Best Practices: Different Phone Numbers on the Same Website
-
Since 2006 www.nyc-officespace-leader.com has promoted my commercial real estate brokerage business. I have been the sole broker listed on the site. As a result, the same phone number has appeared consistently throughout the site.
Now I will be adding a colleague to the site (in addition to me) and I am struggling with how to best display my colleague's phone number. The 2nd broker will be adding property listings and blog posts. It was agreed that my phone number would be replaced by my colleagues phone number on his listings and blog posts. Pages that existed before would remain with my phone number. The idea being that leads generated by the 2nd broker's new content get directed to him rather than me.
My concern is that having a new phone number listed will introduce an inconsistent phone number and harm our local SEO. I have read that it is absolutely critical that NAP (name, address, phone number) must be 100% consistent otherwise it can cause harm search engine ranking.
What are best practices for displaying different phone numbers for different personnel on the same website without harming local SEO efforts? This situation is certainly common, so I would think there must be some work arounds. I have seen "Contact" icons that when clicked show phone numbers. Is there any standard solution for this issue that keeps NAP data consistent?
Also, what if we keep the same number in the header but use different numbers in other locations? Is the header a location where we should be extra careful to display the same phone number?
Thanks,
Alan Rosinsky
Metro Manhattan Office Space, Inc.An example of inconsistent listing pages are:
-http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/listings/386-w-38th-street-office-lease-2370sf
(Broker "#2)-http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/listings/329-545-eighth-ave-office-lease-525sf
(myself)An example of inconsistent blog pages are:
-http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/the-tech-explosion-impact-on-chelsea-2
(Broker "#2)-http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/office-space-build-out-cost
(myself) -
Happy Travels, Alan!
Google permits the development of what are called 'multi-practitioner listings'. In other words, a real estate firm with 2 partners is eligible for 3 listings (one of the business and one for each of the practitioners). My advice:
-
If you go with this approach, you would also build out a set of citations for each practitioner as well as those you build for the business. By citations, I mean other listings on platforms beyond Google My Business (Facebook, Yelp, Superpages, Localeze, Infogroup, etc.). You would typically link the business' listings to the homepage, and the practitioners' citations to their respective landing pages on the website, though you'd only want to do the latter once you have built an extremely good landing page for each of the two partners. Finally, wherever possible, choose different GMB categories for the two practitioners to try to skirt around Possum as best you can, so that your practitioners can avoid the heaviest effects of that filter.
-
Alternatively, you can decide not to build multi-practitioner listings and can simply build out the GMB listing for the brand and skip building citations for the partners. This is simpler, does not get tangled up in Possum (unless there are other real estate firms in your building). If you go this way, I would still recommend building content on the website representing the two partners, for the sake of users.
Does this make this a bit clearer?
-
-
Excellent response!!! I apologize for the delayed response as I am travelling in Europe at the moment.
If I understand correctly, there are 3 entities, the business plus the 2 partners. When you refer to "unique set of local business listings/citations for each partner" what are you referring to? I understand that the business wold have a Google+, GoogleMyBusiness, GoogleMaps listing, however are you suggesting that the partners have listings for themselves that link back to the site, and if so where should these listings be?
Thanks, Alan
-
Hi Alan!
Did my answer help you at all? Just want to be sure you've been helped.
-
Hi Alan!
My apologies for the delay in responding here - just getting back into the swing of things after the holidays
Okay - good news: what you have is a multi-practitioner practice, like most real estate firms would be. Typically, the structure of this would be:
-
You have a main number for the firm that connects to your customer support/front desk. You use this number on your website header, footer and pages like Contact Us. You use this phone number on your Google My Business listing for the firm and all other citations you build for the firm. You link from these citations to the homepage of the website.
-
You have a unique, high quality landing page for each of the practitioners in the firm (one for you, one for your new partner). You each list a unique phone number on your designated landing page. You build a unique set of local business listings/citations for each partner using their own phone number. You be SURE you are filling out the business title field on these citations appropriately. In other words, your citations for yourself are just Alan Rosinsky, and not Alan Rosinsky: Metro Manhattan Office Space. Similarly, your partner is just E_lliot Forest_ on his citations. You do not include the name of the company in the business title field of the practitioner citations. You link from the practitioner citations to each partner's designated landing page on the website.
-
You can have a Staff or About Us page on the site that lists all partners and their phone numbers, topped by the main contact information for the office.
-
As for the pages of property listings, themselves, I would simply put Phone Alan Rosinsky: (XXX) XXX-XXXX or Phone Elliot Forest: (XXX) XXX-XXXX on them and would not be concerned that an agent's detail would get mixed up with the main details for the practice, provided you have taken all necessary steps described above to clearly delineate each partner from one another and from the practice. This is a very common business model that should not lead to NAP inconsistency if managed properly.
-
You go into this with eyes open about Possum. Google's new filter for listings that share a physical location and share categories will likely lead to variables in which of your 3 listings (the practice and the 2 partners) show up at a given time for local searches. Your business model would be one with which a Local SEO might experiment to see if choosing a different Google category for each of the 3 entities could positively impact visibility, despite Possum. It has been some time since I've worked with a real estate agency, so I'm not sure what's available in terms of category experimentation opportunities, but I'd look into it in creating the Google My Business listings for the 3 entities.
Hope this covers the waterfront. Please, let em know if you have any further questions about this!
-
-
Basically the question is what are best practices for multiple business phone numbers on a website. How should they be added without having a detrimental effect on local SEO?
-
Does anyone want to venture an opinion on this? I would think this is a potentially common issue.
Thanks,
Alan
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
The best way to create multi language project?
