Thoughts on how to speed up my site? (Other site ideas.)
-
I was wondering if someone had a few minutes to talk a look at our site and see how to speed it up. I've ran some of the speed tests and I get different results, so I'm not sure if my site would be considered "slow" or not.
Also if there any other things that jump out at you (usability, side bar, things I should change / add / take away to make a users experience better, etc.) please let me know. Any feedback is good feedback to me.
I'm using WP Super Cache as well.
Thanks!
-
Paul,
Thank you very much for all the feedback. Such great info.
I've been working on improving many of these items over the weekend. I'm only using total cache, I set up a CDN, i took off on of the tabs on the activity widget and just let the popular posts. I'm trying to figure out how to resize the images better on the sidebar tab as you're right they are using css to rescale the images.
I'm actually saving up to have the site designed by a designer instad of my non-design self. But that's down the road as having something designed professionally isn't cheap (although it is worth it.)
I'm going to be working on your suggestions for the rest of the site. Thanks again for the feedback and for the kind words about our site. I'm really trying to help people through this site, and from the feedback we are getting it looks like it's been doing that.
Now I'm on the journey to make it an even better experience for people.
-
Be careful with WP Smushit. As mentioned it relies on Yahoo api that has been very unreliable, but it also uses memory mapping. If you exceed memory mapping (very easy to do on shared hosting) the plugin fails and can bring down the site with it.
-
Yea, I figured from some of the commentary and what I saw in his code he must have been acting on some of the suggestions right away. Just didn't want to assume, just in case
And yea, getting to the next level of performance may mean bigger changes like removing some items from the page altogether.
Paul
-
Looks like he's already implemented many changes since this question was posted. At the time, he was running just Supercache, now he's got W3TC, MaxCDN and he seems to have optimized some of the images.
Definitely agree with aiming for 1Mb or less per page, though.
-
First of all, just wanted to wish Noah a happy birthday!
You're right to be asking about speeding up your website, as there are a number of opportunities to improve page load times. I notice you also have questions posted asking about VPSs, and CDNs.The thing is, there is definitely an order in which these things should be tackled.
The first thing you must do is get your on page code as efficient as possible. The reality is that an inefficiently coded website can bring even the strongest of servers to its knees with just a little extra surge in traffic. It's never a good idea to try to make up for inefficient code by throwing additional hardware resources at the problem.
By default, WordPress is fairly easy to use and build, but that front-end simplicity comes at the cost of complexity and inefficiency of code on the back end. Every bit of functionality you add using plug-ins and widgets comes at the cost of additional files to load, more database calls to process, and more opportunities for someone else's inefficient code to get in the way.
In your case, your homepage is approx 2 MB in size, and some of your internal pages are over 4.5 MB. This translates into page load times anywhere from 10 to 25 seconds at typical cable Internet speeds. In practical terms, anything over 1 MB is awfully big.
Site speed optimization can be a fairly complex process, and needs an overall plan, rather than trying to implement one-off tactics and hoping for the best. I'd be happy to help you off-line to build up a plan, but in the meantime these are the kinds of things you should be taking into account:
- reduce the number of plug-ins and widgets adding content to your page to the bare minimum.
- Make sure the plug-ins/widgets you have chosen are the most efficient available in their class
- make certain photos are as efficiently compressed as possible, are being rescaled as opposed to resized in html, and be careful of using too many photos on any one page
- Ensure your caching plug-in is tweaked and tuned to be as efficient as possible for your server configuration.
Some specifics for you to think about:
- the Recommended sidebar widget (and to a lesser extent the Popular widget) are extremely inefficient in their use of images. Even though they're only showing 50x50px thumbnails, they're loading full-size images up to 550kb in the background.
- is there enough difference between Recommended and Popular for both to be of benefit to visitors?
- you're obviously using W3 Total Cache - hope you don't also have SuperCache enabled as well? If so, they'll compromise each other's performance. Only one caching plugin - ever.
- you have several different advertising networks providing ads to the page. Each one loads it's own set of backend scripts, many of which are VERY inefficient. Could you consolidate?
