Should I have home listings not followed?
-
Hi,
I currently am doing digital marketing for a home builder. Here is one of our challenges: we build homes, create the page to sell them, details on the house are put up, Google crawls them, and then the house sells and I need to take it off the site. This is just creating a constant redirect process that I'm OK with but I'm just thinking I'd rather have Google not know they exist and delete them.
I have community pages and floor plan pages with evergreen content and a blog that's doing well. I'm OK with Google not seeing these pages, but I'd really like to know what others in the industry do and what Moz thinks is best. I have a working theory of creating 10-15 pages where I rotate the houses: house 1 is posted and once it sells replace site content with house 16 (assuming 15 pages already exist with 15 houses).
Reason - none of my listing pages have any page authority and it overall just makes the site un-authoritative. I know the domain authority is a different ranking factor, but I need the pages to be stronger or just not there. I'd love confirmation that that shouldn't be a concern for me as it seems to be one that I've inherited through years of SEO marketing paranoia.
-
You know what I don't know if this is something you would like to do or not considering your a custom home builder and I just finished up a custom home I purchased in New Hampshire I have a lot of respect for your craft.
I think you can get that information at a very low price and also give your site a little bit more appeal to end-users if you use walkscore.com you can get data if you think it would benefit your site. If not I would simply leave the pricing off of the site entirely I'm assuming that because everything is a custom home everyone is a different price and they are purchasing the land on their own already. I am certain that you advise them. So you really want to show off what you have accomplished with these past homes that you've built. I would definitely keep the photographs and add video if you do not have them. I know when I look at homes I like to be able to see as much as possible and if I'm looking for a builder I want to see a lot of trust signals and past work.
https://www.walkscore.com/professional/research.php
https://www.walkscore.com/professional/
I would also definitely crawl with Moz & deepcrawl you want to make certain that if somebody linked to one of your homes for sale that you keep that link equity as well.
I would definitely make sure that they are visible and show off what you are proud of.
Hope that was of help,
Tom
-
Thanks - super helpful. We are home builders so once a home sells there isn't pricing updated or anything since they are almost custom houses after they are sold. The traditional information that would be enticing for potential buyers/sellers in a neighborhood isn't on our site, unfortunately.
-
Yes - I think that would definitely be a way to go especially creating more link juice out of the sold listings. The related posts plugin idea is golden and I've been trying to think of spicing up the sidebar because as of now it's none existant. I will incorporate that part for sure.
-
I think that you should link to them from the new homes as long as the relevant. So if I live at 1313 Mockingbird Ln. and 1210 Mockingbird Ln. comes up as a sold home I want to know what it sold for I want to be able to get an idea of what people are paying in the neighborhood. So I would not make them into orphans I would have them linked from the new homes and when the new home sell keep the link so they're not orphans they're just helpful data.
I created a video for you it's narrated hopefully this is helpful.
Here is an example of a home that is no longer for sale but is still linked to.
I hope that helps,
Thomas
-
It wouldn't be hard to add custom postmeta to the "home" post type - a simple flag called "inactive." When you create a new home or update one, it would by default be unchecked - meaning the listing is active. Once it sells, you check the box to make inactive = true. From there, you just edit your theme (child theme or custom theme). The easiest way to ensure a link to the inactive listings won't appear anywhere, no matter what type of page you're on - archive/search/etc. - would be to add a filter to the main query. If the post type is "home", add a meta query that searches for "inactive == false". You'd then customize the "single-home.php" theme file - check whether inactive is false; if it's false go ahead and display all the details, but if inactive is true remove the price, add a "not for sale" banner, that type of thing.
This way your home URLs never change, so nobody has to set up redirects, but it's also dead simple to mark a listing inactive and have it disappear from navigation. Yet it still is indexable by Google, it will still appear in your XML sitemap if you're generating one automatically, and people who have bookmarked the listing and return to the page will immediately see that this house is sold. You might even want to use a related posts plugin so that if the house is sold, visitors (and spiders) will see links to related houses that are still for sale. That will give you even a bit more link juice out of your old pages, because they'll be funneling spiders to the newer pages, and they'll also help spider AIs determine which content is the most related.
-
I really like that idea - thanks! To build on that - do you think that it is ok to have them as orphan pages?
I am certainly ok with the URLs stating active and updating the listing to have information that the house has been sold, but I'd really like them to not be a part of any page unless someone has the link bookmarked or something. If it shows up in a Google search, that's fine too, but not just as a part of the site that anyone can navigate to.
Thoughts?
-
I would keep the homes on the site and allow them to be indexed however once they have been sold I would put them into a new category where the buyer does not have the opportunity to see them unless they try to.
If you make sure the site you ask is designed not to show them Two people looking to purchase a house that is still for sale look at companies like Zillow you can see that they keep every listing online and indexed the reason that they do that is the place no longer for sale in a very prominent part of the page including using colors to show what is on the market and what is no longer on the market.
You will have to get with your developer and figure out a way to essentially move them below the listings based on pricing or location however you should keep the URLs indexed to get as much juice as possible.
