Bogus Search Results
-
Hi,
A website I look after was hacked. We cleaned it up , removed malicious content and changed passwords. However the bogus links which were created have kept multiplying. Search Console is all clear. But they keep adding to Google, bogus links.
My client site is www.mechfieldfm.com.au
For example http://mechfieldfm.com.au/JCB-BACKHOE-IGNITION-SWITCH-WITH-2-KEYS-PART-NO-70180184-70145500-372796/
There are thousands of bogus links created. But I believe they are outside the hosting.
Any help would be appreciated.
-
Thanks for your follow up.
Regards
Wayne
-
These invasive URL hacks can be very tricky to get under control. Sometimes if you're lucky, it's just a matter of erasing the pages and stuff. In other circumstances scripts are injected which recreate the bad URLs (and links to them) when you take them down. You certainly want to be on the lookout for unknown scripts on your site, or links to external scripts which didn't exist before
-
Thanks very much for your detailed response.
When the website was hacked they created the hacked pages and when you searched in Google you would go to an actual page. Once we shut the attack down, the links went back to our website.
I thought I had it under control. Listed in search console not to to index links and was going to place redirects on. But in the last few days another 5 pages of the bogus links have been created. Just checked again and more bogus links are being created. Therefore it could be an endless job, if they are going to be added to.
Correct client is a Air Conditioning service business. When you go to site:mechfieldfm.com.au the first couple of pages are actually from client website.
I will look at locking down the HTTP>HTTPS redirect.
-
Are you sure that this:
http://mechfieldfm.com.au/JCB-BACKHOE-IGNITION-SWITCH-WITH-2-KEYS-PART-NO-70180184-70145500-372796/... is an example of a bogus or hacked page? Because when I check Google's cache for the URL:
https://d.pr/i/6sioLy.png (screenshot)
It looks like it was once a 'real' page. Google's cached version only looks so messed up as they failed to capture the CSS properly. It just seems weird that someone would hack your client's site and just leave info for construction-related products on your client's domain. Usually with hacks it's a phishing / political agenda or something like that (or some kind of scam)
Still, having said that; although your client is in construction they don't seem to list any products of any kind (your client appears to be service-based). You have to admit though, to an outsider, it looks more like 'dev-gone-wrong' than a hack. It's just really weird, at the very least
Can't you just write a redirect rule that 301s or 302s all of those bogus URLs somewhere else? Those URLs shouldn't be accessible anyway. Your client has a valid SSL certificate and the site loads just fine on HTTPS: https://mechfieldfm.com.au - so another question is, why was HTTP left exposed? The bogus URLs are on HTTP, maybe they found an entry-point because that architecture was left exposed instead of being properly redirected
Even Google mostly link to the site on HTTPS:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Amechfieldfm.com.au
https://d.pr/i/XfbNF7.png (screenshot)
Where they're not doing this, it's because they are linking to more examples of 'bogus' URLs. Personally I'd just slap no-index tags and status code 410 (gone) on all of those problematic URLs. If you're worried you can't use no-index as the HTML of those pages is gone, you can still fire Meta no-index directives through the HTTP header using X-Robots, so be sure to look that up
It will probably take a while (some weeks) for Google to digest all the disruption and fixes. In the future, ensure that disused architectures (like HTTP) are made physically inaccessible via redirects. Leaving old architectures active is a recipe for disaster. Once this is all cleaned up, be sure to properly implement HTTP -> HTTPS redirects
Here's something odd. On your client's homepage, the HTTP->HTTPS redirect is properly implemented. Somehow these 'hacked' URLs are evading that redirect. You need to at least lock that down or it could happen again
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it black hat to include your city name in a blog title to hopefully help local search resultts
I frequently blog and want to increase my ranking in local search in my area-Boston-blogging about Plastic Surgery. If I write a post about tummy tuck will I be penalized by Google search if I use a title like
Content Development | | wianno168
Tummy Tuck After Weight Loss Boston or Boston Tummy Tuck After Weight Loss0 -
Google "blog" search
Anyone notice a while ago - the "more" drop down used to include "blogs" which really helped with finding like minded blogs for content marketing. Anyone finding this frustrating and or find a solution? I know they supply us with: http://www.google.com/blogsearch Any other hints? Your pal, Chenzo
Content Development | | Chenzo0 -
How to make a bad posting drop down the search engines
we have had a competitor who has been stealing a lot of content from us and now they have used seo tactics to write a bad article about one of our sites that they have been taking content from, and what we would like to do is to use seo techniques to drop their article down the rankings. We are consulting a solicitor to take action against them as we are fed up of the content being stolen and the other techniques they are using, can anyone give me ideas on the best way to drop this post down the rankings. I was thinking about articles and press releases and blog posts to get higher up in the rankings and do a lot of these to drop their article down the rankings. Our solicitor has already taken action against them in the past and that cost us a fortune and it looks like we are going to have to spend a fortune again, so any help on using seo techniques to drop their article down the rankings would be great.
Content Development | | ClaireH-1848860 -
I have a domain with rank no 1 in google web search!
I have a domain with rank no 1 in google web search! When I search for the keyword which are the domainname in google adwords, keyword search I get 1.200.000 searches in that keyword. Our domain have only 10 visitors a day - why is that?
Content Development | | fredrecokonsult0 -
Google Image Search - How to rank?
Hi, How would you optimise for rank higher in image search? Any tips/rules which need to be applied. Thanks.
Content Development | | Bondara0 -
Can forums bring down your search engine rankings?
it might be my imagination, but i could swear that after the launch of a bbpress forum and posts and replies coming from members, the site alexa website rankings actually went DOWN for a while. i always thought forums would de facto bring up rankings - more content, traffic, etc. Is it possible that forum content is considered lower quality? i remember reading that lots of new threads and such from forum members can actually hurt your rankings- is this true? i guess i'm trying to figure out: on balance, what is the impact of forums on rankings - and if there are any negative impacts, if you still want to have one, how to minimize the downside? thanks much for any help!
Content Development | | prospects0 -
Does it still help to bold text on webpages to draw the attention of the search engine bots?
I remember a few years ago, bolding text was important for the search bots, is this still the case?
Content Development | | TheVolkinator0 -
I have a page where you can download a PDF of the material - should I exclude the PDF from the search engines?
In my niche, there is a controversial research article that is very popular. I am writing a rebuttal to this article and giving another point of view. My article has the potential to be really good link bait for my site. The original article is often printed out to be shown to professionals in my niche. My hope is that people will do the same with mine. So, I plan to have a PDF version of my article available on my page. The article that is visible on my site (i.e. non PDF) will be a graphic rich article that is easy for the reader to go through. I plan to have the PDF have all of the same text, but it won't have as many graphics - it will look more like a scientific research article. So, should I exclude the pdf from search engines so that it isn't duplicate content? Or does that even matter seeing as it is a duplicate of my own content? I want people to link to the main article, not the pdf. Any tips would be greatly appreciated!
Content Development | | MarieHaynes1