Does it make sense to pursue long-tail keywords with low search volume
-
Hi Moz community,
I need your insight into what would ensure better rankings. Some of the pages that I am optimizing are dedicated to niche products targeting specific verticals and the main keywords have really low average search volume (below 50). I'll give you an example (these are not the exact keywords, just an example to illustrate my dilemma): if my long-tail keyword is "student information management software" with search volume of 20, when do I stand better chances to gain search visibility: by optimizing the page for this long-tail keyword and incorporating it in the title tag, or by pursuing more generic keywords with higher search volume: "student" and "information management software"? If I am targeting short-tail keywords, will the page also rank for long-tail searches that are a combination of these keywords? In other words, which scenario gives better chances to rank higher: 1) pursuing short-tail keywords with high search volume in the title-tag 2) pursuing fewer long-tail keywords with lower search volume that are a combination of those in scenario 1?
Thanks in advance for your help!
-
Yes, this makes sense! Big thanks for sharing your insights, Kevin!
-
Yes, they will. However, Google will weigh the exact phrase differently. If all other factors are removed, Google will likely rank the optimized page with the long tails higher as opposed to the keywords being fragmented. Do a query of the long-tail to see if any result pops up for the exact phrase (using quotes). If you see many pages that come up, probably an indication of value and create an optimized page.
-
Kevin, thanks for your answer! In fact, my question is more around organic search, not PPC, but good observation on the quality score as well! What about when you are optimizing pages targeting specific verticals - this means that the search volume of the keywords will be even lower. Let's say my page is about mobility solutions for the healthcare vertical. If I pursue "mobility solutions" and "healthcare" separately (keywords with really high search volume), won't I also capture the searches for "healthcare mobility solutions" (low search volume)?
-
No problem!
Optimize for the long-tail keyword in question. Going more generic with your on-page elements and content is likely to dilute your other pages. You can use generic terms in content, but treat those as opportunities for internal linking, pointing generic keywords towards the page you're targeting for that particular generic term.
-
Logan, big thanks for your answer. This has been our understanding as well, so you validated our approach. Do you optimize the page copy and the title tag for the same long-tail keywords, or in the title tag you go for more generic terms/ high-level topics?
-
I would pursue optimized long-tail landing pages as long as you have resources and the page provides value.
For example, you noted "student information management software" & "information management software". If you only offer "student information management software" and no other, you should optimized for that page with those terms. If your company offers many types of "information management software", these should link to the different types (including student) on child pages. By doing so, you will have a chance for two pages to appear in the serps. In my experience, since these long-tail landing pages convert much higher because of less competition (see Logan's chart), the resources are typically worth it. Furthermore, since these long-tail landing pages are more optimized, your Quality Score will be higher in PPC and you will pay less and better visibility of your ad. Good luck!
-
Yes, it definitely is beneficial to attack long-tail keywords in your content strategy. This chart is my go-to point of reference any time this topic comes up. It very clearly illustrates the need for long-tail targeting in a comprehensive SEO strategy. Not to mention, your competitors are most likely NOT putting the time and effort into it, so you can get some pretty big wins in that regard.
-
long tail keywords tend to come up with much much better quality leads, meaning they will be less likely to bounce from your site.
Long tail keywords also tend to have less lookups and cheaper ad cost for the same reason, but again, are highly accurate when they do end up showing up as part of your ad campaign or as an organic result. There is less competition for them too oftentimes.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO question for page keyword focus - how to make it sound natural
So I have a page that sells say hockey sticks and the site is situated in Australia. My Keyword focus for the page would be hockey sticks Australia.
Keyword Research | | eulabrant0 -
How many keywords do you recommend tracking?
I am working through thousands of organic keywords and would like to create a list of core keywords. I want the list to be small enough that we can really go after these keywords and track progress. I work for a B2B software company. I am thinking between 20-30 but I would love to hear any tips, opinions and recommendations! Thank you!
Keyword Research | | NikCall0 -
Disparity between new and old keyword planner
Hi everyone! While performing keyword research using both Google's old and new Keyword Planner, I've noticed a disparity between the two tools. In many cases, the old tool gives a much larger monthly search volume than the new tool. There are a few cases where both tools provide the same monthly search volume for a term, but those are few and far between. Has anyone else experienced this? Thanks in advance!
Keyword Research | | Brandon.H0 -
Keywords
i have found proper keywords for my site. The site is www.anavasis.gr what is the proper way to have them in my site? Make articles in my site and link them from the homepage like: www.anavasis.gr/keyword-article and put all those links in the footer of my homepage? Which is the best way? thanks in advance
Keyword Research | | anavasis0 -
This page could be penalized as keyword stuffing?
Dear Mates, This sample page is http://goo.gl/kGljFX Title tag: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Coupon Code 30% - Buy Page Meta Desc: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Coupon Code 30%: Convert both Standard-Definition and High-Definition formats, super fast speed. H1: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Coupon Code H2: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Key Functions: H2: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Detailed Features: Could you take a look and let us an idea? Thank you Claudio
Keyword Research | | SharewarePros0 -
Top keywords
Hi, Where can I get a reliable list of the top 1000 keywords searched for over the last few months or 2012 or whatever? Thanks
Keyword Research | | jwdl0 -
Accurate monthly search data
I have a search term that is only used widely for one month of the year (roughly) - that keyword is "ucas clearing" only really used in august. Looking at google's keyword tool it shows a monthly search figure of 22k and apparently this is the average across the year. Now, do google add up 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,264k,0,0,0,0 - divide by 12 and come up with 22k - or do they see that it isn't steady traffic and just ignore the 0 months and therefore 22k is actually about right? Many THanks for confirmation, Ally
Keyword Research | | UOEWebTeam0 -
So if you rank well for the long tail, does that help your ranking for the short tail?
So say for instance you rank well in "online medical billing software." Does that help or influence your rank for derivatives of it (eg: "medical billing," "billing software," or "online medical billing")?
Keyword Research | | Bill4Time0