Thoughts on how to speed up my site? (Other site ideas.)
-
I was wondering if someone had a few minutes to talk a look at our site and see how to speed it up. I've ran some of the speed tests and I get different results, so I'm not sure if my site would be considered "slow" or not.
Also if there any other things that jump out at you (usability, side bar, things I should change / add / take away to make a users experience better, etc.) please let me know. Any feedback is good feedback to me.
I'm using WP Super Cache as well.
Thanks!
-
Paul,
Thank you very much for all the feedback. Such great info.
I've been working on improving many of these items over the weekend. I'm only using total cache, I set up a CDN, i took off on of the tabs on the activity widget and just let the popular posts. I'm trying to figure out how to resize the images better on the sidebar tab as you're right they are using css to rescale the images.
I'm actually saving up to have the site designed by a designer instad of my non-design self. But that's down the road as having something designed professionally isn't cheap (although it is worth it.)
I'm going to be working on your suggestions for the rest of the site. Thanks again for the feedback and for the kind words about our site. I'm really trying to help people through this site, and from the feedback we are getting it looks like it's been doing that.
Now I'm on the journey to make it an even better experience for people.
-
Be careful with WP Smushit. As mentioned it relies on Yahoo api that has been very unreliable, but it also uses memory mapping. If you exceed memory mapping (very easy to do on shared hosting) the plugin fails and can bring down the site with it.
-
Yea, I figured from some of the commentary and what I saw in his code he must have been acting on some of the suggestions right away. Just didn't want to assume, just in case
And yea, getting to the next level of performance may mean bigger changes like removing some items from the page altogether.
Paul
-
Looks like he's already implemented many changes since this question was posted. At the time, he was running just Supercache, now he's got W3TC, MaxCDN and he seems to have optimized some of the images.
Definitely agree with aiming for 1Mb or less per page, though.
-
First of all, just wanted to wish Noah a happy birthday!
You're right to be asking about speeding up your website, as there are a number of opportunities to improve page load times. I notice you also have questions posted asking about VPSs, and CDNs.The thing is, there is definitely an order in which these things should be tackled.
The first thing you must do is get your on page code as efficient as possible. The reality is that an inefficiently coded website can bring even the strongest of servers to its knees with just a little extra surge in traffic. It's never a good idea to try to make up for inefficient code by throwing additional hardware resources at the problem.
By default, WordPress is fairly easy to use and build, but that front-end simplicity comes at the cost of complexity and inefficiency of code on the back end. Every bit of functionality you add using plug-ins and widgets comes at the cost of additional files to load, more database calls to process, and more opportunities for someone else's inefficient code to get in the way.
In your case, your homepage is approx 2 MB in size, and some of your internal pages are over 4.5 MB. This translates into page load times anywhere from 10 to 25 seconds at typical cable Internet speeds. In practical terms, anything over 1 MB is awfully big.
Site speed optimization can be a fairly complex process, and needs an overall plan, rather than trying to implement one-off tactics and hoping for the best. I'd be happy to help you off-line to build up a plan, but in the meantime these are the kinds of things you should be taking into account:
- reduce the number of plug-ins and widgets adding content to your page to the bare minimum.
- Make sure the plug-ins/widgets you have chosen are the most efficient available in their class
- make certain photos are as efficiently compressed as possible, are being rescaled as opposed to resized in html, and be careful of using too many photos on any one page
- Ensure your caching plug-in is tweaked and tuned to be as efficient as possible for your server configuration.
Some specifics for you to think about:
- the Recommended sidebar widget (and to a lesser extent the Popular widget) are extremely inefficient in their use of images. Even though they're only showing 50x50px thumbnails, they're loading full-size images up to 550kb in the background.
- is there enough difference between Recommended and Popular for both to be of benefit to visitors?
- you're obviously using W3 Total Cache - hope you don't also have SuperCache enabled as well? If so, they'll compromise each other's performance. Only one caching plugin - ever.
- you have several different advertising networks providing ads to the page. Each one loads it's own set of backend scripts, many of which are VERY inefficient. Could you consolidate?
- you currently have over 1 megabyte of just Javascript loading on each page when target should be less than 1 MB for the whole page including content
- sidebar titles like "Like Us on FaceBook" have so little contrast from the background they're very hard to read (& likely disappear on dark monitors)
- you get so many comments on each post (a nice problem to have!) that it may be time to consider paginating the comments so that each page doesn't have hundreds of comments to load each time it displays
Overall, you're doing an absolutely kick-ass job with your website, from everything I can see. You're rocking the engagement and interest of your visitors, and you've tuned most of the things that are readily tuneable. The next level up in performance will require some tough decisions and perhaps even killing a few sacred cows. That's why I recommend you make a plan before randomly changing things.
