Homepage alone dropped for one "keyword"
-
Hi Moz community,
Our websites has dropped almost 50 positions for main keyword and Okay with other keywords. Other pages are doing consistent for other keywords. We haven't made any changes in website. What could be reason this ideal scenario of homepage dropping for main keyword. And recent unconfirmed algo update have anything do with this?
Thnaks
-
Google left us in "confusion world" and making money. First, does anybody guess what is good or bad link as per Google? No. May be very less SEO experts; that too after using expensive tools. Google agreed that they "try hard" to stop the negative SEO affect; but cannot guarantee you that no links hurt. So it implies that Google algorithm is never going to be accurate even they update with Penguin or Peacock. That too it'll be more less accurate coming to websites like us with thousands of backlinks where hundreds and thousands of new clueless backlinks add every month making it hard finding the culprits.
Wikipedia page is sure a strong hit. Wikipedia page is not a feasibility every company but only for which holds some genuine reputation can get a page and backlink. So, even it's a nofollow technically, Google gives a weight to it.
One of our sub-domain is hitting with backlinks from same domain for last few months...all added up to 5k links...mostly from comments. Do we need to worry about this hitting our domain and website rankings?
-
It's not that Google will penalize you for using the disavow tool, but rather, that if you disavow a good link you'll potentially end up doing harm.
I don't think Matt's statements were confusing. He said that if you reavow a link it may not be given the weight that it once had. This is a measure Google takes to make it harder for people to experiment with the disavow tool. I wrote a lot more about this here:
https://searchenginewatch.com/sew/how-to/2409081/can-you-reavow-links-you-have-peviously-disavowed
Losing a link from a wikipedia page should not cause a drop IMO. Links from wikipedia are nofollowed and do not pass PageRank. Now, in some cases you can get followed links from sites that scrape wikipedia, but I would be surprised if losing these links hurt you.
In regards to Google ignoring bad backlinks, that's what they say they do now. Still, if I see a site that has a lot of self made SEO links then I'll disavow just to be sure. Also, there are other algorithms that use links and there is the potential for manual actions, so it's not like we can completely ignore unnatural links.
-
Hi Marie...Thanks for sharing your views and guidance.
I agree that disavowing some useful links might push us down in rankings. But I have only disavowed the links which have more Moz spam score after checking them manually. These links look useful and I don't find any value for them. I don't think removing 10 links from our back-link profile with thousands of backlinks will affect us.
I disagree that Google will penalise for using disavow tool. Statement from Matt Cutts is one of the confusing statement to make sure users not misusing the tools and put a load on Google to process the requests. Disavow is complete auto tool with no human interference as per my knowledge and Google will not punish for just using it. And if Google is against experimenting, first they must able to judge if a request is a experiment or genuine try. This is highly impossible for Google which is like trying to read minds of users.
Something interesting happened in our case is....we actually lost the back link from wikipedia page. So we are presuming this might be the obvious cause for the drop. Do you think so?
And do you believe that Google completely ignores bad backlinks? And only good backlinks are ranking factor? (beside on-site factors)
-
The potential harm in using the disavow tool is that you could be disavowing links that are actually helping you. If a link is truly an unnatural link, then yes, it should be disavowed, but if you are disavowing and then re-avowing, and then trying different links to disavow this could be dangerous.
Matt Cutts a few years ago said that Google had built in some features to the disavow tool to prevent people from trying to experiment with it. He hinted that a reavowed link may not carry the same power that it once did. Also, Cyrus Shepard from Moz did an experiment where he disavowed every link to his site and rankings plummeted. He later removed his entire disavow file and his rankings did not recover at all.
Regarding discounting links vs penalizing for links, Gary Illyes from Google made statements saying that the new Penguin algorithm no longer penalizes sites. With that said, if you have a lot of unnatural links I still recommend disavowing as you could get a manual penalty.
Also, there are other algorithms that use links, so yes, I still do disavow. My reasoning for advising that you don't disavow is because it sounds like you are experimenting with the tool and disavowing and reavowing. Again, if a link needs to be disvaowed, then disavow it and leave it at that.
