Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
One of my Friend's website Domain Authority is Reducing? What could be the reason?
-
Hello Guys,
One of my friend's website domain authority is decreasing since they have moved their domain from HTTP to https.
There is another problem that his blog is on subfolder with HTTP.
So, can you guys please tell me how to fix this issue and also it's losing some of the rankings like 2-5 positions down.Here is website URL: myfitfuel.in/
here is the blog URL: myfitfuel.in/mffblog/ -
http://www.redirect-checker.org/index.php
http://www.contentforest.com/seo-tools/redirect-checker
See http://i.imgur.com/mIqqCla.png
Redirecting all traffic to the www SSL domain
You can force all of your traffic to go to the
www
domain, and to use SSL, even if they did not request it initially.ensure www.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www. [NC]
RewriteRule ^ https://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]ensure https
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting all traffic to the bare SSL domain
With dedicated load balancers or who have purchased a slot on the UCC certificate on shared load balancers have the option of redirecting all traffic to the bare domain using the HTTPS protocol:
# Redirecting http://www.domain.com and https://www.domain.com to https://domain.com RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.+)$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%1%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]
Redirecting http://domain.com to https://domain.com
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]An example of how the requests work
The preceding examples of how and when you would use a rewrite are complex; here's a breakdown of the scenarios, which may help you determine what your website really needs.
A security warning will occur on a bare domain only if the request specifically includes the https protocol, like https://mysite.com, and there's no SSL certificate on the load balancer that covers the bare domain. A request for
http://mysite.com
using the http protocol, however, will not produce a security warning because a secure connection to the bare domain has not been requested.| Domain | DNS record type | IP/Hostname |
| www.mysite.com | CNAME | dc-2459-906772057.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com |
| mysite.com | A | 123.45.67.89 |For AWS ELB,
www.mysite.com
has a CNAME record that points to the hostname of the elastic load balancer (ELB), because that's where the SSL certificate is installed when it's uploaded using the self-service UI. But, bare domains/non-FQDNs like mysite.com can't have CNAME records without something like Route 53, so it must point to the elastic IP address of the balancer pair behind the ELB.If there's a redirect in the
.htaccess
file that will take all requests for the bare domain and redirect them towww
, due to how the DNS records are set up, this is what happens if you requesthttp://example.com
:- The request for
http://mysite.com
hits the load balancers behind the ELB. - The
.htaccess
rule 301 redirects request tohttps://www.mysite.com
. - A new request for
https://www.mysite.com
hits the ELB where the certificate lives and everything is happy, secure, and green.
But, if a specific request is sent to
https://mysite.com
with the https protocol, here's what happens:- A request for
https://mysite.com
hits the load balancers behind the ELB. - Your browser displays the normal security warning.
- You examine the certificate and decide to move ahead.
- The .
htaccess
rule 301 redirects request tohttps://www.mysite.com
. - A new request for
https://www.mysite.com
hits the ELB where the cert lives and everything is happy, secure, and green.
Redirecting all HTTP traffic to HTTPS
In the following example, the server variable
HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PROTO
is set tohttps
if you're accessing the website using HTTPS, the following code will work with yourRedirect HTTP to HTTPS
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting all HTTPS traffic to HTTP
In addition, if visitors to a customer's website are receiving insecure content warnings due to Google indexing documents using the HTTPS protocol, traffic may need to be redirected from HTTPS to HTTP.
The rule is basically the same as the preceding example, but without the first
Rewrite
condition. If no SSL certificate is installed, the value of%{HTTPS}
is always set tooff
, even when you are accessing the website using HTTPS. Use the following rule set in this case:Redirect HTTPS to HTTP
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} =https
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting from a bare domain to the www subdomain
SSL certificates can not cover the bare domain for websites unless you are using Route 53 or some other similar provider. This is because the SSL certificates for Acquia Cloud Professional websites are placed on an Elastic Load Balancer (ELB). While ELBs require CNAME records for domain name resolution, bare domains require an IP address in an A-record for the domain name (DNS) configuration and cannot have CNAME records. Therefore, it's not possible to terminate traffic to bare domains on the ELB where your SSL certificate is located without Route 53.
Even if all requests for the bare domain are redirected to
www
, visitors to ELB websites that explicitly request the bare domain using the HTTPS protocol, likehttps://mysite.com
, will always receive a security warning in their browser before being redirected tohttps://www.mysite.com
. For a more detailed explanation of why this happens, refer to the An example of how the requests work section.Redirect http://domain.com to http://www.domain.com
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www. [NC]
RewriteRule ^ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting all traffic to the www SSL domain You want this!
