Does it make sense to go after broad search with less competition vs. narrow search with very high competition?
-
We are in the process of analyzing our current site structure, on-page optimization and keywords to form a new strategy around our site. What we are finding with the keyword research we’ve done thus far is keywords that are shorter-tail have less competition, but far more searches than some of the long-tail keywords. For purposes of illustration I will give an example. Let's say we sell Wedding Cakes and the keyword string “Garden Wedding” has approximately 246,000 monthly local searches and medium competition, but “Garden Wedding Cakes” only has 880 searches and very high competition.
We believe that if we create a very effective landing page for "Garden Wedding" with all kinds of great content surrounding "Garden Wedding" that we have a much better chance of ranking on page 1 than if we were to go after the term "Garden Wedding Cakes". Furthermore, the volume of search far exceeds the "Garden Wedding Cakes" and hopefully will reach a much larger audience. However, because "Garden Wedding" is such a broad term, we are concerned that we don't necessarily understand what folks are searching for vs, when someone types in "Garden Wedding Cakes" we know they are looking for a cake.
Here are the questions we have:
- Targeting broader terms with higher search, has anyone implemented this type of strategy? We think in the long run, this will help us with exposure, but also with help our targeted page of "Garden Wedding Cakes" rank higher (if we can earn a great PR for the page "Garden Wedding".
- Would we run the risk of creating a higher bounce rate with this strategy for people who are looking specifically for Garden Wedding items/supplies, etc.. Is this a major concern?
- Could we monetize the effort put into new, rich content surrounding Garden Weddings, when we are in the business to sell Wedding Cakes?
Any insight that one can provide would be greatly appreciated.
-
our short tail search has a lot less competition that our long tail
Yes, that makes this sound extra good!
Good luck! Let us know how it works!
-
Andrea,
Thanks so much for your response. If I understand you correctly, this is something that you employ and that you have seen success with. Do your competitors do the same? One interesting thing that we are seeing is that our competitors don't play within this space---meaning they don't rank for (or don't appear to try to rank for) our short tail keywords. We see that as an opportunity. Would you agree?
-
Thank you so much for your incredibly fast response. I think your answer helps us to affirm that we would not be shooting ourselves in the foot and is in fact, a good strategy to try. I did want to clear up that our short tail search has a lot less competition that our long tail. I would assume that this would suggest that we are definitely on the right track. Thanks again for your insight.
-
I think EGOL makes some great points, especially about content vs product/sales. And, given that I work on an incredibly complex site that often poses many SEO challenges, here's how I happen to look at it:
- Low volume words that are highly competitive you hope would mean a more targeted audience. (So, not throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks.) One issue: if it's, let's say 100 searches a month, then the best you can hope for is a percentage of that.
- Fact is, not everyone who may be looking for a "lockout tagout custom procedure" may search for that long tail. They may just search for "LOTO" - so, I have selected to build a keyword/SEO strategy that build long tail into short tail/broad terms.
- Also, what I have noticed is that even with the short tail, our bounce rates haven't taken a hit, perhaps because the meta descriptions give enough info away so people can tell before the click if we may be right for them.
- And, our rankings for a section where we did a much better pyramid build with keywords/content/like subjects has steadily improved in visibility - giving me hope that if you can manage the technical with understanding what Google wants (good, relevant content), it works.
Good luck!
Andrea
-
First, I agree that the traffic for "garden wedding" is going to be very different from the traffic for "garden wedding cakes".
If I owned a cake site I would want at least two special pages dedicated to "garden wedding cakes". One would be my sales page... and another would be an informative page that has a lot of content about that topic. How these cakes are different from others, why a person would want this type of cake, lots of sample photos, lots more sample photos. I might even have a third page that explains how to make them. These two informative pages would be built to be best-on-the-web content for their topic. The hope would be that they would attract links, likes tweets, and traffic. Each of these informative pages would have "house ads" with the goal of luring visitors into the sales page. If you have these three pages and they are successful you might get ranked #1, #2, and #3 in the "garden wedding cake" SERPs.
I would also build pages for "garden wedding". The goal would be to produce awesome content that will attract generic traffic. These would be very long content pages with tons of words, lots of photos, maybe video. I'd want substantive content because I think that it ranks better, gets shared more and attracts lots of long tail traffic.
As you mention, the "garden wedding" SERPs have a lot more competition and probably are more difficult to get rankings. However, my philosophy is... "Do not fear competition" because where there is competition there is also lots of traffic and there is often some money changing hads. My garden wedding page would have adsense on it to generate a bit of income and it would also have house ads that attempt to lure visitors to my cakes sales page.
Depending upon the topic and the amount of traffic and potential money I would not hesitate to create more than one page for the "garden wedding" theme. As long as you are producing more diverse content that is high quality you can keep pulling in still more long tail traffic that is different from your other garden weddings page.
Lots of people would say... you are committing the huge sin of keyword cannibalization. Yes, that is true - for the short tail terms but not for the long tail terms. It is the opposite side of the "archers dialog" from Braveheart that was horrifying in the film but applies perfectly here.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Weebly vs Wordpress for SEO?
