Which direction should I go with NAP change?
-
After watching Benu Aggarwal's webinar, I have updated the NAPs for local search for one of my clients. She recommended getting rid of "Inc" for incorporated companies if that is not how the name is displayed in other places. Most of the NAPs already had the Inc, but some spelled out "Incorporated", and a few left out the inc entirely.
So my question is - How much damage do you think is caused by having a minor difference in the name, such as "Inc"? Is it worth my time to edit listing just for that one minor change? I'm guessing yes, but just wanted to hear some opinions.
-
You are welcome Jastos,
This is one of those points on which I wish the guideline language were slightly clearer. If, as you say, your client appears in the offline world just as 'Joe Plumber' then going the route you are going should be within the guidelines. Does the client have a DBA record of their name without the Inc?
To me, I read those guidelines to mean that the name should be the legal business name (Inc included) but that's an interpretation. I agree, you could equally interpret that to mean what you have decided.
But back to your original question - if you've decided to go with the name without the Inc., then I feel it would be wise to make the effort to make that consistent across the web.
Miriam
-
Thank you Miriam. I have gone with the approach of using "Joe Plumber" in the listings because that is how everyone refers to their company online. If Joe Plumber is featured in a home magazine, they will say "Joe Plumber is the best place to get your pipes unclogged". Also, nobody in Analytics is searching for "Joe Plumber, Inc.". Additionally it seems unnatural to use the Inc in the body text of the website.
-
Hello Jastos, Thanks for coming to Q&A with your good question. I'm the Local SEO Associate here in the forum and will do my best to give a thoughtful answer. In the simplest possible terms, a company's legal business name should be the name it is publishing in all places across the web including its website, local business profiles, review sites and etc. Google's exact language on this from their Places Quality Guidelines reads: Business Name: Represent your business exactly as it appears in the offline world. I take this to mean that if your business is Joe Plumber, Inc., then that's how you should consistently appear on all web records. Now, as it happens, your question is one that I've actually discussed with my colleagues in Local. The smartest Local SEO I know says that Google is typically sophisticated enough to understand that Inc. and Incorporated are the same thing....kind of like the difference between Ave. and Avenue. They get what it means. So, is this a huge issue for your client? No. That being said, I think most Local SEOs would agree, putting the time into making the listings and references consistent would be a best practice. It might not be your #1 task to accomplish, but, yes, I think it would be worth it to do the job when you can. Hope this helps! Miriam
P.S. Sorry for the run-on paragraph. Having a little trouble with line breaks tonight in the forum. Hope you can still read that sensibly.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What do you do for U-NAP distribution for two business within the same building?
I have a hotel that has a restaurant within its building. Both the hotel and restaurant are owned and managed by the same group. There was a proposal to create a U-NAP distribution for the restaurant itself. Should there be any concerns regarding a U-NAP issue with the hotel given that they share the same physical address and the same URL? The Restaurant has it own landing page within the domain. It does not have building specific identifier like a suite number. Please advise if a U-NAP distribution for the restaurant will cause a material impact on the Hotel's U-NAP purity.
Image & Video Optimization | | JohnJimenez0 -
Easy Local SEO NAP Question
Hello, Does differently listed phone numbers matter? For example, 208-998-9988 vs (208) 998-9988 vs 208.998.9988
Image & Video Optimization | | BobGW0 -
Local SEO NAP issue
Hello, All of my citations addresses have the street address 913 S. Latah Street except there are other businesses in this building with the same address. Should I have included "Room H"? Also, is "S." different than "South"? Is "St." different than Street? Looking for correct consistent citations.
Image & Video Optimization | | BobGW0 -
Changing Web Address
What would be the best way to change a web address without loosing google rankings? Currently we have whosjack.org and wjlondon.com redirecting to that address. We want to switch that around but I am aware that this will change all the links. Is there any way to do this without killing our site rankings?
Image & Video Optimization | | luwhosjack0 -
Changing to a cdn
Hi everybody, we want to implement a cdn and I am not sure about, how to handle to old image-Urls. We move all our product-Images to one or more cdn hosts, while the old host (and the old image-urls, which are indexed very well) will stay alive, so I do worry about that dc-thing.... What would be the best way to handle this? Sending Canonicals for the images? Redirects? Or nothing to worry about ? Thanx and all the best from here Hubert
Image & Video Optimization | | wbseo0 -
Google+ Local/Places isn't displaying my suite #. Should I leave it out of NAP on other directories, too?
HI All, For some reason Google is not displaying the suite # for a client of mine in Google+ / Places. I've entered the suite # in the back-end of Google+ / Places and it shows there when I log in, but the public version of the listing omits it. So the question is, should the NAP in other directories omit it as well? Google knows it exists, but is choosing not to publish it... Thanks! Zack
Image & Video Optimization | | HammerandHand0 -
Does it matter how the NAP is formatted as long as it's consistent?
In local SEO, does it matter how the N.A.P. is formatted as long as it's consistent? Does the name have to be the official legal name? Should the address use USPS standards? Can the phone number be ###.###.#### instead of (###) ###-####?
Image & Video Optimization | | SteeleSEO0 -
Google Places Name Change - Duplicate Listings.
Need input on a Google Places change to avoid duplicate listing/phone number issue for a name change. Here is a summary: Company A has a Places listing and ranks week for key local terms. Company A has become a franchise and has a completely new name but same address. A New Franchise listing was created. It has same location but a different telephone (tracking) number. Both listings generally appear in Google Places but Company A (older listing) come up first. For branding purposes I would ideally like to eliminate (or edit) Company A listing and optimize new Franchise listing. We will need to eliminate the tracking phone number and add the old “Company A” phone number to the new Franchise listing. What is the best procedure to delete the Company A listing? I have access to both listings. Do I: -Strip Company A listing of most info…wait and then delete? Do I delete from my account or delete in total? -Just change the name of the “old” Company name to the new franchise name and delete the new franchise listing? An if so, in what order? -or do I just delete the old listing right away and edit the new franchise listing right away? -When do I add the old (and real phone number) to the new franchise listing? This same scenario has played out in other locations with disastrous results. Appears that Google looks at them as duplicate listings if the old Company name is still active and demotes both listings. Trying to avoid that problem that has been created by other companies. -Would adding Google Boost to the surviving listing help? Any input appreciated.
Image & Video Optimization | | AgileInt0