Bogus Search Results
-
Hi,
A website I look after was hacked. We cleaned it up , removed malicious content and changed passwords. However the bogus links which were created have kept multiplying. Search Console is all clear. But they keep adding to Google, bogus links.
My client site is www.mechfieldfm.com.au
For example http://mechfieldfm.com.au/JCB-BACKHOE-IGNITION-SWITCH-WITH-2-KEYS-PART-NO-70180184-70145500-372796/
There are thousands of bogus links created. But I believe they are outside the hosting.
Any help would be appreciated.
-
Thanks for your follow up.
Regards
Wayne
-
These invasive URL hacks can be very tricky to get under control. Sometimes if you're lucky, it's just a matter of erasing the pages and stuff. In other circumstances scripts are injected which recreate the bad URLs (and links to them) when you take them down. You certainly want to be on the lookout for unknown scripts on your site, or links to external scripts which didn't exist before
-
Thanks very much for your detailed response.
When the website was hacked they created the hacked pages and when you searched in Google you would go to an actual page. Once we shut the attack down, the links went back to our website.
I thought I had it under control. Listed in search console not to to index links and was going to place redirects on. But in the last few days another 5 pages of the bogus links have been created. Just checked again and more bogus links are being created. Therefore it could be an endless job, if they are going to be added to.
Correct client is a Air Conditioning service business. When you go to site:mechfieldfm.com.au the first couple of pages are actually from client website.
I will look at locking down the HTTP>HTTPS redirect.
-
Are you sure that this:
http://mechfieldfm.com.au/JCB-BACKHOE-IGNITION-SWITCH-WITH-2-KEYS-PART-NO-70180184-70145500-372796/... is an example of a bogus or hacked page? Because when I check Google's cache for the URL:
https://d.pr/i/6sioLy.png (screenshot)
It looks like it was once a 'real' page. Google's cached version only looks so messed up as they failed to capture the CSS properly. It just seems weird that someone would hack your client's site and just leave info for construction-related products on your client's domain. Usually with hacks it's a phishing / political agenda or something like that (or some kind of scam)
Still, having said that; although your client is in construction they don't seem to list any products of any kind (your client appears to be service-based). You have to admit though, to an outsider, it looks more like 'dev-gone-wrong' than a hack. It's just really weird, at the very least
Can't you just write a redirect rule that 301s or 302s all of those bogus URLs somewhere else? Those URLs shouldn't be accessible anyway. Your client has a valid SSL certificate and the site loads just fine on HTTPS: https://mechfieldfm.com.au - so another question is, why was HTTP left exposed? The bogus URLs are on HTTP, maybe they found an entry-point because that architecture was left exposed instead of being properly redirected
Even Google mostly link to the site on HTTPS:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Amechfieldfm.com.au
https://d.pr/i/XfbNF7.png (screenshot)
Where they're not doing this, it's because they are linking to more examples of 'bogus' URLs. Personally I'd just slap no-index tags and status code 410 (gone) on all of those problematic URLs. If you're worried you can't use no-index as the HTML of those pages is gone, you can still fire Meta no-index directives through the HTTP header using X-Robots, so be sure to look that up
It will probably take a while (some weeks) for Google to digest all the disruption and fixes. In the future, ensure that disused architectures (like HTTP) are made physically inaccessible via redirects. Leaving old architectures active is a recipe for disaster. Once this is all cleaned up, be sure to properly implement HTTP -> HTTPS redirects
Here's something odd. On your client's homepage, the HTTP->HTTPS redirect is properly implemented. Somehow these 'hacked' URLs are evading that redirect. You need to at least lock that down or it could happen again
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Listings site -is freshness important on results or articles?
We have a property listing site.
Content Development | | nick-name123
Wandered if its more important to update the results of the listings (adding or deleting them) or is adding new articles more important.?0 -
How do I find the most popular questions being searched in my industry?
I want to know what questions people are searching for answers to in my industry so that I can create the most relevant blog articles to write.
Content Development | | IntelliSuite0 -
Loads of Blog Search Results showing up in SERPs - What's the best way to remove?
Our client has a good number of results showing up in SERPs that are search results pages produced by Blog posts. Unfortunately all these results have exactly the same Title tag and it has nothing to do with the blog content which means they are unlikely to help us much. We can’t create a 301 redirect because there is no page to redirect. There is no blog page we can re=canonical to either. The content on these pages is a short list of blog posts by each author. They are not true “Author” pages that would have a URL structure like this: your company.com/author/joeblow Our plan is to use GWMT's URL removal tool to request remove of these pages. (and then try to stop new results from being created) We are doing this to get low-value content out of the SERP. Is there a better way to remove these search results? Any drawback in removing them in GWMTs? Thanks.
Content Development | | RosemaryB1 -
Where can I install a blog (not on the domain I'm optimising) which will help my search rankings?
I've got my hands tied, and I cannot install a blog like Wordpress on the domain I'm optimising. My question is, where then, would the next best place be? I've heard stories about subdomains being completely useless for affecting SEO of the root domain, and so anything external would probably have the same effect, correct? Would love to hear what some of you do in these situations. Cheers!
Content Development | | featherseo0 -
Google Image Search - How to rank?
Hi, How would you optimise for rank higher in image search? Any tips/rules which need to be applied. Thanks.
Content Development | | Bondara0 -
Getting an image to rank in blended search
Hi Mozzers, Has anyone got any good tips to get an image to rank in blended search when a user searches for a specific company name. I'm not talking about image search - I'm talking about the regular SERPs that sometimes contain images (normally logos) when you search for 'Coca Cola' for example - any ideas. Thanks Gareth
Content Development | | Bush_JSM0 -
On-Site Blog or Blog Service for Best SEO Results
I had a blog associated with my site, then I had to merge two Google accounts and to make a long story short, my old Blogger page won't transfer to the new account. So, I'm starting fresh. My Question: Would I benefit most from an on-site subdomain blog, adding content to my site on a weekly/monthly basis, or an off-site blog such as Blogger, linking back to pages and resources on my site? Then, any other juicy tips would be great. Honestly, I won't expect a large subscription base. There will be a natural draw for some trade associates, and I'll be linking and promoting them as well. Thanks for any input. I'm new to the community, and SEO, but really impressed with this community.
Content Development | | honestabejosh0 -
Where is microdata (schema.org) already being used by major search engines?
I know Google recently launched their recipes search, but apart from this where else are you seeing microdata being used?
Content Development | | nicole.healthline0