- you currently have over 1 megabyte of just Javascript loading on each page when target should be less than 1 MB for the whole page including content
- sidebar titles like "Like Us on FaceBook" have so little contrast from the background they're very hard to read (& likely disappear on dark monitors)
- you get so many comments on each post (a nice problem to have!) that it may be time to consider paginating the comments so that each page doesn't have hundreds of comments to load each time it displays
Overall, you're doing an absolutely kick-ass job with your website, from everything I can see. You're rocking the engagement and interest of your visitors, and you've tuned most of the things that are readily tuneable. The next level up in performance will require some tough decisions and perhaps even killing a few sacred cows. That's why I recommend you make a plan before randomly changing things.
With the way you're going, you may very well find that even the highly tuned site is going to outgrow shared hosting as a result of increasing traffic. If/when this does happen, you'll still benefit from having leaned out the website so it can take better advantage of whatever server hardware it's hosted on.
I'll close with a couple of really useful tools for visualizing exactly what's happening in the performance of your site.
First is webpagetest.org (if you haven't already found it) which allows you to run tests that directly mimic the experience a user and their browser would have. You can even have it test from different areas of the country, and using different typical Internet speeds. I usually test with the two lowest speeds, as they will cover the widest range of typical users including mobile.
The second is a plug-in called P3 Performance Profiler. It may seem counterintuitive to be adding another plug-in when what you're trying to do is reduce the complexity, but what P3 does is give you an actual readout of how much of your server's resources are being used by each of your site's plug-ins. You you can enable it for testing purposes, then turn it off again for normal running of your website.
No doubt this has created as many questions as it may have answered, so by all means fire away if you need additional clarification.
Paul
-
Pingdom says your page is 5.5mb big. But it loads pretty quick for me.
You can do alot better. Here's my recommendations.
1. Optimize your images before uploading. I would recommend the WP-Smushit plugin which does it on the fly, but lately the yahoo api hasn't been working.
2. Switch the W3 Total Cache. It does the same thing as Super cache, but there's some additional goodies.
3. Using W3TC, you should enable minify and combine for all the css and js. The plugin allows you to combine all your css and js in two files (from both your theme and other plugins).
4. Consider using a CDN. Again W3TC makes it easy. I use amazon cloudfront, and it's amazingly cheap. Essentially, you keep your current hosting, but actually serve all css, js, and images from the CDN. It makes an enormous difference.
-
Thanks. The host I'm using is really good, so I'm not sure switching hosts would be that different.
In regard to number of posts on home page, how many would you suggest?
-
After taking a quick look I would just utilize Cloud Flare (http://www.cloudflare.com). It is a free tool where they not only optimize your site with an increase of speed around 60%, but they also provide a CDN.
I tested this out a few weeks ago with a blog of mine and it took it down from 8 - 10 seconds to load, down to 1.8 seconds. Very impressive.
They also provide a Wordpress plugin.
No need to change hosting companies.
Two tools to help you as well.
-
Consider
- Moving to WPengine.com for hosting.
- Less posts on the home page.
- Compressing your CSS.
- Better optimization of images.
It was pretty quick for me. The slowest load was the externals, videos from you tube as it calls out for each one to "load" then in the browser.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Mobile-First Indexing New Site monetized with Adsense AMP or not?
I am considering developing a new site monetized with Adsense. I am wondering if it's still worth bothering with AMP, it will take some work to get the functionality I have in mind working on these pages due to the inherent limitations. Has anyone got any insights in terms of current and future benefits of AMP in terms of ranking benefits and Adsense earning potential?
Web Design | | GrouchyKids0 -
Services\Companies that expertise to improve WP site speed ?
Hi guys, I used few companies to improve my WP site speed but in general the results were not that good. I wanted to know if there's any recommendation for companies that expert on improving speed of WP sites ? I need companies that this is what they do and that's their expertise! Thanks in advanced
Web Design | | EdmondHong870 -
Responsive Site has "Not Found" Errors for mobile/ and m/ in Google Search Console
We have recently launched a new responsive website for a client and have noticed 2 "Not Found" errors within Google Search Console for /mobile and /m Both these URLs are not linked from anywhere within the site. However Google is reporting them as being linked from the homepage. This is not the first site we have seen in which Google has reported this error, however the other site was not a mobile friendly site. My thoughts are to 301 them back to the Homepage. Anybody else have any thoughts on this? or have recently received the same errors?