You can force all of your traffic to go to the
www
domain, and to use SSL, even if they did not request it initially.ensure www.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www. [NC]
RewriteRule ^ https://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]ensure https
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting all traffic to the bare SSL domain
AWS dedicated load balancers or who have purchased a slot on the UCC certificate on our shared load balancers have the option of redirecting all traffic to the bare domain using the HTTPS protocol:
Redirecting http://www.domain.com and https://www.domain.com to https://domain.com
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.(.+)$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%1%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting http://domain.com to https://domain.com
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]As an example, if you wanted to ensure that all the domains were redirected to
https://www.
except for Acquia domains acquia-sites.com, you would use something like this:ensure www.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !prod.acquia-sites.com [NC] # exclude Acquia domains
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www. [NC]
RewriteRule ^ https://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]ensure https
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]elb 2.2.15 | intermediate profile | OpenSSL 1.0.1e | link
Oldest compatible clients : Firefox 1, Chrome 1, IE 7, Opera 5, Safari 1, Windows XP IE8, Android 2.3, Java 7
This Amazon Web Services CloudFormation template will create an Elastic Load Balancer which terminates HTTPS connections using the Mozilla recommended ciphersuites and protocols.
{ "AWSTemplateFormatVersion": "2010-09-09", "Description": "Example ELB with Mozilla recommended ciphersuite", "Parameters": { "SSLCertificateId": { "Description": "The ARN of the SSL certificate to use", "Type": "String", "AllowedPattern": "^arn:[^:]*:[^:]*:[^:]*:[^:]*:.*$", "ConstraintDescription": "SSL Certificate ID must be a valid ARN. http://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/aws-arns-and-namespaces.html#genref-arns" } }, "Resources": { "ExampleELB": { "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancing::LoadBalancer", "Properties": { "Listeners": [ { "LoadBalancerPort": "443", "InstancePort": "80", "PolicyNames": [ "Mozilla-intermediate-2015-03" ], "SSLCertificateId": { "Ref": "SSLCertificateId" }, "Protocol": "HTTPS" } ], "AvailabilityZones": { "Fn::GetAZs": "" }, "Policies": [ { "PolicyName": "Mozilla-intermediate-2015-03", "PolicyType": "SSLNegotiationPolicyType", "Attributes": [ { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1.1", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1.2", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Server-Defined-Cipher-Order", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true } ] } ] } } }, "Outputs": { "ELBDNSName": { "Description": "DNS entry point to the stack (all ELBs)", "Value": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ExampleELB", "DNSName" ] } } } }
- You can get managed Magento hosting here.
- https://www.armor.com/security-solutions/armor-complete/
- https://www.mgt-commerce.com/
- https://www.rackspace.com/en-us/digital/magento
- https://www.cogecopeer1.com/en/services/managed-it/ecommerce/magento/
- https://www.cogecopeer1.com/en/services/cloud/mission-critical/
- https://www.engineyard.com/magento
- https://www.cloudways.com/en/magento-managed-cloud-hosting.php
- https://www.rochen.com/magento-hosting/
- http://www.tenzing.com/ecommerce-hosting-2/magento-optimized-hosting-on-aws/
- https://www.siteground.com/dedicated-hosting.htm#tab-3
- https://www.siteground.com/cloud-hosting.htm#tab-2
- https://www.siteground.com/speed
- The request for
-
May I ask did your friend modify any of the site structure aside from adding HTTPS?
make sure you have followed all the steps in this list by Google link to your and the list below. There are more resources
if needed. Read what Google's John Mueller has to say on the subject of redirects.
Official Google moving to HTTS how to
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6033049
** tools you can use**
- https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/log-file-analyser/
- https://www.deepcrawl.com
- https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
** a very important checklist make sure you do this one below.**
SEO checklist to preserve your rankings
-
Make sure every element of your website uses HTTPS, including widgets, java script, CSS files, images and your content delivery network.
-
Use 301 redirects to point all HTTP URLs to HTTPS. This is a no-brainer to most SEOs, but you'd be surprised how often a 302 (temporary) redirect finds its way to the homepage by accident
-
Make sure all canonical tags point to the HTTPS version of the URL.
-
Use relative URLs whenever possible.
-
Rewrite hard-coded internal links (as many as is possible) to point to HTTPS. This is superior to pointing to the HTTP version and relying on 301 redirects.
-
Register the HTTPS version in both Google and Bing Webmaster Tools.
-
Use the Fetch and Render function in Webmaster Tools to ensure Google can properly crawl and render your site.
