Hi,

I haven't had to do this myself, but this guide in Google might help you outwith the Apple stuff?
https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/6095881?hl=en-GB

-Andy

Hi,

I heard RSS Feed helps in ranking.

No, this is not a ranking factor. I have never heard of or seen any research about this either. Think about all the sites that rank exceptional wall without one.

Use it if you seed your content around, but don't think it will do anything for your SEO.

-Andy

Hi Amelia,

No, no need to do this. As long as you have a new sitemap in place, then just have Google index this one. If they are still indexing the old one, highlight and delete it and then point them to the new one.

-Andy

Hi Branden,

You are fine using images hosted elsewhere - this is a well-used way to speed up page load times. You will get no penalty for going this and it won't impact on-site SEO either.

-Andy

This is hugely dependent upon what you want to do. There is certainly no outright SEO benefit to doing this.

Personally, I don't like naked domains and much prefer the www. version.

Have a read of this to see if you can gain any additional information.

-Andy

Hi,

Occasionally you might see Google does this where they will return a URL and as part of the description, show a hashed anchor - but they won't show just an anchor as a result in its own right. It will always form part of the page that Google returns.

Worth doing if you think it might help usability but it wouldn't fit for every page and circumstance. Have seen it used to good effect, but am seeing less and less of these.

-Andy

Another vote for noindexing tags.

They serve very little (no real) benefit for SEO and cause more headaches than anything else. I never really want to see tags indexing and competing with primary internal pages that actually carry the information I want people to find.

Use them, but just don't index them.

-Andy