thanks Keri
any ideas though aprox how long G takes to update/pass authority of an old page to new one via a 301 ?
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
thanks Keri
any ideas though aprox how long G takes to update/pass authority of an old page to new one via a 301 ?
Hi
How long aproximately does G take to pass authority via a 301 from an old page to its new replacement page ?
Does Moz Page Authority reflect this in its score once G has passed it ?
All Best
Dan
many thnaks for further comments Kate
Sorry but whats PLA ?
No but i will now
All Best
Dasn
Thnaks for commenting Alrockn !
it definately fits the content of the page, just worried about it increasing kw rich word count & repeating key phrase sentence. but if i understadn u correctly then so long as fits content which it does then should be ok ?
ok thanks Chiaryn
is that the actual name of the moz crawler (to allow in Robots) simply rogerbot ? or any other characters etc ?
Also is it not the case that even when blocked by robots.txt G can still crawl/index it once password removed, think i read few comments somewhere on Moz that can still happen somehow ?
Please advise asap ?
Many Thanks
Dan
Hi
I have a client project who's developers platform is populating the category part of the breadcrumbs with the header tag. Since these include the pages primary target keywords/phrase they are being repeated in the breadcrumbs increasing the keyword/phrase count on the page as well as repeating/duplicating the sentence.
Can this cause problems ? or not because Google knows its not part of the page content/body copy (because its a breadcrumb) ?
Cheers
Dan
i dont suppose either of you are able to help at all with this related question:
http://moz.com/community/q/site-crawl-errors-download-list-of-all-urls
i dont suppose either of you are able to help at all with this related question:
http://moz.com/community/q/site-crawl-errors-download-list-of-all-urls
Hi Andy
Screaming Frog does have password access feature for your info i have just tried it
All Best
Dan
Thanks Matt
I have got screaming frog and can confirm that it has password access feature, but i really want Moz to be able to access too, i would have thought they should have this option somewhere. Are you saying Moz crawls have more info than SF (re 'moz level' analysis) ?
Dev site better password prtected than robots arnt they i think ?
Cheers
Dan
Hi
Ive instructed clients to password protect dev areas so dont get crawled and indexed but how do we set up Moz crawl software so we can crawl theses sites for final check of any issues before going live ?
Is there an option i havnt seen to add logins/passwords for crawl software to access ?
cheers
dan
isnt cpc type activity going to show in Paid search ?
when i click on 'other' within channels it shows 4 sub channels no 1 is Google and the others are know activity like Buffer.
When i click on Google there's no further breakdown apart from the traffic details (sessions/goals etc).
ok thanks Kate
Seems a tad strange though since all known paid channels being reported elsewhere.
It would be good to know if theres a way to find out whats causing it since all paid campaigns, PPC, emails, display, etc etc being reported in other places and traffic from this 'Google Other' source is 4x current organic search traffic
All Best
Dan
what about what these guys are saying:
Many Thanks for that Kate !
When i look in GA under Channels (under Acquisition) 'other' is listed
What is 'other' ?
I have been told its other unidentified channels as they did not allow 3rd party cookies or surfers were in anonymous/private mode. Other is usually organic traffic that couldn't be identified for the aformentioned reasons. This data is encrypted and available but it violates Google guidelines as they are not allowed to pass personal info//data to third parties so it is automatically filtered. But they are not 'Not Provided' (since that still shows under organic) but is usually/mainly some form of organic visits.
Hence Seo can take credit for much of that traffic, is this correct ?
Many Thanks