Hi everyone! I want to create multi language site (main language is English) with community and anothers subdomains. The community will also be in different languages. The site has a single database, only translation is required. What is the best way in terms of seo to create it? I see two options: 1) One language - one domain. For example: en: site.com; community.site.com; shop.site.com; subdomain.site.com; de: site.de; community.site.de; shop.site.de; subdomain.site.de; etc One domain, language as subdomain. For example: en: site.com; community.site.com; subdomain.site.com; fr: fr.site.com; fr.community.site.com; fr.subdomain.site.com; etc or en: site.com; community.site.com; subdomain.site.com; ru: site.com/ru; community.site.com (?); subdomain.site.com (?) What's the better way? The project will have at least 10 language. Thanks in advance for help!
Local Website Optimization | | oxojeck0 -
The best option for expanding a website to another country
Hi everyone, I have a couple questions about expanding my website from US to another country. Which option would be better to use: Country-Coded Top Level Domains, Sub-Directories or Sub-Domains? If I use a new domain, but I want to keep all the content, would canonicalization affect SEO of my new website? I want the new website (or another option) look just like the one I have, except for changing contact information, pictures and adding another language. Thank you!
Local Website Optimization | | KseniaLL0 -
Does having a host located in a different country than the location of the website/website's audience affects SEO?
For example if the website is example.ro and the hosting would be on Amazon Web Services. Thanks for your help!
Local Website Optimization | | IrinaIoana0 -
Multi-Country Multi-Language content website
Hi Community! I'm starting a website that is going to have content from various countries and in several languages. What is the best URL structure in this case? I was thinking of doing something like: english name of the plant, content in english, content for USA:
Local Website Optimization | | phiber
www.flowerpedia.com/flowers/red-roses spanish name of the plant, content in spanish, content for MX:
mx.flowerpedia.com/es/rosas/rosas-rojas english name of the plant, content in english, content for MX:
mx.flowerpedia.com/roses/red-roses
this content is not the same as flowerpedia/flowers/red-roses Content for Mexico would not exist in languages other than english and spanish. So for example:
mx.flowerpedia.com/jp/flowers/red-roses would not exist and it would redirect
to the english version:
mx.flowerpedia.com/flowers/red-roses What would be the best URL structure in this case?0 -
SEO and Redirecting Site to a Different Firm's Domain while Maintaining Current Domain's Rankings
I am a plaintiffs' attorney with a website that ranks well for my major practice areas. I am considering taking a position with a new firm. As part of the discussion, the new firm would allow me to keep my current site so long as it redirects to my bio page on their firm's site. My goal is to keep my current site ranking well and continuously work on SEO efforts, in case I leave the new firm and want to rely on my current site in the future. My questions are: Is there a way to redirect my site every time it shows up in the listings (I have 1000+ indexed pages) without sacrificing its current rankings b/c of bounce rate issues, etc and 2) If I continue to add pages and work on SEO for my site while it redirects to another, will those efforts be worthwhile due to the redirect? I want to keep trying to build my site even though it redirects to a page on a different domain.
Local Website Optimization | | crpoll0 -
Website Rankings - Provincial Movers
Hello Moz Community, We have been working with a company called Provincial Movers to optimize their website. We are focusing our efforts on building external local & relevant citations, however, I can't help but think there is more we can do internally --> www.provincialmoving.com The previous provider created a LOT of articles that are not necessarily relevant to the website like this: http://www.provincialmoving.com/blogs/ Do you guys have any suggestions for cleaning up the website so it performs better on Google? Thanks, Anton
Local Website Optimization | | Web3Marketing870 -
One location performing worse than the rest despite no major difference in SEO strategy
Hi all, I'm flummoxed. I'm dealing with a business that has 15 or so offices in three cities, and one city is performing horribly (this includes every office therein). The other two cities have shown consistently stellar results with massive traffic increases month over month for the past year; the city in question dropped unexpectedly in June and hasn't ever recovered. We didn't perform any major website changes during or immediately prior to that time period, and the website in general hasn't been negatively affected by Hummingbird. All locations for the business are optimized in the exact same way and according to best practices; there's no significant difference in the number of local listings, reviews, G+ fans, social signals, etc across locations. All meta data and content is optimized, NAPs are all consistent, we've built links wherever we can: the SEO for every location has been by-the-books. We've run a competitor audit in this particular city that included pulling our top competitors and exploring their domain authority, meta data, on-page keyword grade for the term we're trying to rank for, number and type of inbound links, social signals, and more; and we didn't spot any patterns or any websites that were significantly outperforming us in any area (besides actual rankings). It's frustrating because the client is expecting a fix for this city and I can't find anything that needs to be fixed! Have any multi-local SEOs out there run into a similar problem? What did you do about it?
Local Website Optimization | | ApogeeResults0 -
Separate Domains for Different Locations (in Different Cities)
We are in the process of building a new website for a client with locations in Tucson and Phoenix. Currently, they have one website that encompasses all locations, however, we are going to build them location specific websites (as many of the services are different between locations). Now my question is, as far as SEO goes, which one of these options would be the best? Option 1: Have separate domain names for each location. For example, StevesPetTucson.com and StevesPetPhoenix.com. _Pros: Easy to target specific, local keywords. Better looking domains. _ _Cons: Splits backlinks between two domains. _ Option 2: Setup StevesPet.com/Phoenix and StevesPet.com/Tucson. Pros: Keeps all backlinks pointing to one root domain. Note: We are going to use seperate WordPress installs for both websites, regardless of how we setup the domains. As we will be using different templates, menus and so on, we found this to be the best option. Thanks for any advice!
Local Website Optimization | | McFaddenGavender1