-
Update your sitemaps to reflect the new URLs. Submit the new sitemaps to Webmaster Tools. Leave your old (HTTP) sitemaps in place for 30 days so search engines can crawl and "process" your 301 redirects.
-
Update your robots.txt file. Add your new sitemaps to the file. Make sure your robots.txt doesn't block any important pages.
-
If necessary, update your analytics tracking code. Most modern Google Analytics tracking snippets already handle HTTPS, but older code may need a second look.
-
Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS). This response header tells user agents to only access HTTPS pages even when directed to an HTTP page. This eliminates redirects, speeds up response time, and provides extra security.
-
If you have a disavow file, be sure to transfer over any disavowed URLs into a duplicate file in your new Webmaster Tools profile.
-
NGINX
Add the following to your Nginx config.
server { listen 80; server_name domain.com www.domain.com; return 301 https://domain.com$request_uri; }
Apache
Add the following to your
.htaccess
file.RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]
-
** Here are some more extremely helpful resources**
-
https://www.seroundtable.com/google-seo-http-to-https-migration-checklist-19268.html
It is not abnormal for a site to see a dip in rankings or search visibility after migration or a change of structure. I have a very regimented list that I stick to and have not seen anything dip for more than three days, but all sites are unique, and Google indexes all sites differently.
Depending on your domain authority you may or may not have a higher crawl budget based on whether or not you tell Google you are making these changes will make an enormous difference in whether or not your site recovers quickly or sees a dip in traffic.
I hope this is helpful and remember Google has to reindex everything.
Thomas
-
It makes no sense that you would have your blog on a subfolder that was non-encrypted why did you choose to do this? I like the site to be 100% encrypted?
Read the second post first please
http://www.myfitfuel.in/mffblog/ should be https://www.myfitfuel.in/mffblog/
why not https?
if your hosting provider does not allow you to use HTTP/2 I suggest adding a WAF four as little as $20 a month you can run your site on HTTP/2
Now the cost of Akamai might scare people just from hearing the name, but I can assure you there are very good pricing options now that companies are competing against them in the same area. One thing in my opinion that no other CDN Waf company has is the amount of points of presence or pops/ Akamai exceeds over 250
https://community.akamai.com/community/web-performance/blog/2015/01/26/enabling-http2-h2-in-akamai
https://www.cloudflare.com/http2/
https://www.incapsula.com/cdn-guide/cdn-and-ssl-tls.html
when you switch your entire site over to https, then you can use the Google change of address tool and migrate your site to HTTPS
This should be encrypted you don't need a next or certificate you want to encrypt the entire site ideally. Add it to Google Webmaster Tools four times
- http://www.myfitfuel.in/
- http://myfitfuel.in/
- https://www.myfitfuel.in/
- https://myfitfuel.in/ Canonical chooses this in Webmaster tools like the site you want traffic to go to.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/topic/6029673?hl=en&ref_topic=6001951
https://www.deepcrawl.com/knowledge/best-practice/the-zen-guide-to-https-configuration/
https://www.deepcrawl.com/knowledge/best-practice/hsts-a-tool-for-http-to-https-migration/
elb 2.2.15 | intermediate profile | OpenSSL 1.0.1e | link
Oldest compatible clients : Firefox 1, Chrome 1, IE 7, Opera 5, Safari 1, Windows XP IE8, Android 2.3, Java 7
This Amazon Web Services CloudFormation template will create an Elastic Load Balancer which terminates HTTPS connections using the Mozilla recommended ciphersuites and protocols.
