Keyword Difficulty
-
is probably a "how long is a piece of string" question but wondered how to use the keyword difficulty tool, particularly in relation to the % and the wording moderate, what are these actually saying?
Perhaps some of you could give details of how you use this tool and apply the % and term to real world situations,
Thanks in advance, Lee
-
Thank you Sha
"I'm sure you know already that you dodged a bullet by losing that client Lee :)"
Agreed, I had a bad feeling about them at the initial meeting, the second meeting merely convinced me they were a bad lot. Thought they were very controlling, inflexible and negative towards new concepts or embracing social.
So yeah in hindsight I'm glad I lost the contract, but I did learn from the experience which is a plus :))
-
"There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see!"
I'm sure you know already that you dodged a bullet by losing that client Lee
What you currently see in the keyword difficulty tool is just a representation of how competitive the term is. The tool previously also showed local and global broad and exact match search volume for your term, but Google's recent decision to withdraw developer access for the Adwords API means they are no longer visible.
As mentioned by others here, the report generated below the competition result, which shows results on specific metrics for the Top 10 Domains ranking for the term (and the advanced Report you can generate if you want to) is by far the most valuable output from this tool.
There is a detailed blog post from Rand Best Kept Secret in the SEOmoz Toolset, which explains in detail how to use the information to see what you can improve to have a shot at matching it with those sites.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
I know what you mean.... Getting even poor content out of some business owners is impossible.
-
"content on a retail site it gains an enormous advantage over competitors (who do not have that type of asset) in its ability to climb the SERPs."
Perhaps I should hire you to convince my clients! Just lost a potential contract for suggesting this (insurance company). All of their content was very poor, one news post had 27 words and included 3 keyword strings - Couldn't believe what I was seeing. They told me I was being too negative lol I thought I was giving constructive feedback.
Good points though, appreciate your thoughts,
Lee
-
Wouldn't the numbers be indicative of quality?
Yes... but not always...
The numbers could be skewed by paid links or other links that were not given on the basis of merit.
Also, the numbers can be skewed by time. Older content has had a long time to accumulate links but new content - that is superior - is just getting started.
New content that is superior can rank very low but climb the SERPs over time as its quality is recognized.
The perspective above is for two content sites competing against one another.
For retail sites a comparison of "numbers" can be more important.... however, once you start putting desirable, informative, tweetable, likeable, linkable content on a retail site it gains an enormous advantage over competitors (who do not have that type of asset) in its ability to climb the SERPs.
-
Thanks for your advice Egol always appreciative of your insight
Am new here so my question was more from the perspective of getting a feel for the tools and how to use them.
Before using SEOmoz all of my data was taken from SERPS (i.e. experience, knowledge and hunches) and am hoping that the tools would compliment this.
Elaborating somewhat on your second paragraph:
Wouldn't the numbers be indicative of quality?
I'd also prefer to take a balanced view, I'm sure you do this too, by taking both into consideration, the numbers and the quality of the content, which of course I can only do with sufficient knowledge of the tools.
Thanks, Lee
-
Rather than looking at these numbers, consider going to the SERPs and look at the pages and sites that you would like to defeat. Then ask.... can I build better content? .... can I build a better website?
If you can do these things you will have greater success than chasing numbers... and if you have success by chasing numbers but are defeated by higher quality content or higher quality websites then the numbers that you must chase will escalate over time as your competitors gain natural strength.
-
Thanks Kyle,
like what you said about "void of any helpful context in and of itself. The more meaningful data is the underlying metrics of the pages competing"
Shame .......... was hoping for a faster starting point, but I guess it always boils to drilling down and defining the data.
Thanks
-
"In other words if it says "70%" but the site I'm trying to rank is already IN spots 1-10 somewhere this is much different than trying to pick keywords for a brand new site and getting it to rank from scratch."
Thanks Dan, this is what I'm trying to determine, most of my business comes from new sites, so while they have a little age, from the sense of rankings I'm trying to identify new phrases on sites with no previous seo.
Would have been a little more helpful if that percentage gave me a better idea of the impact on a new site, but I guess we can't have it all.
Thanks for the tip though will certainly broaden my search, perhaps look for moderate to low, but as you advise, look for weak off-page competitors.
Cheers, Lee
-
The only way that those overall percentage makes sense is if you have experience ranking terms at different difficulties. At least that's what I've found. It's generally accurate but void of any helpful context in and of itself. The more meaningful data is the underlying metrics of the pages competing, specifically:
- Domain & page strength
- Number of in-bound links with matching anchor text
- How many times the pages have been liked, shared, +1'd and tweeted
- Unique C-Block IP's linking to the page
- On-page keyword targeting.
Those factors are what the overall percentage is trying to convey, but it's generally just good to use as a starting point -- SEO is meaningless without context!
-
Hi Lee
By percentage do you mean when it says for example "57% highly competitive"? And not sure what you mean by "wording moderate" could you elaborate?
