Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
PDF best practices: to get them indexed or not? Do they pass SEO value to the site?
-
All PDFs have landing pages, and the pages are already indexed. If we allow the PDFs to get indexed, then they'd be downloadable directly from google's results page and we would not get GA events.
The PDFs info would somewhat overlap with the landing pages info. Also, if we ever need to move content, we'd now have to redirects the links to the PDFs.
What are best practices in this area? To index or not?
What do you / your clients do and why?
Would a PDF indexed by google and downloaded directly via a link in the SER page pass SEO juice to the domain? What if it's on a subdomain, like when hosted by Pardot? (www1.example.com)
-
repeatedly noticed that google index PDF files. But only their headers, without the contents of the file itself.
If you format the file description correctly, you can do it through the PDF Architect (http://pdf-architect.ideaprog.download/) program, or any other convenient for you.
-
PDFs can be canonicalized using .htaccess. Google is usually very slow to discover and obey this but it can be done. However, if your PDF is not close to being an exact copy of the target page, Google will probably not honor the canonicalization and they will index the PDF and the html page separately.
PDFs can be optimized (given a title tag) by editing the properties of the document. Most PDF - making software has the ability to do this.
You can insert "buy buttons" and advertising in PDFs. Just make an image, paste it into the document and link it to your shopping cart or to your target document.
PDFs accumulate linkjuice and pass it to other documents.
Use the same strategies with PDFs as you would with an html page for directing visitors where you want them to go and getting them to do what you want them to do.
Some people will link to your PDF, others will grab your PDF and place it on their website (in that situation, you lose the canonical but still get juice from any embeded links), and benefit from ads and buttons that might be included. Lock the PFD with your PDF-creating software to prevent people from editing your PDF (but they can always copy/paste to get around it).
Other types of documents such as Excel spreadsheets, PowerPoint documents, Google images, etc can have embedded text, embedded links and other features that are close to equivalent to an html document.
-
PDF documents aren't written in HTML so you can't put canonical tags into PDFs. So that won't help or work. In-fact, if you are considering any types of tags of any kind for your PDFs, stop - because PDF files cannot have HTML tags embedded within them
If your PDF files have landing pages, just let those rank and let people download the actual PDF files from there if they chose to do so. In reality, it's best to convert all your PDFs to HTML and then give a download link to the PDF file in case people need it (in this day and age though, PDF is a backwards format. It's not even responsive, for people's pones - it sucks!)
The only canonical tags you could apply, would be on the landing pages (which do support HTML) pointing to the PDF files. Don't do that though, it's silly. Just convert the PDFs to HTML, then leave a download button for the old PDFs in-case anyone absolutely needs them. If the PDF and the HTML page contain similar info, it won't affect you very much.
What will affect you, is putting canonical tags on the landing pages thus making them non-canonical (and stopping the landing pages from ranking properly). You're in a situation where a perfect outcome isn't possible, but that's no reason to pick the worst outcome by 'over-adhering' to Google's guidelines. Sometimes people use Google's guidelines in ways Google didn't anticipate that they would
PDF documents don't usually pass PageRank at all, as far as I know
If you want to optimise the PDF documents themselves, the document title which you save them with is used in place of a <title>tag (which, since PDFs aren't in HTML, they can't use <title>). You can kind of optimise PDF documents by editing their document titles, but it's not super effective and in the end HTML conversions usually perform much better. As stated, for the old fossils who still like / need PDF, you can give them a download link</p> <p>In the case of downloadable PDF files with similar content to their connected landing pages, Google honestly don't care too much at all. Don't go nutty with canonical tags, don't stop your landing pages from ranking by making them non-canonical</p></title>
-
Yes, the PDFs would help increase your domain rank as they are practically considered as pages by Google, as explained in their QnA here.
Regarding hosting the PDFs on a subdomain, Google has stated that it's almost the same as having them on a subfolder, but that is highly contested by everyone since it's much harder to rank a subdomain than a subfolder.
Regarding the canonical tags, they are created for "Similar or Duplicate Pages", so the content doesn't have to be identical, and you'll be good so long as most of the content is the same. Otherwise, you can safely have them both be and have backlinks linking from the pdf to the main content to transfer "link juice", as they are considered as valid links.
I hope my response was beneficial to you and that the included proof was substantial.
Daniel Rika
-
Thank you.
Could you address my question about what's best practice? What do most companies do?
I am not sure what the best choice would be for us -- to expose PDFs which compete with their own landing pages or not.
Also, do you know if PDFs pass SEO "juice" to the main domain? Even if they are hosted at www2.maindomain.com?
Where can I see some proof that this is the case?
If the PDFs have a canonical tag pointing to the parent page, wouldn't this be confusing for the search engines as these are two separate files with differing content? Canonical tags are usually used to eliminate duplicates for differing URLs with identical content.
-
Whether you want to index the pdf directly or not will mostly depend on the content of the pdf:
- If you are using the pdf as a way to gather e-mails for your newsletter, or if you are offering the pdf as a way to get users to your site, then it would be best not to have them indexed directly, but instead have the users go to your site first.
- If the pdf in itself is a way for you to promote your website or content then you can index it so that it can be accessed directly and may help you to get a bit more rank or clicks.
If you are looking to track pdf views, there are options to connect GA and track your pdf views, such as this plugin.