With the way you're going, you may very well find that even the highly tuned site is going to outgrow shared hosting as a result of increasing traffic. If/when this does happen, you'll still benefit from having leaned out the website so it can take better advantage of whatever server hardware it's hosted on.
I'll close with a couple of really useful tools for visualizing exactly what's happening in the performance of your site.
First is webpagetest.org (if you haven't already found it) which allows you to run tests that directly mimic the experience a user and their browser would have. You can even have it test from different areas of the country, and using different typical Internet speeds. I usually test with the two lowest speeds, as they will cover the widest range of typical users including mobile.
The second is a plug-in called P3 Performance Profiler. It may seem counterintuitive to be adding another plug-in when what you're trying to do is reduce the complexity, but what P3 does is give you an actual readout of how much of your server's resources are being used by each of your site's plug-ins. You you can enable it for testing purposes, then turn it off again for normal running of your website.
No doubt this has created as many questions as it may have answered, so by all means fire away if you need additional clarification.
Paul
-
Pingdom says your page is 5.5mb big. But it loads pretty quick for me.
You can do alot better. Here's my recommendations.
1. Optimize your images before uploading. I would recommend the WP-Smushit plugin which does it on the fly, but lately the yahoo api hasn't been working.
2. Switch the W3 Total Cache. It does the same thing as Super cache, but there's some additional goodies.
3. Using W3TC, you should enable minify and combine for all the css and js. The plugin allows you to combine all your css and js in two files (from both your theme and other plugins).
4. Consider using a CDN. Again W3TC makes it easy. I use amazon cloudfront, and it's amazingly cheap. Essentially, you keep your current hosting, but actually serve all css, js, and images from the CDN. It makes an enormous difference.
-
Thanks. The host I'm using is really good, so I'm not sure switching hosts would be that different.
In regard to number of posts on home page, how many would you suggest?
-
After taking a quick look I would just utilize Cloud Flare (http://www.cloudflare.com). It is a free tool where they not only optimize your site with an increase of speed around 60%, but they also provide a CDN.
I tested this out a few weeks ago with a blog of mine and it took it down from 8 - 10 seconds to load, down to 1.8 seconds. Very impressive.
They also provide a Wordpress plugin.
No need to change hosting companies.
Two tools to help you as well.
-
Consider
- Moving to WPengine.com for hosting.
- Less posts on the home page.
- Compressing your CSS.
- Better optimization of images.
It was pretty quick for me. The slowest load was the externals, videos from you tube as it calls out for each one to "load" then in the browser.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does interlinking on mobile site helps in seo & improvement in rankings
Hi, Does interlinking on mobile site helps in seo & improvement in rankings. Our desktop site & mobile site has same urls. Regards
Web Design | | vivekrathore0 -
Site with no ads hit by Page Layout update?
Hi there! Can a site that has no ads on it be hit by Google's latest Page Layout update? Can it be hit for just one or two keywords? My site (www.ink2paper.com) has a decline in Google organic traffic in early Feb so my suspicion is the Page Layout update. However I have no ads on the site. Digging into GWMT I find that it is only one or 2 keywords that seems to have taken a dive, mainly [photo paper]. I used to get around 80 imps a day for this term. Then on 6 Feb it was down to 50; 7 Feb = 34; 8 Feb just 4 impressions! I got a spike back at usual levels on 10 & 11 Feb, but since then it has been back down to only 5 or so impressions a day. [photographic paper] took a small hit at the start of February, but has nose dived since the start of April. The homepage performs well for Google organic traffic - low bounce (22%) and good ecom conversion rate (14%) - although this is likely to be largely branded traffic. I feel my site is a 'good' result for the search term [photo paper], although there is always room for improvement of course! Any suggestions as to why Google has stopped showing my site for these keywords? All help is greatly appreciated. Cheers,
Web Design | | SimonHogg
Simon0 -
Can anyone recommend a tool that will identify unused and duplicate CSS across an entire site?
Hi all, So far I have found this one: http://unused-css.com/ It looks like it identifies unused, but perhaps not duplicates? It also has a 5,000 page limit and our site is 8,000+ pages....so we really need something that can handle a site larger than their limit. I do have Screaming Frog. Is there a way to use Screaming Frog to locate unused and duplicate CSS? Any recommendations and/or tips would be great. I am also aware of the Firefix extensions, but to my knowledge they will only do one page at a time? Thanks!
Web Design | | danatanseo0 -
Best course of action when removing 100's of pages from your site?
We had a section on our site Legal News (we are a law firm). All we did there was rehash news stories from news sites (no original content). We decided to remove the entire Legal News section and we were left with close to 800 404's. Around this same time our rankings seemed to drop. Our webmaster implemented 301's to closely related content on our blog. In about a weeks time our rankings went back up. Our webmaster informed us that we should submit each url to Google for removal, which we did. Its been about three weeks and our Not Found errors in WMT is over 800 and seems to be increasing daily. Moz's crawler says we have only 35 404's and they are from our blog not the legal news section we removed. The last thing we want is to have another rankings drop. Is this normal? What is the best course of action when removing hundreds of pages from your site?