Sincerely,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Internal search pages (and faceted navigation) solutions for 2018! Canonical or meta robots "noindex,follow"?
There seems to conflicting information on how best to handle internal search results pages. To recap - they are problematic because these pages generally result in lots of query parameters being appended to the URL string for every kind of search - whilst the title, meta-description and general framework of the page remain the same - which is flagged in Moz Pro Site Crawl - as duplicate, meta descriptions/h1s etc. The general advice these days is NOT to disallow these pages in robots.txt anymore - because there is still value in their being crawled for all the links that appear on the page. But in order to handle the duplicate issues - the advice varies into two camps on what to do: 1. Add meta robots tag - with "noindex,follow" to the page
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SWEMII
This means the page will not be indexed with all it's myriad queries and parameters. And so takes care of any duplicate meta /markup issues - but any other links from the page can still be crawled and indexed = better crawling, indexing of the site, however you lose any value the page itself might bring.
This is the advice Yoast recommends in 2017 : https://yoast.com/blocking-your-sites-search-results/ - who are adamant that Google just doesn't like or want to serve this kind of page anyway... 2. Just add a canonical link tag - this will ensure that the search results page is still indexed as well.
All the different query string URLs, and the array of results they serve - are 'canonicalised' as the same.
However - this seems a bit duplicitous as the results in the page body could all be very different. Also - all the paginated results pages - would be 'canonicalised' to the main search page - which we know Google states is not correct implementation of canonical tag
https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html this picks up on this older discussion here from 2012
https://moz.com/community/q/internal-search-rel-canonical-vs-noindex-vs-robots-txt
Where the advice was leaning towards using canonicals because the user was seeing a percentage of inbound into these search result pages - but i wonder if it will still be the case ? As the older discussion is now 6 years old - just wondering if there is any new approach or how others have chosen to handle internal search I think a lot of the same issues occur with faceted navigation as discussed here in 2017
https://moz.com/blog/large-site-seo-basics-faceted-navigation1 -
Using Canonical on home page
Our home page has the canonical tag pointing to itself (something from wordpress i understand). Is there any positive or negative affect that anyone is aware of from having pages canonical'ed to themselves?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | halloranc0 -
Bing still not listing my site after 3 weeks, Google ranks very very low
I am scared that somehow the search engines are penalizing me for something, but I don't know what. The site can be found at http://www.hypnotherapy-guide.com It is a business directory/advice/guide site listing a lot of hypnotherapists (9000). Is it possible that such a large site popping up over night is flagged by the SE as spam? I don't know what I am doing wrong.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tguide0 -
How important is a good "follow" / "no-follow" link ratio for SEO?
Is it very important to make sure most of the links pointing at your site are "follow" links? Is it problematic to post legitimate comments on blogs that include a link back to relevant content or posts on your site?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BlueLinkERP0 -
Reducing onpage links - manufacture list
Hi Guys, I am relaunching one of my sites, and one of the categories has 746 links on it due to a list of boating manufactures. Ideally I need to cut this down - anyone got any tips on how I can do this without losing the user experience but still allowing google to crawl all the manufactures? Cheers
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Sayers0 -
Why do Twitter Canonicalise to Home?
I have just noticed that Twitter canonicalise back to their homepage from every profile page that I checked. Check the source on any profile, and the canonical looks like this: rel="canonical" href="https://twitter.com/" /> Have I completely missed something here? I don't get why Twitter need to, or indeed would want to do this. As far as I understand it, Twitter is hinting to Google that they should ignore profile pages and only rank the homepage. Except Google doesn't. If you search for "Rand Fishkin Twitter", you'll get Rand's page. Search "[Anyone You Like] Twitter" and you'll get to their exact page. Hope somebody can shed some light on this, as it seems counter intuitive to tell Google to ignore profile pages when I imagine a significant chunk of their search traffic comes from people searching Google for specific profiles. Cheers, Mark
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | markadoi840 -
Can I use a "no index, follow" command in a robot.txt file for a certain parameter on a domain?
I have a site that produces thousands of pages via file uploads. These pages are then linked to by users for others to download what they have uploaded. Naturally, the client has blocked the parameter which precedes these pages in an attempt to keep them from being indexed. What they did not consider, was they these pages are attracting hundreds of thousands of links that are not passing any authority to the main domain because they're being blocked in robots.txt Can I allow google to follow, but NOT index these pages via a robots.txt file --- or would this have to be done on a page by page basis?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PapaRelevance0 -
NOINDEX listing pages: Page 2, Page 3... etc?
Would it be beneficial to NOINDEX category listing pages except for the first page. For example on this site: http://flyawaysimulation.com/downloads/101/fsx-missions/ Has lots of pages such as Page 2, Page 3, Page 4... etc: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aflyawaysimulation.com+fsx+missions Would there be any SEO benefit of NOINDEX on these pages? Of course, FOLLOW is default, so links would still be followed and juice applied. Your thoughts and suggestions are much appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Peter2640