Does it make sense to pursue long-tail keywords with low search volume
-
Hi Moz community,
I need your insight into what would ensure better rankings. Some of the pages that I am optimizing are dedicated to niche products targeting specific verticals and the main keywords have really low average search volume (below 50). I'll give you an example (these are not the exact keywords, just an example to illustrate my dilemma): if my long-tail keyword is "student information management software" with search volume of 20, when do I stand better chances to gain search visibility: by optimizing the page for this long-tail keyword and incorporating it in the title tag, or by pursuing more generic keywords with higher search volume: "student" and "information management software"? If I am targeting short-tail keywords, will the page also rank for long-tail searches that are a combination of these keywords? In other words, which scenario gives better chances to rank higher: 1) pursuing short-tail keywords with high search volume in the title-tag 2) pursuing fewer long-tail keywords with lower search volume that are a combination of those in scenario 1?
Thanks in advance for your help!
-
Yes, this makes sense! Big thanks for sharing your insights, Kevin!
-
Yes, they will. However, Google will weigh the exact phrase differently. If all other factors are removed, Google will likely rank the optimized page with the long tails higher as opposed to the keywords being fragmented. Do a query of the long-tail to see if any result pops up for the exact phrase (using quotes). If you see many pages that come up, probably an indication of value and create an optimized page.
-
Kevin, thanks for your answer! In fact, my question is more around organic search, not PPC, but good observation on the quality score as well! What about when you are optimizing pages targeting specific verticals - this means that the search volume of the keywords will be even lower. Let's say my page is about mobility solutions for the healthcare vertical. If I pursue "mobility solutions" and "healthcare" separately (keywords with really high search volume), won't I also capture the searches for "healthcare mobility solutions" (low search volume)?
-
No problem!
Optimize for the long-tail keyword in question. Going more generic with your on-page elements and content is likely to dilute your other pages. You can use generic terms in content, but treat those as opportunities for internal linking, pointing generic keywords towards the page you're targeting for that particular generic term.
-
Logan, big thanks for your answer. This has been our understanding as well, so you validated our approach. Do you optimize the page copy and the title tag for the same long-tail keywords, or in the title tag you go for more generic terms/ high-level topics?
-
I would pursue optimized long-tail landing pages as long as you have resources and the page provides value.
For example, you noted "student information management software" & "information management software". If you only offer "student information management software" and no other, you should optimized for that page with those terms. If your company offers many types of "information management software", these should link to the different types (including student) on child pages. By doing so, you will have a chance for two pages to appear in the serps. In my experience, since these long-tail landing pages convert much higher because of less competition (see Logan's chart), the resources are typically worth it. Furthermore, since these long-tail landing pages are more optimized, your Quality Score will be higher in PPC and you will pay less and better visibility of your ad. Good luck!
-
Yes, it definitely is beneficial to attack long-tail keywords in your content strategy. This chart is my go-to point of reference any time this topic comes up. It very clearly illustrates the need for long-tail targeting in a comprehensive SEO strategy. Not to mention, your competitors are most likely NOT putting the time and effort into it, so you can get some pretty big wins in that regard.
-
long tail keywords tend to come up with much much better quality leads, meaning they will be less likely to bounce from your site.
Long tail keywords also tend to have less lookups and cheaper ad cost for the same reason, but again, are highly accurate when they do end up showing up as part of your ad campaign or as an organic result. There is less competition for them too oftentimes.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Where else can I get search volumes from?
We use Keyword Planner to get a rough idea if a keyword has search volumes and worth tracking. But recently, it's showing zeroes (all locations) for very broad search terms such as "corn seed" "sorghum seed" "canola seed" and all variations of these three with "seed" in the phrase. We checked trends and there are searches for it. Has keyword planner gone bonkers? There were search volumes for corn, canola and sorghum variations, just not words with "seed", which is very odd. "corn grain" has 9,900 searches and "canola plant" has 5,400 searches, for example. "canola seed" has 201-500 searches on Moz, so keyword planner, I think really filtered out seed words. Is there another tool where we could just copy/paste or import a list and it'll show us the search volumes? I uploaded words on Moz, but we can only get search vol ranges and mostly don't have data yet for Australian searches. Does SEMRush have this capability too? I couldn't seem to find where to upload a list. If Google just filtered out these words, is there a way to get around it?
