What to do about endless size pages
-
I'm working on a site that sells products that come in many different sizes. One product may come in 30 sizes.The products themselves are identical, except for the size. There are collections pages that are all of several kinds of product in a particular size and then there are individual product pages of one product the specific size. Collections pages for widgets size 30 is the same content as widgets size 29. A single product page for gold-widget-size-30 is the same content as the single product page gold-widget-size-29.
To make matters worse, they all have the same tags and very little written content. The site is in Shopify. Last month there were almost 400 pages that produced visits on organic, mostly in the 1 to 4 per month range, but all together about 1000 visits.
There are several hundred more that produced no traffic in organic, but are duplicate (except for size) and part of this giant ball of tangled string.
What do you think I should do?
Thanks... Mike
-
Hi Nigel,
Thanks for the message. So, just to cap on this, I've got:
150 pages that got any kind of organic landing last month.
115 of those pages are 1 visit out 13000 visits
525 pages in the sitemap
4300 pages in Google's index
if you were me you would noindex/de-index all but about 50 that either have traffic or am working on it and then noindex/deindex/remove from sitemap 4250 pages?
How would I even get a list of everything in Google's index?
Just wondering about the actual process for fixing this.
Thanks! Best... Mike
-
Hi Michael,
Yes - OK forget the brand pages - I had to make some assumptions from what you had written.
Cut it down and write contextually strong descriptive content 3-400 words at category & Sub-cat level.
I work with a lot of eCommerce sites that have fallen victim to pernicious tags, sizes and colours appending themselves to every version of a page.
It might look great having 50000 pages splattered all over Google but can you honestly say that they provide value and a good UX for the consumer?
Make each page sing for it's supper. Have a keywords or small group of contextually similar content for each page and add the written content and you will nail it.
Use MOZ Keyword explorer to provide you will the closely matched keywords,
I hope that helps,
Kind Regards
Nigel
-
Hi Egol & Nigel,
Egol, I always appreciate your answers over the years - thank you!
The site has a Moz domain authority of 37. It's in a organic/product niche with Amazon, Nordstrom, and about a buzzillion other national brand retailers. It makes and sells only its own products.
When you say, "if you have a weak site and you need highly optimized pages to get the traffic, then I might keep things "as is," I get confused. As it is, we have an endless number of duplicate pages. Shouldn't I just pick my winners (adding content there), noindex/nofollow and de-index?
If so, what do I do about the ones that randomly produce in organic search now? Same thing and suffer the loss?
Nigel, super interesting post... thank you! I'm not sure I totally understood everything. The site is the brand, not a retailer of others brands. In any case, you're saying cut it way down?
Thanks!
Best... Mike
-
Sorry but I think the opposite.
If you are a weak site with few back links and a low domain authority then you need to concentrate as much juice through as fewer pages as possible whilst retaining a strong fairly flat hierarchy. You don't have the option of doing nothing as you are cannibalizing your site in search.
I deduce from what you are saying that you have this problem.
Site/size
Site/Collection-1/Size
Site/Collection-2/Sub-collection-1/SizeSo the size filter can be applied to any part of the site at collection level. You may also have
Site/Brand/Size
Site/Brand/Collection/Size
Site/Brand/Collection/Sun-Collection-1/SizeThen you will have maybe
Site/Sale/Size
Site/Sale/Collection-1/Size
Site/Sale/Colelction-1/Sub-collection-1/SizeOn top of this problem you will have
Site/Brand/Product-1/Size-29
Site/Brand/Product-1/Size-30Etc
I hope I am right!
Solution for Brands and Categories
it is better to have size as a tag and noindex/nofollow the tag group so that none of these extra pages get indexed in Google. This will make an enormous difference to your website slashing the number of pages with skinny content and visits right down.
You simply can not have these pages:
Site/Brand/Size
Competing with the main brand page ie
Site/Brand/
I don't know how many sizes you have but say there are 20, then it's like having 20 duplicates of the brand page, the category page, the category/sub category page.
Solution For Products.
Have one product page:
Site/Brand/Product-1
The sizes can then drop down on the page without changing the URL - the canonical on any size is thus
Site/Brand/Product-1
Some sites will append the tag for size thus:
Site/Brand/Product-1#size30
With the size as an attribute - everything after the # is not indexable as Google does not go beyond a #
It would also be prudent to do this for colour as well otherwise you will get mass duplication at colour level. That should also be treated as a tag or attribute that does not append to every version of a page.