Web Design | | MFC0 -
Site structure and blog tags for local with five locations
I have a client who has five locations. Their current web site was structured very well for the pre-penguin and Panda world. However it does not seem to do as well after these changes. I believe it would serve them both with their customers as well as on Google if they localized the site for each location. Currently all the content on the site if focused on one location that is in the largest metro. On the content side we have a plan to produce local content and blogs for each location. My questions are how to go about structuring the site map and blogs to provide the most local juice. I was also wondering how to properly mark up a site with a main trunk and five local branches. I am also trying to figure out how to structure the tags on the blog. On the site map itself I was planning on maintaining all the content as well as the older blogs in the main trunk of the web site. Under this trunk there is a locations page that currently goes to five pages that simply have an address as well as a bulletin board of upcoming events. The blog is directly off the main page with no tie to any location. Here are my thoughts on what I think we should do: I believe we should create a mini web site starting at the location page that has specific content and navigation related to each location. That the content should focus on the specifics of that area and what would serve that clientele the best. We should add to each branch location based on the key words and competition in that area. The blog off the main web site should continue to house the general categories that are already there as well as any other general posts. I think we should add a link to each store page with a location specific blog in each mini location site. Each mini location site should have it's own blog with specific blogs targeted towards the local market. This local blog would also feed in the general blogs from the "trunk" as they are posted. Relating back to my original questions: is what I outlined the right approach or is there a more effective way to do this? Is there any special mark up I should do to tell the directories what to do? How do I structure the tags for the blog? I was thinking of a structure like this: General blog/category/subject under the main structure : local blog/category/subject Any ideas of input on this? Ron
Web Design | | Ron_McCabe1 -
Internal linking for small site
I have a site with 13 pages, 6 are product pages, 5 are free tips pages (the other 2 are the home page and contact form). Currently I have the navbar at top of site with a "products" dropdown menu for the 6 product pages and a "Tips" dropdown menu for the 5 tip pages. All categories except the contact page are at the bottom as breadcrumbs, the homepage is "home" and the rest are relevant user friendly keyword anchor text. So I have 2 more pages to ad to "Tips" and am wondering whether to have a new 2nd level tips page that links to a 3rd level of 7 different tips pages, or keep it shallow as it is, with only 2 levels from the homepage to the other (now 13) pages, with a potential of 22 pages in the foreseable few years? (and some graphics work to make it user friendly like how Zappo's has categories to the side on each of its drop down navbar menu's and non-link text categories for its bottom of page breadcrumb links) Can those aforementioned pages linking to each other in the footer dilute link equity? (I think that's one of the primary reasons I'm curious). What do you think of this: http://www.dbswebsite.com/blog/2012/08/08/internal-linking-101-5-best-practices/ (I guess I should no follow my contact page), could it be better to have a 2nd level page for "Tips" to get more equity to that page rather than across all 7 tips pages? I have read around about this on here (hence how I found out about Zappo's) and elsewhere and wanted ask to make sure.
Web Design | | Zoolander0 -
Question #1: Does Google index https:// pages? I thought they didn't because....
generally the difference between https:// and http:// is that the s (stands for secure I think) is usually reserved for payment pages, and other similar types of pages that search engines aren't supposed to index. (like any page where private data is stored) My site that all of my questions are revolving around is built with Volusion (i'm used to wordpress) and I keep finding problems like this one. The site was hardcoded to have all MENU internal links (which was 90% of our internal links) lead to **https://**www.example.com/example-page/ instead of **http://**www.example.com/example-page/ To double check that this was causing a loss in Link Juice. I jumped over to OSE. Sure enough, the internal links were not being indexed, only the links that were manually created and set to NOT include the httpS:// were being indexed. So if OSE wasn't counting the links, and based on the general ideology behind secure http access, that would infer that no link juice is being passed... Right?? Thanks for your time. Screens are available if necessary, but the OSE has already been updated since then and the new internal links ARE STILL NOT being indexed. The problem is.. is this a volusion problem? Should I switch to Wordpress? here's the site URL (please excuse the design, it's pretty ugly considering how basic volusion is compared to wordpress) http://www.uncommonthread.com/
Web Design | | TylerAbernethy0 -
Duplicate content on mobile sites
Hi Guys We are launching a mobile webshop later this year and have decided to use a subdomain for this. (m.domainname.xx). The content will be more or less identical with the one on the standard desktop site (domainname.xx), but im struggeling to find out if this will create dipplicate content between the mobile and desktop site. Does anyone have a solid answer for this one?
Web Design | | AndersDK0