Keyword Research | | nhhernandez1 -
Any keyword tools to do this?
Hi, I'm looking for a tool which can pull keyword idea data from Google Keyword Planner at landing page level for multiple URLs at once. Right now with Google Keyword Planner you can only manually do one URL at once. Which will give you 800 keywords. I'm looking to pull landing page keyword ideas for about 10 URLs at once, so in total i should get about 8,000 keywords. Any tools which can automate this with Google Keyword Planner? Cheers.
Keyword Research | | jayoliverwright0 -
Which "search volume" stats should I choose? Moz or Google Keyword Planner?
Hi there Hoping someone can shed some light... The same keywords give different Search Volume results in Moz and Google Keyword Planner. Why is this and which one should I "trust"/use? Thank you!
Keyword Research | | Jana_Joubert0 -
Keyword In Page Title
Broad Keyword Usage in Page Title Easyfix <dl> <dt>Page title</dt> <dd>"The Sea Trout Inn in South Devon, Near Totnes - Luxury Bed and Breakfast and Restaurant - Contact Us"</dd> <dt>Explanation</dt> <dd>Search engines consider the title element to be the most important place to identify keywords and associate the page with a topic and/or set of terms. SEOmoz's correlation research has also shown that rankings are heavily influenced by keyword usage in the title tag.</dd> <dt>Recommendation</dt> <dd>Employ the keyword in the page title, preferrably as the first words in the element.</dd> <dd>The keyword is Hotels Totnes, how can I put this in a page title without it looking stupid ?</dd> </dl>
Keyword Research | | Stoz0 -
What keywords does the competition have?
I know this might be a long shot. I've been working on my google rankings and am first for a few keywords but still seeing quite low traffic. Is there a tool that allows me to see what keywords my competition is receiving high levels of traffic from? Thanks Dan
Keyword Research | | DanFromUK0 -
Is there any value to meta keywords?
The more I read the more I realize that meta keywords are not as helpful as they once were. Is there any SEO value to meta keywords anymore or should the emphasis be put on the content and title tags in regards to keywords? As always, I appreciate any feedback.
Keyword Research | | TracSoft0 -
Using a country in your keywords
My company has recently started offering services in South Africa - which is great - same language - lot of potential there. But I suspect our keyword research is suffering from "thinking like a foreigner". i.e. "buy cars South Africa" rather than "buy cars". Wouldn't google.co.za naturally assume: 1) Anyone using their service for "buy cars" is looking for "buy cars South Africa" (I know it's more complicated - Google will give different results the more it can figure out about your location) 2) That any co.za site optimised for "buy cars" is automatically 90% optimised for "buy cars South Africa" too - so isn't a productive long tail query (against something like “buy sports cars”) I appreciate that some companies will be TARGETING foreign browsers (i.e. holiday accommodation South Africa) so will need to explicitly optimise their on-site for the country for “foreign search engines”. But I'm asking about companies in South Africa targeting people from South Africa.
Keyword Research | | Ali310 -
Keyword Variations?
Hi, can anybody tell me if it is useful to optimize the following keyword in all 3 Versions?
Keyword Research | | mbase22
As I know google separates the 2 words as if using a hyphen - so it would be the same as if just using a space between the words.
But if you search for the different Versions in google there are different SERPS for every of this versions? Not many users will search using a hyphen between the words I guess - butt I saw some few keywords tipped in with hyphen in my google analytics report. And I want to be on top 😉 Piloten Ausbildung Piloten-Ausbildung Pilotenausbildung thx!0