Does it make sense to go after broad search with less competition vs. narrow search with very high competition?
-
We are in the process of analyzing our current site structure, on-page optimization and keywords to form a new strategy around our site. What we are finding with the keyword research we’ve done thus far is keywords that are shorter-tail have less competition, but far more searches than some of the long-tail keywords. For purposes of illustration I will give an example. Let's say we sell Wedding Cakes and the keyword string “Garden Wedding” has approximately 246,000 monthly local searches and medium competition, but “Garden Wedding Cakes” only has 880 searches and very high competition.
We believe that if we create a very effective landing page for "Garden Wedding" with all kinds of great content surrounding "Garden Wedding" that we have a much better chance of ranking on page 1 than if we were to go after the term "Garden Wedding Cakes". Furthermore, the volume of search far exceeds the "Garden Wedding Cakes" and hopefully will reach a much larger audience. However, because "Garden Wedding" is such a broad term, we are concerned that we don't necessarily understand what folks are searching for vs, when someone types in "Garden Wedding Cakes" we know they are looking for a cake.
Here are the questions we have:
- Targeting broader terms with higher search, has anyone implemented this type of strategy? We think in the long run, this will help us with exposure, but also with help our targeted page of "Garden Wedding Cakes" rank higher (if we can earn a great PR for the page "Garden Wedding".
- Would we run the risk of creating a higher bounce rate with this strategy for people who are looking specifically for Garden Wedding items/supplies, etc.. Is this a major concern?
- Could we monetize the effort put into new, rich content surrounding Garden Weddings, when we are in the business to sell Wedding Cakes?
Any insight that one can provide would be greatly appreciated.
-
our short tail search has a lot less competition that our long tail
Yes, that makes this sound extra good!
Good luck! Let us know how it works!
-
Andrea,
Thanks so much for your response. If I understand you correctly, this is something that you employ and that you have seen success with. Do your competitors do the same? One interesting thing that we are seeing is that our competitors don't play within this space---meaning they don't rank for (or don't appear to try to rank for) our short tail keywords. We see that as an opportunity. Would you agree?
-
Thank you so much for your incredibly fast response. I think your answer helps us to affirm that we would not be shooting ourselves in the foot and is in fact, a good strategy to try. I did want to clear up that our short tail search has a lot less competition that our long tail. I would assume that this would suggest that we are definitely on the right track. Thanks again for your insight.
-
I think EGOL makes some great points, especially about content vs product/sales. And, given that I work on an incredibly complex site that often poses many SEO challenges, here's how I happen to look at it:
- Low volume words that are highly competitive you hope would mean a more targeted audience. (So, not throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks.) One issue: if it's, let's say 100 searches a month, then the best you can hope for is a percentage of that.
- Fact is, not everyone who may be looking for a "lockout tagout custom procedure" may search for that long tail. They may just search for "LOTO" - so, I have selected to build a keyword/SEO strategy that build long tail into short tail/broad terms.
- Also, what I have noticed is that even with the short tail, our bounce rates haven't taken a hit, perhaps because the meta descriptions give enough info away so people can tell before the click if we may be right for them.
- And, our rankings for a section where we did a much better pyramid build with keywords/content/like subjects has steadily improved in visibility - giving me hope that if you can manage the technical with understanding what Google wants (good, relevant content), it works.
Good luck!
Andrea
-
First, I agree that the traffic for "garden wedding" is going to be very different from the traffic for "garden wedding cakes".
If I owned a cake site I would want at least two special pages dedicated to "garden wedding cakes". One would be my sales page... and another would be an informative page that has a lot of content about that topic. How these cakes are different from others, why a person would want this type of cake, lots of sample photos, lots more sample photos. I might even have a third page that explains how to make them. These two informative pages would be built to be best-on-the-web content for their topic. The hope would be that they would attract links, likes tweets, and traffic. Each of these informative pages would have "house ads" with the goal of luring visitors into the sales page. If you have these three pages and they are successful you might get ranked #1, #2, and #3 in the "garden wedding cake" SERPs.
I would also build pages for "garden wedding". The goal would be to produce awesome content that will attract generic traffic. These would be very long content pages with tons of words, lots of photos, maybe video. I'd want substantive content because I think that it ranks better, gets shared more and attracts lots of long tail traffic.
As you mention, the "garden wedding" SERPs have a lot more competition and probably are more difficult to get rankings. However, my philosophy is... "Do not fear competition" because where there is competition there is also lots of traffic and there is often some money changing hads. My garden wedding page would have adsense on it to generate a bit of income and it would also have house ads that attempt to lure visitors to my cakes sales page.
