Nofollow advertisers with high value sites
-
A site with a high PA/DA links to all of their advertisers on their home page using nofollow. The advertisers generally have high quality sites and none of them are spammy. Having read this forum for the past couple months, it is my understanding that nofollow should be used to control spam links, and is commonly used in the forum section where site owners can not control or vouch for the outgoing links. However, as I understand the topic, there is no benefit to using nofollow for high value sites for which you can recommend, and in particular, when the site is receiving money from the advertisers. The link juice is divided by all the links on the page, both follow and nofollow, and the juice for the nofollow is discarded.
I ask this question because we are one of the advertisers on the site. I want to contact them about this issue, and request that they remove the nofollow from the advertiser links.
Comments?
Best,
Christopher -
Does it matter that this site has a DA of 72 with 5K plus domains linking in, and the majority of advertisers have big advertising budgets? We're much smaller than most advertisers on the site, but all the advertisers are real sites that sell real products with healthy volume.
That said, I understand the purpose of the Google policy. It's just a shame in cases like this, because we are linked from their home page and that link juice just vanishes into the ether.
Best,
Christopher -
I don't know that we are saying two different things. I agree that dofollows should gain you advertisers who appreciate what you do for them. Unfortunately, with professional practices and small businesses I see tons of people advertising with companies who state they are doing organic, ppc, content, and building sites for the client.
The sites are all template sites without imagination and the SEO is the same from site to site. (Which begs the question how can you tell one client you are going to help them to rank higher and higher and then tell their ten competitors the same thing when you are selling them). These guys then put links to the client sites and I have seen NoFollows along with 302's in dynamic urls. First when it says "Company Website" the click takes you to another page on the advertising site. If you search you eventually find a link t the client URL. 8 times out of ten it is either 302 or no follow. As to image links and lack of anchor text, if you or I told a client we were going to link to their site and provide them juice, would we use an image or leave out anchor text? I think it is deliberate. But, I am a cynic on odd days.They actually believe they hurt themselves by helping their client. Odd, isn't it?
-
Hey Robert, I respectfully disagree with this theory:
"The reasoning (this is my opinion) is that they do not want the advertiser to grow and leave them so they try to prevent any juice from going to them. To, in essence, endeavor to keep them captive. "
Giving an advertiser a dofollow link is like gold, so not only will you get more advertisers, but if they do see better rankings as a result they would be less hesitant to leave because losing their links on your site could cause a drop in rankings so just the opposite is actually true regarding keeping them captive.
Also, image links do not pass PR which a lot of people don't know and also there is not anchor text so SEO benefit is minimal. If someone wants to advertise on your site and says they want their image link dofollowed I see no problem, that is of course assuming it's a clean site (which should go without saying because you only want to associate yourself with clean sites anyway)
-
Thanks!
Best,
Christopher"Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know." -- King Arthur
-
Likely the primary reason they do this is to comply with Google's wishes regarding paid links, outlined at http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66736. They do not like to see links sold to manipulate pagerank, and adding a nofollow tag complies with their guidelines. They are doing it so their site doesn't get hit with a rankings penalty.
-
If you look at sites like those whose titles end in "pages," it is common for them to no follow their links. The reasoning (this is my opinion) is that they do not want the advertiser to grow and leave them so they try to prevent any juice from going to them. To, in essence, endeavor to keep them captive.
When we take on a client who uses an advertising medium that uses no follows in their links to their clients, we generally also find they are the type who do "ppc" but have "no way to show you what they paid for a given keyword", etc. We suggest the clients do not continue unless the advertising medium is bringing them a really good ROI that is demonstrable.
I doubt the site you advertise on will change its policy to assist you based on my experience with this type. It is not a question of their fear of losing juice, but a fear that they will be increasing their clients value and therefore more likely to lose the client. However, if you want to try the place to put the pressure is on your individual rep. Tell them you are unhappy and you think they owe you the link in an uncorrupted way. Reps want to keep their commissions and not lose clients.
Good Luck.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Which site is gonna get most of the link juice?
site: a has PA of 25 , DA of 30 and has 1000 external links. site:b has PA of 5 , DA of 30 and has 5 external links i already know that high PA and DA matters but please explains in terms of those external links mentioned above, because i have heard if a page has a lot of ext links, the link juice will be given to all the external sites , ultimately juice will be divided.
Link Building | | calvinkj0 -
Does this lose link value?
I have a link to my site from a post on an online forum. I now want to include the forum in a blog post about good industry-related e-forums. If I link to them in this article, will I lose the value from the link on the post in their forum, and could it be seen as spammy?
Link Building | | AHC_SEO0 -
Directory listing and open site explorer
As per my previous post regarding my new client. I am dissecting all the previous seo companies docs and basically there are hundreds of directory listings on paper however site explorer does not show any. my question is this does site explorer not list directories site or are they worthless?
Link Building | | Shuffled0 -
Links to International Versions of the same site
Hi, our clients' .com site has a link in the header to the .com.au version of their site and vice versa. In effect this creates a reciprocal link on each page. Should we prevent the robots from crawling this link? I don't think a nofollow will suffice.
Link Building | | steermoz70 -
Getting into DMOZ for my coaching site
Hello, Before I submit to DMOZ, I'm wondering if my site is one that would get indexed: www.bobweikel.com Also, if you have any hints beyond what I can read at DMOZ I'd really appreciate it. I don't want to submit and then after several months get rejected.
Link Building | | BobGW0 -
Value of paid for directories
For a company with a limited budget, is it worth spending money on paid for directories which a high authority to boost your page rank? Thanks
Link Building | | f1plustraining0 -
Is it a bad idea to build unique sites to build credibility for your main site?
It is hard to sum up the question in one line, but basically my company has bought several descriptive domains that we would like to build out into microsites that link back to our main site. For example...say we are a florist. Our main site talks about all the different kinds of flowers we have and the work we do. So the idea is to buy weddingflowersdallas.com (example only...) and have a mini site that has the same look and feel as our main site, but has unique content that talks solely about our wedding flower business and has a few links back to our main site. 1. Is this a no no from a google perspective? 2. Is this a good strategy in general? Thanks, David
Link Building | | ciinc1 -
No-Follow Tag and Advertising
Hiya! I've got a relatively new domain, and one of my goals is to be 100% white hat, squeaky clean as I really would love to see my site succeed in the long term. So far my linkbuilding efforts are going pretty well. I'm beginning to buy some ads, and some of the bloggers I'm buying ads from don't use advertising networks, they just host your jpeg from their own blog... For the little picture that will show up in the side column of their blog should this be no-followed? And if it's not do we know if google assigns a penalty? I'm ok with asking the blogger to do that, but I notice my competition is not (and I know they know better) so I feel like it puts me at a bit of a disadvantage. Secondly - I'm 100% avoiding sites that sell text links (even ones with high pagerank, like pagerank 6), is this the right path to go? I read this article from Matt Cutts and was wondering if this is still true, reputable sites that sell links maintain their pagerank but aren't able to pass pagerank? http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/text-links-and-pagerank/ "Reputable sites that sell links won’t have their search engine rankings or PageRank penalized–a search for [daily cal] would still return dailycal.org. However, link-selling sites can lose their ability to give reputation (e.g. PageRank and anchortext)."
Link Building | | super990