If the content is similar to the web page, then you can put a canonical tag to transfer the ranking. You can add it to the http header using the .htaccess file as explained here.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What are best SEO plugins for wordpress?
Hi, I hope you are doing well. I want to know what are the best SEO plugins for wordpress website? https://www.myqurantutor.com/
Reporting & Analytics | | Bigbrand0 -
Page Speed or Site Speed which one does Google considered a ranking signal
I've read many threads online which proves that website speed is a ranking factor. There's a friend whose website scores 44 (slow metric score) on Google Pagespeed Insights. Despite that his website is slow, he outranks me on Google search results. It confuses me that I optimized my website for speed, but my competitor's slow site outperforms me. On Six9ja.com, I did amazing work by getting my target score which is 100 (fast metric score) on Google Pagespeed Insights. Coming to my Google search console tool, they have shown that some of my pages have average scores, while some have slow scores. Google search console tool proves me wrong that none of my pages are fast. Then where did the fast metrics went? Could it be because I added three Adsense Javascript code to all my blog posts? If so, that means that Adsense code is slowing website speed performance despite having an async tag. I tested my blog post speed and I understand that my page speed reduced by 48 due to the 3 Adsense javascript codes added to it. I got 62 (Average metric score). Now, my site speed is=100, then my page speed=62 Does this mean that Google considers page speed rather than site speed as a ranking factor? Screenshots: https://imgur.com/a/YSxSwOG **Regarding: **https://six9ja.com/
Reporting & Analytics | | Kingsmart1 -
Same person on my site, every day, for over 6 months??
I watch my Google analytics real time while I work and for the last 6 months, I've had one person on my site consistently during every Monday to Friday. It's only the home page there go on, it never shows they look anywhere else. But it's starting to concern me a little since it's been going on for so long. Does anyone have an idea what they could be doing? I do my own SEO, there is no one else working on my site. Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | Coppell0 -
SEO dealing with a CDN on a site.
This one is stumping me and I need some help. I have a client who's site is www.site.com and we have set them up a CDN through Max CDN at cdn.site.com which is basically a cname to the www.site.com site. The images in the GWT for www.site.com are de-indexing rapidly and the images on cdn.site.com are not indexing. In the Max CDN account I have the images from cdn.site.com sending a canonical header from www.site.com but that does not seem to help, they are all still de-indexing.
Reporting & Analytics | | LesleyPaone0 -
Switch to www from non www preference negatively hit # pages indexed
I have a client whose site did not use the www preference but rather the non www form of the url. We were having trouble seeing some high quality inlinks and I wondered if the redirect to the non www site from the links was making it hard for us to track. After some reading, it seemed we should be using the www version for better SEO anyway so I made a change on Monday but had a major hit to the number of pages being indexed by Thursday. Freaking me out mildly. What are people's thoughts? I think I should roll back the www change asap - or am I jumping the gun?
Reporting & Analytics | | BrigitteMN0 -
Why did my site go from 1,000 Impressions to 0 impressions over the past couple days
so we have been doing a lot of reconstruction our website the past couple days with our navigation and moving stuff around. Now bare with me because i am a noob to SEO and i am still learning. But we went from a steady 800-1000 impressions everyday to a 0 since the first. you can check out our site here: www.hidguy.net Not sure if its because we are moving stuff around or what. But we can notice that our conversion rate has dropped and we have had traffic but no conversions and no orders. Is what we are doing bad or is this normal?
Reporting & Analytics | | Dante130 -
What is best practice for tracking RSS feed subscribers
What is the most accurate/achievable way of tracking data about subscribers to your RSS feed through Google Analytics? With standard WordPress sites, we place the RSS link to Feedburner so we could track statistics. However it wouldn't track the way that I use it. I use Pulse on an Android Tablet to read my feeds offline on the bus each morning. At home, Pulse automatically downloads the latest feeds wirelessly overnight. So then I can read them without a connection. The obvious downside for my reading experience is that I only get what is contained in the feeds. If the company only includes an excerpt, it's too annoying to read the teaser and be unable to connect and follow a link. So I only subscribe to feeds that contain the full post. Yeah to seomoz, aimclear, SEL, adwordsblog. I dont subscribe to bruceclays blog, much as i'd like to, because it doesn't contain the full feed. That's probably deliberate on their part, because I have to consciously visit their blog on my desktop at work, to see the whole post. The other problem with say Pulse, is how it locates the feed. I typed in the URL, and Pulse subscribed me. I assume that Pulse simply looked for the domain.com/feed URL and added that, rather than look for feeds2.feedburner.com/domain. I looked at Feedburner stats and they didn't go up for 2 days, so basically it didn't track me. Would it be as simple as using the Google URL builder to add parameters to each post in the RSS feed? Eg utm_source=feedreader, utm_medium=rss, utm_campaign=tracking. But that still wouldn't track offline users. I assume that most people are also not going to paste the Feedburner URL into their FeedReader, but would let the platform auto-detect the feed. Any suggestions?
Reporting & Analytics | | ozgeekmum1 -
Tracking pdf downloads
hello, I have a site with 100's of pdf's for download and I would like to track how many people are downloading these, does anyone have a simple solution for this? Is there anyway I can do this in Google Analytics using one piece of code, thanks...
Reporting & Analytics | | Socialdude0