Hi Egol,
Thanks for your input. The term is actually quite bad as in not your main stream type of adult content so I'm not sure how nice the people are but I get you drift
Thanks for your help and input!
b
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi Egol,
Thanks for your input. The term is actually quite bad as in not your main stream type of adult content so I'm not sure how nice the people are but I get you drift
Thanks for your help and input!
b
Hi,
I'm conducting an on-page review for someone and have noticed something I've not seen before.
Some of the major internal links from the home page are marked as no follow. For example:
<a <span="">href</a><a <span="">="</a>/customer-services" rel="nofollow">Customer Services
This is on the top navigation bar and the content in this and all other sections are marked as no-follow but they should all be crawled. Is this an error or am I missing something?
Any ideas guys?
Thanks
Bush
Hi - Yes I've seen my clients metrics move and there are a tonne of p155ed off people out there on the Anlaytics forum and here as well - http://www.seroundtable.com/google-analytics-session-definitions-13872.html
I've been looking into this and I think just as many who have left comments, that there is a bug when calculating the session times or returning visits incorrectly being flagged as a traffic source.
There is definitely big issues around the session update.
Bush
Thanks Logan,
The meta data is very clear on what the site is about (both title and description). The issue is it's showing up in the SERPs and users are just clicking without reading anything.
Hi Karen,
Spot on! Thanks for that I've been pulling my hair out on it.
March (not provided) rocketed. There are other things at play but this is definitely part of the issue.
You Rock!
Bush
Hi Gerwin,
I can't give timeframes but I had a client who had 100+ property sites interlinked (nothing to do with my advice!) and these guys starting to see the sites with no other links in their portfolio get smashed for rankings. One was pretty much de-indexed and was not ranking for its meta title. I sent a re-inclusion request via Google WM tools and after around 5 weeks the site started to rank again. It ranked worse after the drops but I think you'll find that the rankings and traffic were won by an artificially inflated link graph so if you get a re-inclusion request filed and all is forgiven it will be lower down in the SERPs as the site should not have been so high in the first place.
Thats what happened to me anyway but how G react depends on how many other non-reciprocal links you have. When you file a re-inclusion request grovel and come clean. Thats what I did and it seemed to work.
Thanks
Bush