Exact Match Domain Names
-
Basically without a doubt having a exact match domain name is a massive benefit.
If you targeted a keyword with 2 different sites one with an EMD and one without, I could quite easily expect the EMD to pop up page 1/2 and the non EMD site to be 10 pages deep.
I'm going to be honest, I hate how much weight is put on the EMD, Domain brokers are focused on purely finding these, buying them up and selling them way above there worth.
Google needs to realise this is a massive problem because I see sites with great content, great moz trust and rank being outranked by a EMD that sits on a squeeze page.
Question: If no link building was taking place on the EMD site, lets say it ranked page 2, position 4 but you was linking building on the NON EMD how long to get it up to the EMD site?
-
That's not my experience, and it's not what this data suggests:
2011 Search Engine Ranking Factors
Pages don't compete in isolation of any other factors...
-
I disagree.
-
There is no real benefit of having an exact match domain, because it is single web pages and not domain names who are competing for SERPs.
-
Cheers EGOL,
You have hit the nail on the head for the kind of response I was looking for.
I have seen some amazing results, when you combine a EMD with good content some of the results from it are unbelievable, especially when you appreciate how hard it is to rank without one and how much effort is needed SEO wise to rank without one.
It's the brokers that annoy me the most, a domain is meant to be brought to attach a website to - domain sites on IP, IP points at site.
If Google ever devalues EMD's brokers are going to be in the muck.
-
I own a few exact match domains for competitive keywords and will confirm that they are helpful in getting rankings. However, Google has turned back the importance of these domains and even before Google did that these domains were not invincible. I am getting my butt kicked in a few places.
I'm going to be honest, I hate how much weight is put on the EMD, Domain brokers are focused on purely finding these, buying them up and selling them way above there worth.
I used to feel this way then I paid a ransom to get one of these domains. (My wallet is still smoking.) But, for me, it was worth it. Not only did I get better rankings, my conversion rate went up (without changing the site) and these domains will get you more links, tweets, etc - in my opinion. You might not have the same results.
So, my suggestion would be to bite the bullet and buy one of these domains. It will cost you some money, you might need to deplete savings or take out a loan but then you will see their true value - which might be less than what you expect.
But at least then you will have one of these gems and see what you can do with it.
The bottom line... owning one of these domains for me is not all about the rankings. It is about owning a great virtual property that gives me enormous energy to work on the site. That will kick a lot more asses than the EMD.
-
I can relate to your problem!
I think that's a difficult question to answer as you don't know the relative strengths of the two domain/ranking pages or the competition and it's hard to determine just how much of an advantage the exact match domain is providing without looking at the context.
When you see an exact-match domain ranking somewhere in the middle of the SERPS you can at least take a look at the pages around it to asses just how strong you're going to need to be to out-rank the exact match domain.
If you find an unassailable exact-match domain ranking for your chosen keyword, then maybe look at other keywords although remember that you don't necessarily have to out rank that page to get more traffic. If your can craft a more compelling snippet (title + description) then maybe you can draw more than your expected share of the traffic.
-
There is actually a patent that tackles this exact issue. Over 2012, in my opinion there are going to be more "Panda style" updates that target this method that filters out domains that are exact match, but really just a "loophole" doorway page.
Of course these are not really "doorway pages" by technical definition, but the underlying motive is to game the Algorithm into ranking a single entity for many keywords using multiple domains just junking up the web, in my opinion.
w00t!
Did I mention #STOPSOPA ?
Resource;
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
linking domain issues
Hello guys. I am having issues with my linking domains. These domains are made outside of my website. I have tried to disavow these links but not able to do it. These are mostly from google redirects links. Here is the```
Link Building | | Rom1988z
code_text0 -
1000's Backlinks from ONE Root Domain - Positive or negative?
One of my website's link is placed over a comment. This website has a "recent comments" section in the footer which is hence appearing on all the websites pages. All tools including - Google Search Console, Majestic and MOZ are showing 45000+ links from that root domain. Questions: Are these links harmful to my rankings? Should I get all those links disavowed? Should I disavow the root domain or leave the link that lies on the home page? What if there are up to 10 links coming from a domain? is that harmful too? Apart from disavowing, is there any other option to get this fixed? If at all this counts as an issue... Thanks in advance!!
Link Building | | Ishrat-Khan0 -
Forwarding a domain seems to be creating 10,720 backlinks according to majestic?
I have a site toptwincitiesrealtors.com that points to my main site mnpropertygroup.com when I look up my backlinks on majestic it says I have 10,720 coming from this toptwincitiesrealtors.com site. should I stop pointing that site? I have a low trust flow but high citation flow on my mnpropertygroup.com site and a 0 trust flow and 5 citation flow on my toptwincitiesrealtors.com site
Link Building | | jchoughton0 -
Domain authority vs. anchor text in backlinks
Hi - I launched a new blog ~3 months ago and I've managed to get some backlinks from Yahoo, Cnet, Huffington Post, Gimodo, etc. I created some compelling and unique content. However, all of the anchor text of all of the links is mywebsite.com or mywebsite. None of them are the actual keywords I want such as "this website is great for keyword blah and keyword blah" My question is....could I get more "juice" from these links if they had more specific anchor text or is their high domain authority enough as far as google is concerned?
Link Building | | garyislearning0 -
Backlinks and Domain Authority
Hi there, I have a question on backlinks. I have seen conflicting stories about it, and hoping someone with a vast amount of experience will be able to help me (If you could please be so kind). Now I understand the difference between 'no-follow' links and 'follow' links. I have accumulated quite a few 'no-follow' links through things like Facebook, Youtube, Twitter etc. I understand that they won't feed my site authority or trust; or anything of that sort (I do work on content too, and have gotten a few follow links, don't worry). Now I have seen conflicting answers to the actual importance of them. Some things I have read are saying that SEs completely ignore them (NFL), and they don't even consider them a 'link', but rather a user tool to further the experience of the reader on your site. Which is fair enough, but then people are turning around and also saying that Google relies heavily on them, and they only make up 5% of the internet or something. I have even read something saying they are the only ones worth getting (I know that is bs, but they must have a reason behind this thought?). If someone could enlighten me as to a 'ideal' ratio, and also any little known authoritative sites I could look at submitting content to. I am in the plumbing business, and doing my own sites, so I'm no expert. Also, what are the importance of comment links? I don't go for them, but don't know if I should? Sorry for the mouthful, but I would really appreciate help on this matter. Kindest regards, Kyle The Plumber Bro's The Electrician Bro's
Link Building | | Kyle_James0 -
Backlinks - Linking to new domain
Hello Moz community! My established client recently franchised their business by adding a metro area location. We have thousands of back links built to the corporate website, a lot of which have anchor text that are geo-targeted to the new metro area website. We still find the corporate website important, but would rather focus our efforts now on the newly franchised location. Does anyone have experience with successfully having old links changed to a new domain and if so how? When changing directory listings, such as everything on get listed, is it better do do slowly or as much at once as possible? Any recommendations or information would be appreciated! Thanks!
Link Building | | FullMedia900 -
Advice on buying a domain name for a valuable link
There is an expired blog which scores well for a search term I'm interested in. I'd like to know if people think it's a good idea to buy it to get a link essentially? Also, if I buy the domain and the content is wiped, does anyone have any tips on what I should do in regards to content to maintain the domains value? I don't generally look to buy domains for links but on this occasion it could be worth the effort and expense.
Link Building | | benners0