Hi Mozzers, Wordpress has become a pain in the butt as far as plugins slowing down site speed and snippets of codes breaking here and there. My goal is to decrease the constant maintenance that needs to be done on Wordpress. I am curious what do you guys think of Weebly as an "SEO platform" vs wordpress? I only hear good things about Wordpress for SEOs but what about Weebly? Please share your thoughts and why one or the other is better for SEO purposes? P.S: if you have any experience with Weebly, feel free to let me know how did that go for you and if you were satisfied with it. Thanks!
Industry News | | Ideas-Money-Art0 -
Net Neutrality: FCC Votes To Make Internet Public Utility
It sounds like it is now official: the FCC has voted to make the Internet a Public Utility, supporting Net Neutrality. But before I jump for joy, I'm asking myself, "What exactly does this mean?" I know what it doesn't mean: ISP's won't be able to throttle data, and they won't be able to package together access to websites for additional fees, as they do with television channel packages. That's great, in my opinion. Even though I'm a Libertarian and I believe strongly in freedom, I know that that would have a seriously negative impact on the Internet, and especially for people like us who rely on it on a daily basis as our livelihoods. The problem that I am find is that what they voted on contains ~322 pages of new regulations for the Internet. I have no idea what is in those 322 pages, and I doubt anyone who voted on it does either. The democrats are loving it, while the republicans are calling it, "Obamacare for the Internet". My mind works more in the direction of, there must be pros and cons. I'm just very curious as to what those pros and cons are, and what this will actually mean for us in the online marketing industry, as well as anyone who works on the Internet. I'm not looking for any answers, and I'm especially not looking for a political or biased debate. But I think there should be a place where we can discuss this issue, because it has the potential to be extremely important to us. Please share you thoughts, findings, and research here where we can discuss them. I'm looking forward to learning from you all, and I hope I can add some useful insights to this conversation. Once more: please, do not turn this into a political debate - this is not the place for it. Please keep it to how Net Neutrality and Internet as a Public Utility will affect the Internet and Online Marketing landscape for us, our clients, and our customers.
Industry News | | Millermore3 -
Huge website Search Quality Team problem
One of my clients, have a huge problem. His page which generate traffic over 3 milion unique users per month (GA) has been penalized in January / filtered by Google, reason is simple: incoming links from low quality pages... We try everything from reconsideration request to meeting Google Europe employees (But not directly with search quality team), reconsideration requests (over 10) in 6 month are bounced off we got automatic reply like "This website have still problem, read Google Webmasters FAQ etc." We contacted manually with webmasters which have websites with incoming link to us, some pepole delete with no problem, rest don't take any action to remove our links from webistes...A few days ago we use disavow tool links where we add all links which can be ignored by Google, so.. we make new recosideration data with specific information and yesterday we got the same reply like as beginning of the year.. Like this: "There are still some inorganic links to your site" What we can do? We lost a money, our client lost money, lost position, lost users... Anyone have any idea to contact with Google excluding reconsideration request form and forum?
Industry News | | thenaturat0 -
Convert Oganic ranking into Local Search Results
Hi, Right now, my website appears in top 5 results in organic SERPs, but I noticed that my business has gradually started going down, as my local results have been replaced by organic search results. Initially I used to rank in local results, but now, I appear in organic results so the no. of calls/day have decreased significantly. Now, I again want to appear in local search results instead of organic results. Please advice what should I do to remove my listing from organic search results and improve position in local search results PFA the screenshots for both the results for your better understanding. I look forward to hearing from you. Regards, qHKAt.png 0cPOp.png
Industry News | | Visiblics0 -
How to go about removing bad/irrelevent links?
We have been made aware of a series of irrelevant links on some rather dodgy sites. http://www.designerdogstop.com/level-static/http://www.bestfirepits.net/some-of-the-best-vacations-for-families/2010/05/05/ http://whatcigarsdoismoke.com/cigar-lighters/cigarette-cigar-2/ http://dollfuss.org/build-bear-hawaii/ Absolute rubbish im sure you will agree. These links must surely be causing our link profile some damage. They are currently wordpress sites with no means of contacting the authors. What ways and means are there of removing these negative pages and links? Cheers all, any help appreciated.
Industry News | | TimHolmes0 -
Site search
My google site search is now costing us $750/year. That is an outrageous fee for providing a search feature on our website. does anyone know of an effective search box we can put on our site that is less expensive than google?
Industry News | | StreetwiseReports0 -
How to search adwords properly
If i search the word gold, Google tells me it is searched 20 million times/month. I realize that is people searching the word gold in combination with other terms. I would like to know how to find out how many people search the word gold just by itself. How do i do that?
Industry News | | StreetwiseReports0 -
New Search Engine
Looks, like I signed up months ago to be a BETA tester for a new search engine called Volunia Has anyone else heard about this engine? Just curious! Thx
Industry News | | Ben-HPB0