Canonical URL Tag Usage
-
I have a large website, almost 1500 pages that each market different keywords for the trucking logistics industry. I don't really understand the new Canonical URL Tag USAGE. They say to use it so the page is not a duplicate but the page that MOZ is call for to have the tag isn't a duplicate. It promotes 1 keyword that no other page directly promotes. Here is the page address, now what tag would I put up in the HEAD so google don't treat it as a duplicate page.
http://www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php
1.
Number 1 the actual page address because I want it treated like its own page or do I have to use #2 below?
2.
I don't know why I would use #2 as I want it to be its own page, and get credit and listed and ranked as its own page. Can anyone clarify this stuff to me as I guess i am just new to this whole tag usage.
-
In a roundabout way, yes, that is the general idea.
Decide on the page, create a title that suggests the objective of the page (Learn about Heavy Haulage | Freight Etc Inc).
Google is very good at understanding that Haulage will also mean Haul, Hauliers etc, so try to fill the page with lots of related information. Talk about transporting of abnormal loads, types of trailers, training required, etc. Make the page as informative as possible.
When it comes to finding the keywords to use and research, look for what others talk about that are doing well in Google and then give your own spin on this - although I don't mean spin the content. Spend some time making your content better than the sites above you.
-Andy
-
So probably right now I should take HEAVY HAUL page and Combine with HEAVY HAUL QUOTES. Maybe do ao shared title
Heavy Haul | Heavy Haul Quotes
and then just have 2 sections to the page? Is that kind of what you mean. So I would hope to get listed individually for each phrase still.
-
Google is pretty good at delivering pages for similar terms, so try not to worry about that. They will know that Heavy Haul and Heavy Haulers are one in the same.
My thought in this circumstance would be to have a page Heavy Haul Companies (it it lists other companies) and then rel=canonical all of the others to this one.
However, if they are so similar and only there to try and gain extra traffic, then I would be taking all of the content from each similar / duplicate page, pulling it into one fantastic page and then removing the others.
Without seeing everything, I wouldn't be able to advise if they should be 404 or 301, but it isn't good practice to have so much duplication / similar pages on the site.
-Andy
-
My problem Andy, is yes they are similiar, but they each promote their own keywords.
Heavy Haul
Heavy Haulers
Heavy Haul Companies
Heavy hauling
so I want them all listed in google. What do I do in this case?
-
Rel=canonical is the one thing that can really mess a site up, so please do be careful.
Basically, what is does, is helps you tell Google if you have pages that are similar, are useful to your visitors, but you don't want to remove to avoid duplication.
For example, if you have a page: www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php and www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul-trucks.php, and both are similar but www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php is the main page you want to appear in Google, you would set the rel=canonical tag on www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul-trucks.php to point back to www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php.
Screaming frog will help you make some sense of everything on your site, but the free version stops at 500 pages, so you won't get to see everything.
-Andy
-
Thanks for the offer, but I'm not an SEO-specialist, and it's a big responsibility.
Once you run your website through Screaming Frog you'll get a list of errors with explanations, start with that and address a proper specialist, whom you can trust, or even an agency. To keep the price down, contact any agency in eastern europe and order site audit. They should do it for you for a on-time payment and it's cheaper than what you'll pay in US. Plus there are a lot of really good specialists here.Just a sidenote. If you have a folder in your URL like site.com/c/ it should be accessible and provide information, so whatever purpose it serves make sure that people can use it.
If you have several categories, make a page where you list them, for example: site.com/our-services/ Make it a real page instead of just a lift-off point, list your categories and short descriptions there there, break them into subcategories if necessary.
-
Thank you for your response. So I really like what you had to say. So currently my structure is built around heavy haul for this section. Check this out.
www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/ (c is for category as I have several)
I have 6 or 7 pages for this section targeting big keywords.
Heavy Haul, Heavy Haul Companies, Heavy Haulers, Heavy Hauling, Heavy Haul Quotes, Oversize Hauling and Oversize Haulers. So the difference in what you said above is I use /heavyhaul/ instead of /specialty-trucking-oversize/
So how would I change this? As you can see on the main page I have www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php I have it with a related pages bottom right that connects to the rest of the above pages.
PS Errors? Can you give me a few examples? I am downloading screaming frog as I write this. Your feedback is very valuable. Possibly consult me on some stuff occasionally for a fee because I can do most of the ground work myself just need guidance. Look forward to your response for all of the above.
-
You should work on your structure and you won't have to worry about it. Let me show you an example on your website with this URL of yours.
Your URL:
1. https://www.www.freightetc.com**/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php - shows info about heavy haul.
2.** https://www.www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/ - not set up properly
3. https://www.www.freightetc.com********/c/ - not set up property********Then you also have this thing: http://i.imgur.com/BmwLfeD.jpg
SPECIALTY TRUCKING - OVERSIZE – this should be your category. and your URL should look like this:
www.freightetc.com**/specialty-trucking-oversize/heavyhaul/** www.freightetc.com/specialty-trucking-oversize/machinery/
www.freightetc.com/specialty-trucking-oversize/equipment/Now you have a category (specialty trucking oversize) you can set it as canonical for your heavy haulers and machinery if content on those pages is similar.
