High bounce rates consistent with a login that takes you to a 3rd party site?
-
My firm has a credit union client whose bounce rates skyrocketed after implementing an online banking portal. Logging in to the online banking portal takes you to a 3rd party site. Would arriving at the site and immediately logging in be considered a bounce? And if so, would a high bounce rate actually correlate with a warm reception to their online banking tool?
-
Paul,
Let me just say thank you for a thoroughly informed and thoughtfully written response. It gives me everything I need to guide my client. Really appreciate you taking the time.
-
The technical definition of a bounce in Google Analytics is that the visitor arrived at the page and triggered a hit to the Analytics tracking code and then left the page without triggering any further interactive hits to the tracking. That's exactly what's happening when a visitor comes to the primary site's page, then leaves it to go on to the new 3rd-party page that doesn't contain the same tracking code.
The critical question here then is "would a high bounce rate actually correlate with a warm reception to their online banking tool?" Unfortunately, in GA's default tracking mode, there's no way to know definitively whether a visitor bounced because they didn't get what they wanted and left, or if they got exactly what they wanted and went on to the online banking tool. And ideally, we want more than just correlation, we'd like reliable data. Knowing the difference between these two site behaviours gives us the critical understanding of whether those bounces are happy visitors or not. The solution is going to require some enhancement of the default tracking.
Fortunately, once you understand that definition of a bounce above, the possible solutions to your challenge become more clear.
The ideal solution would be that the 3rd-party site has a system to allow you to add your own site's Google Analytics tracking code to your pages on their site. You could then set up cross-domain tracking, and your GA would then fire again on the 3rd-party site visit so you'd know for certain they got there and you'd be able to report on the users' behaviour as they went from your site to the other one and back again. Many of the better 3rd-party tools offer this if you check, as it's a common need.
If that's not possible, we still need to understand the behaviour of the visitor during the course of the bounced visit on the primary site. The way we discover and track user behaviour within a page (as opposed to when moving from page to page) is by adding Event tracking to the actions a user might take that are valuable or of interest to us. In this case, we can add event tracking to the link click that takes the visitor off to the 3rd-party site. That way, we'll know that for every bounce visit that also had that click event associated with it, we had a "warm reception", rather than an annoyed "I came, I puked, I left" visitor (to quote Analytics expert Avinash Kaushik).
And in the definition we have another clue - if a bounce is a visit with only one hit to the tracking code, we can decide that a successful one-page visit shouldn't be counted as a bounce. To do that, we can specify that the event tracking click should be classified as interactive and count as another hit to the tracking code. This means single pageviews with such clicks will no longer be counted as bounces. This is just a semantics change - we will already be able to tell in the GA reports that the event occurred. But if the data model for the site is that bounces are bad, this will make the data more properly reflect that this bounce visit shouldn't be counted as bad.
Final note - if you're not able to get your own tracking added to the 3rd-party site, you're going to need to add that site to the primary site's Referral Exclusion list. This way, if/when a visitor comes back to the main site from the online banking tool, they'll essentially "pick up from where they left off" in their original tracking, instead of just being (artificially) counted as a whole new session with a referrer as the banking tool site, which would badly skew the accuracy of your data.
Hope that all makes sense?
Paul
[Sidenote: This is why average bounce rate for a site is a totally worthless metric. Some pages are actually most successful if they are bounces - i.e. the visitor got exactly what they wanted in a single pageview. Bounce must always be segmented by page (and even by location/mobile/desktop etc) to avoid incorrect assumptions. And if you add behavioural understanding through event tracking, you can get a much fuller picture of what's actually happening during those bounces and where optimization is needed.]
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Drop in Bounce Rate in Google Analytics
Hi guys, I have recently seen a large drop in bounce rate (from GA) which seems unnatural for one of our clients website. Since the start of 2018, the bounce rate was consistently between 40-60%, and then saw a random spike, and now for the past two weeks, the bounce rate is below 10%. I was wondering if anyone had any ideas if this is a problem with GA, or the site itself. Site: https://www.zoomocarcredit.com/ Any comments/feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! Jack. SnP0Hc4
Reporting & Analytics | | ChemistryMarketing0 -
Site Hacked: Is it Faster and Better to 301 or 404 Irrelevant URLs?
Hey Everyone, So our site was hacked which created a large amount of irrelevant URLs on our domain; resulting in thousands of 404 errors and pages coming up for searches unrelated to our brand. The question is now that the issues have been resolved (and site re-submitted) would it be quicker (and more ideal) to redirect important 404 errors that see traffic, have links…etc. although not relevant or just let everything 404 out? We’re not as concerned with offering a relevant user experience because these are not in our demographic but want to avoid these pages convoluting our analytics as well as issues that might arise from Google thinking these topics do apply. Any help or insight would be very appreciated. Please let us know if you have any questions, concerns or we could provide further details that might help. Looking forward to hearing from all of you! Thanks in advance. Best,
Reporting & Analytics | | Ben-R0 -
Verifying Site Ownership & Setting Up Webmaster tools for clients who use Hubspot
We are a Hubspot partner agency. I'm trying to find the best route for managing Google's tools as an extra resource for insight, not the primary basis for marketing effort. I also want to explore adwords in more depth. Finding a lot of our clients don't have one or the other or both Analytics/Webmaster tools in place. Can I verify site ownership to set up webmaster tools simply by having admin access to their analytics account or will that require ownership of the analytics account? With Google merging things together these days I'm not sure of the best approach to take. Usually clients have their site hosted somewhere and built on some platform and ADD a Hubspot blog and the landing pages/cta's, Hubspot tools on a subdomain hosted by Hubspot. Hubspot has tools in it's website settings for adding google analytics (actually it's just a field to add code to the header area). If a client has universal analytics on their primary domain do I still need to go and add a separate analytics property for the subdomain and go through Hubspot's tools to install it on the subdomain? Or just use the same code from their primary domain and add it to the Hubspot header? What is the best route? Any additional thoughts on this subject are welcome - with so much updating and changing coming from Google (and Hubspot as we implement 3.0 - COS) I'm trying to avoid wasted effort, outdated methods, etc. Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | rhgraves651 -
What is The Bounce Rate of Single Page Website?
Hi All, I just want to clear some of my confusion regarding bounce rate. Bounce rate depends upon time. If yes than how? What will be the bounce rate for single page website. Single page website will have same bounce rate and exit rate?
Reporting & Analytics | | RuchiPardal0 -
When I look at my SEOMOZ campaigns I see there are a lot of warnings in regards to missing Meta Tags Descriptions but they exist on a clien'ts wordpress site
when I look at my SEOMOZ campaigns I see there are a lot of warnings in regards to missing Meta Tags Descriptions but they exist on a clien'ts wordpress site
Reporting & Analytics | | Doug_Hay1 -
Organic bounce rate after site re-launch
3 months ago a client of mine re-launched theoir web site (after having a lot of work done on it). Since then, many of the SEO indications are good - more non-paid keywords sending search visits, more organic visits overall, more URLs receiving entrances via search, etc. The issue is that their bounce rate has been increasing pretty much EVERY week since. Has anyone seen a similar issue and what could a potential solution be for this? Thanks everyone!
Reporting & Analytics | | CathalOMaoilfhinn0 -
Googlebot encountered extremely large numbers of links on your site??? How Do I resolve this?
I am working on a site with over 30 million pages. Every time I get about One Million indexed I get a Message in the Google Webmasters Tools saying "Googlebot encountered extremely large numbers of links on your site" The indexing then starts dropping like a Rock. I need to get the site indexed. Please Help!
Reporting & Analytics | | GlobalFlex0