{ "AWSTemplateFormatVersion": "2010-09-09", "Description": "Example ELB with Mozilla recommended ciphersuite", "Parameters": { "SSLCertificateId": { "Description": "The ARN of the SSL certificate to use", "Type": "String", "AllowedPattern": "^arn:[^:]*:[^:]*:[^:]*:[^:]*:.*$", "ConstraintDescription": "SSL Certificate ID must be a valid ARN. http://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/aws-arns-and-namespaces.html#genref-arns" } }, "Resources": { "ExampleELB": { "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancing::LoadBalancer", "Properties": { "Listeners": [ { "LoadBalancerPort": "443", "InstancePort": "80", "PolicyNames": [ "Mozilla-intermediate-2015-03" ], "SSLCertificateId": { "Ref": "SSLCertificateId" }, "Protocol": "HTTPS" } ], "AvailabilityZones": { "Fn::GetAZs": "" }, "Policies": [ { "PolicyName": "Mozilla-intermediate-2015-03", "PolicyType": "SSLNegotiationPolicyType", "Attributes": [ { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1.1", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1.2", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Server-Defined-Cipher-Order", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true } ] } ] } } }, "Outputs": { "ELBDNSName": { "Description": "DNS entry point to the stack (all ELBs)", "Value": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ExampleELB", "DNSName" ] } } } }
** here are some fantastic resources from https://mozilla.github.io/server-side-tls/ssl-config-generator/ for setting up your server These things need to be put in place**
Nginx 1.10.1 | intermediate profile | OpenSSL 1.0.1e | link
Oldest compatible clients : Firefox 1, Chrome 1, IE 7, Opera 5, Safari 1, Windows XP IE8, Android 2.3, Java 7
server { listen 80 default_server; listen [::]:80 default_server; # Redirect all HTTP requests to HTTPS with a 301 Moved Permanently response. return 301 https://$host$request_uri; } server { listen 443 ssl http2; listen [::]:443 ssl http2; # certs sent to the client in SERVER HELLO are concatenated in ssl_certificate ssl_certificate /path/to/signed_cert_plus_intermediates; ssl_certificate_key /path/to/private_key; ssl_session_timeout 1d; ssl_session_cache shared:SSL:50m; ssl_session_tickets off; # Diffie-Hellman parameter for DHE ciphersuites, recommended 2048 bits ssl_dhparam /path/to/dhparam.pem; # intermediate configuration. tweak to your needs. ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2; ssl_ciphers 'ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA:AES256-SHA:DES-CBC3-SHA:!DSS'; ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on; # HSTS (ngx_http_headers_module is required) (15768000 seconds = 6 months) add_header Strict-Transport-Security max-age=15768000; # OCSP Stapling --- # fetch OCSP records from URL in ssl_certificate and cache them ssl_stapling on; ssl_stapling_verify on; ## verify chain of trust of OCSP response using Root CA and Intermediate certs ssl_trusted_certificate /path/to/root_CA_cert_plus_intermediates; resolver <ip dns="" resolver="">; .... }</ip>
Apache 2.4.18 | intermediate profile | OpenSSL 1.0.1e | link
Oldest compatible clients : Firefox 27, Chrome 30, IE 11 on Windows 7, Edge, Opera 17, Safari 9, Android 5.0, and Java 8
<virtualhost *:443="">... SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /path/to/signed_certificate_followed_by_intermediate_certs SSLCertificateKeyFile /path/to/private/key # Uncomment the following directive when using client certificate authentication #SSLCACertificateFile /path/to/ca_certs_for_client_authentication # HSTS (mod_headers is required) (15768000 seconds = 6 months) Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=15768000" ...</virtualhost> # intermediate configuration, tweak to your needs SSLProtocol all -SSLv3 SSLCipherSuite ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA:AES256-SHA:DES-CBC3-SHA:!DSS SSLHonorCipherOrder on SSLCompression off SSLSessionTickets off # OCSP Stapling, only in httpd 2.3.3 and later SSLUseStapling on SSLStaplingResponderTimeout 5 SSLStaplingReturnResponderErrors off SSLStaplingCache shmcb:/var/run/ocsp(128000)
After you change the architecture of any website it normally takes a little bit of a dive. John Mu stated Google would not be punishing people to redirect to encrypted sites so while that might be true it doesn't mean Google has figured out what is going on yet.
I think you need to get Google crawling your site and have it in Webmaster tools with all of the pages redirected to https including adding things like HSTS and HTTP/2 to speed up your site.
Hope this helps,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Over-optimizing Internal Linking: Is this real and, if so, what's the happy medium?
I have heard a lot about having a solid internal linking structure so that Google can easily discover pages and understand your page hierarchies and correlations and equity can be passed. Often, it's mentioned that it's good to have optimized anchor text, but not too optimized. You hear a lot of warnings about how over-optimization can be perceived as spammy: https://neilpatel.com/blog/avoid-over-optimizing/ But you also see posts and news like this saying that the internal link over-optimization warnings are unfounded or outdated:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SearchStan
https://www.seroundtable.com/google-no-internal-linking-overoptimization-penalty-27092.html So what's the tea? Is internal linking overoptimization a myth? If it's true, what's the tipping point? Does it have to be super invasive and keyword stuffy to negatively impact rankings? Or does simple light optimization of internal links on every page trigger this?1 -
Realistic expectations to increase domain authority
A) what is a realistic timeline to increase a websites domain authority by 20 points? B) what are the most important factors to increase a websites domain authority?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WebMarkets0 -
What happens to a domain in SERPs when it's set to redirect to another?
