Frequent updating of pages on website to rank better
-
Will updating each page often for example everyday or few days, rank the page and/or website better in google.
The reason I ask is that I made 18 websites about three months ago and the traffic initially was alot higher and has fallen little by little thru the 3 months. Also how well my pages rank has also fallen. I just put out the websites, have done nothing else. No linking, etc. No updates.
It is evident that without new links coming in, the website will fall in rank ie., link aquistion velocity
But my question is if I update the pages and change content frequently will this improve my position in google and other search engines.
The traffic on websites over the three months if graphed sort of looks like a stair case going down.
-
I agree with Ryan and EGOL. Spend your time and energy on making content that users want to read, not in trying to outguess the search engines.
-
I believe such changes would offer zero SEO value, but I don't have any evidence to support my position, and I am not aware of any tests on this particular topic.
Google is very smart. They have billions riding on search quality. They have proven very effective at detecting duplicate content across billions of web pages. I am confident making minor changes to your content in the manner you described would have no effect at all on SEO.
Many sites offer a dynamic date on their pages. Naturally the date changes each day. Google only sees the HTML. They have no way to see the actual php code which alters the date in the HTML.
Another example is signatures and other information users change. If a user has 10k posts on a forum and changes their signature, then 10k pages could possibly change. The overall ranking of the page is not usually affected because of this change.
These are two examples as to why I disagree with the practice you are suggesting. As EGOL shared, making changes to impress users, not Google.
-
just to clarify things - I dont mean updating a page to make it more meaningful, like giving people the latest fashions on a fashion site, I mean purely changing the text of the page every 24 hours for example- leaving the main seo words the same like the title H2 tags, li tags etc. So bascially in the optimization sense everything is held equal except now we have most of the words changed on the page, but not the keywords. Also disregard gettin any new links because the page was helpful. I mean purely purely just the words change, every so often. WILL THIS make the page rank better even for a short period of time like a day.
-
It's all in the execution....
If you add a brand new, unique, substantive, interesting and accurate article every few days I bet your website will grow very powerful over time.
But, if you change yada yada yada text to yaba yaba yaba text you might get a little tiny boost in the SERPs for a while but it's not going to be enough to make a difference in your wallet.
People who try to impress their visitors usually rank a lot better than people who try to impress Google.
-
Will updating each page often for example everyday or few days, rank the page and/or website better in google.
There are many factors involved. Your question is a bit vague and it's hard to offer any firm reply. This falls along the "add a blog to your site is great for SEO" kind of advice. In general, adding a blog will help your site but only if it is done in a quality manner. You can't simply add a blog to your site and check it off your list as "done" and expect better rankings. The same idea would be applied to updating your content.
Do you have a clothing site? Then updating your content with your latest sales, fall fashions, etc. as appropriate would be helpful for users and probably rankings as well.
Do you own a health product site? Updating your content with latest health trends (acai berry, etc), product recalls, latest studies, etc. along with your sales and other helpful information for users should have a positive effect for your site.
I would not advise you to make changes just for the sake of making a change. You are not adding any value to users in the process.
With respect to your traffic drop, I would suggest taking a step back and re-evaluating your content. If you have high quality content then it should be earning some links and mentions. If that is not happening perhaps your content quality could use a boost. What changes can you make to your content to make it more engaging? Can you incorporate latest headlines into your site? How can you take your site to the next level? What can I offer that would make users WANTS to link to my site, tweet about it, etc.
These are the questions I would suggest you focus on.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will Google crawl and rank our ReactJS website content?
We have 250+ products dynamically inserted and sorted on our site daily (more specifically our homepage... yes, it's a long page). Our dev team would like to explore rendering the page server-side using ReactJS. We currently use a CDN to cache all the content, which of course we would like to continue using. SO... will Google be able to crawl that content? We've read some articles with different ideas (including prerendering): http://andrewhfarmer.com/react-seo/
Technical SEO | | Jane.com
http://www.seoskeptic.com/json-ld-big-day-at-google/ If we were to only load the schema important to the page (like product title, image, price, description, etc.) from the server and then let the client render the remaining content (comments, suggested products, etc.), would that go against best practices? It seems like that might be seen as showing the googlebot 1 version and showing the site visitor a different (more complete) version.0 -
Does adding subcategory pages to an commerce site limit the link juice to the product pages?