I really do hope I have understood this correctly.
I repeat, You don't have the option of doing nothing as you are cannibalizing your site for search.
eCommerce site structure is core to my business.
Kind Regards
Nigel
-
My answer would depend upon two things... 1) the strength of your website, and 2) the number and strength of your competitors.
If you have a really strong site and weak competition then I would have a small number of pages with a lot of products on each page. It will probably rank well against the competition for even the very specific queries.
However, if you have a weak site and you need highly optimized pages to get the traffic, then I might keep things "as is".
We started out with the first option and that worked great for years. Now the competition is getting fierce and we might go with a larger number of pages to keep holding them off.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ecommerce category pages
Hi there, I've been thinking a lot about this lately. I work on a lot of webshops that are made by the same company. I don't like to say this, but not all of their shops perform great SEO-wise. They use a filtering system which occasionally creates hundreds to thousands of category pages. Basically what happens is this: A client that sells fashion has a site (www.client.com). They have 'main categories' like 'Men' 'Women', 'Kids', 'Sale'. So when you click on 'men' in the main navigation, you get www.client.com/men/. Then you can filter on brand, subcategory or color. So you get: www.client.com/men/brand. Basically, the url follows the order in which you filter. So you can also get to 'brand' via 'category': www.client.com/shoes/brand Obviously, this page has the same content as www.client.com/brand/shoes or even /shoes/brand/black and /men/shoes/brand/black if all the brands' shoes happen to be black and mens' shoes. Currently this is fixed by a dynamic canonical system that canonicalizes the brand/category combinations. So there can be 8000 url's on the site, which canonicalize to about 4000 url's. I have a gut feeling that this is still not a good situation for SEO, and I also believe that it would be a lot better to have the filtering system default to a defined order, like /gender/category/brand/color so you don't even need to use these excessive amounts of canonicalization. Because, you can canonicalize the whole bunch, but you'd still offer thousands of useless pages for Google to waste its crawl budget on. Not to mention the time saved when crawling and analysing using Screaming Frog or other audit tools. Any opinions on this matter?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Adriaan.Multiply0 -
Dynamic pages
Hello Team, How can we create dynamic pages or more pages on website but maintaining SEO standards.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Obbserv0 -
Multiple Results On First Page
Hi Guys, First question here, after splitting our content across 2 subdomains (~6 months ago) we've noticed google showing several of our pages on page 1. Would it be better to somehow consolidate to just one page (in the hopes that together it would push the rank higher or is it better left to google to work out on its own? I've attached an example of this happening with one of our targeted keywords. HwEARxd
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mattjamesaus0 -
Wordpress Tag Pages - NoIndex?
Hi there. I am using Yoast Wordpress Plugin. I just wonder if any test have been done around the effects of Index vs Noindex for Tag Pages? ( like when tagging a word relevant to an article ) Thanks 🙂 Martin
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | s_EOgi_Bear0 -
Linking to local pages on main page - keyword self-cannibalization issue?
Hi guys, Our website has this landing page: www.example.com/service1/ Is this considered keyword self-cannibalization if on the above page we link to local pages such as: www.example.com/service1-in-chicago/ www.example.com/service1-in-newyork/ www.example.com/service1-in-texas/ Many thanks David
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sssrpm0 -
What causes internal pages to have a page rank of 0 if the home page is PR 5?
The home page PageRank is 5 but every single internal page is PR 0. Things I know I need to address each page has 300 links (Menu problem). Each article has 2-3 duplicates caused from the CMS working on this now. Has anyone else had this problem before? What things should I look out for to fix this issue. All internal linking is follow there is no page rank sculpting happening on the pages.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEOBrent0 -
Do in page links pointing to the parent page make the page more relevant for that term?
Here's a technical question. Suppose I have a page relevant to the term "Mobile Phones". I have a piece of text, on that page talking about "mobile phones", and within that text is the term "cell phones". Now if I link the text "cell phones", to the page it is already placed on (ie the parent page) - will the page gain more relevancy for the term "cell phones"?? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | James770 -
Noindex term for pages
I have a client who has a virtuemart site and all of the "ask a question on this product" had been indexed on google. I have managed to get a noindex meta tag into the ask a question page, will these be dropped from the index next time they are crawled and google sees the noindex?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | webseoservices0