Your category will be indexed which is better. So when I search for "heavy haulers" I will end up on your category page (specialty trucking oversize) where I can pick what I need, a hauler or equipment. It's also easier to rank with a category page.Your website is actually full of errors. the basic ones. I would hire a specialist or if you can fix all of that stuff, run your website through some seo-audit soft like Screaming Frog or Netpeak Spider. It will show you the mistakes on your website that you should fix.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Using the Same Word in Every URL
Just looking to get some opinions on this. Some coupon sites use "coupon" in all of their URLs - this is a practice I would avoid, as to me it is a little spammy. For example:
On-Page Optimization | | vanessakohl
.com/amazon-coupons/
.com/ebay-coupons/
.com/walmart-coupons/
... and so on for thousands of other brands. I don't think this is necessary, as Google will understand from the content, backlinks and the domain name (including the word "coupon") that brand pages are coupon-focused. Any other thoughts on this?0 -
Ecommerce Canonical Question
Hi all, first question (eek) Could I pick the brains of fellow users around an issue we are having with canonical urls on a magento website. At the moment we do not have these enabled as it seems to break our indexing. Cut a long story short, we have thousands of products but haven't rewritten many of the descriptions from the manufacturers yet and so have noindexed all the product pages (freeing them as we go). The goal, for now, is to pull in traffic via the filtering options we have on the site The goal, for now, is to pull in traffic via the filtering options we have on the site. For example, if you go to Dresses, there then are several filtering options which would allow you to choose a colour, shape and material - if you wished to filter that precisely. These filtering options are all crawlable and so we would then have a page that google could index for, for example, Green Lace Maxi Dress. All good there, few people search for specific products and a lot search for types of products so we are covered. To get back to the issue at hand. If we enable the canonical option on our magento plugin it will stop us from being able to target these terms. Whereas the filtering option would create domain.com/dress/green/maxi/lace with the page title of Green Lace Maxi Dress, if we enable the canonical part of the seo plugin the canonical link which would be added to the page would be - instantly removing our ability to rank for longer tail dress related searches (we are not going to compete with the big players on the premium terms, yet!). There are alternative plugins we can buy for magento to add the correct tag, however, if every page's canonical just points back it itself like this, is there really much point spending nearly $1000 on the 4 licences we would need to cover our range of sites. Is it really necessary, in this case, that we have a canonical for the product filtering? Sorry for the long post, hope it made sense. Thanks for any assistance.
On-Page Optimization | | DSCarl0 -
URL structure
Hello all, I am about to sort out my websites link structure, and was wondering which approach to our services page would be best. should we have: services/digital-marketing & services/website-design etc or: digital-marketing/website-design & digital-marketing/seo Basically I see digital marketing as the top level category that is the umbrella term for all of our digital services. But would it make more sense to have service to be the main category and digital marketing within that (along with all the other services from web design to seo)? all thoughts welcome!
On-Page Optimization | | wseabrook0 -
How can i block the below URLs
Google indexed plugins pages for my website. Please check below. How can stop them to be indexed on google.? http://www.ayurjeewan.com/wp-content/plugins/LayerSlider/static/skins/glass/ http://www.ayurjeewan.com/wp-content/plugins/LayerSlider/static/skins/borderlesslight3d/ http://www.ayurjeewan.com/wp-content/plugins/LayerSlider/static/skins/defaultskin/ My robots.txt file is - User-agent: * Disallow: /wp-admin/
On-Page Optimization | | MasonBaker0 -
Short URL's vs Optimised URL's
Howdy Mozzers! What are your thoughts on short URL's vs Optimised URL's. For example if a website currently sells wood furniture and wants to target the keyword "Wood Furniture For Sale", which URL would be preferable: Short URL: www.domain.com/wood-furniture Optimised URL: www.domain.com/wood-furniture-for-sale The website also uses facet navigation and selected attributes are added in a fixed order sequence after the category. For example if Cane is selected as wood type: Short URL: www.domain.com/wood-furniture/Cane Optimised URL: www.domain.com/wood-furniture-for-sale/Cane Which one do you prefer (between the short URL and optimised URL) and why? Cheers! MozAddict
On-Page Optimization | | MozAddict0 -
Removing old URLs from Google
We rebuilt a site about a year ago on a new platform however Google is still indexing URL's from the old site that we have no control over. We had hoped that time would have 'cleaned' these out but they are still being flagged in HTML improvements in GWT. Is there anything we can do to effect these 'external' dropping out of the indexing given that they are still being picked up after a year.
On-Page Optimization | | Switch_Digital0 -
Tags or Categories: Which is best?
I seem to have duplicate issues on my website due to tags and categories having the same title. If I was to delete one of the two, which would be better to delete? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | IoanSaid0 -
Canonical URL's - Fixed but still negatively impacted
I recently noticed that our canonical url's were not set up correctly. The incorrect setup predates me but it could have been in place for close to a year, maybe a bit more. Each of the url's had a "sortby" parameter on all of them. I had our platform provider make the fix and now everything is as it should be. I do see issues caused by this in Google Webmaster, for instance in the HTML suggestions it's telling me that pages have duplicate title tags when in fact this is the same page but with a variety of url parameters at the end of the url. To me this just highlights that there is a problem and we are being negatively impacted by the previous implementation. My question is has anyone been in this situation? Is there any way to flush this out or push Google to relook at this? Or is this a sit and be patient situation. I'm also slightly curious if Google will at some point look and see that the canonical urls were changed and then throw up a red flag even though they are finally the way they should be. Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | dgmiles
Dave0