I generally look at the percentage to get a basic feel for how hard it might be to rank well for that keyword. I use this is a general guide as you have to dig into the metrics to get a real sense of how hard it is to rank. And it depends on your situation.
In other words if it says "70%" but the site I'm trying to rank is already IN spots 1-10 somewhere this is much different than trying to pick keywords for a brand new site and getting it to rank from scratch.
Or if all the top sites are ranking more because of on-page factors than off page (links and social) I know there's a good chance you can beat them, because on-site is easier to fix.
Hope that helps
-Dan
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What defines what words in a title are considered Keywords?
Hi, sorry if this is a silly question. I'm curious how keywords are defined. Is every word in a title a possible keyword? If I have a keyword titled "Linear Shower Drain | 40" Long", does it take the whole thing as a keyword? Is just "Linear Shower Drain" the keyword? Would "Shower Drain" pop up as a keyword, since its nested in the title? Thank you in advance for your answers!
Keyword Research | | ezable0 -
Coworker and I see totally different keyword volumes on same paid keyword planner account
My coworker and I are both connected to the same company's paid keyword planner account but are using our own individual google accounts to log in. When I look up the keyword "joint bank account" I get a search volume of 9,900, while she gets a search volume of 2,900. Does anyone know why this might be? Do we know which might be more accurate? This doesn't seem to be connected to Google lumping semantic variations together. I've seen it happen way before that update. It's hindering our headline pitching since the volume she sees does not meet our minimum search threshold. Any insight would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Laira
Keyword Research | | CTI1 -
Where do I go from here with my keyword research?
Hi all. I'm wondering if I can get some assistance on keyword research. I've set out a step-by-step process for myself about how to go about finding a list of keywords we want to optimise our site for. I've used a guide over at http://www.seonick.net/keyword-research to break it down step-by-step. After using Keyword Tool and Ubersuggest to get a list of keyword suggestions with their local monthly search volumes, I now have an Excel file with 1663 suggestions (yikes!). It is at this point where I am not 100% sure of what to do with this data & how to figure out which of these terms we should optimise for. I know not to go purely based on the local monthly search volume because that is not based on organic searches. So how would I go about condensing this into a list of keyword suggestions to target for optimising? Thanks in advance for assistance on this.
Keyword Research | | janc0 -
Best Practices For Keyword Optimization
Hey currently building a new page on a clients site in the weight loss niche. The keywords he wants to rank for are the following: <colgroup><col width="198"> <col width="64"></colgroup>
Keyword Research | | monster99
| [fat burning foods] | 49500 |
| [foods that burn fat] | 22200 |
| [fat burning foods for women] | 2900 |
| [belly fat burning foods] | 2900 |
| [best fat burning foods] | 1900 |
| [fat burning foods for men] | 1900 |
| [list of fat burning foods] | 720 | His site is new, but he has excellent content production capabilities. My question is, in terms of optimizing the page (the title and url) for these keywords would you focus on the highest volume keyword. In this case the highest volume keyword is "fat burning foods" however is the most competitive and dominated by high domain authority sites (50+ vs. clients site which is around 30). Thus its highly unlikely he will rank for that keyword for quite a while. But for the keyword term "best fat burning foods" the competition is alot less in terms of DA and other factors but volume is smaller with 1900 hits a month. So would you optimize the page (the title and url) for "best fat burning food" or would you optimize thinking about the long-term and eventually ranking the keyword "fat burning foods". My thinking would be to optimize the page for "fat burning foods". And that the benefits of optimizing (url and title) for "best fat burning foods" isn't ideal for the long-run. Any suggestions or advice would be appreciated. Cheers, Mark0 -
Keyword analysis tool
Is it not working? I have not been able to use it for the past 2 or so days.
Keyword Research | | JohnWalker0 -
Keyword Search
Keyword search How low is too low for choosing to use a key phrase for one of your articles, website pages, etc. I see some with 100 local and global searches. Is this too low to really be spending the time working on this key phrase?
Keyword Research | | sansonj1 -
Keyword Ranking Information
Recently I received an email from an SEO marketer with the following ranking information for my site (image attached) ( link to image http://imgur.com/CAo4D) I am sure he ran some sort of tool to this ... Is there any tool , which can give a list of low ranking articles in my site which have high search traffic CAo4D
Keyword Research | | iamnew1 -
Google keyword tool [exact match]
Hey there, I'm trying to work out what my next big course to run will be. I want to know if my technique is a good gauge of popularity. I'm using Google's keyword tool specifically for New Zealand. I'm typing in a course topic e.g Photoshop Courses and looking at the exact match results to see if there might be a market for that course. Broad match seems to offer up a lot more numbers but seem a bit vague. Am i right to think 'After Effects Training' wouldn't be a popular course as it returns a (<10) local monthly result while 'Photoshop Courses' might be ok as it has a (46)? **I'd appreciate any insight. ** Dan
Keyword Research | | danielfromnz
- the Adobe Trainer0