We have just acquired a competing website and are wondering whether to leave it running as is for now, or set the domain to redirect to our own site. If we set up this redirect, what would happen to the old site in Google SERPs? Would the site drop off from results? If so, would we capture this new search traffic or is it a free for all and all sites compete for the search traffic as normal? Thanks in advance. Paul
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kevinliao0 -
Can I dissavow links on a 301'd website?
So we are performing link removal for a client on his old website (A), which is being 301 redirected to his new website (B). We have identified toxic links on site A and are removing, once complete we will undo the current 301, confirm a new GWT account for website A, and then submit the disavow report. We would then like to reapply the 301 redirect to site B while we are waiting for Google to process the disavow report, the logic being we can retain some current rankings on site B while waiting for the disavow to process on site A. Has anyone had experience with this method? I foresee some potential issues here but am interested to here from others on this. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEOdub1 -
Two Pages with the Same Name Different URL's
I was hoping someone could give me some insight into a perplexing issue that I am having with my website. I run an 20K product ecommerce website and I am finding it necessary to have two pages for my content: 1 for content category pages about wigets one for shop pages for wigets 1st page would be .com/shop/wiget/ 2nd page would be .com/content/wiget/ The 1st page would be a catalogue of all the products with filters for the customer to narrow down wigets. So ultimately the URL for the shop page could look like this when the customer filters down... .com/shop/wiget/color/shape/ The second page would be content all about the Wigets. This would be types of wigets colors of wigets, how wigets are used, links to articles about wigets etc. Here are my questions. 1. Is it bad to have two pages about wigets on the site, one for shopping and one for information. The issue here is when I combine my content wiget with my shop wiget page, no one buys anything. But I want to be able to provide Google the best experience for rankings. What is the best approach for Google and the customer? 2. Should I rel canonical all of my .com/shop/wiget/ + .com/wiget/color/ etc. pages to the .com/content/wiget/ page? Or, Should I be canonicalizing all of my .com/shop/wiget/color/etc pages to .com/shop/wiget/ page? 3. Ranking issues. As it is right now, I rank #1 for wiget color. This page on my site would be .com/shop/wiget/color/ . If I rel canonicalize all of my pages to .com/content/wiget/ I am going to loose my rankings because all of my shop/wiget/xxx/xxx/ pages will then point to .com/content/wiget/ page. I am just finding with these massive ecommerce sites that there is WAY to much potential for duplicate content, not enough room to allow Google the ability to rank long tail phrases all the while making it completely complicated to offer people pages that promote buying. As I said before, when I combine my content + shop pages together into one page, my sales hit the floor (like 0 - 15 dollars a day), when i just make a shop page my sales are like (1k+ a day). But I have noticed that ever since Penguin and Panda my rankings have fallen from #1 across the board to #15 and lower for a lot of my phrase with the exception of the one mentioned above. This is why I want to make an information page about wigets and a shop page for people to buy wigets. Please advise if you would. Thanks so much for any insight you can give me!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SKP0 -
Include Cross Domain Canonical URL's in Sitemap - Yes or No?
I have several sites that have cross domain canonical tags setup on similar pages. I am unsure if these pages that are canonicalized to a different domain should be included in the sitemap. My first thought is no, because I should only include pages in the sitemap that I want indexed. On the other hand, if I include ALL pages on my site in the sitemap, once Google gets to a page that has a cross domain canonical tag, I'm assuming it will just note that and determine if the canonicalized page is the better version. I have yet to see any errors in GWT about this. I have seen errors where I included a 301 redirect in my sitemap file. I suspect its ok, but to me, it seems that Google would rather not find these URL's in a sitemap, have to crawl them time and time again to determine if they are the best page, even though I'm indicating that this page has a similar page that I'd rather have indexed.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WEB-IRS0 -
Should I use both Google and Bing's Webmaster Tools at the same time?
Hi All, Up till now I've been registered only to Google WMT. Do you recommend using at the same time Bing's WMT? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet0 -
To subnav or NOT to subnav... that's my question.... :)
We are working on a new website that is golf related and wondering about whether or not we should set up a subnavigation dropdown menu from the main menu. For example: GOLF PACKAGES
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JamesO
>> 2 Round Packages
>> 3 Round Packages
>> 4 Round Packages
>> 5 Round Packages GOLF COURSES
>> North End Courses
>> Central Courses
>> South End Courses This would actually be very beneficial to our users from a usability standpoint, BUT what about from an SEO standpoint? Is diverting all the link juice to these inner pages from the main site navigation harmful? Should we just create a page for GOLF PACKAGES and break it down on that page?0