Which direction should I go with NAP change?
-
After watching Benu Aggarwal's webinar, I have updated the NAPs for local search for one of my clients. She recommended getting rid of "Inc" for incorporated companies if that is not how the name is displayed in other places. Most of the NAPs already had the Inc, but some spelled out "Incorporated", and a few left out the inc entirely.
So my question is - How much damage do you think is caused by having a minor difference in the name, such as "Inc"? Is it worth my time to edit listing just for that one minor change? I'm guessing yes, but just wanted to hear some opinions.
-
You are welcome Jastos,
This is one of those points on which I wish the guideline language were slightly clearer. If, as you say, your client appears in the offline world just as 'Joe Plumber' then going the route you are going should be within the guidelines. Does the client have a DBA record of their name without the Inc?
To me, I read those guidelines to mean that the name should be the legal business name (Inc included) but that's an interpretation. I agree, you could equally interpret that to mean what you have decided.
But back to your original question - if you've decided to go with the name without the Inc., then I feel it would be wise to make the effort to make that consistent across the web.
Miriam
-
Thank you Miriam. I have gone with the approach of using "Joe Plumber" in the listings because that is how everyone refers to their company online. If Joe Plumber is featured in a home magazine, they will say "Joe Plumber is the best place to get your pipes unclogged". Also, nobody in Analytics is searching for "Joe Plumber, Inc.". Additionally it seems unnatural to use the Inc in the body text of the website.
-
Hello Jastos, Thanks for coming to Q&A with your good question. I'm the Local SEO Associate here in the forum and will do my best to give a thoughtful answer. In the simplest possible terms, a company's legal business name should be the name it is publishing in all places across the web including its website, local business profiles, review sites and etc. Google's exact language on this from their Places Quality Guidelines reads: Business Name: Represent your business exactly as it appears in the offline world. I take this to mean that if your business is Joe Plumber, Inc., then that's how you should consistently appear on all web records. Now, as it happens, your question is one that I've actually discussed with my colleagues in Local. The smartest Local SEO I know says that Google is typically sophisticated enough to understand that Inc. and Incorporated are the same thing....kind of like the difference between Ave. and Avenue. They get what it means. So, is this a huge issue for your client? No. That being said, I think most Local SEOs would agree, putting the time into making the listings and references consistent would be a best practice. It might not be your #1 task to accomplish, but, yes, I think it would be worth it to do the job when you can. Hope this helps! Miriam
P.S. Sorry for the run-on paragraph. Having a little trouble with line breaks tonight in the forum. Hope you can still read that sensibly.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
NAP: Best practices on your website?
My store currently has 2 location and will soon have 3. I was wondering what the best practice for listing your address information on a website. I currently have all 3 listings on one page, but would like to have a separate page for each location (to include managers and specific location info). My question is what is the best practice for listing locations on a website (for SEO)? Should I have a landing page with all 3 and their NAP info then have a link to the specific page with the same NAP info. Would having that info twice be a negative?
Image & Video Optimization | | nat88han0 -
Google Places UK address has randomly changed to a US address in Texas!
Hello, one of my clients has 2 Google Places listings, both UK addresses. However one of them has randomly changed to a US address in Texas, and it won't let me update the country unless I create a new listing.... https://www.google.co.uk/maps/preview#!q=the+43+club&data=!4m16!1m15!4m8!1m3!1d22152595!2d12.5088275!3d47.73855!3m2!1i1440!2i774!4f13.1!7i10!9m1!6e0!10b1!17b1!25b1!6m1!1e1&fid=1 As you can see the second listing is Texas, but it should be: Tall Trees Cottage, Winkfield Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7EX. 0208 144 0166 Any help would be great. Thanks
Image & Video Optimization | | Kerry_Jones0 -
Once you start fixing Local citations with correct NAP, is it normal for your rankings to plunge at first?
I strongly believe that I have received the most solid Local advice I could from these forums and have started (in just a few days) to make the needed corrections. At the same time I'm somewhat excited and optimistic that it will be a long journey but that it's a learning process. About 5 days ago, I set my website up with "City landing pages" and I started plundering through google, fixing and claiming and correcting as many citations as I could with correct NAP. The journey still continues today as I just got my Bing Local card in the mail and verified. I went to check my rankings on Google Maps, just to see if anything had changed and sure enough it had. My listing had been holding strong at page 10 (which drives me nuts) and now after 5 days of solid work its on page 18. I have to assume that because I'm stirring the dust perhaps Google is confused and maybe in a month or so things might start moving the other way? Thoughts?
Image & Video Optimization | | jonnyholt0 -
Thoughts on Google's New NAP Dispaly on Google+ Local
Hi, Do you think ACTION needs to happen based on Google's new NAP formatting change? They are changing Suite or STE to #. So for example 265 Racine Dr #100 Wilmington, NC 28403 Even if you enter in Suite they change it to pound. I am wondering the thoughts of the community of the following: 1. Do you think Google knows that STE, Suite, and # are all the same 2. Do you feel that we need to change ALL online local business listings and our website to match this change. 3. Here is the letter from Google on the matter FROM GOOGLE: Thanks for informing us about your address appearing differently on your local Google+ page than it does on your dashboard. After looking further, we've determined that 240 Stockton St #300 San Francisco, CA 94108 is an appropriate way for your listing to be displayed. Note that the address on your page might be different from what you've input into your dashboard. Our processes might alter user-input addresses to make them more standardized and easier for users to access. Thanks for understanding. Best, Nathan
Image & Video Optimization | | WebBizIdeas
The Google Team0 -
Easy Local SEO NAP Question
Hello, Does differently listed phone numbers matter? For example, 208-998-9988 vs (208) 998-9988 vs 208.998.9988
Image & Video Optimization | | BobGW0 -
Local SEO NAP issue
Hello, All of my citations addresses have the street address 913 S. Latah Street except there are other businesses in this building with the same address. Should I have included "Room H"? Also, is "S." different than "South"? Is "St." different than Street? Looking for correct consistent citations.
Image & Video Optimization | | BobGW0 -
Whats is going on with Google Places?
I know they recently started rolling out their update of their Places pages but a lot of people, including myself are having problems such as missing descriptions, hours, categories (not updated), etc. Anyone have any insight into when we might expect these issues to be corrected? As far as I can tell Google has not really addressed the problem whatsoever. Their forum is packed with people complaining but so far so they have remained quiet. Thanks!
Image & Video Optimization | | PMC-3120870