Depending upon the topic and the amount of traffic and potential money I would not hesitate to create more than one page for the "garden wedding" theme. As long as you are producing more diverse content that is high quality you can keep pulling in still more long tail traffic that is different from your other garden weddings page.
Lots of people would say... you are committing the huge sin of keyword cannibalization. Yes, that is true - for the short tail terms but not for the long tail terms. It is the opposite side of the "archers dialog" from Braveheart that was horrifying in the film but applies perfectly here.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Subdomain initials vs full city name(s) for a multi city subdomain site?
Helping with a multi-city non-profit magazine/news blog. Subdomain options; sf.domain.com, ny.domain.com, la.domain.com sanfrancisco.domain.com, newyork.domain.com, ... Some cities added, will as an example seol.domain.com a city that doesnt have a recognizable initlals, like NYC for example. For brand, recognition, seo benefit, what have you used and why? Thanks
Industry News | | vmialik0 -
Is there a really good place to find high end, cutting edge web developers online.
My issue is that I know there are a lot of web developers in the world and all of them are great just like all the great SEO's in the world. Does anyone know of a great place to find really top talent that is the kind where the people are constantly stretching and trying new things, etc.
Industry News | | RobertFisher
Is there a web dev board the better ones are on, etc. Any luck in other areas? We have a position available, but will not fill it with anyone average or above average. I really would love to know what boards, forums, etc. I can find them on, but every search lists 50 boards and, the is not my everyday world. I just do not know which are the ones that will put me in front of the best in the world. Any help is appreciated. Robert0 -
Effect of changes on the Content page on search ranking
Hi, I have a question related to my ranking on Google Search On the content pages of my website, there is a section where our content keeps on changing. Whenever a visitor enters new information, Old information will be removed from the page. Therefore our content page is dynamic. Does this make us difficult to rank for particular keyword / overall.
Industry News | | adiez12340 -
What are the click-through rates by position for organic search on Google by industry?
I'm interested in knowing what the average CTRs are by industry (specifically for the credit card industry). Here's an example of what I want in aggregate (not by industry): http://searchengineland.com/organic-click-thru-rates-tumbling-study-97338 Is this information available?
Industry News | | wepayinc0 -
How to add excel in Google custom Search
Hi I was watching this video http://www.seomoz.org/blog/eight-link-building-tips-whiteboard-friday and i wanted to know how to put the excel sheet in Google Custom Search engine? Many thanks
Industry News | | conversiontactics0 -
URL Search removal tool.
Hi All! I have tried to request a URL removal from Google search for an old testing site they still have listed. Ive tried requesting removal of the domain and of individual pages, all requests are getting rejected. Any help would be gratefully appreciated 😄 Many Thanks Anthony
Industry News | | Anthonykal-group0 -
Is anyone else looking into ARIA Roles vs HTML5 Markup and Schema.org
Hi im investigating the pros/cons of the Aria Roles, HTML5 Semantic Markup and Schema.org. For those not in the loop: HTML5 Semantic Markup = Semantic Structure Layout. (i.e. Header, Footer, aside (sidebar) Nav) Aria Roles (WAL-Aria)- Defined for Screen Readers Schema.org - Microdata I went gung-ho with some dev costs accounted for to push the new marekup schema. My devs being really good pushed back and in doing further research I have found that there is indeed some underlying complexities surrounding how we structure and markup these pages. A lot of the HTML5 Semantic Stucture code seems to lack adequate purpose, like it was recommended in 2004 (oh wait it was). Schema.org makes sense in the larger realm given in SEO land we love the search engines, although Schema.org vs. Facebook Open Graph. The ARIA attributes look great and work for screen readers (so I am supportive of pursuing) but do they offer and SEO benefit. I would love to get the communities thoughts in general and or thoughts on ignoring HTML5 Semantic markup and just putting in Schema.org tags. Is anyone else going through the same issues? Regards, Phil
Industry News | | AU-SEO1 -
What does the New Frontier of Search Look Like? (Mobile and Tablet)
I'd like to start a discussion thread on the direction of search as it applies to mobile and tablet. Jeff Haden, one of our Inc.com contributors, wrote an article headline stating that SIRI would be the end of SEO. However, what the article really talks about is the direction mobile search is likely to take: 1. Search results will be bypassed 2. Even more emphasis on local 3. PPC will be irrelevant 4. Emphasis on social media I think these insights are fairly intuitive and it will be really interesting to see how the medium for mobile and tablet develops. It will be interesting to see what technologies will shape the means by which users find information and not just the search intent of the user. Please add any insights you may have or good reads you'd like to share here.
Industry News | | inc.com0