-
Thanks for your thoughts Marie.
I don't understand what's wrong in using disavow tool with any number of links and how it'll harm. It's an automation where link juice will stop passing from the links we disavowed and nothing behind that. Moreover if disavow tool made our push, why don't we recover even after weeks removing it? Also we hardly kept the disavow file for few days.
I also don't agree that Google gonna just ignore unnatural links and consider good links with it's algorithm. After all humans itself these days couldn't able to conclude some links; so Google doing a smart job here is impossible and it's never going to be accurate. Definitely some links will trigger the backlink profile and that's how most of the penalties have been removed by SEO experts these days by using disavow tool.
Page title: I can see in my niche, most of the top ranking pages are starting with "brand & keyword"..like I said "vertigo tiles". I can see this mostly on homepage which might be contributing better as this phrase has been mentioned more time across internet. I mean if "vertigo tiles" has more visibility, starting home page title with same will boost the rankings.
Thanks
-
It's tough to comment without seeing the actual page, but here are my thoughts.
You should not try to experiment with the disavow tool. If you've got links that you yourself made for SEO purposes and they serve no other purpose then yes, disavow them. But, if you're not sure, it's best to just leave the disavow tool alone as it's possible to do more harm than good. Google's new version of Penguin just ignores unnatural links and doesn't penalize sites for having them. If you have lots of spammy links I still advise disavowing, but disavowing just a few links is not a good idea.
Regarding page titles, it's generally best practice to have your most important keywords at the beginning of the title tag, so with that in mind the old title tags look better to me.
-
We dropped on Jan 20th and dropped more in Jan last week. We haven't changed anything around the time. We have disavowed few links and removed the links again if they might dropped us; but this disavow removal does't help us. I think it's more about On-page. I can see page titles with exact match are pitching more effectively on top results. Below example is my hypothesis on monitoring the new results and comparing them:
Let's say, for "tiles" keyword, below are how old and new page title types making on top:
Old page titles: "tiles for kitchen, hall and bedroom - vertigo tiles"
New page titles: "vertigo tiles - tiles for kitchen, hall and bedroom"
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks
-
When did the drop happen? If it was within the last few days, I'd say not to change anything and just wait. I've had a number of clients recently that have noticed a huge drop and then within a week, they popped back up higher than they were before. I personally think this could be a part of how Google tests a site's worth. I think they may remove a page from the first page temporarily to see if it affects where people click.
One other thing to check is keyword stuffing. That can sometimes cause a page to drop for one keyword. But again, I wouldn't change anything just yet.
-
A few Days ago I faced same the problem
But I recovered this by Optimizing my ON Page like I used more Keyword in Title and extended to more that 70 characters.
After that, i have linked some internal link on the Home page and linked 1-2 Outbound link to High Authority Website.
That's It. I Got My Website Rankings.
I am Sure this will Help you to Get Your Ranking Soon.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Home page rank for keyword
Hi Mozers I have traded from my website balloon.co.uk for over 10 years. For a long while the site ranked first for the word 'balloon' across the UK on google.co.uk (first out of 41 million). Around the time Penguin launched the site began to drop and currently sits on about page 5. What's confusing is that for a search on 'balloons' ('s' on the end of balloon) it ranks 2nd in the location of Birmingham where I'm based. That's 2nd in the real search rather than a map local search. But - if I search 'balloon' from the location of Birmingham my contact page ranks 5th: http://www.balloon.co.uk/contact.htm but the home page ranks nowhere. So - it's gone from ranking 1st nationally to ranking nowhere with my contact page ranking above the home page (which is a generic word domain). Any ideas?
Algorithm Updates | | balloon.co.uk0 -
Anyone seeing big drops in Bing this month?
Seems like our Google rankings are improving on most sites, but BING took a big hit this month for many of the sites we working on. I have never seen them drop like this before. Anyone else seeing the same thing? I am wondering if it is because we are building a lot of brand links vs. keyword links and Bing still wants to see the keyword links. What have you seen?