Web Design | | JustinTaylor881 -
What happens if I 301 Redirect my homepage to a different page on site
If i were to 301 redirect the index page of my website to a page in a different subdirectory of my site would that adversely affect SEO? Does your home page need to be in the root of your site? I'm asking because a developer has told me that it would be best to do that since he needs to install OpenCart on the root of our domain...
Web Design | | SheffieldMarketing0 -
How do I optimize a site designed to be one scrolling page of content?
Our website uses section ID's as its navigation so all the content is on one page. When you click About Us, the page scrolls down to About Us. Products, the page scrolls to Products section, and etc. I am getting crawl errors for meta descriptions but will this go away once the main domain has this info? We just added the meta keywords and description to the header and since the navigation sections use the same page, I assume it will correct the errors. Any other advice on optimizing for site designs like ours would be great. www.theicecubekit.com is the site. Thanks,
Web Design | | bangbang
Chris0 -
Is it a good idea to use sub-domains?
Hello everyone! I have a question about whether we should be using sub-domains. We are currently in the process of redesigning our site so this would be the time to do it. We are a reseller of brand name IT equipment (servers, storage, etc...) should we create a sub-domain for each brand for example: hp.domain.com dell.domain.com or should we just use folders instead like: domain.com/hp domain.com/dell does one have any more SEO value than the other? Thank you!
Web Design | | igor.pinchevskiy0 -
404 page not found after site migration
Hi, A question from our developer. We have an issue in Google Webmaster Tools. A few months ago we killed off one of our e-commerce sites and set up another to replace it. The new site uses different software on a different domain. I set up a mass 301 redirect that would redirect any URLs to the new domain, so domain-one.com/product would redirect to domain-two.com/product. As it turns out, the new site doesn’t use the same URLs for products as the old one did, so I deleted the mass 301 redirect. We’re getting a lot of URLs showing up as 404 not found in Webmaster tools. These URLs used to exist on the old site and be linked to from the old sitemap. Even URLs that are showing up as 404 recently say that they are linked to in the old sitemap. The old sitemap no longer exists and has been returning a 404 error for some time now. Normally I would set up 301 redirects for each one and mark them as fixed, but there are almost quarter of a million URLs that are returning 404 errors, and rising. I’m sure there are some genuine problems that need sorting out in that list, but I just can’t see them under the mass of errors for pages that have been redirected from the old site. Because of this, I’m reluctant to set up a robots file that disallows all of the 404 URLs. The old site is no longer in the index. Searching google for site:domain-one.com returns no results. Ideally, I’d like anything that was linked from the old sitemap to be removed from webmaster tools and for Google to stop attempting to crawl those pages. Thanks in advance.
Web Design | | PASSLtd0 -
Considering site navigation options
I am working on a site redesign and re evaluating concepts I haven't thought about for a few years. I generally see site navigation that is either "top-down" or "left bar". Top down navigation normally uses the left nav. for search refinements. The benefit of top nav. is that it clears up the center of the page for non navigation content. The drawback is that you can't fit as many categories in a top nav. Left side nav. can hold a long list of categories, but subcategories are often in the center of the page. In the past, I have preferred to use left nav. with a multi level scroll over search refinement. I believe this allowed users to get to their destination page with fewer clicks. (I have always believed that every required additional click causes lost customers). I also believe that this has caused me to get more juice flowing to deeper pages on sites and better long-tail conversion. This means I have had pages with a LOT of links. With this method, I have tightly controlled my categories. What on other sites are often dynamic search refinements, are on my sites additional categories. I am considering making a site with a top down navigation system. I like the additional screen space in the center I get to work with. Is my assumption about pages created by search refinement wrong? Is it ok for SEO to have a left nav that has a bunch of search refinements that are dynamically created?
Web Design | | EugeneF0