Getting indexed in Google Scholar
-
Hi all! We have a client who publishes scholarly research as a highly regarded non-profit. Their Publications aren't being indexed in Google Scholar 50% of the time and when they are, Google is pulling random stuff from a PDF vs. from the html page. Any advice on best practices is enormously appreciated
-
@SimpleSearch I understand your client's frustration with Google Scholar not indexing their research consistently and accurately. Here are some steps you can take to improve their visibility:
- Optimize content for Google Scholar:
Structured data: Implement schema.org markup for scholarly articles. This helps Google Scholar understand the content and context of the research.
Metadata accuracy: Ensure all metadata (title, authors, keywords, publication date, etc.) is accurate and consistent across all platforms where the research is published.
Open access: Consider publishing research openly whenever possible. Google Scholar favors open access publications.
Backlinks: Encourage citations from other reputable research publications.
Internal linking: Link to the research from other relevant pages on the client's website.
2. Troubleshoot indexing issues:Check for technical errors: Use Google Search Console to identify any technical issues that might prevent indexing.
Use the "Fetch as Google" tool: Submit the research page to Google to expedite indexing.
Check Google Scholar's guidelines: Review Google Scholar's guidelines for publishers to ensure compliance.
Contact Google Scholar support: If the issue persists, contact Google Scholar support for further assistance.
3. Address content issues:PDF vs. HTML: Ensure the HTML version of the research is high quality, well-formatted, and text-based. Google Scholar prioritizes HTML over PDF content.
Avoid irrelevant content: Remove any irrelevant content from the PDF that might confuse Google Scholar.
4. Additional resources:Google Scholar Publisher Guidelines: https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/publishers.html
Google Search Console: https://search.google.com/search-console/about
Schema.org: https://schema.org/
Remember: Getting indexed in Google Scholar takes time and effort. Implement these best practices consistently and be patient. -
I understand your concern about inconsistent indexing on Google Scholar. Let's address the issues step by step:
Issue 1: Publications not being indexed in Google Scholar 50% of the time
Solution:
-
Ensure Proper Metadata: Check if your client's publications have accurate and comprehensive metadata. This includes title, author(s), abstract, keywords, publication date, and references. Metadata helps Google Scholar understand the content and index it correctly.
-
Consistent Citation Format: Ensure that the citation format used in the publications is consistent and follows standard academic conventions. This helps Google Scholar accurately identify and index the content.
-
Robots.txt File: Make sure the website's robots.txt file allows Google Scholar's bots to crawl and index the publications. Check for any disallow rules that might be preventing indexing.
-
Sitemap Submission: Submit a sitemap to Google Search Console containing URLs of the publications. This helps Google Scholar discover and index the content more efficiently.
-
Canonical URLs: Ensure that canonical URLs are implemented correctly for each publication. This helps Google understand the preferred version of the content and avoid duplicate indexing issues.
-
Quality Content: Ensure that the content of the publications is of high quality and relevance. Google Scholar prioritizes scholarly and authoritative content.
-
Indexing Frequency: Understand that Google Scholar's indexing process may not be immediate. It may take some time for new publications to be indexed. Patience is key.
Issue 2: Google pulling random content from PDF instead of HTML page
Solution:
-
Structured HTML: Ensure that the HTML version of the publications is properly structured using semantic markup. This helps Google Scholar understand the hierarchy and content of the page more accurately.
-
Text Accessibility: Make sure the text content of the publications is accessible within the HTML page and not embedded within images or other non-text formats. Google Scholar primarily indexes text-based content.
-
Metadata Alignment: Check if the metadata provided in the HTML version aligns with the content of the publication. Discrepancies between metadata and actual content may confuse Google Scholar's indexing process.
-
PDF Optimization: If the publications are available in both HTML and PDF formats, optimize the PDFs for indexing by adding proper metadata, text layer, and bookmarks. This can improve the chances of Google Scholar correctly extracting content from PDFs.
-
PDF-to-HTML Conversion: Consider converting PDF publications to HTML format using tools or services that preserve the structure and formatting. This ensures better compatibility with Google Scholar's indexing algorithms.
-
Reporting Issues: If the problem persists despite following these steps, consider reporting the issue to Google Scholar through their support channels or forums. Provide detailed information about the specific publications and indexing issues encountered.
By implementing these best practices and troubleshooting steps, your client can improve the indexing and visibility of their scholarly publications on Google Scholar. Regularly monitor indexing status and make necessary adjustments to ensure ongoing visibility.
Visit our webpage lydiadigitalacademy and stay connected!
-
-
@SimpleSearch This happens sometimes if following are not done properly.
