thereof hurt our rankings in other locations nationwide? I'll appreciate your opinions.
Technical SEO | | anagentile1 -
Using RewriteRule - SEO Implications
Hi There, My client has a website (www.activeadventures.com) which they relaunched in April 2013. The company sells inbound tourism trips to New Zealand, South America and the Himalayas. Previously, the websites for these destinations were on their own domains (activenewzealand.com, activehimalayas.com, activesouthamerica.com). With the launch of the new website those domains were all retired (but had 301 redirects put into place to the new site), and moved into sub directories of the activeadventures.com domain (eg: activeadventures.com/new-zealand). There has been no indication that this strategy has improved organic search results (based on analytics) and in my opinion I believe that having this structure has been detrimental to their results. My opinion is based off the following: Visitors to the websites are coming into the site with a specific destination in mind that they want to travel to. Thus... having the destination in the URL I believe provides more immediate relevancy and should result in a higher CTR. I also feel that having the sites on their own URL's will provide a more concentrated theme for the destination based search phrases. The new site is a custom Joomla build and I want to find the easiest way to keep the current Joomla set up AND move the country specific sections of the site back onto their original URL's. It seems on the face of it that the easiest way to get this done is to use the htaccess file and use "RewriteRule" to push all the relevant pages back onto their original domains. Obviously we will ensure we also cover off pointing the existing 301's from the new site and the old sites to this new structure. My question is, are their any potential negative SEO implications of using the RewriteRule in the htaccess file to achieve this? Many thanks in advance. Kind Regards
Technical SEO | | activenz
Conrad Cranfield0 -
1000+ links from domain to subdomain - impacting?
Hi there! I'm wondering if anyone could kindly help me with this question. I have a domain let's say: thisdomain.com - and I also have a subdomain called widgets.thisdomain.com thisdomain.com has approx 2000 pages on it. There are site wide links in the top nav, side nav and footer pointing to widgets.thisdomain.com (all with the same anchor text - not branded - it's a money term). My question is, do you think this would be causing some kind of algorithmic penalty (over optimisation / penguin)? Or, do you think Google realises these links are pointing to a subdomain and says, "hey, OK we understand these two domains could be related" or given subdomains are seen as essentially standalone websites, the algo is saying "hang on a minute, pal, this looks fishy, why are you linking to this subdomain 1000+ times with sitewide links on the same anchor text"? Should I nofollow these sitewide links? Do you think that will help? I would really appreciate any help on this one. Cheers!
Technical SEO | | WCR0 -
Minor SEO for Yahoo and Bing
Over the past year, we have completely optimized one of the sites we manage for Google (removed bad links, reduced keyword count, etc) and we are doing great for Google organic traffic. However, in the process we have seen a steady decline in Yahoo organic traffic and Bing organic traffic. Enough so that I am looking for suggestions for quick fixes that aren't going to interfere with the Google optimizations that we made. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks for your help!
Technical SEO | | airnwater0 -
Multiple domain SEO strategy
Hi Mozzers I'm an AM at a web dev. We're building a new site for a client who sells paint to different markets: Paint for boats Paint for construction industry Paint for, well you get the idea! Would we be better off setting up separate domains - boatpaintxxx.com, housepaintxxx.com, etc - and treat each as a searate microsites for standalone SEO activity or have them as individual pages/sub doms from a single domain - paints4all.com or something? From what i've read today, including the excellent Beginners Guide - I'm guessing there's no definitive answer! Feedback appreciated! Thanks.
Technical SEO | | rikmon0 -
How to best remove old pages for SEO
I run an accommodation web site, each listing has its own page. When a property is removed what is the best way to handle this for SEO because the URL will no longer be valid and there will be a blank page.
Technical SEO | | JamieHibbert0 -
Changing CMS, are there SEO effects?
We want to change our cms from typo3 to CMS made Simple. We have done this already for another site and it effected the rankings. Have you got experience with this? What factors are important for SEO to consider? Is it normal when you change from cms the rankings will drop?
Technical SEO | | PlusPort0 -
Competiting In the Small Business SEO Market
I deal with primarily small businesses in the construction and maintenance industries and I'm looking for some advice. Traditionally in these categories you find absolutely awful websites with the below attributes, all ranking 1-5 in the SERPs. Weak/Limited content No blog Awful title tags Minimal backlinks Poor on-site optimization Ect. In most cases I am going to assume that these sites have been indexed for the last ten years, and that is why they are retaining such high rankings. My issue is trying to compete with them! So far I have worked to have my client's website submitted to and accepted by all of their competitor's backlinking site (which didn't take as long as you might think). I've also listed my client in several of the top paying and free directories (dmoz, joe ant, ect.) and still I see limited results. Lastly and most annoyingly my clients website, according to SEOmoz is currently leading the domain authority race in every category. Does anyone have a suggestion as to what is going on.
Technical SEO | | calin_daniel0