I have a client who has an online outdoor gear company. He mostly sells high end outdoor gear (like ski jackets, vests, boots, etc) at a deep discount. His store currently only resides on Ebay. So we're building him an online store from scratch. I'm trying to determine the best site architecture and wonder if we should include subcategory pages. My issue is that I think the subcategory pages might be good from a user experience, but it'll add an additional layer between the homepage and the product pages. The problem is that I think a lot of user's might be searching for the product name to see if they can find a better deal, and my client's site would be perfect for them. So I really want to rank well for the product pages, but I'm nervous that the subcategory pages will limit the link juice of the product pages. Home --> SubCategory --> Product List --> Product Detail Home --> Men's Ski Clothing --> Men's Ski Jack --> North Face Mt Everest Jacket Should I keep the SubCategory page "Men's Ski Clothing" if it helps usability? On a separate note, the SubCategory pages would have some head keyword terms, but I don't think that he could rank well for these terms anytime soon. However, they would be great pages / terms to rank for in the long term. Should this influence the decision?
Technical SEO | | Santaur0 -
After I 301 redirect duplicate pages to my rel=canonical page, do I need to add any tags or code to the non canonical pages?
I have many duplicate pages. Some pages have 2-3 duplicates. Most of which have Uppercase and Lowercase paths (generated by Microsoft IIS). Does this implementation of 301 and rel=canonical suffice? Or is there more I could do to optimize the passing of duplicate page link juice to the canonical. THANK YOU!
Technical SEO | | PFTools0 -
Will syndicated content hurt a website's ranking potential?
I work with a number of independent insurance agencies across the United States. All of these agencies have setup their websites through one preferred insurance provider. The websites are customizable to a point, but the content for the entire website is mostly the same. Therefore, literally hundreds of agency sites have essentially the same content. The only thing that changes is a few "wildcards" in the copy where the agency fills in their city, state, services areas, company history, etc. My questions is: will this syndicated content hurt their ranking potential? I've been toying with the idea of further editing the content to make it more unique to an agency, but I would hate to waste a lot of hours doing this if it won't help anything. Would you expect this approach to be beneficial or a waste of time? Thank you for your help!
Technical SEO | | copyjack0 -
Home Page .index.htm and .com Duplicate Page Content/Title
I have been whittling away at the duplicate content on my clients' sites, thanks to SEOmoz's pro report, and have been getting push back from the account manager at register.com (the site was built here and the owner doesn't want to move it). He says these are the exact same page and he can't access one to redirect to the other. Any suggestions? The SEOmoz report says there is duplicate content on both these urls: Durango Mountain Biking | Durango Mountain Resort - Cascade Village http://www.cascadevillagehotel.com/index.htm Durango Mountain Biking | Durango Mountain Resort - Cascade Village http://www.cascadevillagehotel.com/ Your help is greatly appreciated! Sheryl
Technical SEO | | TOMMarketingLtd.0 -
How do I get my keyword rankings to update?
My keyword rankings did not update. It says updates every Thursday and the last update shows as Aug 23 (which was the original update). Any idea why this would happen and how I can get the updated info?
Technical SEO | | pattersonla1 -
What to do when you want the category page and landing page to be the same thing?
I'm working on structuring some of my content better and I have a dilemma. I'm using wordpress and I have a main category called "Therapy." Under therapy I want to have a few sub categories such as "physical therapy" "speech therapy" "occupational therapy" to separate the content. The url would end up being mysite/speech-therapy. However, those are also phrases I want to create a landing page for. So I'd like to have a page like mysite.com/speech-therapy that I could optimize and help people looking for those terms find some of the most helpful content on our site for those certain words. I know I can't have 2 urls that are the same, but I'm hoping someone can give me some feedback on the best way to about this. Thanks.
Technical SEO | | NoahsDad0 -
Discrepency between # of pages and # of pages indexed
Here is some background: The site in question has approximately 10,000 pages and Google Webmaster shows that 10,000 urls(pages were submitted) 2) Only 5,500 pages appear in the Google index 3) Webmaster shows that approximately 200 pages could not be crawled for various reasons 4) SEOMOZ shows about 1,000 pages that have long URL's or Page Titles (which we are correcting) 5) No other errors are being reported in either Webmaster or SEO MOZ 6) This is a new site launched six weeks ago. Within two weeks of launching, Google had indexed all 10,000 pages and showed 9,800 in the index but over the last few weeks, the number of pages in the index kept dropping until it reached 5,500 where it has been stable for two weeks. Any ideas of what the issue might be? Also, is there a way to download all of the pages that are being included in that index as this might help troubleshoot?
Technical SEO | | Mont0