Algorithm Updates | | netviper0 -
Google webmaster tool content keywords Top URLs
GWT->Optimization->Content Keywords section... If we click on the keyword it will further shows the variants and Top URLs containing those variants. My problem is none of the important pages like product details pages, homepage or category pages are present in that Top URLs list. All the news, guides section url's are listed in the Top URLs section for most important keyword that is also present in my domain name. How to make google realize the important pages for the important keyword?
Algorithm Updates | | BipSum0 -
Domain Change: Leave The Old Domain Homepage Up
We are going to be redesigning our website and switching to a new domain. I think we will set up a permanent 301 redirect from each page of the old domain to a page on the new domain. We would like to leave the old domain homepage up with all content removed and have a link pointing to the new domain. Is there any SEO harm to leaving the old domain homepage up? Thank you! Jessie
Algorithm Updates | | JessieT0 -
Queries vs Keywords
Can anyone clarify why my list of queries from google webmaster tools varies so much from the keywords that have resulted in clicks? I have a site that, according to Google analytics, has had clicks from 125 key phrases where as in webmaster tools (via analytics) allegedly only 17 queries have resulted in clicks. Is it becuase GA can't handle less than 5 clicks from the webmaster data or is it something else I am missing? The site I am researching for has very little traffic from other search engines.
Algorithm Updates | | SoundinTheory0 -
Recovered from penguin/panda but which one?
So the good news is that for the first time since April 24th, one of our websites is back in the search results as of around December 12 but I am still unsure as whether it was panda or penguin (or both) that was impacting the site?? Note this was not a manual penalty. I diagnosed it as a penguin issue (drop on April 24th, aggressive on-page optimisation, around 10% of links from spammy directories like addyourfreelinks.com with anchor text built by a questionable agency), but on further advice it was thought that panda was also an issue because it is a hotel microsite so there was duplication with our own brand site and across third party travel sites and there were a number of pages with bare content. I figured it was a good time to clean everything up to address both. Here is a summary of actions taken: submitted disavow file on October 24th with all questionable links including actions taken and comments. Since then I have cleaned up some content so it is less aggressively targeting certain keywords. Amended several third party listings with duplicate content No follow,indexed pages that were directly duplicated with our brand site and over the last month have built a few good quality links. Cleaned up 404's in webmaster tools over the last week I have searched to see if there were any algorithm updates around December 12 but cannot find any mentions. Thoughts?
Algorithm Updates | | jay.raman0 -
Why am i seeing a "conduit" line for search engine sources in Google Analytics ?
Among Google, Yahoo, Bing etc... One of the line is "Conduit". I never heard about this engine but, accordingly to Google Analytics metrics, it is the engine that bring the best traffic to my site in terms of pages per visit.
Algorithm Updates | | betadvisor0 -
Issue: Having to Fight Product Marketing to Use Keywords
This is sort of a "DUH!" moment to me. I know everyone has come across this at some point in time and am interested in hearing how others deal with this. A little background: I was researching keywords for new menus and pages. Sometimes, people (product marketing in my case) do not give me a heads up on changes they want to make to pages and it is always a fight with them to change it. This is pretty normal for me and I am use to it. It is one of those things that they don't want to discuss it with you because they know you are going to critique their work. and, yes, change it for the good of the company. I had a co-worker say to me:
Algorithm Updates | | SmartBear
"We may have to start making [pages] meaningful to the human visitor than satify the bot army". My response was:
"What better way to make it [web page] meaningful to users by knowing which terms they search on the most in our industry? Keyword research is not just for Search Engines, it is actual live data as to what most people are searching. That is why I put such a high precedence on it and report on trends. You can bet that if 100,000 people are searching for [keyword], that is what they want to see when they search for it." Anyways, that is how I handled this particular event. I have several responses when these comments pop up from time to time. Usually it is something to the fact that they are not the ones who will get fired if leads drop via organic search, so we better try this. But today, I was feeling kind of spunky and decided to take another route. What are some of your responses to these types of remarks? Hopefully this will make for a good discussion.0