- Ensure Structured Data: Implement Schema.org markup for scholarly articles including title, author names and affiliations, publication date, keywords, and abstract. This provides clear and consistent information for Google Scholar bots to understand.
- Format Author Names Consistently: Use the same format (e.g., first name, last name) across all publications and platforms. Consider using ORCID identifiers for authors.
- Use High-Quality PDFs: Create searchable PDFs with full text and avoid image-based PDFs. Embed metadata within the PDF document properties.
- Optimize HTML Pages: Make sure the HTML pages for each publication are well-structured with clear titles, headings, and body content. Include the full text of the research and relevant keywords naturally throughout the text.
- Link to Related Publications: Use internal links to connect related research on your website. This helps Google Scholar understand the context and subject matter of your publications.
This comes is with experience, working for exam guide about nursing licensing related content on a website.
Hope this helps you out.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Fetch and Render - Partial result (resources temporarily unavailable)
Over the past few weeks, my website pages have been showing as partial in the Google Search Console. There are many resources/ files (js, css, images) that are 'temporarily unreachable'. The website files haven't had any structural changes for about 2 years (it historically has always shows as 'completed' and rendered absolutely fine in the search console). I have checked and the robots.txt is fine as is the sitemap. My host hasn't been very helpful, but has confirmed there are no server issues. My website rankings have now dropped which I think is due to these resources issues and I need to clear this issue up asap - can any one here offer any assistance? It would be hugely appreciated. Thanks, Dan
SERP Trends | | dan_550 -
Is the search volume insight in Bing more accurate as it is in Google?
Does anybody know if Search volume insight in Bing is more accurate than it is in Google?
SERP Trends | | Seeders
Moz is showing Search Volume insight in Bing now (not sure about the reason, probably Moz has no access to Google? Or is it because it is more accurate?)
For some words I have my doubts about the Google Keyword Tool. I don't know about Bing.
For the first time I compare two words on Bing with Google I found out the ratio in Bing is very different compared with Google. Example:
When you check out the words: espressomachine and koffiemachine
**Google, local search in the Netherlands:Â **
espressomachine: 6600
koffiemachine: 8100
Bing, local search in the Netherlands:
espressomachine: 549
koffiemachine: 361 So..., are Bing users typical kind of users who uses other search phrases?
Or... is one of these two more accurate? Does anybody know?0 -
Deleting a duplicate google places listing
Hi i currently have duplicate Google places listings for a store. One of the Google Places listings is mine (which is correct) and the other is a listing which someone else put up (which is wrong). Which is currently sending customers to the wrong location. I tried to claim the listing by clicking: If you own this place, claim it and edit it directly Which takes me to this page: This Listing Is Unavailable You may only access listings that you own. If you created this listing with a different Google Account, please log in to that account and try again. If you've deleted this listing, you may create it again in Google Places. Is my own option at this stage to leave a comment with additional details use: IMAGE ATTACHED And select 'this is a duplicate listing'? I would imagine this would take sometime, and i need it changed as soon as possible. Any suggestions? screenshot_133.jpg
SERP Trends | | MBASydney0 -
Using the same Google Analytics account for two sites
I have a friend who is concerned that his competition is trying something funny to show high traffic. The competition has two sites using the same GA tracking code. What impact would this have on his actual traffic. One site has high traffic 7500 daily the other site has 150 daily but gaining momentum
SERP Trends | | polarking0 -
Pros and Cons Google Site Search
I'm having a hard time finding the actual pros and cons of implementing Google Site Search on a website. Â Thoughts? Â Any data on bounce rate of internal SERP because UX doesn't look like the website? I know you can customize, but most examples I've seen still look pretty different from the stie's native style. Any other cons? Â Data issues, etc?
SERP Trends | | Aggie0 -
Getting rid of negative websites/reviews
I have a client who is semi-famous and has some negative press that is appearing at the top of search engines. What is the best way to get rid of these?
SERP Trends | | StreetwiseReports0 -
Google Places Citation Differences
Hi All... I know its important to get citations the same in terms of company name, address, phone number and URL but how dissimilar can they be before this causes problems with Google Places? One of my clients has citations with very minor differences to the correct address i.e.: 2a such and such a road when it should be: 2 such and such a road I cannot see duplicate listing for the company. Anyone got any ideas / experience of this? I don't want to suggest changing them all if its not nessasary? Cheers in advance. Justin
SERP Trends | | GrouchyKids0 -
Searching google without bias
i read a tip once and can't find the reference to that tip. It had to do with searching google without including the history of your searches to bias the result. The user was suppose to put a code at the end of the URL, like &pw or something like that. Anyone hear of this?
SERP Trends | | StreetwiseReports0